T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
271.1 | I believe it's fixed... | VAXUUM::GRANT | I've saved $2323.00 since I quit smoking. | Thu Feb 01 1990 16:40 | 8 |
| Hi Diane,
I believe we've fixed this problem. But, if you could, would you
send me a small .SDML file that demonstrates the problem?
Also, what version of the bookbuilding tools are you using?
Thanks,
Wayne
|
271.2 | 1.2B should be better | VAXUUM::UTT | | Thu Feb 01 1990 17:06 | 16 |
| RE: .0.
1. Spacing between words: this is an unfortunate side effect of
positioning hotspots in such a way that supports both the
75 and 100 dpi monitors (the basic problem is that fonts are
*not* monitor independent). Some improvements have been made
for V1.2B and this problem should not occur as frequently.
2. Spacing between paragraphs: as Wayne says in .1, this should be
fixed in V1.2B. If you continue to have problems under 1.2B, send
or post a small .SDML that reproduces it. (Is the tag after the
<figure> a <cp>?)
Thanks,
Mary
|
271.3 | SPACE BETWEEN WORDS AND PARAGRAPHS | HKFINN::TAYLOR | | Fri Feb 02 1990 09:31 | 10 |
| We are running 1.2a. I have been told that we will probably not
be running 1.2b for another couple of weeks or so. So if you
feel this problem has been fix in 1.2b then it would not make sense
to forward you a .sdml file at this time. The books are not due
to go on tape until March 28th. I can sit on them for a while.
I'll let you know if the probably still exist on 1.2b.
Thank-you both for responding.
Diane
|
271.4 | also found a spacing problem | ZORBA::BURACK | Not Fade Away | Tue Feb 13 1990 10:26 | 16 |
| Hi,
We are running 1-2B and I ran a book yesterday to make sure that everything
was working.
I got the book to run and scanned through it quickly. I did notice a case
of no space between words.
...to the calling routine insdb_
address.
This is coded as in <emphasis>(sdb_address\bold) in a <routine> section.
Will send file if anyone wants it.
Ruth-Ellen
|
271.5 | Please send file | VAXUUM::GRANT | I've saved $2341.00 since I quit smoking. | Tue Feb 13 1990 13:18 | 12 |
| RE: 271.4
Ruth-Ellen,
Would you please send me a short .SDML file that exhibits this
problem? I'll take a look at it for you.
My first guess is that this is caused by the change to bold font
for the emphasis. Font changes, especially when they're located to the
right of the window, tend to shift text. But, I won't know for sure
until I see it.
Thanks,
Wayne
|
271.6 | 271.4 caused by font change | VAXUUM::GRANT | I've saved $2344.00 since I quit smoking. | Thu Feb 15 1990 08:19 | 12 |
| Ruth-Ellen,
After testing the file that you sent, I found that my first guess
was correct. The problem is caused by the font change from normal to
bold near the right side of the window. I tested it by removing some
of the text and making the offending font change appear nearer the left
margin and it looked OK. I'm not suggesting that that's a workaround.
That's just the way I tested the file.
This is a regrettable technical problem with the output device (and
one which will be solved eventually).
Wayne
|
271.7 | More on no space between words | DICKNS::TAYLOR | | Thu Feb 15 1990 10:38 | 14 |
| Wayne,
When I first initiated this note I thought the lack of space between
words was just when there was a reference tag. Now I see it when
there is an <emphasis> tag (both bold and italics). I don't understand
what Mary meant by dpi, and monitors. If this is appearing in V1.2b
also, is this a bug and something we have to live with? If so,
could someone explain to me in English why it is really happening
so I can explain it to the editor and convince him/her and myself
that there really is nothing that can be done.
Appreciate any comments or suggestions.
Diane
|
271.8 | see note 204 | RAGMOP::UTT | | Thu Feb 15 1990 13:39 | 6 |
| See notes 148.7 and 204, under "hotspot alignment." Note 204 is
an especially good explanation of the problem. Although it
refers only to hotspot alignment, the problem with word spacing
when the font changes is exactly the same problem.
Mary
|
271.9 | dontuseboldattheendofaline | CASEY::BURACK | Not Fade Away | Thu Feb 15 1990 19:33 | 10 |
| Hi,
So is this a bug that we have to live with and work around. It seems
like an awful big problem that is not going to make it easy to make the
book readable online.
Sounds like I have to rewrite sentences so that the bold doesn't come
at the end of a line in the bookreader... but looks fine in hardcopy.
Ruth-Ellen
|
271.10 | align_char? | MARVIN::KNOWLES | intentionally Rive Gauche | Fri Feb 16 1990 05:15 | 4 |
| Would an align_char do as a workaround - to avoid the sort of
re-writing that .-1 mentions?
b
|
271.11 | rewriting is not a workaround | RAGMOP::UTT | | Fri Feb 16 1990 07:04 | 35 |
| <align_char> might work -- anybody wanna try this? BUT it could produce
unnacceptable output for hardcopy...(too much space maybe).
I would *not* suggest rewriting around this problem to get the output
to look the way you want. The first tiny modification you make after
the rewrite-that-works will blow the workaround up. DOCUMENT is
designed to take the formatting out of the hands of writers, so it
would be very difficult to make this work in all cases for all
versions. Read 'very difficult' as meaning 'a real waste of your
time.'
I suggest living with it. New technology does not spring full blown
from the heads of developers. There are always bugs/glitches/things-
that-are-not-as-we-want-them. That's life. That's also fonts -- this
is one area that DEC (or almost anyone) does not have a good handle
on and causes all kinds of headaches. We try not to pass the headaches
on to you, the poor underpaid and overworked user, but sometimes it
is unavoidable. This particular problem is one that we want to fix
as badly as you want to see it fixed and we have some ideas for how
to do so. But it's not trivial to fix; it will probably mean
significant changes to several components of DOCUMENT and the
Bookreader. Given that, and our resource constraints (you knew that
was coming, right?), it won't happen for Bookreader V3.
As mentioned, this is a regrettable side effect of having to support
two different-resolution monitors in DECwindows, which means, in
effect, formatting for two different fonts at the same time. It's sort
of like trying to output a single file that can print on both PS and
LN03 printers: device-independence is still a utopian dream, I'm
afraid.
So, I personally would not lose any sleep, much less coding time, over
this problem.
Mary
|
271.12 | Update to font problems? | NURSE::BURACK | Not Fade Away | Mon May 20 1991 14:54 | 9 |
| Hi,
Any updates to this note? Will DECwindows Version 3.0 fix this problem?
I solved this problem by using conditional text for hardcopy and online
and used the <align_char> tag or just put in an extra space in the
<emphasis>() tag. Worked okay, but meant extra coding.
Ruth-Ellen
|
271.13 | | VAXUUM::UTT | Mary Utt | Tue May 21 1991 13:39 | 5 |
| No, DECwindow V3 handles fonts the same way as DECwindows V2.
Suggest that you submit a requirement to the Bookreader
engineering team. They have a notes conf for that purpose:
DECWET::BOOKREADER-REQUIREMENTS.
|
271.14 | | MARVIN::KNOWLES | Dotting jots and crossing tittles | Wed May 22 1991 04:51 | 4 |
| Uh? I thought fixes to known bugs were a sort of unwritten requirement
on all products. Or maybe this isn't a bug; it just happens to look bad.
b
|
271.15 | it's an imperfect world | VAXUUM::UTT | Mary Utt | Wed May 22 1991 08:51 | 13 |
| We could probably quibble forever about whether it's a bug or not.
The problem occurs because the Bookreader must position text as well as
possible on both the 75- and 100-dpi monitors. Different resolutions
mean different font metrics, and we format for only one set of font
metrics. The Bookreader does the best it can; it's not perfect.
There would be no positioning problem if books were built and shipped
for each resolution, but no one thought it was acceptable to ask
writers to build multiple online versions of their books or to ask
manufacturing to ship multiple online versions.
Mary
|