| Title: | Online Bookbuilding |
| Notice: | This conference is write-locked: see note 1.3. |
| Moderator: | VAXUUM::UTT |
| Created: | Fri Aug 12 1988 |
| Last Modified: | Mon Jul 15 1991 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 440 |
| Total number of notes: | 2134 |
I about to start using the <SET_ONLINE_TOPIC> tag to better organize
some existing Bookreader books. First a few questions that the
documentation doesn't answer.
1. I assume that I can have only 1 argument to the tag. Is this
correct?
2. If I use the tag to identify a <HEAD3> as a chunk, will the head 1s
and 2s not be included in the chunking?
3. If 1. and 2. are correct, I assume I will have to use a series of
the tags to get all head 1s, 2s, and 3s read as chunks. Is this
correct?
I did check the notes and replies and wasn't able to find the info.
Thanks,
Jack
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 184.1 | read the doc | AITG::WARNER | Who ya gonna call? TOOLBUSTERS! | Thu Aug 10 1989 14:49 | 11 |
You need to look at Mary Utt's "Coding Documentation Source Files for
the DECwindows Bookreader".
Copy it from: VAXUUM::KITS_:[DOCUMENT.V11]WRITER_GUIDELINES.PS
It has info about <set_online_topic>. Basically, you set it in the
profile or individual files, it stays in effect until changed, and all
levels above are still online topics (if you set to head3, head2 and
head1 are also topics).
Ross
| |||||
| 184.2 | VAXUUM::UTT | Fri Aug 11 1989 07:40 | 13 | ||
Thanks, Ross. Yes, that document should answer your questions, Jack. If
not, please post questions here and I'll attempt to answer them (and
update the document accordingly).
There is a somewhat newer version of the document for the latest
release (under VAX DOCUMENT V1.2), although the <set_online_topic>
info has not changed. It's in:
VAXUUM::KITS_:[DOCUMENT.V12.BOOKS]WRITER_GUIDELINES.PS
(There are also .LN03 and .DECW$BOOK versions there.)
Mary
| |||||
| 184.3 | Did read doc; didn't get answers | SARAH::DONOHUE | Fri Aug 11 1989 08:58 | 7 | |
Thanks for the quick replies.
I do have the documentation, and did read it before posting the
note. It didn't clarify the relationship when specifying a low level
head without specifying the higher levels.
Jack
| |||||