T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
171.1 | Basically a Good Course | DLO10::TARLING | | Thu Jan 20 1994 08:20 | 15 |
| Perry;
I have taught this course three times and it has been well recieved.
The fact that the developer was allowed to spend time at the CSC is
very apparent.
I have, however, recieved requests from our students for some data
on network trouble shooting. To that end I have added a full day on
"The Rules of Access Control". Why can I copy a file from node A,
but can't copy a file from node B? I also have the students build
their own object database and then we manipulate various Access
Control Information strings etc.
Arnold Tarling, DLO10::TARLING, 483-4325
|
171.2 | | DBLDOG::DONHAM | Progress Through Tradition | Thu Jan 20 1994 08:57 | 5 |
|
Arnold, could I take a look at your material? It probably makes sense to
add it to the course.
Perry
|
171.3 | Yes if you find it useful | DLO10::TARLING | | Fri Jan 21 1994 08:53 | 6 |
| Perry;
I have sent you mail (on BROWNY) regarding these materials. I hope you
find them useful. Please call if you need more data.
Arnold
|
171.4 | Chapter 1 for review | DBLDOG::DONHAM | Progress Through Tradition | Wed Jan 26 1994 08:31 | 11 |
|
Chapter 1, "Dependable Systems Overview," is available for review. The
files are at BROWNY::VMS_TS_DEPENDABLE*.PS.
Please note that my VMS and AXP V6.1 systems are not yet ready, so the code
examples in this chapter are not the ones that will be in the course (there
are only a few).
Comments here or to BROWNY::DONHAM.
Perry
|
171.5 | | SWAM1::BALDWIN_LE | Leon Baldwin | Wed Jan 26 1994 22:33 | 122 |
| Perry,
I have taught this course 3 times with good results overall.
The BIG negative is this student comment:
"Basically a rehash of System and Network Management II & III"
I think 10% of students have felt this. Technically I agree. Some
customers really expect more in the way of tracking down information
and problems such as locking, resource usage, resource waits...
The BIG positive is these comments:
"The best course yet!"
"I really liked the hands on experience."
"The other courses didn't give us this much good lab time."
I have made sure that they have at least 50% lab time. The book
labs plus "on the fly bugs, as the configuration allows" keep
them busy all day. 90% really love it.
The print problem chapter seemed to be cumbersome with little
"flow". I use an alternate presentation. The labs have not worked
out too well because the queue environment can get so gummed up.
In fixing something they can mess up something else to confuse
the issue to the point that it can become an unproductive experience.
My solution (to be tested on my next teach in FEB 94) is a command
procedure I wrote during the holidays. Each student will use this
menu driven procedure to set his own queue to a KNOWN working state.
This queue has its own device control library (with working portrait
and landscape modules), form definitions, lat port and DECserver port.
The student selects any one of 7 bugs from the menu. The procedure
inserts the bug, issues a print job in behalf of a "user", and
sends a problem report to the students terminal. Once a fix is made,
the menu can set the queue back to a know working state ready for the
next bug.
The procedure should be modular enough to add or change bug situations.
The comment header follows at the end. If this if of interest, I can
transport it to an enet node for access.
BTW, I'm interested in using the muliple queue manager capability
of V6.0 to reduce the chances of each trouble shooting group from
interfering with each other. Has any one tried this?
Leon Baldwin @lqo or SWAM1::BALDWIN_LE
$!++ Automated queue lab bug insertion
$!************************************************************************
$!
$! This procedure is intended to supplement the course:
$! OpenVMS Troubleshooting for System Managers
$!
$! Students use this procedure to set a DECserver port, a lat port
$! and a VMS print queue to a known working state. Then a menu
$! selection will insert bugs into student queues, libraries, lat ports,
$! or decserver ports.
$!
$! Students can procede at their own pace.
$!
$! Author: Leon Baldwin
$! Digital Learning Services
$! Los Angeles, California
$! (310) 416-6578
$! DTN 520-6578
$!
$! Date: 5-JAN-1994
$!
$! Requrirements:
$!
$! TSM must be installed on each system where this procedure is
$! used.
$!
$! Student account UIC member numbers must be in the range 1-16
$!
$! One DECserver 200 or DECserver 300 must be available per 8
$! students
$! Ports 1 thru 8 will be used on each server.
$! The DECservers must have lat node names LAB_01 and LAB_02 and
$! be added to the TSM directory with:
$! TSM> add server lab_01
$! (then follow prompts for ethernet address, decnet
$! address, etc.)
$!
$! TSM> add server lab_02
$! o
$! o
$!
$! System logical name INSTRUCTOR must be defined to the location
$! ofthe following files:
$! portrait.txt
$! landscape.txt
$! userfile.txt
$! user_report.txt
$! decserver_bug6.com
$! decserver_bug7.com
$! decserver_printer_port.com
$!
$! Problem synopsis:
$!
$! Problem 1: No device control library. Causes error message
$! on job.
$! Problem 2: Landscape form width is 80. Causes wrapping.
$! Problem 3: Terminal width is 80. Causes wrapping.
$! Problem 4: Lat port mapped to bad server node name. Causes
$! pausing
$! Problem 5: Queue set to nonexistant lat device. Queue
$! won't start
$! Problem 6: Decserver port set to ACCESS LOCAL. Queue
$! pauses.
$! Problem 7: Decserver port set to wrong speed. Jobs
$! complete with
$! no output or with garbage.
$!
$!**********************************************************************
|
171.6 | | SOAEDS::TRAYSER | Seniority: Big Shovel, Less Breaks! | Sat Jan 29 1994 03:00 | 16 |
| Perry,
I entered a few comments in this conference just after I finished the
pilot. The course really needs a bit more "stuff", as I can successfully
teach it in 4 days the way it is. The chapter that was going to be added
originally was on Installation and/or Upgrades. LOTS of problems there,
but Emmalee either ran out of time or money, I forget which, so it never
got added.
As for a repeat of SysNet III (and II), yes, my same comments during
the pilot, but considering the number of problems that the CSC gets on
queues and lats and the boot process, it was decided to leave it in
there. Originally I think we had decided to pull some of the queue stuff
to an appendix for reference, but again...time or money.
$
|
171.7 | Chapter 2 | DBLDOG::DONHAM | Progress Through Tradition | Wed Mar 02 1994 08:46 | 10 |
| Chapter 2, "System Initialization Problems," is available for review. The
files are at BROWNY::VMS_TS_INITIALIZATION*.PS.
Please note that my VMS and AXP V6.1 systems are not yet ready, so the code
examples in this chapter are not the ones that will be in the course (there
are only a few).
Comments here or to BROWNY::DONHAM.
Perry
|
171.8 | VMS_TS_*.PS location? | WARNUT::GRAVESG | Geoff Graves,LS(UK);DTN 851 2637 | Thu Mar 03 1994 05:43 | 8 |
| Perry,
I'd like to pull the VMS_TS_*.PS files to have a read; can you post the
full location spec please?
Ta,
Geoff
|
171.9 | Student Guide | DBLDOG::DONHAM | Progress Through Tradition | Tue May 03 1994 14:39 | 11 |
|
The student guide for this course is available at
BROWNY::VMS_TROUBLESHOOTING_STUDENT.PS
Please note that our editors are taking care of the words; comment on the
content.
Regards,
Perry
|