| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 170.1 | Where should we put bug'uns | HEWIE::HAYWARD | Concerned of Tilehurst | Thu Sep 08 1988 13:06 | 9 |
|
Now that we have local printers, is it possible to restrict
large jobs from being printed on them ? I thought that
they were supposed to be for small jobs & the LPS40 for the
big ones ?
Iain_who_seems_to_always_be_waiting_for_prints_on_the_ln03 :-)
|
| 170.2 | Bigguns vs. Littluns | NECK::THOMPSON | | Mon Sep 12 1988 12:31 | 16 |
|
Re 170.1
I agree, send large jobs to the LPS40(s).
But if you can set up printer queues yourself you could always make a
generic queue ,say sys$local , which is served by 2 or 3 physical
queues. That way your small job switches to a free printer when one of
the others is busy.
/Notify should tell you which device is really printing it.
|
| 170.3 | | FOOT::RUSSELL | Speak softly, and carry a beagle. | Mon Sep 12 1988 13:21 | 11 |
| Re .2
Sounds good, Jerry.
But now take pity on a poor ol' PDP man, and tell me how to do it
(on ALL-IN-1 as well,if poss..)
Peter.
|
| 170.4 | I know walking is good exercise, but... | CRATE::DAGLESS | W.Y.B.M.A.D.I.I.T.Y | Thu Mar 02 1989 15:22 | 10 |
|
Currently, the LN03 queues are spread across the nodes in a
cluster in groups. The way it is currently done, means that if 1 node
goes down, all LN03's in one area become unavailable.
Would it be possible to set adjacent printers on different nodes
to save shoe leather, ie A2A$LN03 on CHEST, A2B$LN03 on CRATE, A2C$LN03
on CHEST etc.
Bryan
|