T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
156.1 | Innocent till proven Guilty | BELLY::GURRAN | Nothing Personal | Wed Jul 13 1988 14:44 | 19 |
|
Not quite right, you can use Decspell, and if you use the additional
functionality of wpsplus you can get access to a thesaurus aswell !
Other incentives are an online Time management system, and ...err..uhm..
Atleast we still have access to our usual accounts with VMS, so far.
And there is now an incentive to write /rewrite our applications with
ALL-IN-1 access so that our customers in the field can use their accounts for
more.
So lets not get too cynical before the system is fully operational, and maybe
then when we give suggestions to Systems Management they will comply and we
will get more functionality.
|
156.2 | Yes - you should use it!! | ELBOW::DRAPER | Steve Draper | Wed Jul 13 1988 15:39 | 60 |
|
RE: .0
� I currently have an account on CHEST in which I can send and receive
� mail, read notes, use VTX , develop systems, use VAXPM, SLIDE, DECSPELL,
� TPU and play games, all of which I do with some regularity (except the last,
� of course !)
�
� As far as I can see, I can only do the first 3 of those from my
� new ALL-IN-1 account, so if I want to do any of the others, then
� I would have to log on to my CHEST account and therfore miss any
� new mail messages that I may get, until I log back in.
Not exactly true on two counts:
1. There should be no problem in installing additional applications
onto SHAPES once a need can be demonstrated (except games (!)
and VAXPM which is probably better kept on the ADG clusters).
2. You are not limited to one LAT session - no need to log out!
� I have solved that problem for the moment by auto-forwarding my
� A-I-1 mail to CHEST, but that seems rather pointless.
True - why clutter up ADG's precious disk space with your mail when
the facility is already (and better) provided elsewhere. In case
you didn't know, ALL-IN-1 mail is much better than VAXmail in its
ability to handle:
folders (searching, cross-filing etc)
distribution lists
nicknames
attaching/detaching mail
deferred sending of mail
etc etc
and thats even if you *only* use the mail facility.
� Will we be able to set up our own menus and/or get VMS access in
� the long term ?
Own menus? - don't know, probably not with this version of ALL-IN-1.
VMS access (assume you mean DCL access)? - possibly if you can show
a need for it, but as you already have an account/accounts on a
development system, why would you need it?
� When are the Training courses being set up?
Don't know - I.S. Operations may be able to help, but I think they
may want to establish what the demand level is likely to be first
as we already have a number of people in here who are skilled in
ALL-IN-1. (HINT: why not put a request in the SKILLS_EXHANGE notes
conference).
� I think we should be told !
For most of it, you just have been; for the rest I'm sure you will
be!
Steve
|
156.3 | | FOOT::WRIGHT | I AM a member of this company | Wed Jul 13 1988 16:19 | 24 |
| > � Will we be able to set up our own menus and/or get VMS access in
> � the long term ?
> Own menus? - don't know, probably not with this version of ALL-IN-1.
> VMS access (assume you mean DCL access)? - possibly if you can show
> a need for it, but as you already have an account/accounts on a
> development system, why would you need it?
Can we all show a need for ALL-IN-1? Why are we being given ALL-IN-1
accounts?
� When are the Training courses being set up?
> Don't know - I.S. Operations may be able to help, but I think they
> may want to establish what the demand level is likely to be first
> as we already have a number of people in here who are skilled in
> ALL-IN-1. (HINT: why not put a request in the SKILLS_EXHANGE notes
> conference).
In that case why did they ask on the account request form if we
needed training?
Tony
|
156.5 | Consult your doctor if symptoms persist.. | CHEST::BATEMAN | Sic biscuitus disintegrat | Thu Jul 14 1988 10:03 | 9 |
|
RE -1
That's right... I've not been notified of my ALLIN1 account either.
Will someone be speeding around to tell everybody access details?
Chris
|
156.6 | More answers... | ELBOW::DRAPER | Steve Draper | Thu Jul 14 1988 11:27 | 30 |
| RE: .3
� Can we all show a need for ALL-IN-1? Why are we being given ALL-IN-1
� accounts?
You don't need to. You are being given access to ALL-IN-1 as part
of Corporate policy.
� In that case why did they ask on the account request form if we
� needed training?
Apologies - didn't realise it did. So just fill it in and stop worrying
about it
RE: .4
� Do we ALL have accounts on the SHAPES cluster ? I certainly haven't
� been informed of one.
All secretaries have received ALL-IN-1 account request forms to
distribute to members of their groups. If you haven't received one
then see your secretary. If she hasn't got one, then see Carole
Crawford.
RE: .5
� That's right... I've not been notified of my ALLIN1 account either.
Putting 100+ accounts onto ALL-IN-1 (note spelling!) is not something
that can be done in 5 minutes. You will be notified when your account
is available.
Steve
|
156.7 | | FOOT::RUSSELL | Speak softly, and carry a beagle. | Thu Jul 14 1988 12:33 | 12 |
| Ummm, what is the correct "process" for requesting "changes" to
the ALL-IN-1 environment?
Do we have "chauffeurs" appointed?
Do we ring x 4040?
Do we hassle the consultants?
Thanks, Peter.
|
156.8 | Contractors do it without ALL-IN-1 | FOOT::WRIGHT | I AM a member of this company | Thu Jul 14 1988 12:55 | 6 |
| re .3
It doesnt matter to me anyway, I have just been told that contractors
will be the last to get ALL-IN-1 accounts
Tony
|
156.9 | Humble Requests | BELLY::GURRAN | Nothing Personal | Wed Jul 20 1988 17:07 | 13 |
| Now that we have ALL-IN-1 accounts can we be allowed to use them fully?
I ask because I have been told that the accounts are for mail only, so
there will be no other priviledges given eg "set owner" so that members
of a team can organise their diaries fully not just one day at a time.
Will it be worth making any suggestions about enhancements/additions
to the system, or is it unchangeable ?
Can we have the functions that are there working properly or atleast
reporting suitable errors MTS , TLX for example ?
I am not trying to knock ALL-IN-1 just to use it properly.
|
156.10 | ALL-IN-1 enhancements | SHAPES::SHILLD | | Fri Jul 22 1988 13:22 | 17 |
| Taking the last point first; if any of the facilities provided within
ALL-IN-1 are not working correctly then please report it as a problem
through the call desk on X4040.
If you have suggestions for increased functionality then please
log a BRIEF description with the call desk as a proposed enhancement.
We will contact you at a later date to discuss the details of your
proposal.
Because of limited staff resources we will not be making any major
enhancements in the short term but will aim to incorporate improvements
as we standardise the ALL-IN-1 systems across the Basingstoke
locations.
Dennis Shill
Basingstoke Support CSM
|
156.11 | | RDGE00::WRIGHT | I AM a member of this company | Thu Sep 08 1988 16:40 | 5 |
| Its now been 2 months since 'everyone' was given an ALL-IN-1 account
on SHAPES. When are contractors going to get theirs?
Tony
|