Title: | FOCUS, from INFORMATION BUILDERS |
Moderator: | ZAYIUS::BROUILLETTE |
Created: | Thu Feb 19 1987 |
Last Modified: | Mon May 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 615 |
Total number of notes: | 1779 |
I'd like to have FOCUS running remote on a small machine like a uVAX and have my users access it through ALL-IN-1 from a remote machine using mostly pre-written FEX's. The jobs that need to be run are fairly short and I don't want the uVAX to go through the overhead of starting up FOCUS, running the FEX and then shutting down FOCUS. I'd rather have one FOCUS process in a loop of some kind. I envision doing the following: - Put FOCUS in dialogue manager loop - At the top of the loop read the name of the next FEX to be run out of a VMS mailbox. in FOCUS: -SET &NEXT_FEX = READ_MAILBOX(&NEXT_FEX); - Run the FEX in FOCUS: -EX &NEXT_FEX - Go back to the top of the loop. A separate process on the uVAX will receive messages from the ALL-IN-1 system using the VAX Site Scheduler or the PAMS messaging facility. It will pass these messages on to the mailbox that the FOCUS process reads out of. Any one have any comments on this? Thanks, Joris
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
274.1 | CURRNT::OTTEN | Wide eyed and Restless | Fri Oct 20 1989 13:56 | 7 | |
If you look in FOOT::MRE_INTEREST , you may find that MRE will allow a dissimilar sort of interaction, but will allow a user to build and validate a .FEX , before executing it in batch on a remote machine. The results are then sent back to the user's All-in-1 account. David | |||||
274.2 | Like system services? | TUNER::COPPERSMITH | SYSTEM-W-RELFLT, reality fault | Wed Nov 01 1989 12:21 | 8 |
It might be more efficient to write a user written subroutine that - sets a write attention AST to a mailbox - hibernates until AST fires - reads mailbox - returns fexname to focexec CJ |