[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference ilbbak::ibi_focus

Title:FOCUS, from INFORMATION BUILDERS
Moderator:ZAYIUS::BROUILLETTE
Created:Thu Feb 19 1987
Last Modified:Mon May 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:615
Total number of notes:1779

207.0. "demonstration request" by LBDUCK::SULLIVAN (bob sullivan) Tue May 02 1989 10:55

Can anyone in the vicinity of PKO3 currently using FOCUS give me a brief 
demonstration of it before I go through the process of getting a license.  It
would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks ahead of time.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
207.1No need for a licenceITGATE::MACCANIWed May 03 1989 04:333
    If you plan to use FOCUS for Internal Digital you do NOT need a
    licence.  FOCUS is in free distribution.
    						Maurizio
207.2It's free, but you need a license so they can keep track of youLBDUCK::SULLIVANbob sullivanWed May 03 1989 11:5640
>>If you plan to use FOCUS for Internal Digital you do NOT need a
>>    licence.  FOCUS is in free distribution.

The following is my correspondence with the keepers of the FOCUS software
(AL WALCOTT DTN 273-5840 VRO6-2/Y13").

Bob,

You can request that IBI perform a demonstration of FOCUS before you order it
via the following process:

1) You will need a Demonstration License, signed by your organization's Corp.
   Officer, which would be processed by me, once you provide the following
   information -
   o  CPU SITE LOCATION

   o  DESIRED DATE OF DEMONSTRATION

2) You should allow time (7 -10 days in advance) to allow mw to send the li-
   cense to IBI for signature, as well as return to you to obtain internal
   approval/signature. (I would think that this request would move rapidly
   as Digital already has a Corporate-Wide, (unlimited) Internal Use Agree-
   ment in place.

If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.

                                                                      Regards,

                                                                        Al

As you can see, the current rules are that you need a license, even though it's
free.

Personally, I felt it was a little too much to go through just to "kick the 
tires".  Besides, I would like to see it from the perspective of a real world
user.

By the way, I agree with the licensing requirement for free software, as it
allows the supporters to more easily support the users if they know who they 
are.  
207.3Found a demo.LBDUCK::SULLIVAN"LES is More"Tue May 16 1989 17:270