Title: | US_SALES_SERVICE |
Notice: | Please register in note 2; DVNs in note 31 |
Moderator: | MCIS3::JDAIGNEAULT |
Created: | Thu May 16 1991 |
Last Modified: | Tue Sep 03 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 226 |
Total number of notes: | 1486 |
F.Y.I. The latest issue of "Corporate Computing" (December 1992) has an interesting article on the selection of an SI vendor for a project at Ortho Biotech (We lost out). It is interesting to see some of the factors that go into the selction of such a system, but for me the article raises more questions than answers. From the article some of the things I saw that were interesting were: o For example, Digital and AGS propsed basically the same solution but Digital's price was $10.5M and AGS's was $19.5. Is it possible we are not charging enough (The winner [BSG] was $19.3M.). o The evaluation scores for the vendors were DEC 502, IBM 443, AGS 445, and BSG 543 For a 7% different in score the customer was willing to pay 84% more for the system. (Or in the case of IBM they were willing to pay 120% more for a 20% improvement in score.) o The winning solution was Unix-based. Apparently this played a major factor in the selection. o The customer did not like IBM's solution because they "...didn't like IBMs distributed database approach, and...[were]...wary of SOMS document manager, which is still in beta testing." Meanwhile they selected the one proposal that uses custom coding rather than off-the-self packages. (You figure).
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
172.1 | The lure of custom code | WHO301::BOWERS | Dave Bowers @WHO | Mon Dec 07 1992 09:25 | 9 |
Custom code has a certain allure for many customers. The need for custom code implies that "We're special!". There is also an assumption that a custom system weil be a better fit to the business' needs. In reality, developing custom code allows you to avoid the unpleasant realization that your archaic, Byzantine business systems have little relation to standard good practice, as embodied in the off-the-shelf package. \dave |