T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
83.1 | it's up to the CC?? | PHDVAX::RICCIO | Bundy in 92! | Wed Feb 26 1992 12:09 | 14 |
|
Back in late June (91) I was up in Nashua NH in the IMCS course.
There were a couple of people that had laptops.
It seems to me that it's an expense & cost center issue. If the
cost center wants to "foot the bill", then you can get one. It's not
unlike the carphone situation a few years ago.
Phil...
|
83.2 | | RCOCER::MICKOL | Greetings from Rochester, NY | Wed Feb 26 1992 14:38 | 7 |
| I believe that any Sales Rep that was "at budget" at the end of Q2 received a
laptop. Don't know if that was U.S.-wide or some local program.
Regards,
Jim
|
83.3 | does a certificate count | ODIXIE::WALLS | Beautiful Atlanta, GA | Wed Feb 26 1992 15:55 | 7 |
| I was above budget at the end of Q2 and did get a "certificate" and told I
would be getting a laptop. I still have my certificate but no laptop.
If there is no laptop or if we have to pay for them thru our own cost
centers then say so instead of letting it just hang. I guess I'm
just looking for the real status.
|
83.4 | | POCUS::OHARA | KennedyHartClinton | Thu Feb 27 1992 07:40 | 3 |
| Must have been a "local" decision, since NY didn't get certificates.
Bob
|
83.5 | | MADWT::HENDERSON | Another Casualty of Applied Metaphysics | Thu Feb 27 1992 10:42 | 1 |
| Three days of rumor and questions, anybody out there with any answers?
|
83.6 | Answer pending | HAMSTR::MURPHY | Sue Murphy MKO2-2/D14 dtn:264-0723 | Thu Feb 27 1992 13:31 | 2 |
| Have sent questions raised to those in the know. Hope to have it
straight by end of the week.
|
83.7 | Rot/Con Units | RIPPLE::KOTTERRI | | Fri Feb 28 1992 10:40 | 5 |
| In our sales district, some of the sales reps have DECpc 320P laptops.
These were ordered as Rotational/Consignment inventory. I received one
a couple of weeks ago and I am making great use of it. To get it, I had
to agree to sell it before the end of the fiscal year, or else buy it
myself.
|
83.8 | I've been begging for one! | MORO::BEELER_JE | Tired of livin', scared of dyin' | Sat Feb 29 1992 14:12 | 16 |
| I've been working the classical "remote office" for nearly ten years -
I'm the only sales person in the office and anywhere from 100 to 300
miles from the nearest large facility. There's a good amount of overnight
travel and two/three nights away are not too uncommon.
While I'm on travel, I would infinitely prefer to get quotes ...
configurations ... correspondence ... done at night - as opposed to
watching the TV with a six pack.
It would be an enormously productive tool for me ...
---------------------
The only thing that I've heard is that I could buy one from EPP. With
two kids in college ... well ... guess where that option stands on the
list of priorities.
Jerry
|
83.9 | Laptops due to rollout March 30. | SWAM1::FERGUSON_BR | | Thu Mar 05 1992 13:36 | 12 |
| Barbra Chibria, the Western Sales Support Manager, sent out a memo
indicating that the US Sales and Sales Support team members will begin
to recieve the new 320p notebook, made by Panasonic, beginning around
March 30.
To recieve the unit, the members would have to undergo training.
The presenter at the Sales Support conference was Bill Horzempa.
Regards,
Bruce Ferguson
Open Systems Manager, Southern California
|
83.10 | Answer in DVN | GERBIL::MURPHY | Sue Murphy MKO2-2/D14 dtn:264-0723 | Fri Mar 06 1992 13:19 | 39 |
|
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
Date: 04-Mar-1992 01:42pm EST
From: Bob Hughes @MKO
HUGHES.BOB
Dept: U.S. Sales
Tel No: 264-SELL
TO: Susan H Murphy @MKO ( MURPHY.SUE )
Subject: RE NEW US SALES & SERVICE NOTS
Re: Note #83.0
Sue,
Please enter the following:
Watch my 3/16/92 DVN for the status of this program.
rch
P.S. If you've wondered why we haven't gotten them to you by
now, it's because we're "sold out" to customers the past
two months. We're now getting a supply, and the training
program is ready.
And - it was "exceeding forecast by $50K" that was to have
earned you a certificate.
|
83.11 | | KYOA::KOCH | It never hurts to ask... | Fri Mar 06 1992 16:48 | 7 |
| What about the sales support people? Will the salesperson be able to
designate a sales support person to receive a 320p also? Personally,
I'd rather have the equivalent value to get a desktop PC so I can learn
Pathworks. A portable PC is of limited value to me, but getting a
device that I can expand my knowledge base with would be more useful.
Plus, it wouldn't cost Digital any travel expense since I'd be learning
at the office.
|
83.12 | Not Always True | POCUS::OHARA | KennedyHartClinton | Sat Mar 07 1992 10:40 | 14 |
| >> And - it was "exceeding forecast by $50K" that was to have
>> earned you a certificate.
Hmmmmmmmm. Still not universally applied. Local sales management must
have decided whether or not to get with the program. Could it be that
they were concerned about the cost to the Account Group/Set?
Bob
|
83.13 | Portables on Pathworks... | ODIXIE::SILVERS | Dave, have POQET will travel | Mon Mar 09 1992 08:28 | 6 |
| From what I understand, you can get a XIRCOM (sp?) ethernet adapter for
the parallel port on the portable and fool pathworks into using it.
I've been told that it works quite well....
Ds.
|
83.14 | I need/want one TODAY | ODIXIE::RYANKE | Kevin Ryan @MTO DTN 360-5100 | Wed Mar 11 1992 12:04 | 41 |
| Bob Hughes mentioned in the training DVN that a program was in place to
study what to do about laptops in the field. He said he had appointed
someone to look into it (John Caputo was the name I recall). He said
they would not put them into the field without providing training.
He also mentioned that the program might be a $2K credit like the $300
credit toward a cellular phone. That way we could purchase what we
need/want rather everybody receiving a tool that might not be needed
or wanted.
I purchased a software product called ACT! - a contact management
tracking system and borrowed a laptop in anticipation of this happening
soon. I had to give it back last week and quite frankly I am lost
without the information I recorded in that machine during the 6 weeks
I used it.
A team within our Account Set Group is piloting the use of laptops.
I am one who could use one today. I understand DOS, I understand
Windows. I would have our new LINKS products, Microsoft Office (Word
for Windows, EXCEL, and Powerpoint), DECwrite for Windows, ACT!,
Mobilizer (if my ALL-IN-1 system would support it) and other assorted
products on the system. I would have it in front of customers daily.
I would like to have my office set up with a regular keyboard and VGA
monitor and I would purchase same for home.
I want/need one now - how can we expedite a program for those of us who
are PC literate and have many accounts to deal with today?
(I am over budget today but was not 12/31/91)
Maybe we should have a topic that is for folks like myself who know how
they would use a laptop today and maybe a note to discuss how we might
use them in the future.
We might also need a note for those who would like to respond to how
the field feels about systems available to us now.
Kevin Ryan @MTO
Sales Executive
|
83.15 | | KYOA::KOCH | It never hurts to ask... | Wed Mar 11 1992 18:05 | 2 |
| I agree with the $2k credit idea. I'd prefer to get a system for the
office which is not portable...
|
83.17 | Laptop Distribution | BAHAMA::MCDONOUGH | | Thu Mar 12 1992 09:30 | 19 |
| This reply is from Judy Gustafson:
"U. S. Sales is planning a program to make PC/laptops available to
members of account teams in Q4. The PC Program proposal is being
reviewed by senior management this week, and if approved, the major
announcement is planned for March 16. Training and shipments will
begin in April.
Those members of account teams that received the coupon for exceeding
their forecasts in Q2 will be given priority consideration for the PC
Program.
This program is being driven by the U. S. Sales Productivity group, and
the Program Manager is Judy Gustafson @OGO (DTN 276 8455).
NOTE: Some Account Groups have been funding PC seed units for their
reps and specialists out of local money. They will not need to
participate in this program.
|
83.18 | Sales Software for 320P? | SWAM2::VANBEZOOY_JO | | Thu Mar 12 1992 18:12 | 12 |
| Does anyone know what software will be distributed for the laptop PCs
for use by sales
?
I have had a 320P for over a month, it is marvelously useful with only
Microsoft Works. I can use the VT100 emulator provided with Windows,
and copy back and forth from A1 and MS Word, Excel, and Powerpoint, or
ship postsript files to VMS for nice output. But if we have any sales
tools planned, I want them now.
ps...I take the 320P around to accounts with me. I have sold a bunch
(via PCBYDEC) because customers see it and want it. And I can demo it
in 5 minutes or less! (I still love to peddle)
|
83.19 | Notebook Training Information | ABACUS::PARAS | | Fri Mar 13 1992 11:37 | 10 |
| Hello,
I am the US PC/PCI Training Account Manager for Product/Technology. I
am also on the Account Team PC/Notebook Training task Force. I would
be VERY interested in hearing how you use your notebook, the advantages
and opportunities it has provided from an account basis, and the
training and softwar you would need to grow your competence.
g
|
83.20 | PATHWORKS enabled | LURE::CERLING | God doesn't believe in atheists | Fri Mar 13 1992 12:53 | 27 |
|
I would like to add my plug for the requirements of a PC that can
be connected into PATHWORKS and utilize all the PC software we are
coming out with.
I am in sales support. I am hindered in addressing the market that
Bob Hughes has said we are to focus on -- Desktop, Office, and
Imaging. So much of what we run into out there has to run on DOS.
I have a VAXstation on my desk (which I will NOT part with as it is
just as critical to my job), but no PC on my desk. I am supposed to
be able to help sales position software/hardware. That DEMANDS that
I be able to understand how pieces fit and work together. I will
not be an expert in all fields, but I will be able to talk in a
knowledgeable fashion.
I have a PC at home. But it is not much help in learning the our
products because it is not on the network. From my experience on
my system at home, and from the storage requirements I have seen
for various applications, I would estimate that Sales Support will
need an 8 MB memory and 80 MB disk system for it to be as beneficial
as possible. Yes, a smaller machine would be better than nothing,
but if we are going to make the investment, let's do it right. If
the PC is going to be configured with sales tools, it will be of
very limited value to me. I need to be able to run a wide variety
of Digital products.
tgc
|
83.21 | Compound Document Breakthrough! | CSTEAM::TURBETT | U.S. Client/Server Campaign Mgr. | Thu Apr 02 1992 17:19 | 17 |
| My understanding is that the Notebooks will come with Microsoft Office
software - Excel, Word, PowerPoint, and Mail.
If this is correct, then Digital finally has a mechanism to vastly
improve communication through the field. Text files were nice in the
80's, but compound documents are fast becoming the norm. Today, we
attempt transmission of compound documents by first converting them to
Postscript files - much larger than the original source file and
non-revisable.
We have the real potential for breakthrough here by distributing
REVISABLE COMPOUND DOCUMENTS, with the added benefit that they take up
much less disk space. Similarly, PowerPoint presentations could be
made available, with each account team customizing the presentation for
their specific customer.
Is this in our sales plan for the 90's?
|
83.22 | running OUTCOME on 320P | SHALOT::THORNTON | NOT just another Al Bundy | Fri Apr 03 1992 15:40 | 5 |
| See also note 80.5 for related information of a sales tracking application
which runs well on a 320P. The product is called OUTCOME. It is client server,
and the server component is VMS w/ Rdb as the database engine.
Lee
|
83.23 | | JMPSRV::MICKOL | Jack Palance for Prez | Sat Apr 04 1992 00:35 | 186 |
|
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
Date: 30-Mar-1992 03:45pm EST
From: SALES COMMUNICATIONS
NOTIFICATION AT A1 at SALES at MRO
Dept: NOTIFICATION
Tel No: 297-2318
TO: See Below
Subject: PC NOTEBOOK INTRODUCTION TRAINING
Management Notification #180 - From JUDITH GUSTAFSON, DTN 276-8455, @OGO
===========================================================================
This announcement is for the PC Notebook Introduction Training that supports
the PC Notebook Investment Program as described by Bob Hughes on the Sales DVN
of March 16th.
The PC Notebook Introduction Training classes are scheduled to begin on
April 20, 1992, at the four training HUB locations. We are planning four
classes a week per site to be delivered in each location during Q4. The Q1
class schedule and locations will be announced in May.
Classes begin at 1:00 P.M. on the first day and conclude at 11:00 A.M. on the
second day, and include an evening session. The training, including the
pre-course material requires between 12 and 14 hours to complete.
Classes are designated "Sales" and "Sales Support," to accommodate different
levels of PC literacy.
TRAINING LOCATIONS AND DATES:
SALES CLASSES - Offered in Maynard, Chicago, Santa Clara, Atlanta on:
4/20 - 4/21 4/27 - 4/28 5/4 - 5/5 5/11 - 5/12 5/18 - 5/19
4/21 - 4/22 4/28 - 4/29 5/5 - 5/6 5/12 - 5/13 5/19 - 5/20
4/22 - 4/23 4/29 - 4/30 5/6 - 5/7 5/13 - 5/14 5/20 - 5/21
SALES SUPPORT CLASSES - Also in Maynard, Chicago, Santa Clara, Atlanta on:
4/23 - 4/24 4/30 - 5/1 5/7 - 5/8 5/14 - 5/15 5/21 - 5/22
* NO CLASSES ARE PLANNED FOR THE PERIOD OF MAY 22 THRU JULY 4TH, SO AS TO
REDUCE IMPACT ON BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS.
ATTIRE: Business casual and Digital badge is required.
TUITION: NONE, HOWEVER, IF YOU FIND YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THIS COURSE,
PLEASE CANCEL YOUR ENROLLMENT MORE THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE
COURSE START DATE.
NO SHOW/LATE CANCELLATION: $450.00 PER DAY
TARGET AUDIENCE: ALL SALES AND SALES SUPPORT (REPS,
SPECIALISTS AND MANAGERS)
PREREQUISITES: NONE
COURSE OVERVIEW:
This 12 - 14 hour course is designed to provide training on basic operations
for using the PC Notebook DECpc 320p for day-to-day sales activities.
Participants from the Sales organization will receive their notebooks at the
training, which they ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE.
The course provides users with hands-on practice in Terminal Emulation,
Moblizer, MS Office applications (Word, Excel, PowerPoint), and basic PC
maintenance activities.
The training will allow participants to get up-and-running in using their
Notebooks for remote access of VAX-based sales tools. Additionally,
participants will learn the basics of the PC-based applications and ways to
incorporate these new capabilities into improving productivity and customer
response time.
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
At completion of this course participants should be able to:
* Effectively use their PC notebooks;
* Improve consistency, quality, and productivity of daily efforts;
* Enhance sales; and
* Improve customer response time
NOTES:
1. PLAN TO CARRY YOUR PC NOTEBOOK, ACCESSORIES AND WORKBOOK, WITH YOU FROM
THE TRAINING.
2. SALES REPS AND SALES SUPPORT SPECIALISTS *MUST BE ENROLLED* BY THEIR
MANAGER.
3. CLASSES ARE RESTRICTED ONLY TO THOSE PERSONS WHO ARE *RECEIVING* PC
NOTEBOOKS THROUGH THIS PROGRAM.
4. IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE SEND AN E-MAIL NOTE TO
PCPO @OGO.
=====================
HOW TO REGISTER:
=====================
**************************************************************************
* FOR MANAGERS ONLY: *
* *
* PLEASE FOLLOW THE THREE STEPS FOR EACH STUDENT: *
* *
* 1. SEND A COMPLETED ENROLLMENT FORM BELOW TO YOUR REGIONAL REGISTRAR *
* FOR EACH PERSON YOU ARE REGISTERING. *
* *
* 2. THE ENROLLMENT FORM MUST COME FROM YOUR E-MAIL ACCOUNT. *
* *
* 3. IF THE FORM IS SENT FROM THE ATTENDEE'S E-MAIL ACCOUNT THE *
* ENROLLMENT WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. *
**************************************************************************
EASTERN REGION:
NJ/NY (ONLY) BRENDA KEGLER @AWO
NORTHEAST BUOSLS @DDD or CGVAX2::BUOSLS
CENTRAL REGION: DOROTHY STRAUB @ACI
GAYLENE HEITBRINK @ACI
WESTERN REGION: REGISTRAR @WRO
SOUTHERN REGION: SALES REGISTRAR @ALF
REGISTRATION FORM:
Course EY# EY-K783E-L0
Session Name: PC Notebook Introduction Training
Session Date:
Attendee's Name:
Badge Number:
Cost Center:
Location:
DTN/Phone:
Job Title:
Complete attendee's E-mail address:
Manager's Name:
Manager's Location:
Complete Manager's E-mail address:
TUITION: No Tuition NO-SHOW/LATE CANCELLATION: $450.00
****************************************************************************
START TIME DAY 1 ------ 1:00 P.M. END TIME DAY 1 ------ 6:00 P.M.
START TIME DAY 2 ------ 8:30 A.M. END TIME DAY 2 ------ 11:00 A.M.
============================================================================
Distribution: U.S. Sales and Sales Support Account Team Members. To update
your Personalized Communications Profile, send your name and badge number to
SEGMENTATION @MRO or SALES::NSP.
============================================================================
|
83.24 | Cost Savings? | LURE::CERLING | God doesn't believe in atheists | Mon Apr 06 1992 13:57 | 28 |
|
In this day and age of cost containment, this seems like about
the most expensive way to train everybody. From our office
alone, we have to look at about 50-60 people making a flight and
hotel reservations. Conservatively speaking, this amounts to
about $35-40 thousand dollars. (Airfare, hotels, meals, trans-
portation to/from airports, parking).
It would seem much more cost effective to either:
1. Send the trainers around the country to train entire offices
2. Train selected individuals in each office and allow them to
train the entire office.
For option 1, I could see a trainer coming to our office and
spending a week to get everyone trained. Maximum cost for the
trainer would be in the realm of $2,000 for the week.
For option 2, if we trained 2-3 people from our office, we could
see a maximum expense of $2-4,000. (Assuming they would have to
have more in-depth training to be able to answer questions.) If
the people trained to train were people from the PC sales/sales
support, it would be natural training for them as well.
Were these less expensive options considered?
tgc
|
83.25 | Or have we come a long way on the expense line? | SWAM2::MCCARTHY_LA | Lie to exit pollers | Mon Apr 06 1992 16:34 | 11 |
| re: .24
That struck me, too. Effectively, unless you happen to be in one of the
four magic cities, this might best be described as "Notebook Prevention
Training."
A cynic might say conclude that the purpose is only to *appear* to be
making notebooks available in the field. Lucky I'm not one of those!
:-)
|
83.26 | PC TRAINING PLANS | SONATA::PCPO | | Wed Apr 08 1992 14:57 | 19 |
| This is from the PC Notebook Program Office
At the present time there are no plans to conduct training in other
than the four Hub sites. We will be evaluating the training during Q4
and looking at the possibility of adding sites for Q1 and/or Q2. There
are extensive costs and preparation involved in the development of the
physical training plant required for this type of program, as well as,
significant effort involved to assemble four training teams --all in a
three month time frame.
We certainly recognize the travel costs that are involved, and are
doing a three quarter training schedule to allow account teams that
lack Q4 funding, to plan and execute their training in the next fiscal
year.
If it is more appropriate to travel to training at a later date than
you should plan accordingly.
Thanks
|
83.27 | | POCUS::OHARA | Slick Willie and The Moonbeam Kid | Wed Apr 08 1992 22:02 | 9 |
| >> We certainly recognize the travel costs that are involved, and are
>> doing a three quarter training schedule to allow account teams that
>> lack Q4 funding, to plan and execute their training in the next fiscal
>> year.
I think the point was not the travel expense impacting the sales teams' account
profitability (though that's certainly a consideration). The point is that
Digital is (in some of our opinion) incurring large, unnecessary expense by not
doing a "train-the trainer" or other local training effort.
|
83.28 | Not even penny-wise; definitely pound-foolish | LURE::CERLING | God doesn't believe in atheists | Thu Apr 09 1992 14:03 | 27 |
| > >> We certainly recognize the travel costs that are involved, and are
> >> doing a three quarter training schedule to allow account teams that
> >> lack Q4 funding, to plan and execute their training in the next fiscal
> >> year.
>
>I think the point was not the travel expense impacting the sales teams' account
>profitability (though that's certainly a consideration). The point is that
>Digital is (in some of our opinion) incurring large, unnecessary expense by not
>doing a "train-the trainer" or other local training effort.
EXACTLY. We have a training facility in our building. We
regularly have training brought in here rather that shipping
people off. In fact, this week we are having a DECwrite class.
For this we scrounge up the necessary workstations (generally
from the people who are taking the class), set up the lab, and
bring in a teacher. If the teacher wants to load examples to
teach with, we load them up on a system and give everybody
network access to it.
Since the students come to class to get the PCs for the PC
training, we would have no problem with equipment. If you
need special wiring, we can most likely accomplish that too.
The idea of having 50-60 people fly, eat out, and stay overnight
seems like a great waste of money. Particularly when the exact
same training can be accomplished for thousands of dollars less.
tgc
|
83.29 | Some questions regarding the Laptops and training... | WHYNOW::NEWMAN | What, me worry? YOU BET! | Thu Apr 09 1992 20:00 | 26 |
| In a recent Joint Partners Meeting sponsored by Bob Schmidt there was a
discussion with Don Zareski regarding the mandatory Laptop training. The
reason given for REQUIRING all the sales support people to attend was so
that Sales Support would all be trained on the Business Model applications
that would be available.
Well, one of my fellow Sales Support members just returned from the 14
hour training program in order to get his laptop. There was no training
about Business Model applications. There was not even training on how load
software or how to back up the system. What was covered was DOS, Windows,
Excel, Word, how to Dial In, how to access VTX and other "general purpose"
applications.
But, at the end of the training he did walk away with a laptop, case,
extra battery, trackball, ethernet adaptor, preloaded software and some
documentation.
Again I ask the question... If we are technical people who use MS-DOS
computers in our day-to-day activities, what is the reason for requiring us
to sit through 14 hours of basic introductory training?
Another reason that was given for the mandatory training was so that Sales
and Sales Support would go through the same training at the same time so
that when they returned to their offices they would be able to help each
other. If this is true, they why are there SEPARATE classes for Sales and
Sales Support?
|
83.30 | Camp RunAmok all over again? | RIPPLE::NORDLAND_GE | Become Obsessed with Listening - TR | Fri Apr 10 1992 14:09 | 15 |
|
Could this be another case of our Bureaucracy feeding itself at
the expense of the well-being of the whole corporation? Who developed
this 'training course' and who approved it? Could it be that neither
of these groups knew MS-DOS basics and therefore assUmed that the poor
field people didn't either? Did they know that the same material is
available at nearly every community colege (and most computer stores)
in the country? Did they just want to construct a barrier so that if
the field REALLY wanted a Notebook they would have to show they could
hop over it? Or did they just run out of time and developed the only
course they could develop materials for within the schedule?
I would guess/hope the latter. By the way, where ARE the Business Model
applications?
|
83.31 | | KYOA::KOCH | It never hurts to ask... | Fri Apr 10 1992 17:57 | 16 |
| Gee, if .29 is an accurate statement of the facts, this training will
indeed be bogus. We should tape this 14 hours of training, duplicate
it, and then prepare a test. The user would be tested on what is in the
tapes on their PC and then we would train them on the BUSINESS
APPLICATIONS like Don Zereski said we would be. I want this PC, but I
also want to bring in revenue for Q4. I don't want to waste my time. I
can just as easily help people based on what I see on a videotape as I
could from on-site training.
Is Don Z. aware that what he said at the combined partners meeting and
what is actually be delivered to the laptop PC users are 2 different
things? This seems like another case of people not telling Don the
whole story. My interpretation of his Q3 videotape was that messages he
wanted to get to the field weren't getting there for some reason. Is
Don being misled? He sincerely believed when he talked to us that this
training was for the BUSINESS APPLICATIONS. What went wrong?
|
83.32 | Laptops & the EASYnet | SCAACT::RESENDE | Spit happens, Daddy! | Mon Apr 13 1992 11:31 | 18 |
| re: .29
>But, at the end of the training he did walk away with a laptop, case,
>extra battery, trackball, ethernet adaptor, preloaded software and some
>documentation.
I'm sure of the answer, but I'll ask anyway.
Are EASYnet addresses assigned for these laptops' Ethernet adaptors? An EASYnet
address is almost impossible to get, with our saturation of Phase IV address
space. Are these people supposed to take their present desktops (some I'm sure
have desktops with addresses already assigned) off the network in order to use
the laptops?
Please surprise me and tell me that these laptops will be legal on the net
(other than dial-in at asych terminal emulations).
Steve
|
83.33 | No EasyNet address | WHYNOW::NEWMAN | What, me worry? YOU BET! | Mon Apr 13 1992 12:04 | 4 |
| No, no EasyNet addresses were assigned. In fact, I would
think that this would be rather difficult to do ahead of
time because of the different areas that are used.
|
83.34 | Aw, it ain't as bad as all that! | SWAM2::MCCARTHY_LA | Lie to exit pollers | Mon Apr 13 1992 12:41 | 4 |
| re: Network addresses;
No big shortage of hidden area addresses. I'm sure that the training
will cover the ins and outs of poor man's routing :-)
|
83.35 | Which costs more: Training or Notebook? | RIPPLE::NORDLAND_GE | Become Obsessed with Listening - TR | Mon Apr 13 1992 18:15 | 8 |
|
It seems we have done it to ourselves, once again:
With the street price of a notebook ~ $2K, how far can you afford
to travel for how many days before the 'training' costs more than the
'unit'?
My guess would be across town for � day.
|
83.36 | | JMPSRV::MICKOL | Winning with Xerox in '92 | Tue Apr 14 1992 23:27 | 23 |
| Mail sent to PCPO@OGO:
From: JMPSRV::MICKOL "Member of Team Xerox" 14-APR-1992 22:04:52.60
To: MTS$"ogo::pcpo"
CC: MICKOL
Subj: PC Training & Saving Money
Is there any way you can open up more Laptop PC Training courses in the
Massachusetts area during the three weeks of DECworld? In an effort to save
air fare and hotel costs, I was planning to take the time during DECworld to
attend the Maynard-based training only to find out that it is filled (I guess
others had the same notion). I think it would be prudent of you to do what you
can to expand the offerings in Mass during that time. Through these efforts
perhaps we can help to make our next quarterly results a bit more positive.
Thanks.
Regards,
Jim Mickol
Sales Support
Xerox Account Group
|
83.37 | Which is worth more: Notebook or more productive person? | DLOPAS::DLO28::GUSTAFSON | | Tue Apr 21 1992 16:27 | 19 |
| .35 It seems we have done it to ourselves, once again:
.35
.35 With the street price of a notebook ~ $2K, how far can you afford
.35 to travel for how many days before the 'training' costs more than the
.35 'unit'?
.35
.35 My guess would be across town for � day.
This exemplifies the change in the market - the hardware costs a lot less
than training the individual and providing the support services. If you
continue to look only at the relative cost of the hardware, your operating
and sales models are out moded.
A better question to ask is: How far can you afford to travel to become more
productive? (By the way, they throw in a notebook PC with the productivity
training.)
My guess is that it would be a lot farther than across town for a half day.
|
83.38 | Read 'em all before you blast, please | RIPPLE::NORDLAND_GE | Waiting for Perot :^) | Tue Apr 21 1992 16:59 | 14 |
|
RE: .37
Before you blast .35, you might go back and read the previous
notes, esp .30! This 'training' is SO basic that it could hardly be
considered a "productivity enhancement" and therefore is NOT worth more
than the cost of the HW.
I don't disagree with the need for better productivity, just the
methods (i.e. do some 'training' and give them a notebook). The
problems start much higher in the corporation and won't be fixed until
we recognize their impact and how to fix them, develop better tools and
THEN do some real education.
|
83.39 | | WHO301::BOWERS | Dave Bowers @WHO | Tue Apr 21 1992 17:53 | 33 |
| The way I see it, there are at least 3 groups of potential users:
1. People who are fully PC literate. They've been ready for months
to make use of a laptop. Pulling them in for 2 days of PC/Windows
basics, besides being a waste, will tend to turn them off totally.
2. People with some PC/Windows experience. They could probably use some
formal training to improve their confidence level and help them get
productive quickly. It's still not clear that dragging them off to
a 2-day, 14-hour training session is the most cost-effective way of
delivering this training (as opposed to video tape/DVN or in-the-field
training).
3. People with NO PC/Windows knowledge and NO real idea of how to use a
PC in a productive manner. This describes a significant portion of our
Sales force (at least the ones I can see from where I'm sitting). For
this group, the planned course is a disservice. They will learn
very little and end up very confused. They will then go back home and
either a) dump the PC in a drawer or b) try to use it and drive the local
PC gurus nuts with beginners' questions.
Intoducing PC's into a large, heterogeneous organization takes a lot more
than a "quickie" training course. It requires ongoing support and technical
backup. For instance, has anyone thought to set up a help desk for these
folks? How about a notes conference where they can ask questions and share
"discoveries"? How about training someone local (like a Sales secretary or
admin.) to provide the basic support the third group will require?
On the whole, if this course is all you're planning, you might just as well
skip it and ship the PCs to the users. They won't be much worse off, and
you'll save a whole pile of money.
-dave
|
83.40 | Just reframing the question | DLOPAS::DLO28::GUSTAFSON | | Tue Apr 21 1992 17:55 | 13 |
| I don't mean to "blast" anyone. The point is to reframe the questions so
that we look at the real issues.
The quality of the "productivity" training is clearly an issue. If the
training isn't going to enhance your productivity clearly you shouldn't go -
whether they give you a laptop or not.
How do we fix it?
A side issue is what are we selling to our customers - hardware (laptops) or
productivity enhancements (trained personnel and systems that happen to
include a laptop.) The way we look at things internally effects how we
approach our customers.
|
83.41 | Notebook Program for Service Personnel? | HEAT::BOLD | That is a definite maybe | Wed Apr 22 1992 19:48 | 19 |
| From several different sources, Don Z is quoted as saying that there is a
Notebook program for Service personnel in the field as well as Sales.
I have been unable to find any information about this program and how I
could make use of it. I do extensive sales support in support of the
consulting efforts that my group does. But the requirements for the
sales/sales support program are a sales/sales support job code,
a sales/sales support CC and a manager that support you. All I have is a
manager that support me in obtaining one, but under the auspices of a
program.
So even though I travel over 150,000 miles a year for Digital and spend
over 130 nights away from my home and office for Digital, I can't get a
tool that will improve my productivity substantially and hence
Digital's revenue stream.
Any help in tracking this down will be greatly appreciated.
Steve
|
83.42 | Laptops for HPS Delivery Engineers | MAIL::THOMPSONP | Paul Thompson, St. Louis, MO | Thu Apr 23 1992 11:19 | 6 |
| There is currently being rolled out a program to provide Laptops to our
service engineers. This is designed to provide them better access to
our technical databases as well as improved labor reporting and call
handling.
Contact your local HPS Service Delivery Manager.
|
83.43 | One opinion... | RIPPLE::CORBETTKE | | Thu Apr 23 1992 19:23 | 23 |
| re .39
I agree!!
I fall in category 3 and, as much as I think productivity is important,
I'm not sure this is productive to the front line sales team.
We do not usually get into a PC discussion with our customers. If it
involves a networking issue or something with PC's being an integral
portion of that network, the discusion usually goes toward the pros and
cons of Pathworks. If a customer starts asking specific questions
about PC's, we have specialist for that. We also have an 800 number.
Therefore, product knowledge is not an issue. The $/effort isn't worth
it. Ask Don Z.
As far as using Mobilizer or something to check into your All-in-1
account or having AQS on-line for pricing info, not worth it. I can
call for messages of importance and DECdirect will get me by at a
customers site for pricing. I don't quote exact prices at a customer
site anyway.
Ken Corbett
|
83.44 | | SWAM2::BRADLEY_RI | Holoid in a Holonomic Universe | Mon Apr 27 1992 15:45 | 16 |
| re: Need for Laptops
My opinion is that knowledge of and use of a Laptop PC confers upon its
user, information and experience that is of value in calling upon
Information Systems Managers and their technical recommenders and staff
members. I think that having intimate knowledge of computing, and
especially PC computing, will increase one's "face validity" and
improve chances of gaining sales. If I were a customer being called
upon by someone with only superficial knowledge of computing, and who
didn't use the tools themselves, I would be biased in favor of those
who are users. I'd assume that the latter would better understand my
problems and issues.
Richard Bradley
Sales Support Manager
|
83.45 | Where's competency training??? | SWAM2::KELLER_FR | | Mon Apr 27 1992 16:14 | 10 |
| I agree, but the key caveat is that we have to be very well trained on
it and we have to be able to demonstrate how it's helping us be of
greater value to them. To carry it in without really being able to use
it (i mean REALLY use it; not just turn it on and do a few simple
things with it...) will backfire on us. So far I haven't seen any plan
for competency training; only familiarization, and some possibly some
level of literacy. To me that's a recipe for failure.
FJK
|
83.46 | What are the BUSINESS TOOLS | METMV1::SLATTERY | | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:42 | 9 |
| Could anyone explain what BUSINESS TOOLS are planned?
I have talked to people who went to the class and none were discussed.
Is there a place where these tools are discussed?
Has anyone asked the field for input?
Ken Slattery
|
83.47 | Tools in the works ? | ESDNI4::MINER | | Wed May 06 1992 19:11 | 13 |
| I saw an article in Digital Today (inhouse rag) featuring Tim Walsh.
Wasn't very specific but it did talk about a proto toolset that was
developed by Bob Mjos et al. that is evidently up and running.
Also heard that Compass service/tools might go away and that the pc-based
toolset might be the replacement.
Agree that field involvement is a must. If I hear that they're looking
for help, I'll post it here.
Please do the same.
-Brian
|
83.48 | I want my DPC! | DENVER::DAVISGB | I'd rather be driving my Jag | Wed Jun 03 1992 15:16 | 8 |
| I just called Judy Gustafson's office regarding next FY's training and
laptop distribution. Looks like they'll publish the training schedule
around the 15th of June.
Gil (Who tried to get into a May class....all filled up.
8'(
|
83.49 | Full? | MORO::BEELER_JE | Ross Perot for President | Sat Jun 06 1992 12:50 | 8 |
| "...all filled up..."
Yes, I know what you mean.
I know that a lot of the field service guys have one. Haven't seen too
many sales people with 'em yet.
Jerry
|
83.50 | | JMPSRV::MICKOL | Winning with Xerox in '92 | Mon Jun 08 1992 00:53 | 10 |
| Re: .-1: The reason Customer Services engineers have the laptops is that their
distribution and training was distributed to local sites and note centralized
like the Sales organization. I'm wondering why that is. I'm sure this whole
process is going to be a much larger expense for the Sales organization.
Regards,
Jim
|
83.51 | I'm lucky it isn't my primary computing device... | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Mon Jun 08 1992 11:28 | 15 |
| I got one of the older Notebook PCs off of DIAL. I used it a bit and then the
LCD display bit the dust. No problem. I logged a call on it and was rather
surprised to have my CS person tell me I had to send it to Salem, N.H. to be
fixed. I understand that this is how repairs on the new Notebook PCs will be
handled.
I can just see it now. The people really learn to use their PCs and become
dependent upon them, even more so than their phones. What happens when someone
spends hours working on a proposal, etc and the machine dies? Does Digital
lose the business while the person waits a week or so to get their PC fixed?
Has anyone made plans so that if a PC has to go in for repairs, its hard disk
can be pulled and put into a loaner so that the person isn't dead in the water?
What about that boring task called backup?
Bob
|
83.52 | If our repair program is like Apple's it isn't bad :-) | WHYNOW::NEWMAN | I am NOT a bottlecap! | Mon Jun 08 1992 12:09 | 38 |
| re .51
If our repair program for laptops is anything like the one that Apple
Computer has it will not be bad.
I have an Apple PowerBook that I had to send in for repairs. I
called them to schedule the repair. Over the phone they asked me
where to pick up the system, what was wrong with it, and where to
return it to once it was repaired. The reason for this is you might
be on the road and be somewhere else when it is fixed.
They told me it would take three days for the system to be returned
to me and that they would send me a box for shipping.
The next morning (Tuesday) an Airborne Express box showed up at my office. It
was a specially constructed shipping container with foam cutouts for
the system. Also enclosed were two shipping labels; one to send it
to Apple and one to have it shipped back to me.
I packed up the system and called Airborne Express to come pick it up.
The package was picked up Tuesday afternoon. On late Wednesday I
called Apple to inquire about the status of the system. I was curious.
I did not believe that they could turn it around in three days. When I
called I gave them the repair order number that was assigned to me. In
response I was told when the system arrived at their repair center, what
was done to repair it, what time it had shipped out on Wednesday, the
AirBill number of the shipment, and what number to call if I did not
receive it on Thursday morning as originally scheduled. Needless to say
I was impressed.
Thursday morning came and at 10:00 a.m. I received a call from the front
desk that a package had arrived for me - it was my repaired system as
promised.
AND ALL OF THIS WAS DONE AT NO CHARGE SINCE THE SYSTEM WAS UNDER WARRANTY
In my mind, THIS is the way to run a service organization. Hopefully
Digital can learn from this.
|
83.53 | don't leave home without it....... | NECSC::ROODY | | Mon Jun 08 1992 16:05 | 6 |
| Can we say "Backups are our Friends"?
I knew we could.
They are of course your first line of defense. It's kind of like
wearing your seatbelt........
|
83.54 | We can all dream, can't we... | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Tue Jun 09 1992 10:05 | 14 |
| re: .52
Yep, I hope our program is that good, but from my experience it isn't going to
be that way. Of course, since I haven't been to the training to get my PC yet,
I may not be aware of the fantastic support program that is in place to support
these folks. Can anyone who has been thru the training, comment on how the
company plans to handle these problems?
re: .53
Yep, you need backups, but if no loaner system is available, you are still
dead in the water until your machine is returned.
Bob
|
83.55 | | NECSC::ROODY | | Tue Jun 09 1992 11:13 | 15 |
| re .54
If these are "personal" resources, then I would agree with you. But if
these are "Corporate" resources, supplied as a tool to make you more
efficient, then I would "expect" that "management" would have thought
of this and budgeted some kind of spare or shared resource. Then your
backup would have an immediate home to relocate to.
Maybe this is a fecicious question (who, me?), but is this any
different than a company car that won't run or a pager/cellular phone
that dies?
If the resource is critical, you make it redundant. If it's not, you
take the risk of being without it for a period of time. Anything in
between is a business call. No?
|
83.56 | | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Tue Jun 09 1992 11:54 | 14 |
| re: .55
This makes perfect sense. However, you should not expect it to happen
everywhere.
Case in point: I'm in a Digital Services/EIS unit. We tried to get
some blank TK50 tapes to backup our workstations last month. We were
told that the cost was too high (for an additional 10 or so tapes) and
to ask again in Q1.
I sure hope that our workstations containing our revenue-producing
customer projects don't die in Q4!
-- Russ
|
83.57 | The silence is making me concerned... | DLOACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Wed Jun 10 1992 10:06 | 8 |
| re: .55
I was really hoping that someone would jump in and say "It's all been
taken care of. You will find out the procedure when you go to your
training." or "The procedure is...", but unfortunately it hasn't
happened.
Bob
|
83.58 | Salem Repair Facility turn them around very quickly... | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Mon Jun 15 1992 15:03 | 12 |
| Hi Bob,
I have one of the older Notebooks, and have had to send it in for repair
(twice, unfortunately). Both times, the turnaround was 48 hours from
Salem. The second time, since I specifically requested to know what they
did, I got a personal note back from "Mike" who told me he replaced the
system board.
I can complain about the quality (that's whjy we don't sell them anymore)
but I can't complain about the service from Salem.
Bob
|
83.59 | Q1 schedule? | SLOVAX::THOMSON | , Mark DTN 544-3195 | Mon Jun 22 1992 11:11 | 3 |
| Has anyone seen any information about the Q1 training schedule for the
laptops?
|
83.60 | Yes....... | SYOMV::CLARK | | Wed Jun 24 1992 09:51 | 171 |
|
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
Date: 23-Jun-1992 06:59am EDT
From: SALES COMMUNICATIONS
NOTIFICATION AT A1 at SALES at MRO
Dept: U.S Communications
Tel No: 297-2318
TO: See Below
Subject: PC INTRODUCTION TRAINING UPDATE
Training & Events Notification #334
From RON CALABRARO, DTN 264-2395, @MKO
===========================================================================
The PC Training Assessment Test administered via DECMENTOR, will be deployed
in your region on June 22, 1992 and run for three consecutive weeks, ending
July 10, 1992 at 5:00 P.M.. The Assessment portion is the first part of a
two part TEST OUT process. A score of 90% is required on this portion of the
test to pass. The PC Assessment Test will challenge your understanding of
"how to" use the notebook in the following areas:
* General System Knowledge
* Windows Environment
* Day to day tasks with Commonly used windows applications
* Remote Access
If you are successful with the written portion of the process, you will be
contacted to schedule the HANDS-ON PERFORMANCE TEST portion of the TEST OUT
process. If you do not pass the PC Training Assessment Test, you will have
to enroll in one of the "PC Notebook Introduction Training" Classes.
The PERFORMANCE TEST portion of the course TEST OUT is hands-on and will be
conducted at each of the training sites listed in the TEN announcement.
However, if you are not within a reasonable driving distance to those sites,
attempts will be made to have the PERFORMANCE TEST conducted in a Digital
office more convenient to your location.
PCs will be distributed at the Training sites listed in the TEN announcement
ONLY. In other locations where TEST OUTS occur, the PCs for those
individuals who pass the PERFORMANCE TEST, will be sent to the Digital office
AFTER VERIFICATION OF RESULTS.
******** DECMENTOR ********
The PC TRAINING ASSESSMENT TEST is accessible by choosing the PC option from
the DECmentor Menu. The test is timed and may be taken ONLY once. It
contains no references and does not allow a review of answers after
completing the test. All test scores will be kept confidential.
HOW TO ACCESS THE PC TRAINING DECMENTOR ASSESSMENT
To access a DECmentor test, use your regional login instructions. If you
don't have an account, you may access a generic account in the Northeast
region.
HELP IS AVAILABLE:
The technical contacts will assist in setting up new accounts, and DECmentor
coordinators are available to answer any product questions.
HOW TO ACCESS THE PC TRAINING ASSESSMENT:
Choose the PC option on the DECmentor menu. Once into the initial test
taker's screen, press RETURN to go from one field to the next in answering
informational questions such as badge number, first name, last name,
sales/sales support and location code. Press backspace (BS) to go back to a
previous field. Verify this information with a Y or N.
TEST-OUT SCORE REQUIREMENT:
A 90% score must be achieved to pass the first phase of the test-out process.
Assessment scores will be treated as confidential information.
TAKING A DECMENTOR TEST:
Upon entering a DECmentor Test, you can answer questions by entering
1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, mark questions by entering M, or skip questions by entering
9. You can go back to the skipped or marked questions and change the answers
by choosing the M or S options from the Other Options Menu. If a skipped
question is not changed, it is scored as incorrect. On-line HELP is
available by pressing the PF2 key.
Once you have answered, skipped or marked all questions, you will see a
screen message that you have answered all test questions. Use the Options
Menu to review and change the marked and/or skipped questions. End the test
by entering X after reviewing marked/and or skipped questions.
The Test Results Screen will include a total score for questions answered
correctly, scores broken down by module, and the percentage of the questions
that were answered correctly.
DECMENTOR LOGIN INFORMATION BY REGION
CSR:
For people in the old ECA/CEA: For those people in the old SCA:
Local> C DLO LAN> C DPDSAL
Enter Username> USERNAME: MENTOR_TEST
(user may enter their last name) PASSWORD: CENTRALREGION
DALLAS LAN> C DPDSAL
USERNAME: MENTOR_TEST
PASSWORD: CENTRALREGION
MKO: (Merrimack, N.H. Generic Acct) NEA: (Northeast Generic Acct)
Local> Set host ABACUS Local> Set host GREAT1
USER NAME: MENTOR_TEST USER NAME: DECMENTOR
PASSWORD: SALESTRAINING PASSWORD: SPRINGISHERE
Select the menu's DECMENTOR option
MRO: (Marlboro, MA. Generic Acct)
Local> Set host HYEND NQO: (Nashua, N.H. Generic Acct)
USERNAME: CSMENTOR Local> Set host RHODES
PASSWORD: BOSTONMASS USER NAME: MENTOR_TESTS
PASSWORD: MENTOR_TESTING
SSR (Southern States Region): WSR:
After LOCAL> type C MENTOR Local> c ONOFRE
Then use your user name and password. USERNAME: Type your password
Select MTR from the menu and choose PASSWORD: Type your password
the test option. This will bring up a menu entitled
Business Applications Menu. Select
the MENTOR option.
HELP! HELP! HELP! HELP! HELP!
PLEASE CONTACT YOUR REGIONAL IM&T CONTACT FOR NEW ACCTS. OR TECHNICAL
PROBLEMS:
REGION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEL. NUMBER NODE
CSR Hotline 1-800-DEC-2IMT
NE Help Desk 237-3300
SSR Bill Lashley 385-4349 SAHQ
WSR IS Hotline @TUS 537-7770 ONOFRE
FOR DECMENTOR PRODUCT QUESTIONS CALL YOUR REGIONAL COORDINATORS:
DECMENTOR COORDINATORS PHONE NO. REGION NODE
Nancy Hawald @FAC 456-5456 CSR @FAC
Gloria Ortiz @NYO 352-2867 NE @NYO
Maria Bonsavage 343-0253 SSR SAHQ::BONSAVAGE
Judith Ulrich @WRO 521-4135 WSR WR2FOR::ULRICHJU
FOR PROBLEMS ACCESSING THE GENERIC ACCOUNTS ON ABACUS, GREAT1, HYEND, OR
RHODES NODES CALL: Sue Harlow, DECmentor Program DTN 276-9585, NE, Node:
RHODES
GOOD LUCK! GOOD LUCK! GOOD LUCK!
===========================================================================
Distribution:
This distribution list was created utilizing Personalized Account Services.
You received this information because you are a U.S. Sales Rep or Sales
Management. If you have any questions or you wish to update your
Personalized Communications Profile, send your name and badge number to
SEGMENTATION @MRO or SALES::NSP.
===========================================================================
|
83.61 | Laptop Comments | GUIDUK::MANN | | Wed Jun 24 1992 21:02 | 23 |
| A couple of thoughts/questions/concerns now that I've been to the
training...
1. Interesting that after the fact they had no record as to who
attended the course. Now they are trying to determine who
should be receiving the documentation on the products they
gave us in early May.
2. The training did not include anything on using AQS on the
laptop. Seems like a common sense requirement.
Still trying to figure out what to use as the NEXT SCREEN
key on the laptop. Anyone know?
3. Support is VERY limited, as my first call to the number they
provided at training was quickly ended. Seems the people on
the other end had no knowledge of the 320P. Working later with
Atlanta has been good though.
Art Mann
Seattle
|
83.62 | Training "mandatory"? | MORO::BEELER_JE | Ross Perot for President | Sat Jun 27 1992 12:55 | 16 |
| Well .. the field service guys in the office got their laptops last
week (I haven't been able to get one yet ... being in sales I haven't
been able to get to training).
My understanding was that the training was mandatory .. the local field
service reps got their laptops brought to them and some "in-office"
training was conducted by another service rep who had been to the
training.
Is the formal training session mandatory? Given that there are some sales
reps who are quite PC knowledgeable .. it may be a more productive use
of their selling time to allow for some accelerated or reduced
training.
Thanks,
Jerry
|
83.63 | Test out is now possible | TORREY::BLUNDELL_JE | | Sun Jun 28 1992 20:51 | 10 |
| Jerry, There is now a formal process for testing out of
the mandatory training session.
The first step is to take an online test available under the MENTOR
choice on the FAST system. I got a memo about this the other day, and
I think the distribution was fairly wide in our area. I'll forward
something to you in the next few hours.
Jeff
|
83.64 | | ODIXIE::GEORGE | Do as I say do, not as I do do. | Mon Jun 29 1992 13:17 | 6 |
| I believe there are two, completely diferent laptop programs: one is
funded by Digital Services for field engineers and the other is funded
by Sales for sales reps and sales support. They are being implemented
differently because they have different purposes.
Steve
|
83.65 | | JMPSRV::MICKOL | Winning with Xerox in '92 | Mon Jun 29 1992 22:21 | 8 |
| re: <<< Note 83.64 by ODIXIE::GEORGE "Do as I say do, not as I do do." >>>
I beg to differ. Aren't the purposes common: to make employees more
productive. Yes, they have different tools and utilities, but the desired
result is the same, no?
Jim
|
83.66 | | ODIXIE::GEORGE | Do as I say do, not as I do do. | Wed Jul 01 1992 10:37 | 3 |
| Point well taken, Jim.
Steve
|
83.67 | you get one shot | PCOJCT::MILBERG | SISsy is a really dumb job-title | Wed Jul 01 1992 11:31 | 26 |
| re. TEST-OUT for training
BE CAREFUL-
I took the test the other night and got a 79% just doing a quick
run-thru. When I went back in the next night to go over the test, see
what I had missed and try to learn and better my score - it was locked
out. Sent a memo to the MENTOR people and got back an answer (I'm
asking permission to post).
YOU GET ONE SHOT AT THE TEST!!!!!
'Passing' is 90%!
I do not understand how:
1. making 90% a passing score
2. not letting one learn from ones mistakes on the test
helps either increase revenue or decrease expenses.
-Barry-
|
83.68 | I finally got my docs, but... | HTBPAS::SNAZZY::DUANE | Send lawyers, guns & money | Wed Jul 01 1992 16:40 | 9 |
| I finally received my documentation last week for my laptop. Why on this
earth did it take so long for the documentation to arrive? My training was
early May. I also have yet to receive my Xircom (sp?) adapter to connect to
the network so I can do file transfers in seconds/minutes instead of minutes/
hours. Also, do we get the actual distribution media in case something happens
and we need to reload the software? If not, why not?
d
|
83.69 | Laptop Doc, etc. | GUIDUK::MANN | | Wed Jul 01 1992 17:00 | 15 |
| Re: -.1
I had heard that they basically had no record as to who had in fact
attended the earlier sessions. I know that out here in Western Region
they distributed a memo asking that if you had attended the training to
let them know so you could then receive the documentation.
It finally came last week, but still am waiting for the Xircom.
Speaking of laptops, has anyone yet figured out what key on the laptop
equates to the NEXT SCREEN key in AQS?
A day in the life...
Art
|
83.70 | unpassable test? | LURE::CERLING | God doesn't believe in atheists | Wed Jul 01 1992 17:14 | 24 |
|
I also gave a shot at the test, however, I had noticed in the memo
announcing the test that it was a one shot deal. Total agreement that
it is not much of a test if one cannot learn from his mistakes. Some
of the questions also struck me as having no correct answer from the
multiple choices. After getting into it, I called over an individual
who had gone to the class and had him start reading the questions. He
said some of the questions weren't even covered in the class.
I am not singing sour grapes on this one (before anyone starts saying
that). I expected not to get 90%, which is 44 out of 48. I just
wanted to see what the questions were like. I have been using a PC at
home and work for some time. The questions were just terrible, and the
fact that you could not even see what constituted a `wrong' answer
makes it worse yet. I got the feeling that the administrators of this
program said, `Well, they wanted a test so that those who think they
know PCs can pass out; we will give them a test. Except they aren't
going to undermine my program. They simply won't be able to pass the
test'.
Maybe that isn't true, but after taking the test, that was my
impression.
tgc
|
83.71 | "next screen" and other thoughts | SWAM2::VANBEZOOY_JO | | Wed Jul 01 1992 21:44 | 35 |
| Re .69....the "Next Screen" key is attained by Gold Control-J. I guess
that 3 strokes beats 6.
Re the test out process for PCs....I have had a notebook since January,
using Windows and MS Office, etc (not Mobilizer [and never heard of
Keaterm]). I have used PCs awhile longer. I took the test and got 15
of 15 on hardware, and only 24 of 33 on software - not near good
enough, and I know for a fact that some questions had no right answer,
and others were terribly worded. $100 says so. Our CTS rep (a PC
wizard) took it and got a lower score. He got another chance to take
it (he can't have a notebook!), and all the PC people in the office,
including myself and the family dog, with a Sales Workbench notebook PC
in hand for reference, we sat down to take the test. We only managed
an 88%. Give me a break!!!!
Also, two people from our office have been to the "training" so far,
and at best they view the notebook disdainfully..."is this all there is?".
And they spent $650 in travel and two days each to get the PCs.
Where are the sales territory managment tools? How about SNAP or maybe
Outcome? Is the notebook PC program existent as ordered by the field?
I have used my PC to good advantage over the last couple of quarters, I
have becomer PC literate, and like the use of it very much.
Somebody please tell me that we are working on this program to make it
better, and that we will have some sales territory management tools
available quickly. Also - please review enforced travel to pick a pc
up. We have some perfect examples here of rigid rules being enforced,
costing the company unnecessary $, for no gain. And the notebook
program could be so good!
Please take these comments positively. I know that we are trying hard.
Regards, JVB.
|
83.72 | Test designed to make you fail | SLOVAX::THOMSON | , Mark DTN 544-3195 | Thu Jul 02 1992 03:19 | 14 |
| re: the test out program.
A very persistent person in our office called the "powers that be" with
respect to the content of the test, and came away with the definite
impression that the intent of the DECmentor test is as was indicated in
a prior reply: to allow them to say "we gave you the opportunity to
test out and you failed, now just come to the training like we told you
in the beginning.
By the way, I agree that some of the questions are really hokey and
that one could take issue with some of the answers. In spite of that,
I managed to get a 92% score. Now let's see if anyone can really pass
that second hoop....
|
83.73 | | MADWT::HENDERSON | Another Casualty of Applied Metaphysics | Thu Jul 02 1992 10:51 | 12 |
| One of the people in our office that took the early training has an ethernet
adapter (don't know if came it came from the official source). Problem
is there are two missing pieces to using it.
1. No node name/number. Apparently they are being told that there is still a
shortage of node number and they are scarce. I though the "hidden area" trick
was supposed to fix this.
2. No Pathworks server. A number of people here are under the impression that
you can't use ethernet unless there is a pathworks server available. Since
IM&T were not included in the planning for the PCs it looks like the only way
to get pathworks is to buy it and run it ourselves.
|
83.74 | Laptops | GUIDUK::MANN | | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:26 | 27 |
| re: .71
Thanks for the info on the NEXT SCREEN key for the laptop keyboard.
Now, how about the NEXT SCREEN key for the standard PC keyboard that
connects to the laptop. So far, the key in the same position as NEXT
SCREEN (Next Page) does not work, only switches the Keaterm modem
control betwen Resume and Hold!
re: many of the others
It would be nice if there was some indiciation of the applications being
developed (hopefully) for the field to use on the laptops. If the
intent was that we each would take Excel, Powerpoint and Word, develop
applications specific to our own needs, and then be more productive, I
think we have missed the mark. What we can develop on our own is only
a part of the need.
Has anyone from back east approached anyone in the field about we
actually would want on the laptops? Is anyone back east even reading
this note any more?
This has been an editorial comment!
Art
|
83.75 | So publish the answers then | SMAUG::GARROD | Floating on a wooden DECk chair | Thu Jul 02 1992 18:49 | 7 |
| Re .72
So why don't you "do the right thing" and publish all the correct
answers so that the PC literate who feel they don't need PC training
can make sure they can score 90% on the silly test.
Dave
|
83.76 | It's worse than I thought... | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts is TOO slow | Mon Jul 27 1992 12:33 | 27 |
| Well, I went to training last week and asked my questions.
What about backup? "That's an advanced topic covered in a future optional
class." Huh?
What happens if it breaks? "You send it off and get it fixed." What about a
loaner? "There are no plans for a loaner program." You mean I'm dead in the
water until it gets fixed? "Yes."
So we are putting thousands of laptops in the field with no apparent plans
to provide resources the ensure that they will be properly supported.
Must be The Digital Way:-(
Then there is the question of documentation. I really liked most of the
applications we got with our PCs. Just one problem. No documentation. We are
supposed to get it within 10 days of completing the class, but we were told
that since we were OEMing the products, Digital is producing their own version
of the documentation, and it's not ready yet!
YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING! What is wrong with the documentation from the vendor?
It's good enough for the rest of the world. I guess I'll keep the folks at the
800 number busy reading the manuals to me.
Great. Give me a tool but make it almost impossible to use effectively:-(
Bob
|
83.77 | | ACOSTA::MIANO | John - NY Retail Banking Resource Cntr | Mon Jul 27 1992 15:19 | 13 |
| Well Bob you're doing a lot better than I am. I got back from vacation
to find an announcement for the training in the mail that is, of course,
all filled up. In addition, I find a mail message for an on-line test
that people who already know about PeeCees can take in lieu of the test.
Of course that test was only available the period I was on vacation.
It's amazing that those of use who do much more advanced stuff on the
PeeCees than any stupid into course will ever cover can't get the PCs
until we get take the course that is completely filled up all the time.
I guess this is what's called job protection.
John
|
83.78 | Good Idea, but the implementation plan needs work | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Wed Jul 29 1992 14:47 | 10 |
| Re:.76 (no support plans)
Seems to me that this is exactly the kind of implementation error that we warn
our customers about! 8^)
Another issue we are finding... now that all of these laptops exist in the field,
where is the funding to increase the modem banks to accept all of the incoming
connections?
Bob
|
83.79 | Software Pblms/Updates? | GUIDUK::MANN | | Thu Jul 30 1992 12:53 | 10 |
| Also,
1. What happens when the next versions of software come out?
Is there a process for distibuting media/doc? Who is the
support for such a large undertaking?
2. If you need to reload any of your existing software, where is
the media?
Art
|
83.80 | SEE PC_PROGRAM NOTES FILE | SONATA::PCPO | | Thu Jul 30 1992 14:59 | 2 |
| Please see SONATA::PC_PROGRAM note 33.0. Your questions are addressed
there.
|
83.81 | Virtual Laptops | JMPSRV::MICKOL | We won with Xerox in '92 | Wed Aug 19 1992 18:34 | 54 |
| I've been trying to get into laptop training since DECworld. After much
consternation I finally get into a course and its the week they stop
distributing the units. Aaaarrrrrgggggggghhhhhhhh!
Empty Lap Jim
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
Date: 06-Aug-1992 01:52pm EDT
From: CEA_REGISTRAR @ACI
CEA_REGISTRAR AT A1 AT POBOX AT ACI
Dept: ED SERVICES
Tel No: 708/806-7578 DTN:474
TO: See Below
Subject: URGENT - PC PROGRAM UPDATE
*******************************************************************************
THIS IS FROM THE PC PROGRAM OFFICE
*******************************************************************************
Due to a sudden and unexpected increase in customer demand for PC Notebooks,
all current inventory has been frozen to fill external orders. Therefore we
are not able to continue with the "train and deliver" strategy that we have
been using for the PC Notebook Investment Program.
In order to accommodate the customer demand, and not jeopardize the program, we
have altered the plan as follows:
Effective August 10, 1992, participants will not be able to leave with their
PCs upon completion of the course. Instructors will use dedicated "lab"
machines, and all participants who successfully complete the program, will
receive their unit later (shipped directly to their job site with the
accompanying documentation).
Although it is not clear when internal shipments will resume, it is our intent
to fulfill distribution ASAP. In the meantime, we want to complete the Q1
training schedule, as well as, distribution to those persons who have completed
the "Test-Out" process.
According to our records, you are already enrolled or waitlisted to participate
in a class beginning on or after August 10. If you chose not to participate,
please notify your local registrar, by e-mail, immediately (see addresses
below). This will allow us to re-fill the seat. (Note: All classes for this
quarter are filled, and no training schedule for Q2 is yet available.) There
is no cancellation charge.
Should additional information become available, we will notify thoe persons
enrolled and waitlisted, so please refrain from calling the Program Office.
Thank you for your cooperation in this regard, Judy Gustafson, PCPO @OGO.
|
83.82 | Thud! | MORO::BEELER_JE | Bush in '92 | Thu Aug 20 1992 01:53 | 8 |
| Tell me about it ... I cover a territory that requires me to be on the
road (overnight) three or four days a week. I've got an old LA12 that
I was thinking of bringing out of storage .. but .. ever tried to do
ALL-IN-1 on a hardcopy terminal?
Let's hope for the best.
Jerry
|
83.83 | | STOHUB::F18::ROBERT | | Thu Aug 20 1992 10:17 | 3 |
| I hear that they will be replaced by the new 325P laptop. Which is a better
and faster machine.
|
83.84 | | JMPSRV::MICKOL | We won with Xerox in '92 | Fri Aug 21 1992 00:38 | 9 |
| If you are right about getting the 325p, it may be worth the wait. I asked
that very question of the instructors at ACI (where I took the training) and
they were rather skeptical of the units being upgraded. The program office
(PCPO@OGO) is probably sick of hearing from me, so is anyone else up for
asking them?
Regards,
Jim
|