T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
32.1 | Some issues ... | MORO::BEELER_JE | Hit hard, hit fast, hit often | Thu Aug 29 1991 03:15 | 42 |
| Just this week we had a distributor call our office: "Could I send my
distribution media to your office so that your software specialist can
install it for a demo - it should only take 3 hours or so for the
installation"....
There have been times where more direct sales time was devoted to the
sale than would have been necessary had the entire sale been done "up
front" - i.e., direct Digital. I'm trying to do a better job of
"training" the distributor(s) to alleviate this distinct problem. So
far, marginally successful, but, I keep trying.
The word has not filtered down to our resellers/OEMs/etc... that just
because there's a customer in town does not necessarily mean that we
can provide any sales/support for that potential customer. This is
particularly true of the national accounts.
Just recently one of our OEMs sold the virtues of having a local Digital
sales office ... BEFORE they checked with the local sales office. We
now have a "sticky" situation on our hands since the potential customer
has found that their Digital sales support comes from 500 miles away
and not the local office.
This is a new partner and they're threatening to switch to another
platform so that they have local sales and service for this new
customer (city government). Had this partner known "up front" that we
weren't budgeted to handle this local customer, this entire problem could
have been avoided.
A larger problem is that of long term strategic accounts - the
distributors tend to be more tactical than strategic. There is a
tendency for the distributors to not devote much time to the long term
strategic accounts. If a national account is involved, and we're not
budgeted for that account, and, the distributor won't devote the time to
the account ... ...
This is not directly related to "cost of sales" but more so the issue
of the "style" of selling that distributors classically present.
I'm sure that in the long run we'll get the kinks worked out but I sure
solicit any direction and advice that anyone can give.
Jerry
|
32.2 | Like teaching a child to doit right! | NEAGP::SAMPSON | On the Road Again - and again - and.. | Thu Aug 29 1991 08:13 | 14 |
| ref: base note
I don't want this to be a forum fo back and forth discussion about
distributors but it does seem to me that if our distributors (I deal
almost exclusively with an end user) are doing something incorrectly
and we "pay the price" in the post sales situation why aren't we as a
company forcing the distributors to immediately make a correction to
their P & P's or potential lose the distribitorship et al.?
I don't want to overly simplify this but if we continually pay for the
distributors mistakes we will never teach them how to do do it right -
and increase their business in the meantime throught a more enthusiastic
customer! 8^)
Dave Sampson
|
32.3 | Feet On the Street | CTOAVX::RPOWELL | | Thu Aug 29 1991 18:07 | 16 |
| I'm on the Xerox Account team. This year, one-third of my effort is
to grow all our business thru our CSO's, with over $1M from our two
selected distributors. We're spending considerable effort to develop
a joint planning and joint selling effort with those two companies,
who have agreed to treat Xerox as a national account. They in turn
will be treated as a team member, introduced into the sales campaign,
giving our account managers a second salesforce to manage. The goal
is to gain "Feet on the Street" and cover more ground, with more
profitable business. There's considerable resistance to this, as you
can imagine....we just don't see many realistic options around, are
are dedicated to making this work. We kicked off a team contest
called "Channel Master" to demonstrate how an updated mailing list,
use of DMO, these two distributors, and others CSO's will add $X M
to our business this fiscal year. We think it will work, and the
distributor managers think so too!
|
32.4 | Response from U.S. Distributor Sales | MURPHY::KAMINS | | Thu Sep 12 1991 14:28 | 47 |
| As we all have to learn the new behaviors of the New Management System, so
too are distributors learning new behaviors: how to be part of a Digital
account team; how to handle the full sales cycle and cost of sale for
business they are assigned to handle; how to communicate clearly so missed
expectations do not result from their efforts.
At the top of the house, our distributors fully understand and are
committed to having the best support resources in place and managing the
full sales cycle. It is not their desire to do skimming - looking for
orders late in the cycle that they didn't earn. However, their
organizations, like ours, are large and we can expect that some people at
the local level will not do the right thing. When that happens, please
raise it to the account manager or the local sales manager responsible for
the distribution accounts. They are listed below. If that still doesn't
work, feel free to call my office at DTN 296-4251.
ACCOUNT GROUP MANAGERS
Name Telephone #
Randy Glickman (Pioneer) 296-4627
Rich Tyldesley (Wyle) 296-4079
Steve Woodward (Avnet) 296-4100
Mike Murphy (Regional Accounts) 296-4057
Dan Williams (Specialty Accounts) 296-4093
Larry Miscowski (Channels Industries) 296-4082
Steve Wentzell (MWBE) 296-4387
Joe McFadden (Channels Sales/Govt.) 337-4283
DISTRIBUTION SALES MANAGERS
Name Telephone # Location
Beverly Badois 433-3862 @DYO
Bart Dellinger 531-4424 @LAO
John Gingher 323-4297 @KYO
Geoff Litteral 431-2878 @CLO
Dennis Macumber 474-2595 @ACI
Mike McSweeney 521-4424 @WRO
Carol Morris 385-2772 @ALF
Stu Schlackman 486-6635 @DLO
Robert Waldron 274-6802 @MKO
Ed Kamins
Manager, U.S. Distribution
|
32.5 | Much Appreciated... | ODIXIE::SILVERS | Sales Support Ninja... | Thu Sep 12 1991 15:28 | 4 |
| Thanx much for the list - hope we won't have to use it -- but I'll
pass it along to our local sales folk anyway.
David Silvers
|
32.6 | Just curious? | PHDVAX::RICCIO | It's still Rock'n Roll to me! | Wed Sep 25 1991 13:58 | 15 |
|
David,
Just curious to who the distributor is/was. When I was up north
(New England district) we delt primarily with Avnet. The G.E. team
here in PA deals a lot with Pioneer. I don't recall any problems to
the extent you mentioned, but like anything else, it's the individuals
not the distributor.
I sit right next to Joe McFadden (listed in note 32.4) and I see
everyday the push towards using distributors. It's a great idea,
providing it doesn't cost US money.
Phil...
|
32.7 | Distributor changes? | DENVER::DAVISGB | I'd rather be driving my Jag | Mon May 11 1992 14:18 | 10 |
| I had a discussion with my account team the other day regarding
distributors. Some of the feedback I heard included a rumor that the
distributor program may change next year...i.e...
someone found out that selling through disti's isn't as profitable as
originally thought...
Cheers,
Gil
|
32.8 | Maybe we should revisit the process... | RIPPLE::CORBETTKE | | Mon May 11 1992 15:02 | 11 |
| I haven't heard anything, but I can believe it can't be very
profitable. What I see is distributors following SR's around and
booking business that should be done by DEC. Therefor, tying two reps
up to book one piece of business. Unfortunately, the DEC rep's are
happy to let them do it. The system should be established to increase
the people selling DEC products to an increasing number of prospects
without increasing the headcount by DEC. I believe that is the intent,
but not the fact.
Ken Corbett
|