T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
70.1 | Yes - its the file transfer for a 7.800 | MUNICH::KLOEPPER | Vera Kloepper/Net&Comms-Support | Tue Jul 17 1990 17:45 | 18 |
|
Hi,
Yes - you are right - FT-MSP is a Siemens-Protocol and it is the
same (hopefully) which is used by FTSIE , FT-BS2000 .... but this
is a product for the layer 5 to 7 it didn't define the underlying
network.
MSP is the operating-system for the 7.800 Hardware, which is from
Fuijitsu and IBM kompatible.
This system is running SNA for communication - but I didn't know
if we can interwork with the "Siemens"SNA.
As I know that system isn't able to run OSI communication which is
needed to use FTSIE.
regards Vera
|
70.2 | I think we can do it | ECCGY4::STROHMAIER | | Wed Jul 18 1990 14:43 | 6 |
| I think we even made tests with this system - I forwarded the note to
Helmut Schimmel (if this is the right system we made the tests via
X.25)
Regards
Elisabeth
|
70.3 | Should work!!! | MUNTRA::SCHIMMEL | The Answer Is 42 | Wed Jul 18 1990 19:20 | 8 |
| Hello,
the connectivity between FT-MSP and VAX FTSIE has been successfully tested
via X.25 by "CGK Computer Gesellschaft Konstanz mbH".
CGK used a IBM 4381 running MVS/XA and FT-MSP V2.0A.
Regards
Helmut
|
70.4 | FT-MSP - SDLC - FTSIE ??? | ECCGY4::STROHMAIER | | Fri Jul 20 1990 15:47 | 50 |
| This is what Jean wants to do - anybody any idea?
EXISTING CONFIGURATION
-----------------------
+----------------+ +------------+
|A siemens | SDLC link (I suppose with SNA) | IBM host |
|machine (type ?)|----------------------------------------| |
| FT-MSP | | |
+----------------+ +------------+
(According to customer no X25
is available)
WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO DO
------------------------
+----------------+ +------------+
|A siemens | SDLC link (I suppose with SNA) | VAX |
|machine (type ?)|----------------------------------------| with some |
| FT-MSP | | variation |
+----------------+ |of FTSIE |
+------------+
So I suppose that this will imply that you could "plug" the file transfert
part of FTSIE over VMS/SNA, am I right ?
If yes then the following question rise up:
- Would it be possible ? (or does it exist ?)
- Would you be interested in doing it on a project base if we fund you
with some part of the needed money ?
- How much will it cost us ?
- How long will it take ?
Looking forward to reading your answer, best regards.
Jean.
PS: In case you are interested by WHY, for Whom and so on I could forward
you the report (resulting from a customer visit) on which I have been
requested to work.
|
70.5 | What can be done ... | MUNTRA::SCHIMMEL | The Answer Is 42 | Mon Jul 23 1990 11:26 | 57 |
| From: MUNLEG::TUSCHEK "Andreas LEG @UNT Ext.1309" 23-JUL-1990 10:04:40.69
To: SCHIMMEL
CC: TUSCHEK
Subj: Response: FTSIE<->FTMSP over SDLC
Response to FTSIE and FT-MSP over SDLC links
What could be done:
1) (a little bit unrealistic)
FTSIE uses VOTS TP4[2,0] as the entrypoint to communications.
VOTS itself provides links over IEEE 802.3 LAN or alternatively
X25 (PSI). As far as I know the VAX/SNA gateway resembles roughly
the functionality of PSI, BUT VOTS does not offer links based on
the SNA protocol stack nor bare SDLC links.
--> Request to VOTS engineering to provide something like this.
2) (also a little bit unrealistic)
FTSIE engineering implements an alternastive entrypoint to the SNA/GW
interface but this means we would have to implement OSI TP on top of
SNA/GW by ourself. Because FTMSP uses also the OSI TP layer.
--> Cost use several manyears of OSI protocol wizards
3) If the customer goes local, he should use X25 with a NULLmodem box.
Works!
4) If he goes wide area over leased line subnetwork, it might be possible
to operate similar as a nullmodem but with real modems.
In this case all part of X25 concerned with interfacing to the PSN
could be ignored or directly forwarded to the counterpart modem,
respectively.
Im not a modem/datalink specialist, so the feasability of this aspect has
to be verified by a dedicated specialist!!
5) Wait for DECnet Phase V.
In Ph V OSI TP4 will offered as a layer 4 choice together with old NSP.
This can run over HDLC datalink. (Some variation of SDLC??)
We have plans to port VMS-FTSIE to the Ph V environment when it comes
up. (1991?)
Summary: With current technology, approach # 3 and 4 provide the most
realistic chance to get it run.
(We already run tests with FT-MSP under MVS successfully over
DATEX-P PSDN)
Andreas Tuschek
|