Title: | Zap Technical Conference |
Notice: | ZAP Version 5.3 is available. See note 1.1 |
Moderator: | ZAPDEV::MACONI |
Created: | Mon Feb 24 1986 |
Last Modified: | Mon May 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 170 |
Total number of notes: | 492 |
How does ZAP treat PC users integrated with PATHWORKS ? I have installed ZAP at a couple of customer sites before and both myself and the customers were impressed with its capabilities. It does what it is advertised to do and the various options for time slots process exclusions are great. Now, my new site is inquiring about ZAP, but I don't know how ZAP will behave in their environment. They don't have any users on the server. All of their 30 users are pathworks clients. Will they get the same functionality from ZAP or will ZAP start zapping busy pc users thinking that they are idle ? Also, can ZAP be used to free DECserver ports from inactive connections. In this case the concern is not VMS resources or VMS security, they are just trying to economize the usage of their very precious 8 ports. Thanks a bunch Lale
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
122.1 | ZAP and Pathworks should have no problems | ZAPDEV::MACONI | The Doctor is In | Fri Nov 06 1992 08:49 | 13 |
We utilize Pathworks and Xcursion at our site and have had no problems with ZAP killing off non-idle processes. We do not run ZAP on our dedicated Pathworks server, but since there are no users logging into that system, we do not need to. ZAP should have no problem in handling your Pathworks users as long as it is set up correctly. One thing to remember is that ZAP will not be able to know that multiple connections from the same PC are the same user and will disconnect each one independently. Other than that, there is very little difference for ZAP if the remote system is a PC, VAX or RISC system. Keith Maconi |