T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
450.1 | BTW not for heavy cartridges | RDGENG::FRY | | Thu Oct 14 1993 10:28 | 8 |
|
BTW, should have added that if your cartridge is heavy, or your mounting
bolts are heavy, you may not be able to move the lighter weight far enough
back to balance.
Consider using alloy bolts/nuts or a lighter cartridge if you have this
problem.
|
450.2 | Ittok = It's ok | ESBS01::WATSON | God wants winners | Thu Oct 14 1993 14:40 | 15 |
| An even better tweek...
The Ittok counterweight should be as close to the pivot as possible�
Howerver, as you say, the _early_ two piece counterweight sounds better
with the 2nd ring removed. Linn realised this and brought out a new
counterweight� just prior to the LV III. There are available from our
Glaswegian (?sp) friends for a nominal fee...
Rik -owner-of-2-Ittik's-in-his-time Watson
�There is a good mechanical reason for this related to moments on
inertia which I can't remember for the life of me.
�Can't remember if it's a single piece or an improved 2 peice design.
|
450.3 | It's one piece | COMICS::FLANDERSD | I remember the look in your eye | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:20 | 5 |
|
As the current owner of Rik's last Ittock (LV II), I can say that the
counterweight is a single piece
Dave
|
450.4 | Only for the strong hearted | BAHTAT::SALLITT | Dave @LZO 845-2374 | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:47 | 17 |
| Another couple of Ittok tweeks given to me were to remove the arm rest
from the armboard, and to remove the cueing mechanism. I was told the
results would be amazing. Unfortunately the arm then has to parked
dangling over the rh side of the lidless plinth; as I was using an
Asaka at the time, I decided my nerves wouldn't stand it and never did
the tweeks.
Another is to set the tracking weight to zero, on the rotating scale,
then set to the correct pressure with a set of scales by moving the
counterweight closer. The theory is that the counterweight then exerts
a smaller moment on the system, which means the stylus has to exert
less moment at the other end to track the arm.
None of these makes an Ittok an Ekos, though, the first ones falling
into the range of "stupid and dangerous things to do with your LP12".
Dave
|
450.5 | I've done that | RDGENG::FRY | | Thu Oct 14 1993 17:08 | 15 |
|
> Another is to set the tracking weight to zero, on the rotating scale,
> then set to the correct pressure with a set of scales by moving the
> counterweight closer. The theory is that the counterweight then exerts
> a smaller moment on the system, which means the stylus has to exert
> less moment at the other end to track the arm.
I've done this (great minds run along the same grooves?) but can't say it
was successful.
I don't know about this "smaller momement of inertia thing". I would have
thought the further the counterweight was from the pivot point, the
more "immovable" the arm would be (assuming infinite rigidity), but then
I don't claim to know a thing about physics or mechanical engineering.
|
450.6 | 2.5 grams = 1.5 grams ? | RDGENG::FRY | | Mon Oct 25 1993 13:50 | 16 |
|
re my .5
My belief that the weight should be as far away from the pivot as possible
leads me to set my Ittok LVII like this:
1) Set spring tracking weight to 1 gram.
2) Balance the tonearm moving the weight back/forth
3) Turn on the spring to, e.g., 2.5 grams to get 1.5 real grams
I like it!
Now, what's wrong with my reasoning here? I've never really understood
this moment of inertia stuff. Can someone explain it simply/directly??
Thanks. Brent.
|
450.7 | | ESBS01::WATSON | God wants winners | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:03 | 31 |
| Moment of interia for laymen.
Tak a broom by the handle and swing it about by the handle - notice how
difficult it is to stop it moving - it has a high moment of inertia
because the main weigh of the broom (the head) is relativly far away
from the pivot point (you hand).
Now repeat the above excercise whilst holding the broom by the head and
swinging the handle about.
Next -and don't try this at home- replace the whole lot by your Ittok
and see why you poor old Asak is having such a hard time of it.
|E
=M===x==============================|E
| |E
^ ^ ^
Hand Pivot point (imaginary) Broom head
N
======================x==============N==
V N
^ ^ ^
Asak bearing counter weight
The closer 'N' is the 'x' the easier the Asak can move the whole
assembly.
|
450.8 | Thanks, still puzzled | RDGENG::FRY | | Tue Oct 26 1993 21:11 | 16 |
|
| N
| ======================x==============N==
| V N
|
| ^ ^ ^
| Asak bearing counter weight
|
| The closer 'N' is the 'x' the easier the Asak can move the whole
| assembly.
I think I follow what you've said, but I thought the whole point of the
exercise was for the cartridge NOT to move the "whole assembly". ??
(Except at very low frequencies to comply with record warp...)
Still puzzled...
|