T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
222.1 | Troika owners rejoyce | CHEST::WATSON | Back to mono | Wed Nov 07 1990 10:33 | 4 |
| But there is some good news, you now get 40% back of you old Troika
when used as trade in (=�319 of �798).
Makes it all seem worth while doesn't it ?
|
222.2 | I'm rejoicing, or will be next week | SCARP::BRIGHT | I'm back! | Wed Nov 14 1990 12:31 | 14 |
| Thanks very much for the warning of the price increase. Yesterday I
saved myself �79 by putting my name down for a Troika. It'll be
delivered next week. Of course, if I hadn't rushed out to buy it,
I would have saved myself �719!
Now on my upgrade wish list:
Lingo �496
Dirak �500?
Spark �495
Isobarik stand panels � 89
Isobarik crossover �465
Steve
|
222.3 | Isobarik hacking | CRATE::WATSON | Back to mono | Wed Nov 14 1990 13:53 | 24 |
| � Now on my upgrade wish list:
...
� Isobarik stand panels � 89
� Isobarik crossover �465
???
Forgive my ignorance but what are you doing to you 'briks ?
Are you adding an external x-over to a (currently internal) DMS pair or
going from PMS to DMS ?
If its the former then is your x-over currently accessible by a panel
in the back of the speaker or does it require ripping apart ?
Do you know what the sound difference between and old (internal) and new
(external) crossover is ?
I ask because I want to make my 'briks active and want to know how much
work is involved.
Rik
|
222.4 | Dirak = �345-00 | CRATE::WATSON | Back to mono | Wed Nov 14 1990 14:19 | 5 |
| The Dirak (High current PSU for LK-1) will cost �395-00 and you get an
extra �50-00 back for your old transformer giving a cost of �345-00.
It will be available in the UK before the new year ... now, how do I
convince the wife into buying me one for Christmas ?
|
222.5 | Crossovers and Isobariks | SCARP::BRIGHT | I'm back! | Wed Nov 14 1990 17:44 | 43 |
| Re .3
I have a pair of ex-dem Isobariks with inbuilt crossover which I
bought two years ago (they were roughly a year old when I got them).
I *think* that the crossover is mounted behind a panel in the back
although I can't really remember.
About the same time as I bought them, Linn brought an Isobarik
upgrade consisting of a new crossover which is on a pcb about a
foot square, designed to sit on the stand below the speakers, and
a stand panel kit consisting of three (or four?) black cloth-covered
wooden (or medite?) panels which box in the stand.
At the time I was told that the new crossover, which enables the
speakers to be tri-wired, improved the sound significantly and
tightened up the bass to the extent that the panels were necessary
to prevent the stands resonating.
I have not yet heard the new crossovers, however, I have heard the
Lingo and like most people was gob-smacked. What really surprised
me was when I was chatting to my tame dealer at Farnborough Hifi
yesterday. After handing over my flexible friend to pay for the
Troika I asked whether I should get the Lingo or the crossover
next, expecting the answer 'Lingo'. He was stumped and said that
although the two things improve the sound in different ways, the
magnitude of the difference is about the same. He's going to
consider the matter carefully and advise me when he installs my
Troika.
Of course, going by Linns philosophy I should have got the Lingo
before the Troika, but the Lingo wasn't going up in price so I
plumped for the Troika.
BTW, referring to a note somewhere else in this conference, the
serial number of my Isobariks is 6186, and that of my LK1 is
107476, bought December 1988.
If there are people with LK1's which have a serial number lower
than mine, you may not be aware that there was a modification made
to LK1's just before I bought mine...
Steve.
|
222.6 | | SKIWI::EATON | Marketing - the rubber meets the sky | Wed Nov 14 1990 21:29 | 7 |
| Anyone heard the LK1/Darrik yet ? After spending some considerable time demming
the LK1/LK280/SPARK against Naim 72/HICAP/140 and Exposure XI/XII/Super VIII,
the LK1 could certainly use the assistance to smooth out it's delivery some...
No doubt a fine amp btw, the way it handled some tracks was clearly superior
to the other amps, but I found it inconsistent in resolving low level detail
and in presenting vocals IMHO.
|
222.7 | who's got a spark? | SCARP::BRIGHT | I'm back! | Thu Nov 15 1990 15:37 | 6 |
| .6 >> Anyone heard the LK1/Darrik yet ? After spending some considerable
.6 >> time demming the LK1/LK280/SPARK against Naim 72/HICAP/140 and Exposure
.6 >> XI/XII/Super VIII...
Where did you do the dem?
Steve
|
222.8 | Almost anywhere | CHEST::WATSON | Back to mono | Thu Nov 15 1990 16:35 | 7 |
| Everyone .... Chris Brooks Audio (Since July), F'brough Hi-Fi and
Absolute Sound and Video - The question you should be asking is who has
go A Darrik (and how do you spell one).
Rik
PS Why no listen to ION ?
|
222.9 | The OED says: | SCARP::BRIGHT | I'm back! | Thu Nov 15 1990 16:39 | 4 |
| It's definitely spelt 'dirak'
I think
|
222.10 | Call My Bluff | CHEST::WATSON | Back to mono | Fri Nov 16 1990 08:18 | 1 |
| So now we know how to spell `dirak', what is one.
|
222.11 | Crank it up and rip the knob off | SPAWN::BRIGHT | Out standing in his field | Thu Nov 29 1990 10:08 | 5 |
|
Freeeoooow. I had the Troika fitted yesterday and it's wonderful: inky
blackness etc. :-)
Steve.
|
222.12 | You ain't heard *nothin'* yet.... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | Dave @RKG, 831-3117 | Fri Nov 30 1990 12:52 | 13 |
| re... <<< Note 222.11 by SPAWN::BRIGHT "Out standing in his field" >>>
-< Crank it up and rip the knob off >-
>>Freeeoooow. I had the Troika fitted yesterday and it's wonderful: inky
>>blackness etc. :-)
>>Steve.
If you think it's good now, wait a few months..... :-)
Dave
|
222.13 | What shall I spend my old K18 on? | SPAWN::BRIGHT | Coffee Darling? Ah, Capuccino... | Thu Dec 20 1990 16:00 | 5 |
|
Something I meant to mention a while back: you can trade in your old
Linn stylus/cartridge and get 40% of its value off *any* Linn product.
This is not restricted to trading in Troikas.
|
222.14 | What about my K5 Cartridge? | FORTY2::GROOM | | Fri Dec 21 1990 15:40 | 5 |
|
Can I trade in a 1 year old Linn K5 for a brand new K9 and get 40% off what I
reckon is about �80, ie a saving of �32 (more than the K5 is worth)??!
Alex.
|
222.15 | Merry Christmas, everyone | SCARP::BRIGHT | Just the facts ma'am | Fri Dec 21 1990 16:05 | 12 |
| >> Can I trade in a 1 year old Linn K5 for a brand new K9 and get 40% off what I
>> reckon is about �80, ie a saving of �32 (more than the K5 is worth)??!
No. If you trade in your K5 for a K9, you'll get 40% of the current value
of a K5 off the price of a K9. I don't know the current prices, but s'pose
they're �50 for a K5 and �80 for a K9: You'll end up paying �60 for the
K9 on trade-in.
Steve.
PS. Merry Christmas to all noters.
|
222.16 | This phrase "trade in...." | FORTY2::GROOM | | Wed Jan 02 1991 09:07 | 12 |
| Steve,
I went down to Reading Hi-Fi and mentioned the magic word "trade in" - I think
they thought I was talking Martian.
So where do I go where they will understand this foreign tongue?
Alex.
PS. I guess I didn't actually speak to the organ grinder at Reading Hi-Fi so the
guy might have been mis-informed??
|
222.17 | Speak LOUD and s l o w | CRATE::WATSON | Back to mono | Wed Jan 02 1991 10:40 | 17 |
| Well just like any other foreign language SPEAK LOUD AND SLOW and they
will understand. If not then give Linn Products a ring they are usually
very helpful (But remember today is a public holiday in Scotland)
That number again ... (041) 644 5111
Good old Naim Audio (Remember them ?) have (had?) a scheme where you
could trade your old amp in for the price you payed less the VAT.
Speeking of Naim amps did you know that you can have those wonderfully
masculine extruded aluminium cases brought up to current ``green''
spec ? You didn't ? Well why bother - I liken the old cases any how.
Happy New Year
Rik.
PS What did you get for Christmas ?
|
222.18 | | SPAWN::BRIGHT | Coffee Darling? Ah, Capuccino... | Mon Jan 07 1991 08:31 | 9 |
| Re .16 Trade-ins.
The bit about Linn stylus trade-ins I put in was from info given to me
by John, the organ-grinder at Farnborough Hifi. I *think* he mentioned
this was a new policy from Linn. Of course he could have been wrong,
but he definitely said I could have had 40% of the price of my old K18
discounted if I'd chosen to trade it in.
Steve
|
222.19 | Just when you thought it was safe in the dem room | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Tue Apr 09 1991 14:32 | 39 |
| Rather than start yet another Linn topic, I decided to put this in
here....
Having read comments in this notesfile and in the hifi press about the
Lingo, and being a hardened Linnie, I felt I really ought to hear one
of these things. I'd heard a Lingoed Linn in a triamped Isobarik system
(hex-amped really, as the LK280s had been SPARKed), but it was doing so
many things different to my system that it was hard to figure the
difference. Also, as it was a Linn evening at a dealer's, I decided it
was best not to push it and ask for a comparison; anyway, the single
malt and the music was working so well, why spoil a good thing by
asking stupid questions?
A few weeks later I returned with my Linn for an A-B dem, sat back and
waited for the predicted "Aha!" and "Wow!" experiences. Nothing; zilch;
except frustration, especially from the dealer. No differences to speak
of. I left him scratching his head, I bought some records and went home
feeling *very* smug - I do my own Linn adjustments.
A few days later he called me at home. The dildo who did the conversion
hadn't removed the spring and bearing from the bottom of the motor, and
would I like to come over to York for another dem? After this dem I left
my Linn behind to be converted, having paid out my �496 on the basis of
just a 15 minute dem; we never got around to comparing the Lingoed Linn
to mine. I brought mine back home a week ago Saturday and it still
hasn't stopped surprising and pleasing me.
I have no doubts that the Lingo is worthwhile, but the difference
against a standard Linn is dependent on many other things apart from
the quality of the conversion, especially the revision of the
unconverted Linn. But even though mine had the latest armboard, spring
bushes, feet and a new Valhalla board, the difference was still of
gob-smacking magnitude.
I thought that maybe at last I can start saving for some new speakers,
but most likely I will need a new Troika before I get that far - the
Lingo will make me wear the cartridge out sooner!
Dave
|
222.20 | | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Tue Apr 09 1991 14:34 | 4 |
| On the subject of this topic's title, Linn are absorbing the VAT
increase from 15% to 17�% until May.
Dave
|
222.21 | None-Linn speakers ! | CRATE::WATSON | As simple as possible, not simpler | Tue Apr 09 1991 16:37 | 5 |
| Dave,
What speakers are you looking at ? I thought you had Kabers and
'briks were too big for your room.
Rik
|
222.22 | Heaven is a small speaker that really works... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Tue Apr 09 1991 17:52 | 16 |
| I use 1985 vintage Kan 1's, the NON-biwireable variety! I keep lusting
after a pair of Kabers because I kid myself I need more bass and a
smoother top/mid, allied to the Kan's superb musicality. Then I try one
of Linn's front end options and realise I don't need any Kabers after
all, which is just as well because I have usually just spent a packet!
First transition was Ittok-to-Ekos, then Asaka-to-Troika, and now
Valhalla-to-Lingo.
Since I already have a Spark I guess the next step would be a Dirak; I
nearly flashed the plastic for one when I bought the Lingo, but
apparently Linn are out of stock and I was told they may be bringing
something else out that may interest me more, which really baited my
curiosity. When I find out what the "something else" is, I'll post a
note in here.
Dave
|
222.23 | Keep the Kans | CRATE::WATSON | As simple as possible, not simpler | Wed Apr 10 1991 09:56 | 9 |
| Ah - early Kan's.
I have a pair of these on ``permanent'' loan to my brother. They
really are an excellent speaker. It is possible to make them active -
then they really sing. Both Naim and Ion (But not Linn) make suitable
crossovers which will work with 280's. The conversion to active is
simple.
Rik
|
222.24 | KAIRN �1200-00 Out Monday. You _want_ one. | CRATE::WATSON | As simple as possible, not simpler | Wed Apr 10 1991 12:55 | 1 |
|
|
222.25 | | SKIWI::EATON | Marketing - the rubber meets the sky | Thu Apr 11 1991 23:42 | 1 |
| Details please ?
|
222.26 | New Linn preamp - Enet scoops the hifi press! | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Sun Apr 14 1991 17:11 | 49 |
| The "something else" is a new preamp called the Kairn. Only Linn would
name a product after a pile of stones....
I have had the opportunity to see/listen to one of these things. On the
phone, I was told that all the boys at the Sound Org. in York were
saving their pennies to replace their LK1s; Hamish, the boss man,
already has a buyer for his, so if the people who sell it think it's
good enough to pay for, that's a good start. So I couldn't wait to for
an audition, even though I couldn't afford the 1200 notes - or 900
after an LK1 trade-in - to buy one for a while.
When I arrived at the shop a Kairn was set with an LK280/Spark, driving
Isobariks. Sources were a Micromega Solo CD player (I was sharing the
dem with a CD+bariks user) and an LP12/Ekos/Troika/Lingo. Frankly I was
underwhelmed by the sound differences, as were the other people in the
room. To facilitate a quick A/B/C dem an LK1 and an LK1+Dirak were
stacked on top of the Kairn, both
powered up, so perhaps this had a deleterous effect on the sound. It
didn't sound bad, just not 900 notes better than an LK1. Hamish was
puzzled, as he wouldn't commit himself to buying something for his own
use if it didn't represent a substantial upgrade. I was offered a home
loan for the future, but having just forked out for a Lingo it will be
the distant rather than near future.
Apart from the sound quality, there are other interesting aspects of
the Kairn which indicate Linn's thinking on where hifi is going...
1. It has three line level outputs for feeding up to three power amps
or other loads.
2. it has an output laballed "Matrix", for which Linn has yet to
develop the hardware. Rumour has it that this is surround-sound or
multi-room equipment. The remote already has facilities for this.
3. The remote has controls for manipulating any CD player that uses the
standard Philips chipset.
4. Apart from a few basic controls, everything is managed from the
remote.
5. XLR connectors have been discarded in favour of gold plated RCA
phonos.
There are also rumours that a hi end CD player may be coming out of a
certain factory in Salisbury, and maybe even from a factory in Glasgow.
Remember you read it first in here!
Dave
|
222.27 | Single pre-amp demo room ? | CHEST::WATSON | As simple as possible, not simpler | Mon Apr 15 1991 12:52 | 34 |
| Hum,
Confused-of-Camberley (Well Fleet but it doesn't sound as good).
Dave,
This wouldn't be the first time that initial supplies (Possibly
hand-made prototypes) of new Linn kit didn't live up to expectations.
The first time a heard the Lingo I was underwelmed. Good - yes but not
_that_ good. But Chris Brooks Audio have got one in and he seems to be
_very_ impressed by it - Chris isn't know for going off at the deep
end. He says its better that the top pre-amps from Naim and Ion.
Obviouly you need to listed yourself but Chris does tend to get thing
``right'' for my ear.
Some more info.
Looks like a Kremlin ie LK-280 sized + drop down flap revealing
control panel.
The microprocesser etc are only active when the remote / front
panel is used - switch of after 20 seconds (A'la Naim 52).
Power supply is based on the Darik - but internal.
Rik
This is all part of Linn's plot to stop me getting a CD. Whenever I
save enough money for a player they go and improve / replace a
compenent I have _got-to-have_ Ekos, Lingo, Kairn ...
If Linn are making a CD - and the Remote does tend to show this - the I
will be the last kid on the block to have a CD player :-)
PS The Karin probably sounded bad 'coz of the CD player in the room :=)
|
222.28 | | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Mon Apr 15 1991 13:36 | 19 |
| re last....
"PS The Karin probably sounded bad 'coz of the CD player in the room
:=)"
....or the even numbers of limbs on the people in the room.
Actually, the Micromega didn't disgrace itself soundwise, even in the
Linn system - but then it shouldn't for �1500. It was tuneful and the
timing was good, although it exaggerated sibilants/consonant sounds
more than I like; it sounded almost as good as a Rega with a Linn Basik
cartridge fitted. There's progress for you.
Further to the rumours on the Linn CD player, the shop told me
(confirming our phone conversation of Thursday, Rik) that Linn are not
far off getting the DAC side of the Numerik onto a few monolithic
chips.
Dave
|
222.29 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | I shot the sherrif (and the deputy!) | Wed Apr 17 1991 12:24 | 11 |
| RE: .27;
Perhaps it should be "flustered of fleet"
Personally, I think Linn are trying to stop me getting an LP12!
Every time, I think I'll upgrade my REGA, they keep announcing upgrades that
make a listenable LP12 (Surely noone will endure an LP12 without a LinnGO!)
more expensive!
Mark.
|
222.30 | Update for a boy in the boonies | SKIWI::EATON | Marketing - the rubber meets the sky | Sun Jul 28 1991 23:55 | 6 |
| OK all you Linnies out there...
What have Linn been up to over the last 3 months. I hear rumours about new
baseboards for the LP12, a CD player, a new pre-amp etc. etc...
Can someone give me a bit of detail about these products ?
|
222.31 | And there's more to come... | CHEST::WATSON | Blood on the Rooftops | Mon Jul 29 1991 09:45 | 28 |
| The baseboard(s) for the LP-12, Trampolinn, (Get it :-) is for LP-12
which for one reason or another (Mainly wife in my case) are not placed
on Turntable-tables but instead reside on heavy sideboards, cost
�80'ish out in September.
The CD player (CD-5) is a pre-pre-production two bit (The transport and
the electronics�) CD player. There is some debate as the whether it
will see the light of day. If it does it will be ``expensive'' and will
sound ``About as good as a Linn Basik'' its based on the experience
gained from the Numeric A/D + D/A studio kit. If it comes out it will
be ealy next year.
The pre-amp is the Kairn - simply the best pre-amp yet. �1300. See my
notes elseware.
The tuner is the Kremlim > �1000. Full remote (Same remote as Karin and
CD-5)
The interesting beast to me is the yet-unnamed loudspeaker. This is the
Isobarik replacement - but based on Kaber technology, price unknown.
This is rumered to sound better passive than active 'briks - wow.
It may even be smaller than the back breaking monoliths ...
... anyone want a LK-1 and pair of Walnut 'briks ...
Rik
�Linn's joke not mine.
|
222.32 | Is it really a pile of stones ? :-) | SKIWI::EATON | Marketing - the rubber meets the sky | Tue Jul 30 1991 12:05 | 3 |
| OK Rik, I denote you the officil Linn Kairn tester for this conference.
I'd be very interested to hear your impressions of this product...
|
222.33 | a bit more on the Kairn | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Tue Jul 30 1991 13:45 | 34 |
| I spoke to one of the techies at Linn a few weeks ago, talking
interconnect lengths and so on. We got around to the Kairn, and I
explained I'd heard one at a music evening and yes, it was better than the
LK1, but not staggering as some had said, conceding it may have been
the room, the system different to mine, odd choice of music, etc. The
guy at Linn said that was likely, and that I should try one at home; he
also said I shouldn't do that if I couldn't afford to buy it, as once
I'd heard in my own system I wouldn't want to take it back!
I since heard that early models need a different mains filter;
apparently a coil inside the filter case was causing some problems. The
shop I use are sending their's back for a rework, tho' it sounded
pretty good to me last Saturday, driving triamped Isobariks. New models
will be made after Linn's summer hols (next 3 weeks), so I'll maybe
have another dem. A good case for selling some shares, perhaps?
Going back to interconnects, Linn reckon that if you use their phono
cable (now available off the reel), length isn't an issue; the LK1 they
have in reception actually drives 3 LK280s, 2 of which are over 70
metres away inside the factory. I made up some 8 metre interconnects so
I could use 5 metre speaker cables instead of 13 metres, and the
difference was worth the effort; I expected the balance to be warmer,
with the extra capacitance of the longer cable, but if anything the
system is clearer (not brighter), with a greater sense of hearing to
the bottom of the recording but no loss of tunefulness. I expect the
shorter speaker cables are having as much effect here. Also while the
system was dismantled (we've had the decorators in) I rolled back the
carpet where the Linn stands and cut out the foam underlay, replacing
it with a 2'x2' board, glued 'n' screwed to the floor. I suppose all
these things add up.
Dave
|
222.34 | Don't take my word for it, listen to one. | CRATE::WATSON | Blood on the Rooftops | Tue Jul 30 1991 13:56 | 21 |
| Well, I haven't got a Kairn yet, but it's next on the shopping list.
As for my impressions, well, I've always liked the ``sound'' of Linn
electronics (prior to that I had Naim 32/160, before that a Quad). What
struck me most about the Kairn was that I couldn't ``hear'' it doing
anything to the music - it sounded ``like a piece of wire with a gain''.
Not harsh, not forward, not layed-back - it just took on whatever mood
the record was. I spent (quite) a few hours listening to the Karin, but
most of the time I was just listening to the music.
The nearest to it I've heard is the big Naim two box pre-amp (NAC42 ?)
but the Kairn didn't have the ``You've just got to hear this'' that the
Naim had.
All in all I'm very impressed and will be looking forward to buying
one - probably towards the end of this year.
Rik
PS How much is an (old) LK-1 worth �150, �200 ? (Serious question)
|
222.35 | More than that.... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Tue Jul 30 1991 15:45 | 15 |
| re .last...
"PS How much is an (old) LK-1 worth �150, �200 ? (Serious question)"
About �300-350, depending on condition/age. I thought there would be
little demand, but with the LK100 and LK150 shortly available, plus an
LK1, pre/power combo from Linn can be had for under �800 if the LK1 is
a used model. Which also means you can have a Kairn for under a
grand....
Before anyone asks, the LK100 is the Intek's power amp on its own in an
Intek box, same power rating (obviously) as the Intek; the LK150 is a
new power amp, same size physically as the 280, but less power.
Dave
|
222.36 | opinions, please.... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Mon Aug 05 1991 16:29 | 21 |
| Can I have some opinions from the panel?
Currently a pair of Linn Kabers will set you back about �1200, a Kairn
preamp about �1300. An LK1 will p-x against a Kairn for about �350, and
a pair of 1985-vintage Kan I's will p-x against a pair of Kabers for
about �300. This means either Kabers or a Kairn can be had for about
�900.
Given this system: LP12/Lingo/Ekos/Troika, LK1/LK280/SPARK, Kan I's,
and �900 from sale of DEC shares burning a hole in your pocket, would
you upgrade the speakers or the preamp (leaving aside for now that
there are other things worth doing with 900 quid)?
The system-heirarchy argument says the preamp should be upgraded first,
but those Kabers did sound nice last time I heard them, even with an LK1
on the front........
I plan to audition the options, and make up my own mind, but what would
you other Linn users do?
Dave
|
222.37 | | WIKKIT::WARWICK | Trevor Warwick | Mon Aug 05 1991 16:58 | 11 |
|
Well Dave, I'm not a Linn user, so can I answer ? :-> I got this
information out of a conversation I had on a different topic a couple
of months ago.
The Sound Gallery in High Wycombe reckon that Kabers sound completely
horrible when driven with an LK1 - "like a cheap transistor radio" was
the quote. However, they said that they sounded really good with a
Kairn !
Trevor
|
222.38 | | IOSG::HORSFIELD | Total ergonomy | Mon Aug 05 1991 17:38 | 2 |
| go for the speakers - you can *see* them as well as hear
them. and if they sound awful, sell some more shares...
|
222.39 | Love to hear a Kairn | SKIWI::EATON | Marketing - the rubber meets the sky | Mon Aug 05 1991 22:56 | 7 |
| Sorry Dave, the Kairn hasn't made it out here yet. I have however listened to a
pair of Kabers in a setup like yours. Liked the sound and the concept - big,
detailed sound from a "small" box.
Will they let you demo at home ?
Have you heard the Kairn with a sparked 280 ?
|
222.40 | | HAMPS::IVES_J | I've got a bad feeling, Mr Tracey! | Tue Aug 06 1991 10:56 | 4 |
| This months gramaphone carried a quote from Ivor Teflonb*m that they
could only build a reasonable CD player for #50,000 a shot.
Bet that's got meridian and naim quaking in their boots !
|
222.41 | Makes my LP-12 seem cheap | CHEST::WATSON | Blood on the Rooftops | Tue Aug 06 1991 11:25 | 10 |
| I think that Gramaphone (shouldn't they change their name to CD-Player ?)
have take Ivor T. out of context. The quote is at least a year out of
date based on the _cost_ price of �25,000'ish for the Numerik D/A A/D
converter + markups + Ivor T. exagerating as always.
Taking to my tame Linn bod just back from the holidays yesterday the
CD-5 could be out by 1992Q2 and even cost _less_ than the Naim thing.
Also the converter _should_ be usable with other peoples transport
(Unlike Naim). Mind you that is for a CD player as good as the Linn
Basik TT, a reasonable CD player may well cost �50,000 :-)
|
222.42 | Linn Kan IIs | SKIWI::EATON | Marketing - the rubber meets the sky | Sun Aug 25 1991 23:35 | 21 |
| I had my first good listen to Linn Kan IIs on the weekend. My usual hifi shop
was discounting a pair 30%. I've been unhappy with my speakers (Mission 764's)
for some time (wobbly bass, lack of integrity) and so listened to these with
interest because of what I'd heard about them. Interest was hightened because I
could esentially swap the 764's for the Kans without having to find additional
monies.
Hooked them up to an LP12/Lingo/Akito/K18 and Naim 62/140.
Overall I was impressed. The speakers were *very* musical and had well,
integrity. Bass wasn't great but improved when the speakers were hard up against
the wall. Very *fast* speakers which helped their musicallity.
I'm going to take them home for a week and give them a good audition. Not sure
whether to upgrade to the Kans while I figure out the ultimate speaker and find
the money (I quite like the Ruark Talisman), or skip the Kans altogether. I have
a suspicion that the Kans might fit the listening environment (polished wood
floors, concrete/plaster walls) quite well without being too lively.
Anyone else heard these speakers (prefereably with Linn front-end) ?
|
222.43 | Don't bank on using Kans as a stopgap..... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Tue Aug 27 1991 13:03 | 22 |
| I have been using Kans for the last 5 years or so. I concur with your
comments about the sound, but you will find as your system gets better
the Kans get better with it. Do not expect to use the Kans as a
standby till something better comes along; each improvement you make in
front of the Kans, especially to your Linn, will get you so enamored
with the sound you will find yourself dissatisfied with anything else
at anything less than three times the money - the trick with Kans is
knowing when to stop improving what you feed them with. I have known
people go as far as changing their 140 to a 250 to two 135s,
before they found it worth changing their Kans. Of course you only need
to upgrade once with a Linn amp (LK280 then add a Spark), but then I'm
biassed.
I've just had a loan of the latest Kabers for three days; although they
were better in terms of bass, detail, treble smoothness, etc., they
didn't make me want to listen to the end of a side on my problem albums
any more than the Kans did. Until I put a Kairn in the system, that is.
However boringly predictable it may seem, the Kairn worked wonders,
even when I put the Kans back on; like Uncle Ivor says, you just hear
more tunes.
Dave
|
222.44 | Like the Kairn huh ? | SKIWI::EATON | Marketing - the rubber meets the sky | Tue Aug 27 1991 23:05 | 10 |
| Hooked the Kans up last night to my system. (LP12/Lingo/Ekos/OC9,
Naim 72/140/HICAP). Overall impressions remain of a very *fast* musical
speaker. Much brighter than I'm used to, but I love the speed and crispness
of the Kans response to transient notes and their attack on the leading edge
of notes. Concerned that they may become a little fatiguing after a while
though...
Thanks Dave. I've had a look at Kabers and have seen the new bits that Linn have
issued for them. Are they as bright as your Kans ?
|
222.45 | Kans are my second favorate speaker | CRATE::WATSON | C is its own virus | Wed Aug 28 1991 10:04 | 12 |
| I used Kan I's until I got the 'briks.
In terms of musicality the Kan -> Isobarik upgrade made the least
difference to my system. (Ittok -> Ekos, Asak-T -> Troika, Lingo etc)
In terms of ``presence'' ... well thats another story.
Re ``brightness'' I had a lot of people comment on how bright my Kans
were but all agreed that you just get ``use'' to the sound and it is
definatly _not_ a problem in log therm listening.
Rik
|
222.46 | Don't point the finger too soon.... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Wed Aug 28 1991 18:25 | 13 |
| re .44....
Kans have their faults, (mainly due to their size and their
idiosynchratic response curve), but a fatiguing sound, especially
with a Linn on the front isn't one of them.
If properly installed Kans sound fatiguing in the long term when
normally you like what they do, you should look for the cause somewhere
else. You may cure it by replacing the Kans, but you will lose some of
the good things they do, and the good things are fundamental to
appreciating the music. Just my experience/opinion, fwiw.
Dave
|
222.47 | <KREMLIN ?> | BEDSOX::CAMILLERI | Fixed in a future release .... | Wed Sep 04 1991 12:50 | 4 |
| Has anybody heard the KREMLIN ? I wonder if it's in the same leage as
the NAT 01.
Patrick
|
222.48 | Some Linn news | BAHTAT::SALLITT | a legend in his lunchtime | Fri Jul 17 1992 15:02 | 59 |
| I had a listen to the new Linn cartidge, the Arkiv, yesterday. Very
nice. It's very smooth and open, and tracks very well, too - even on
the inner grooves of my Mitsuko Uchida Mozart sonatas, which she not
only plays with vigour and virtuosity, but also, as I now know, with
charm and humour too. The Arkiv is based - so I hear - on a modified
Lyra Clavis generator, in a body that Linn has yet to release - the
version I heard was "naked" and looked very vulnerable. The generator
is mounted on a T-bar milled from a solid chunk of the same alloy as
the Ekos headshell. It is a three-hole fixing, a la Troika, but the
holes are tapped. As it is possible to remove the paint from an Ekos
headshell using a bastard file without scratching the alloy, it is
unlikely the hole threads will strip before the bolts give out.
Cartidges with this degree of smoothness that I have heard before tend
to favour classical music, but this beast didn't seem to care, coping
with rock, jazz, folk and classical with equal aplomb. Looks like my
new speakers will be put on the back burner *yet again*. The Arkiv will
cost around �900, less exchange; for Troika owners that means a bottom
line of around �600. Such is Linn's confidence in the Arkiv that the
Troika is being discontinued.
I listened through an active Keltik system, and it's the first time
I've heard Keltiks sound this good. Although they have been revised,
Linn have been training their dealers on how to install them and the
Kabers, i.e. correct positioning, not right back to the wall which is
the default with other Linn speakers.
There are some other Linn products in the pipeline. A modified Karik CD
transport will be available soon at about a grand; it will take a
mini-Numerik DAC as an internal plug-in module, allowing upgrades later,
giving Linn a single box CD player and advantage over Naim as the Naim
one-boxer isn't upgradeable. Also here soon will be a line-level only
version of the Kairn, called the Kairn Pro, for those without a
turntable; it should sell for �989 or thereabouts. Whilst being told
this, I caught sight of a reference in the dealer update to something
called a Ceilidh, but I don't know waht that will be.
Further to the Martin Colloms disaster review of the Kairn/LK100: it
turns out that MC tested the LK100 by driving Wilson Watts/Puppies and,
as good as the Wilson speakers are, the amps that can drive those properly
can be counted on the fingers of one hand; I believe MC normally uses
Krells or similar to drive these monsters. He then assessed the Kairn
by driving his standard power amps, which also sounded rough. It looks
like he has a very optimally balanced system configuration, and
substituting one or both of the Linn boxes threw the whole lot out of
balance. However that begs the question as to why a reviewer of Martin
Colloms' stature, who should realise this and use a system less on knife
edge to assess sound quality, didn't do so or at least declare it in
the review; the answer may be that MC has been, and is, working as a
consultant with Naim Audio. Although Linn were happy that MC should
measure the equipment (he has a superb lab), they asked if HFN/RR let
someone else do the sound quality review, since MC could hardly be
expected to be objective as he was working for a competitor. The editor
of HFN/RR agreed, but the review went ahead anyway without a
declaration of interest by MC or HFN/RR. Draw your own conclusions.
MC is now on the staff of HiFi World. I shall be reading carefully, but
if similar things crop up there I won't be renewing my subscription.
Dave
|
222.49 | I'd also like a pair of Keltiks. | FUTURS::WATSON | Rik Watson | Mon Jul 20 1992 14:29 | 12 |
| I don't know what a Ceilidh is but I caught reference to a replacement
to the Asaka called the ... Klyde.
Rik
PS I finally brought a Kairn - this thing is amasing. With the old LK-1
played LOUD you could hear thing getting a bit ``distressed''. With the
Karin playing VERY LOUD INDEED there was no sign of any distress at
all - then my LK-2 closed down !
The Kairn is also wonderfull very quiet - you don't loose any of the
detail - I love it.
|
222.50 | The Arkiv must be next.... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | a legend in his lunchtime | Mon Jul 20 1992 17:07 | 8 |
| Ah yes, the Kairn is good. I was so chuffed with mine I felt moved to
write to Ivor about it. I got a personal reply, too. My feelings
haven't changed at all, in fact my regard for it grows.
I may like a pair of Keltiks, but a house with rooms big enough for them
to work in would have to come first!
Dave
|
222.51 | re 365.4.... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | a legend in his lunchtime | Fri Jul 24 1992 14:10 | 3 |
| Come on then, Rik. Fess up what you know about the new "cheap" Kabers.
Dave
|
222.52 | Someone said Stereo from 'briks + CD ! | FUTURS::WATSON | Rik Watson | Fri Jul 24 1992 14:52 | 8 |
| I know very little except :
o Based on Kaber/Keltic technology.
o Cheaper than Kaber (But Linn aren't saying how much). I'd guess
at mid way between Kan and Kaber.
o I expect they'll be available in an active form and a LK-100
active version to sound better that Isobariks with a Klout (Linns
words NOT mine)
|
222.53 | yo-yo | WEOPON::SYSTEM | | Thu Sep 24 1992 14:10 | 7 |
| I've been auditioning a Trampolin on my LP12 (which is mounted on a
wall bracket into a 8" thick plaster/concrete wall). Can't make up my
mind about this new item, while it seems to be opening up the bass a
little (however with my speakers it's hard to tell), but I'm losing
something detail I think.
Anyone out there had any experience with the Trampolin ?
|
222.54 | get a tramp' now.... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | Dave, UK Sales (Services), 845-2374 | Thu Sep 24 1992 14:52 | 28 |
| re .53....
"Anyone out there had any experience with the Trampolin ?"
Yes. It's very good. It makes the Linn more independent of where you
place it, but does lots of things with the sound, too. Yes, it opens
the bass up, and also normalizes the slightly "fat" upper bass that used
to characterise the Linn sound. It also makes dynamic shading more
appropriate, quiet sounds remain more obvious when the big noises come
in, the midrange is more open and the top end smoother.
If you don't hear those things on a "Tramped" LP12/Lingo/Ekos set up,
maybe it wasn't installed correctly, or the Linn needs tweeking, or there
is something amiss elsewhere in the system. I saw your earlier note
about speakers elsewhere; almost any speaker on the planet will improve
on the Missions and this is likely where the problem is; check out the new
Kans before you spend loadsamoney on big boxes - other than that, I
second Rik's recommendations therein.
The new Linn speakers are the "Ceilidh", pronounced "Cayly", which from
my time in Scotland I recall as being Gaelic for a right old knees-up
party. They're based on Index drive units in a Kaber configuration, and
apparently are intended to replace the Nexus.
The Linn integrated CD player is out, but I haven't heard it yet. I've
been told that it compares to the two-box player like an Valhalla LP12
does to a Lingoed version.
Dave
|
222.55 | Stop Press.... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | Dave @LZO 845-2374 | Mon Jun 28 1993 13:07 | 43 |
| One more to this string.....
I heard Linn's new integral active crossover boards, designed to fit in the
LK100 and KLOUT power amps, on Friday. Each card is about 2" by 4" and
gets its power from the power amp. Construction is surface-mount, with
most of the works inside two large chips, complete with a heat sink
with a static-handling caution printed on it.
Gain adjustment is via DIP switches which enable/disable each
gain-select line electronically, so the switch contacts aren't in the
signal path. Set up is carried out in an open-top box into which all
cards fit and get their power. Once the levels are optimised for the
customer's listening room, the cards are then transferred into the
respective power amps.
I listened to both LP and CD, in an triamped Kaber system and a
biamped Keilidh system, in both cases using LK100 amps. The
results were stunning. The sound was more tuneful and more clear, as would
be expected by going active, along with all the details hanging
together more appropriately. The known shortcomings of either source
(enter your favourite prejudice here....) were not inaudible but
rendered irrelevant by the excellence of what the systems were doing
well. The LP source was a full-Monty LP12, and the CD player was a
Meridian something-or-other and a Linn Karik/Numerik. Both of these
systems, including the Keilidh system, set new standards that render
the old Isobarik triamped (or even hexamped) systems irrelevant, in
terms of sound, convenience, and domestic-acceptance factors.
And then there's the prices. The cards work out at around �250 per stereo
pair, so (leaving aside power amp costs) a Keilidh user pays �500, and
Kaber and Keltik users pay �750. (The Keltik bass card has a special
roll-off to avoid users rearranging their masonry.) This means that a
Keilidh user with one LK100 can go active for under a grand. The cards can
be transferred from LK100s to KLOUTs, so upgrading is very flexible.
LK280/SPARK users like me can't take advantage of the new cards,
though. Apart from the lack of space, the LK280 amplifiers don't have
the required interface circuits.
So it looks like my next step is to trade-in my LK280/SPARK for three
LK100s. After the Cirkus, that is......
Dave
|
222.56 | | KRAKAR::WARWICK | Can't you just... ? | Mon Jun 28 1993 14:34 | 7 |
|
You could build active Linn systems before though, couldn't you ? Did
they used to have some kind of external active crossover, � la NAXO ?
Maybe you'd do better to get hold of a couple of LK280s (perhaps going
cheap now ?) and the external box ? Or perhaps money is no object...
Trevor
|
222.57 | The missus wouldn't give those boxes house room anyway.... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | Dave @LZO 845-2374 | Mon Jun 28 1993 14:56 | 22 |
| re .56....
You are right, but the Kaber Aktiv crossover was about a grand, a new
LK280/SPARK is �1300 each, or LK280 on its own at about �600 but not as
good as an LK100 at �450. Plus the LK100s can have their inputs
daisy-chained so only one line-level interconnect is needed; to avoid
feeding multiple cables into single XCR conectors (messy), multiple
LK280s need multiple interconnects and mine are 10 metres long.
Then there's all the mains cables, seven (including crossover) instead
of three.....
Used LK280/SPARKs still cost around �600-700 each. Add �100 for the extra
line level interconnects I'd need and �1000 plus for the Kaber Aktiv, and
you'd be looking at �2500 or thereabouts. But three LK100s cost about
�1400, less about �400 part-ex for the LK280/SPARK, plus �750 for the new
cards, and the cost of going active is down to about �1750. And I could
maybe get more for the 280/SPARK if I sell it myself.
So it isn't a case of money being no object, far from it. I wish it
was....
Dave
|
222.58 | If I were a rich man, | ESBS01::WATSON | Rik Watson (7) 782 2238 | Mon Jun 28 1993 16:34 | 5 |
| Just spoke to my tame Linn dealer, he has just replace th Aktiv box on
his Keltik with these card - it looks like Linn have moved the goal
posts.
Rik Waiting-to-hear-the-new-Numerik-D/A-chipset.
|
222.59 | those naughty adds | LARVAE::IVES_J | One i-node short of a file system | Wed Aug 18 1993 12:19 | 14 |
| I was amused and not entirely surprised to read that THOSE Linn adds
that have been appearing in the HiFi press have come in for stick.
the ones that go something like
"Shes fantastic, intelligent , witty, fun
she would'nt go out with me as she said I was a sad, anally retentive
HiFi bore.
Shes going out with some other guy.
he does'nt have a Linn HiFi but he does have a life"
or something like that ;-)
|
222.60 | | HIPS::WATSON | Play with me Daddy | Mon Nov 27 1995 15:08 | 3 |
| There is another (big) Linn price rise on the horizon (Jan 1st)
Rik
|
222.61 | Better get that Ekos/Archiv now then ;-) | KERNEL::HOGGAND | | Tue Nov 28 1995 16:41 | 6 |
| Just as well I picked up my Numerik and Kudos last week :-)
Do you know what's affected?
Dave
|
222.62 | | HIPS::WATSON | DARK IN HERE, ISN'T IT? | Wed Nov 29 1995 08:14 | 3 |
| Mainly the electrical items.
Rik
|
222.63 | Ivor has lost his marbles...... | KERNEL::HOGGAND | | Thu Dec 14 1995 14:10 | 19 |
| Rik,
You were right about the price increases - and they're not small.
increase new price
Kaber speakers, 400.00 1800.00
kaber activ cards 40.00 790.00
Karik CD 300.00 1800.00
Numerik 300.00 1400.00
LP12 200.00 1000.00
LK100 75.00 650.00
Kudos 10.00 775.00
Klout 5.00 2000.00
So, if you're looking into getting some Linn gear, buy before Jan 1st.
Dave
|
222.64 | Esoteric prices. | KERNEL::HOGGAND | | Tue Oct 29 1996 16:39 | 17 |
| Oh dear, it's silly season at Linn.
Effective 10-NOV-1996:
Klout 2000.00 2400.00
Keltik 4400.00 6000.00
Kaber 1800.00 2000.00 (black)
2150.00 (walnut)
Keilidh 850.00
Karik 1750.00 1850.00
Numerik 1400.00 1500.00
There may be more, by then the valium started working and everything seemed
sooooo distant.
Dave.
|