[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hips::uk_audioo

Title:You get surface noise in real life too
Notice:Let's be conformist
Moderator:GOVT02::BARKER
Created:Thu Jul 28 1988
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:550
Total number of notes:3847

220.0. "Yet more advice required" by IOSG::MARSHALL (Waterloo Sunset) Wed Oct 24 1990 15:50

Hello Everyone,

With yet another conference in my notebook, I have very little time left to do
any work, but there's so much interesting stuff in here, I thought "what the
hell!"

Anyway, I will be buying some audio kit in the next six months, and was advised
to ask for advice in here, so here goes.  I've drawn up a short list of
equipment, but it's far too big to go and listen to all of it so I need a bit
of help narrowing things down.  I'll give the list first, then explain what I'm
looking for and how I've arrived at this list.

The list is in two columns, left being cheaper and right dearer.  The idea is
to think in terms of a system made from left-column components, with some from
the right-column where these better fit my criteria (explained below).

Turntable:
Dual CS505-3            Dual CS5000
Rega Planar 2           Rega Planar 3
Thorens TD280           SystemDek IIX (+RB300?)

CD:
Philips CD610           Arcam Alpha 2
Philips CD62x           Mission Cyrus PCMII
Philips CD63x           Philips CD850
(Dual CD5150?)

Amp:
Arcam Alpha 2           Arcam Delta 60
Mission Cyrus 1         Cambridge Audio P70
Musical Fidelity B1     Musical Fidelity A1
(Dual CV5600?)          Mission Cyrus 2

Tuner:
Philips FT880           Cambridge Audio T50
Arcam Alpha 2

Speakers:
JPW Sonata              Arcam Alpha
Mission 760             Mission 762
Wharfedale Delta 30.2   Tannoy DC1000
Arcam 3+                Arcam 2+
Celestion 5             Castle Durham
Wharfedale Diamond IV   Heybrook HB1
Mission 780             Musical Fidelity MC1
Rogers LS2a             Rogers LS4a
Wharfedale 420          Tannoy M20
Wharfedale 505.2        Wharfedale 505 (Mahogany)
                        Wharfedale 507.2

...told you it was a long short list!

OK, first thing to notice is that all the stuff is British / European, for
several reasons.  Having heard British kit, I like the sound.  The general
design principle of "sound quality rather than features" is exactly what I
want.  I also have strong personal views about international trade relations
(or whatever you like to call it) which dissuade me from buying certain
country's products.  It was also a useful criteria to help keep the list
shorter than it would otherwise have been!

The next criteria is price; I'm happy to spend �800, content to spend �1000,
could-be-persuaded to spend up to �1200.

Next, and perhaps most important, is sound quality.  I don't care about
flashing lights, remote controls and multi-play favourite-track-selection.  I
want to spend my money on something that sounds *nice*.  Note this doesn't
necessarily mean audiophile perfectionism.  If I find a �200 amp that sounds
(to me) very good, I'd buy it in preference to a �300 one that sounds a-little-
bit-better-than very good.

Next, I want a balanced system, and this is where uk_audio-ers can help, I hope.
I don't want a marvellous turntable spoilt by a not-so-good amp.  Likewise,
I don't want the best amp if the signal from the CD is poor.

At present I have 60 records and no CDs, so the turntable will be the "main"
component.  Once I've got a CD player though I'll start buying CDs, although
I'll carry on buying records too until the prices even up.  The SystemDek (did
they used to be part of Dunlop?) is really too expensive unless someone gives
me a really good reason for buying it.  The tuner will only get occasional use,
so I've gone for the cheaper ones.

Speakers: Confusion reigns!  All the ones on my list are highly recommended by
someone or other.  There are many cheaper, smaller speakers claimed by reviewers
to outperform dearer ones, hence the plethora of these on the list.  I need
speakers that can fill (in terms of soundstage, stereo imagery, etc, rather
than just volume) a room 18' x 16', but which will still sound good in a room
10' x 12'.  They should be as position-insensitive as possible, and be happy
close to walls.  I'd also prefer even frequency response, rather than speakers
which emphasises either treble or bass.

So can anyone suggest particular items / combinations to avoid, and
items / combinations that it's worth listening to.  As (eg) Arcam Alpha features
throughout the list, I would be tempted to get everything from the one range,
as I feel it would all "match" (in terms of sound / electronics, not
appearance!)

Alternatively, is there anything else I should consider, to make my short-list
even longer?  Other manufacturers not on the list include Marantz, TEAC and
NAD; how do their offerings compare to those on the list?

Well, that's a lot longer than I'd expected; hope I haven't bored you too much,
and I hope you can offer suggestions to help me draw up a list of kit to go
and listen to!

Thanks,

Scott
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
220.1MARVIN::WARWICKTrevor WarwickWed Oct 24 1990 18:2027
    
    I think buying a system from scratch is really hard work. It's much
    easier when you've already got something that you can compare things
    with. There's just *so* many variables !
    
    I've just got a couple of suggestions. It might be a good idea to
    consider buying several components from one manufacturer. For example,
    I understand that Musical Fidelity equipment often works much better with
    other MF equipment. So, if you want an A1, you might be well advised to
    try MC-1s with it. With this approach, it's probably easier to find a
    well-matched set of components (but of course, you might overlook some
    other brilliant combinations). 
    
    You may have a problem with speakers that work well up near a wall (I
    know, having just been through the process of buying some). Of the ones
    you've listed, I would hazard a guess that it's mainly the small cheap
    ones that are designed to work next to a wall. I ended up buying some
    Royd speakers (full story to follow, I'm afraid), which are all
    designed to work right against a wall, but I only listened to the more
    expensive ones. 
    
    It's definitely worth going into a couple of dealers to see what they
    suggest. Reading Hi-Fi are the only proper dealer in Reading. There are
    good dealers in most of the suroounding towns as well (B'stoke, Oxford
    etc.).
    
    Trevor
220.2Some thoughts and a sales pitchWOTVAX::MEAKINSClive MeakinsWed Oct 24 1990 22:5627
    I'll offer my experience of some of the kit you mentioned.  My system
    comprises:
    
    Systemdek IIX/Linn Basik Plus/Linn K9
    Meridian 206 CD
    Musical Fidelity A1
    Musical Fidelity Reference 2
    
    I read that the MC1s aren't as good as the Ref 2s, I believe the 2s
    were canned due problems with the buying in of the drive units.  The A1
    and Ref 2 combo is really classy.  The A1 MM input has a slight bass
    boost compared to CD, I think the CD input is more "accurate".  Don't
    go for the A1 if you are a bass freak, it's good but it's not a disco
    amp.  For classical music the amp is unbeatable at the price (IMHO). 
    Don't worry about the 20 watts per channel unless you have a very large
    room and inefficient speakers, it does go loud.   
    
    The Systemdek IIX has been a pleasure to use, the sprung sub-chassis
    I'm sure helps if you have a less than ideal table to put it on.  When
    I moved to a proper turntable shelf the sound came alive.  A floor
    stand may work for you, depending of your floor.   The company used to
    call themselves Dunlop, nothing to do with tyres though.  They dropped
    the name as their products aren't "tyreing" at all!
    
    Now for the sales bit, I'm considering selling my Systemdek as my
    collection is mainly CD now.  Interested?  I'm based in Warrington but
    visit the deep south regularly.               
220.3 Some thoughts on speakers...COMICS::FLANDERSDThe doctor is in ...Thu Oct 25 1990 16:0111
    
    A small amount of input on the cheaper speakers, I have the Warfedale
    505.2s (std) in my system with them about a foot from the rear wall and
    I really like them !! (understatement). I auditioned them against the
    Rogers LS2a, and the Warfedales were so much more alive. I found the 
    LS2a's a bit too polite by comparison although they were also good
    placed against the wall.
    
    Hope that's of some use.
    
    Dave Flanders
220.4cd850WIKKIT::WARWICKTrevor WarwickTue Oct 30 1990 17:1318
    
    I had a Philips CD850 (�400) on loan over the weekend, and quite liked
    it. It has an interesting array of useless gadgets, in addition to one
    or two useful ones.
    
    In comparison with my 3� year old CD360 (�250), there really wasn't a
    huge difference. The 850 was a little smoother, and a little more
    detailed, but really no electrifying difference - for me, not enough to
    justify upgrading to this level. I haven't heard the Arcam Alpha
    though, and that's supposed to be better than the Phillips.
    
    It would be interesting to compare the 850 with one of the 6x0 players
    to see if you think there's 200 pounds worth of difference. The problem
    I see with CD players is that anything you buy now is going to have a
    very low second hand value in 2-3 years, as the technology is
    developing so quickly.
    
    Trevor
220.5840 vs 850 ?SKIWI::EATONMarketing - the rubber meets the skyTue Oct 30 1990 20:449
How do you compare the CD850 to the CD840 ? What are the differences between
these 2 machines ?

I've sold my PCM II, for considerably more than I paid for it ;-) and am looking
for a good player to replace it, but with the focus primarily on the transport
as I propose the Meridian 203 DAC to partner it. Hence I'm not particularly
interested in the ARCAM Alpha.

Comments anyone ?
220.6MARVIN::WARWICKTrevor WarwickTue Oct 30 1990 23:207
    
    As I understand it, the CD840 isn't sold any more. It was superseded by
    the 850 shortly after being released. The 850 has some changes, I think
    the most major is that it goes some way towards meeting new (proposed
    ?? ) RF emission regulations.
    
    Trevor
220.7A Very Good Transport...SUBURB::SCREENERRobert Screene, UK Finance EUCWed Oct 31 1990 12:5419
    RE:220.5

    Dave, 
    Perhaps the Kenwood DP1100SG could fit your bill perfectly.  It's
    amazingly well built and was said to be a brilliant transport
    mechanism.  It is from Kenwood's '88 range and was their flagship at
    �450, you can probably buy it real cheep now (<�260).

    The internal DAC sounds very nice to me, but I guess you're used to a
    very high standard, what with the LP12.

    It has 2 digital outputs, one optical and one not.  I did notice that
    if you switch on the digital output, the on-board DAC output lines of
    the player keep going, wonder why it doesn't get cut off?

    What is this meridian DAC based on?  What sort of input connections
    does it have?  And what would it do to one's wallet?

    Rob.
220.8SKIWI::EATONMarketing - the rubber meets the skyWed Oct 31 1990 21:1214
re: .-1

Thanks for the advice Rob, I'll follow that up...

The Meridian 203 is based around their PDM  bitstream technology and costs
500 pounds. It is essentially the electronice from the 208 in a separate box
(without the pre-amp). It takes either digital or optical output.

It has been reviewed extremely favourably, and seems to be a significant
upgrade to the Black Box II (which I've heard, it's OK but not staggering).

I've since upgraded my LP12/Ittok to LP12/Ekos, what a nice upgrade !

Still waiting for my Lingo...
220.9SUBURB::SCREENERRobert Screene, UK Finance EUCFri Nov 02 1990 13:056
    Dave,
    I got quite a good deal on the price, see note 190.  However, the shop
    is really a "box selling" operation, they are NOT really Hi-Fi dealers.
    
    Cheers,
    Rob.
220.10meJUNO::JUNO::HAYESMon Nov 05 1990 17:057
Hi,
I've lived with a Rega 3 and Wharfedala Delta 30's for 2 years, 
(& a Rotel 820BX2 amp) the sound is neutral, and quite explicit,
although the systemdek probably sounds a tiny bit better, its also 1.5 
times the price(arm/cartridge inc.) and if I had my time again, I'd buy the 
same equipment, as it is very good sounds for pounds. If you know what I mean.
Chris.
220.11Another silly questionFIELD::FIDDLERThu Mar 21 1991 16:178
    
    Hi All, 
    	  Can anyone advise on a 'cheap' place to pick up gold plated
    sockets for the back of my NAD amp?  I got plated plugs for the cables,
    but I guess I really need to replace the sockets also for maximum
    effect.
    
    Mikef
220.12Tandy ?COMICS::FLANDERSDBoogie my speakers awayFri Mar 22 1991 08:306
    
    Well... (I hate to admit it but...) I have seen gold plated chassis
    mount phono plugs in Tandy (gasp, shock-horror being seen in the place)
    and they cost about �1.70 a pair.
    
    Dave
220.13FORTY2::SHIPMANFri Mar 22 1991 11:0010
If replacing input sockets is all you're doing, I suggest you forget it.  It
can be quite worthwhile to replace power and speaker wiring, along with nasty
speaker connectors, with more meaty alternatives.  It can also help to replace
long PCB traces on the inputs with decent coax - I find this reduces crosstalk
between inputs and makes things generally quieter.  I doubt you'd hear the
effect of going to gold-plated phono sockets; I reckon decent construction
quality is much more important than the plating.  But if you insist cheap ones
can be found in Maplin.

Nick
220.14SUBURB::SCREENERRobert Screene, UK Finance EUCFri Mar 22 1991 13:0111
     The gold plating is to reduce tarnishing between the 2 surfaces.  If your 
     going to get another amp in the next few years, I wouldn't bother 
     changing the sockets.  
     
     The place for gold plated connections is only really within In-Car Audio 
     installations.  Where the environment is much prone to tarnishing 
     connections.
     
     Now there's an argument!
     
     Robbie.