T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
135.1 | We heard it | IOSG::DUTT | Nigel Dutt | Thu Jan 04 1990 21:46 | 39 |
| Three of us (two fully paid up QUAD owners and me) went to the QUAD evening
organised by Reading HiFi a few weeks back. The man from QUAD demonstrated
both the new CD player and the new (remote controlled only) pre-amp on a
variety of types of music. Given all the myths about ELS power and non-bass
performance, they gave a pretty impressive demo in quite a large barn at
Pincetts manor.
The CD player is Philips based. They've chosen to keep the controls very
simple - really just load-and-go plus select-and-play. If you happen to have a
full function Philips remote controller, then you can make it do all the other
clever things like select-granny's-favourite-track and skip-the-Ringo-sings-
-tracks-from-my-Beatles-albums.
The pre-amp can only be controlled from a large (�100 a throw) remote control
pad. This is about the size of a copy of your favourite hi-fi mag, and
designed to sit on your armchair's armrest. It features pretty solid knobs and
buttons unlike the average device. They sell the box and the controller
separately, just in case you want one per armchair. I thought the new look, no
frills boxes were quite attractive.
They took a long time hatching the CD because they wanted to get the quality
right. As the man said, they build the stuff to last as long as you want to
keep them, so they plan for at least 20 years of support.
I can't give a proper assessment of the sound because of the listening
arrangement, namely 120 or so people in a large hall. Even in those conditions
it sounded good enough to me that I'd certainly want to have a closer listen
to the CD player once I've saved the pennies to buy some ELSs. Reading HiFi
have one for demo, but deliveries will be slow for a while.
Chatting to the QUAD man afterwards he made a couple of interesting comments
about reviews. Firstly they don't send review copies out - the mags have to
buy them if they want to review them. Secondly he said that the problem with
reviewers was that they didn't review equipment against the objectives of the
manufacturers. He felt that reviewers should find out what the manufacturer
was trying to achieve with the equipment and then test the kit against those
objectives. He reckoned that manufacturers had a variety of different but all
perfectly valid objectives. Theirs was to generate exactly what was recorded
on the medium at the point where the sound left the speaker.
|
135.2 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | I'd rather be in Seattle | Fri Jan 05 1990 08:29 | 5 |
| Reviewers should NEVER review against the objectives of the
manufacturer, in my opinion. They should review against the needs of
the customer.
Andy
|
135.3 | | SAC::PHILPOTT_I | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Fri Jan 05 1990 08:47 | 12 |
| Reviewers should be honest and say what they are reveiwing against.
They usually know what the manufacturers claim they are trying to do,
and can say whether they succeed or not. They can set up scientifically
valid tests to demonstrate this.
They DO NOT know what every customer wants, so cannot say whether
the equipment will be suitable for them. They can only offer subjective
opinions (which are not worth the paper they are written on) as to
"suitability for the customer".
/. Ian .\
|
135.4 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | I'd rather be in Seattle | Fri Jan 05 1990 10:41 | 7 |
| But their opinions upon the worthiness of the Manafacturers objectives
were, would be somewhat useful if that's what they're measuring
against.
- Andy ��� Leslie
|
135.5 | | SAC::PHILPOTT_I | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Fri Jan 05 1990 11:23 | 17 |
|
re the latter: agreed - its reviewers who ignore the manufacturers comments
and simply decide whether the unit is good for an unmeasurable audience that
I object to. Might as well look at the blob rating in a consumer guide...
Back to the subject: has anybody any idea how much the new Quad stuff will cost?
Since I never do anything with a CD except play it (all of it, starting at the
beginning and proceding to the end) it sounds like it fits my needs nicely.
The new pre-amp sounds, well, interesting? perhaps, but I rarely adjust any
control on the amp, could get along with a NAIM style simplicity, etc. This
raises a question: if the pre-amp and the fancy remote control are separate
purchases can you use the amp without the remote, and if so what controls do
you get.
/. Ian .\
|
135.6 | The prices (rough) | IOSG::DUTT | Nigel Dutt | Fri Jan 05 1990 11:56 | 6 |
| Re -1
Sorry, forgot to mention the price...
The CD was around 450 and the pre-amp was around 600 (I'm a bit hazier
on that) plus 100 for the controller.
|
135.7 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | New, improved, thinner model | Fri Jan 05 1990 13:03 | 1 |
| 450 sounds rather overpriced.
|
135.8 | | BAHTAT::SALLITT | Dave @RKG, 831-3117 | Fri Mar 09 1990 14:31 | 13 |
| Noel Keywood in HiFi Review checked out the Quad CD player in the feb.
issue. He auditioned it within the context of the new Quad preamp, 405
power amp, and ESL63 speakers, comparing it with his Cambridge CD1.
To summarise, his response was "So what?". It didn't measure any better
below 60db than many other CD players, in spite of the hand-picked
Philips chip-set. Consequently it didn't really give its competition a
run for their money sound-wise either.
NK liked the build quality, which was superb. He also like the remote
control of the new preamp.
Dave
|
135.9 | How much for the little girl......I mean player! | UFHIS::JMASLEN | The wheels fallen off your day yet?! | Wed Apr 01 1992 14:34 | 22 |
| For any of you interested, I bought a Quad cd player over the phone for
450 pounds + 10 pounds p&p from;
LINTONE AUDIO
7-11 Park Lane
NE8 3JW
091 477 4167
fax 091 477 2771
I dealt with Tony Gascoigne.........this is the second time a kiwi has
bought such a unit from him at such a price, the last time was for
cash. I did it with a credit card but also bought a Michel Iso for only
10% less retail, so giving these guys some kind of mark up and allowing
for the credit company taking some % of the total transaction.
The CD player is not for me but I have the use of it for the next few
months, my initial impressions sound wise are 'so what'........it
sounds pretty much like my multi cd player at half the price from
Fisher (cough cough!!) but it is built very
solidly...........admittedly, to be fair, it is operating via a
1950's vintage all QUAD valve set up that may be crushing the players'
dynamics somewhat.
|