T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
57.1 | Is there any other speaker? | KERNEL::BROOKER | | Sat Nov 19 1988 03:37 | 16 |
|
I understand (and sympathize with) exactly how you feel. I've been
seriously listening to systems, with an intent to buy, for about
a month now and had been following the traditional (British) principle
of front-end first and speakers last - until I heard the 104's.
They blew me away. I will have them and everything else will have
to work with them. The only speaker I've heard that comes anywhere
close is a well positioned Isobarik (although I've not plucked-up
courage to audition the 107's), but already we've doubled the price.
I'd be interested to know what you are planning to drive them with
since although they are fairly efficient at 92dB/W @1M the 4 ohm
load is still fairly current greedy. I contacted Musical Fidelity
when I decided on the 104's,as my favorite amplifer until then was
(were) the MA50 class A 50W monoblocs, and they seemed distinctly
dubious as to the amps capability of supplying sufficient current.
|
57.2 | Great Speaker! | MSEE::BREAULT | | Sun Nov 20 1988 18:33 | 11 |
|
I've had a pair of 104s for some time now. First powered by a Yamaha
AX-700U and now an Adcom GFA545, either amp would power the 104s
to very high SPLs without any sign of strain. The Adcom, however,
seems to maintain a better low end and is a little less bright at
'lounge levels'. My main listening is acoustic jazz and I feel very
few speakers that I've heard approach the 104s in their ability
to reproduce this music with a complete sense of realism.
ENJOY
bb
|
57.3 | Happy 104/2 Owner | USRCV1::THOMPSONP | Paul Thompson, Rochester, NY | Mon Nov 21 1988 23:02 | 9 |
| I've owned a pair of 104's for 18 months. They are very enjoyable.
If you are interested in hearing the extreme low end from these
speakers, I would recommend auditioning them with the appropriate
KUBE (KEF's User-variable Bass Equalizer). This unit will extend
the low end response, but it will also place additional demands
on the power supplies of your power amp.
Great sounding speakers!
|
57.4 | No other like 104's | LATINA::RUPEREZ | Fails, but by another reason... | Tue Nov 22 1988 16:02 | 30 |
| Hi again
I've ordered the boxes already, but still waiting to get them at
home (walnut colour not at the dealer site).
I went to my dealer with the HK655Vxi in mind to drive them, but
he pushed me to try an Onkyo 8190 (100w per) and it showed a more
natural and deep bass, and seemed to be less coarse, I'd say more
sweet than HK. I finally took it home. This amp has a quite big
input transformer, two good enough capacitors and (this is a propietary
diff) an in-phase transformer to get the bass on phase signal.
I tested it some time and it seemed to me to have power enough to
drive such 104's with no trouble though they demand a good current.
Every circuit is bypassed to the power amp section if you defeat
the knobs. I'd prefer a british one, (audiophile oriented devices),
but they are less versatile, and even lacks some fundamental things
(Cambridge Audio P/C75 have no phones socket, Cyrus II from Mission
doesn't allow to disconnect speakers when listening to the phones,
and has no output for the video input, and I have a Hi-Fi Sony
used as a quality and cheap music/hour tapedeck, MF have no
"independent record selector" to choose a different source to tape
and to listen to, etc).
I know this Onkyo amp is not at the heigh of the speakers, but ...
I'll change it in some years if something special and not too expensive
comes to the Hi-Fi arena.
The Adcom are from U.S. and costing double here. The British apparel
will become cheaper for me after 1992 (CEE common taxes, no economic
borders, etc), and then I'll come back again to study the market.
(I'm even a current subscriber of Hi-Fi Choice Mag.)
O.K. Thanks for your inputs
Jose
|
57.5 | Sorry for mistakes | LATINA::RUPEREZ | Fails, but by another reason... | Wed Nov 23 1988 08:42 | 9 |
| re.4--> The British apparel
will become cheaper for me after 1992 (CEE common taxes, no economic
borders, etc), and then I'll come back again to study the market.
Though British apparel will be cheaper too... I meant appliance,
of course, or apparatus.
I think I should carry my pocket dictionary in every moment, but
sometimes I'm have no doubt till is too late. Sorry about that.
Jose
|