T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
33.1 | try these..... | ERIC::SALLITT | A legend in his lunchtime | Tue Aug 30 1988 12:51 | 9 |
| .....Wharfedale Diamonds, Goodman Maxims, Royd A7.
Any of these should fit the bill; a good dealer could recommend
others.
Why set a lower limit of #100? There's some superb speakers available
now at around #80...
Dave
|
33.2 | Got some Maxims | BOOTIS::CARPENTER | | Tue Aug 30 1988 13:05 | 6 |
| I've got some Goodmans Maxamps already!!
(and I want something better!)
Steve.
|
33.3 | | MARVIN::WARWICK | Sanity isn't all it's cracked up to be | Tue Aug 30 1988 13:38 | 7 |
|
Assuming you listen fairly exclusively to Rock/HM, have you considered
those funny wedge-shaped jobs by JBL [Rock Partner ??]. I think
I saw a review of these that said they were pretty good for this sort of
music (probably not much cop for anything else though).
Trevor
|
33.4 | Mmmmmm, Rock Partner eh? | BOOTIS::CARPENTER | | Tue Aug 30 1988 13:50 | 16 |
| > Assuming you listen fairly exclusively to Rock/HM, have you considered
> those funny wedge-shaped jobs by JBL [Rock Partner ??]. I think
> I saw a review of these that said they were pretty good for this sort of
> music (probably not much cop for anything else though).
Rock Partner? arn't they from AR rather than JBL?
(There active as well, if I memory servers me right)
Does anyone know anything abount the new JBL's (out soon)?
Steve.
ps. Re.1 I think that the Marantz/Mission combination could do with something
a little better than 80 quids worth!
|
33.5 | a few q's | LARVAE::JEFFERY | Even the white bits are black | Tue Aug 30 1988 14:29 | 18 |
|
Well, I wouldn't rule out something around �80, My Diamonds cost
me �65 two years ago, and they will be the last thing I upgrade.
I'm not sure whether the sound quality from the amplifier in the
Maxamps is showing off the Maxims to their full. They should be
capable of a hell of a lot. They would certainly not be out of place
on your system.
I've heard good things about the Heybrook point 5's, but have never
heard them.
Why the height restriction ? Are you thinking about getting stands
for them ? If so, will that come out of the �150 ?
cheers.
Mark.
|
33.6 | Not your average headbanger! | BOOTIS::CARPENTER | | Tue Aug 30 1988 14:53 | 17 |
| Re. .5
The Maxamps are used when I am in my student digs in Bristol. My actual
speakers are Goodmans PQ130's, bloody big things they are too, and these are
my reason for a height restriction, ie I want a speaker that is luggable.
I do intend to mount the spekers on suitable stands which I have already
budgeted for (around 50-60 quid, possibly QED).
All I want is a speaker that will make full use of the signal that the
Marantz/Mission combination will provide, but have the necessary qualities
(ie dynamicism) for my kind of music. I don't want just a headbangers speaker
as I im not the typical HM muso you might expect, I listen just as critically
as some of you would to Holst etc.!!
Steve.
|
33.7 | | XNOGOV::JCH | John Haxby. Definitively Wrong | Tue Aug 30 1988 17:39 | 11 |
| I have got some Heybrook 1's that sound good and I play quite a
bit of rock. They also sound good on a lot of other things, for
when your music tastes change.
I compared them with Linn Saras once (grossly unfair), and the worst
we could say about them was that they were a little harsh and the
bass wasn't as good. They could be a bit on the expensive side,
mine were #120 a while ago, I'm afraid I don't know what the current
price is. (The Saras were #600 at the time, for what it's worth)
jch
|
33.8 | speakers corner. | LARVAE::JEFFERY | Even the white bits are black | Tue Aug 30 1988 17:49 | 16 |
|
The Heybrook's are about �180 now, I tried them with my REGA and
a Quantum IA-100 (anyone remember them ?). I wasn't too impressed,
although I'm not sure if it was the amp or speakers.
I shall have a dig at a best buy guide I saw, but certainly, the
Royds and Heybrooks of this world are supposed to be good.
Re. -1; Comparing Linn Saras against Heybrook HB-1's. What
amplification was used in the comparisons. The Linn Sara's would
murder most amplifiers. I think they are classed as "difficult to
drive"
Cheers.
Mark.
|
33.9 | Yes but.... | ERIC::SALLITT | A legend in his lunchtime | Tue Aug 30 1988 17:51 | 14 |
| How do you know 80 quid speakers won't do your Marantz/mission combo
justice? What do you think the extra 20-70 quid will buy you? You'll
maybe get a bigger box, but that isn't what you want, is it? Above
the 100-110 pounds mark, there just aren't any small speakers other
than the Linn Kan and Rogers LS3/5A, which are out of your price
range (around 300 quid); and the difference between 80 pound speakers
and 100 pound ones is minimal.
Go and listen to what good modern small speakers can do. To answer
your question another way, you'll get more jollies for 150 pounds
if you buy 80-90 pound speakers and some new CDs than from a pair
of 150 pound speakers.
Dave
|
33.10 | | MARVIN::WARWICK | Sanity isn't all it's cracked up to be | Tue Aug 30 1988 19:05 | 17 |
|
RE:.4 I think you're right - they're AR, not JBL, however, they're not
necessarily active. I think the "rock partner" isn't, but the "powered
partner" is. Still, if you also listen to other stuff, they might
not be a good choice.
On the subject of Heybrook HB1's, my SO and myself both listened
to these when we were buying our system, and didn't like them at
all.
I think the best approach may be to just wander into B&B in Reading
(Minster Street, behind Heelas) when they're not too busy and listen to
some. They had quite an extensive range of sub-�150 speakers when we
bought our stuff - we listened to at least five separate speaker
systems, and there were some we didn't try.
Trevor
|
33.11 | | XNOGOV::JCH | John Haxby. Definitively Wrong | Wed Aug 31 1988 09:47 | 28 |
| Pity no one likes the HB1s anymore ... anything in particular you
don't like? Maybe there is something critical in the way they are
driven or maybe the early ones were much better,
.8 The system used to drive both sorts of speakers started with
a Linn and went through one of the original quantums. Although
the Saras are improved more than somewhat with a Naim (which they
have now), they were driven very well by the Quantum. Ideally,
we should repeat the test now with the Linn/Ittok/Asak/Naim front
end; though from the listening we did in the shop, I suspect we'd
find the same -- the HB1s are a little harsh and not quite so refined.
The advantage of the HB1s over the others at the time was that although
the sound isn't quite so pretty, it did embody the good things about
much more expensive speakers; hence the comparison with the Saras.
Other speakers in the prive range at that time were sweeter, smoother
and gentler, for want of a better description. I suppose the HB1s
didn't hide their inadequacies by losing information -- the result
is that among their peers they sound a bit harsh, among their betters
they give a good impression of `trying hard'. It's a matter of
taste, if you want a system that lets the music reach out and grab
you, the HB1s are good; if you want a system that sounds `nice',
you won't like them. Personally, I prefer a system that does as
little as possible to the music before it gets to me and that is
what the HB1s seem to offer over their peers. I would've preferred
HB2s but they were out of my price bracket.
jch
|
33.12 | | MARVIN::WARWICK | Sanity isn't all it's cracked up to be | Wed Aug 31 1988 10:36 | 7 |
|
I think you've mentioned the point that we didn't like about the
HB1s - they sounded a coarse in comparison to the other things we
listened to. As you say, it's all a matter of taste, but they just
didn't sound "right" somehow.
Trevor
|
33.13 | Another vote for Wharfedale | AYOV29::ISMITH | Considering a move to Memphis | Tue Sep 06 1988 13:52 | 18 |
| Wharfedale Diamond II's are excellent little speakers. They sound
great, cost around �90, and can handle amplifiers with power outputs
of between 30 and 100 watts.
They like to be put on stands or wall brackets� (reccommended), so
that they can be 4" - 6" from the wall at an angle of about 30�.
This positioning allows the speaker to generate the bass properly.
As for being 'luggable', they even come in a dinky box with a carrying
handle!!
I shall be keeping mine for a long time.
Ian.
---------------------------------
� AVF wall brackets - rock solid.
|
33.14 | Follow your ears.... | BOOTIS::CARPENTER | | Mon Sep 12 1988 13:38 | 14 |
| Does anyone remember the base note? I asked for a list of speakers to
audition and I've only had 2 sensible suggestions!
So after listening to your advice (!), I did the usual thing and totally
ignored it and just followed my ears. The result is that I have some lovely
new Celestion DL6 Series II speakers sitting in my front room. (Okay so there
45 cm high, I can put up with an extra 5 cm).
Beware a review is comming soon!
Steve.
|