T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
159.1 | No phosphates on me. | KERNEL::BIRKINSHAW | A personal name that actually fits in the space | Thu Jun 01 1989 02:56 | 5 |
| All the ECOxxxx cleaning products are very friendly but supermarkets
don't tend to stock them, you need to go to your local health food
shop.
Simon.
|
159.2 | Anyone use Amway? | SHAPES::STREETR | Have another vat of wine dear | Thu Jun 01 1989 03:03 | 3 |
| AMWAY products are Environment friendly (no CFCs etc...)
Ray.
|
159.3 | | SHAPES::ALFORDJ | Dragon Riders do it in between... | Thu Jun 01 1989 18:37 | 4 |
|
AMWAY products are great. The pyramid selling racket directly
connected with the products is not (and it is pyramid selling
regardless of what the people involved try to make you believe).
|
159.4 | Get your facts straight | SHAPES::KERRELLD | Euro Tour '89 | Thu Jun 01 1989 22:00 | 17 |
| re .3:
> AMWAY products are great. The pyramid selling racket directly
> connected with the products is not (and it is pyramid selling
> regardless of what the people involved try to make you believe).
Pyramid selling is ILLEGAL. So if AMWAY is pyramid then how come they are
still in business?
Pyramid selling is when a company sells stocks of products to it's rep's who
then have to sell them to customers.
AMWAY sells through a distribution network. If the last person in the world
signed up for AMWAY they would still benefit from the products at warehouse
prices, so where's the racket?
Dave.
|
159.5 | Meanwhile back on the topic | SHAPES::KERRELLD | Euro Tour '89 | Thu Jun 01 1989 22:02 | 4 |
| Yes, AMWAY are environmental friendly and also make products which can be
used with septic tanks which is why we use them.
Dave.
|
159.6 | exit | CURRNT::PREECE | Whose garden was this ? | Sun Jun 04 1989 11:37 | 14 |
| A slight rathole, or maybe not...
I was approached last week to sign a petition protesting about proposed
implementation of EEC rules which will force health food/organic
product shops to close in 1992 when we all join the "free" market. The
supposed reason was that many of the products do not comply with
EEC requirements, in particular they haven't got enough preservatives
in them. In other words, they're *too* environment-friendly.
Anybody else know anything about this ??
Ian
|
159.7 | A tonic..... | VOGON::SAMANTHA | pazza per Perrier... | Tue Jun 06 1989 19:43 | 13 |
| The thing in 1992 that will force health food shops to close has little
or nothing to to with organic food/preservatives......in 1992 only
chemists will be able to sell the item the keeps all these shops
going.............VITAMINS and all the related, fiendishly expensive
mineral supplements etc that currently are normally only found in
health food shops.
Health foods actually make very little profit, if any, and most of
these shops only keep going on the VITAMIN sales, it would seem a shame
to lose the other hard to get things they sell if they can't survive.
Sam
|
159.8 | How green was my washing powder? | CURRNT::HARRISON | | Mon Jun 26 1989 14:40 | 16 |
|
On the subject of environment-friendly goodies...
Ark, an environmental action group, have just released an environment-
friendly range of cleaning products. They are aiming to get these
into supermarkets (I think Tesco already stock them) and charge
a price not much higher than chemical-ridden nasty products.
On the subject of health food shops...
Most of these shops have petitions on the counter about 1992. If
you want to see these shops continue trading sign on the dotted
line. Or write to MPs/MEPs/anyone else.
Paul the Contractor
-------------------
|
159.9 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Mon Jun 26 1989 15:38 | 25 |
|
Playing devil's advocate for a second or two, if the environment
friendly range of products aren't significantly *cheaper* than the
nationally advertised brands then I for one will need a lot of
convincing of their efficacy.
As for campaigning to save the "health food shops", similarly I'm
not interested. They charge more for products than I'm prepared
to pay.
Sure I like organic vegetables, but I prefer to grow my own, and not
pay a bunch of profit grabbing neo-hippies for the pleasure of
believing that they don't cheat...
Similarly I prefer chemical free meat, but if I have to I'll go
and hunt a deer or two, kill a few dozen brace of grouse, pheasant
and partridge, and catch my own fish, (not to mention the abundance
of rabbits just ready for the snaring) before I'll pay a health food
store a penny a kilogram more than for the "factory farm" variant.
Vitamins, minerals, etc... well according to a piece on "That's
Life" last night iron pills are lethal, so heaven only knows what
multi-vitamins and mineral complexes do to your vital processes...
/. Ian .\
|
159.10 | They're not really cheaper | SHAPES::KERRELLD | Euro Tour '89 | Tue Jun 27 1989 09:54 | 5 |
| re .9:
Those "cheaper products" have a hidden cost, the environment.
Dave.
|
159.11 | A Green on his Soapbox | CURRNT::HARRISON | | Tue Jun 27 1989 13:54 | 38 |
|
Re: .9
As .10 says, these green products are cheaper on a wider scale than
the immediate impact on your wallet. My main reason for buying these
things is that I'm not very keen on damaging *anything*, the
environment included.
I am not very interested in the vitamins and cure-alls side of health
food shops. I don't take vitamin supplements, I feel OK without
them. I am, however, a vegetarian and I find that my local health
food shops stock a pretty good range of veggie food, not to mention
all of these other "green" products. Also there are some people
who find the pills and potions beneficial.
The price of green products is an interesting point. There is no doubt
that they are expensive, the blame for this seems to come from many
directions. The health food shops themselves suffer from the corner
shop syndrome - they just do not have the buying power and economy
of scale of supermarkets. The producers also have increased costs
due to low volume production.
This does not mean that there is no profiteering within the green
product industry. Our standard farming concerns are grossly
inefficient, while most organic farms are forced to run at a high
level of efficiency to stay alive. The result is that there should
be little or no differntial between organic vegetables and chemically
treated ones. Retailers still charge higher prices though, including
one reported case of a (nameless) large retailer asking an organic
grower to charge a higher price so they could justify the price
they charge on the shelf. Many similar cases have been reported.
In the end, though, my conscience wins out over cash and I still
try to buy environemnt-friendly products. Seems stupid, but that's
me all over!
Paul the Contractor
-------------------
|