T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
143.1 | Yes and no | INCH::BADMAN | Nipple end in tears ... | Wed May 10 1989 16:31 | 8 |
| I don't, but if you'd like to teach me, I'll give it a go ;-)
I tried to find a board recently but could not find a shop which
sold them. Any pointers ???
Jamie.
|
143.2 | hum | CHEST::LEE | IAM4C2H5COOH | Wed May 10 1989 18:14 | 4 |
| I know that people certainly have to GO after being in the Crescent
Canteen ;-) x 1000000
Phil
|
143.3 | To GO or not to GO ! | KERNEL::QUINN | Every Clown has a silver lining | Wed May 10 1989 18:28 | 4 |
| I used to know someone who was a go-er. :-)
Graham
|
143.4 | I'll have a GO | LEG::GURRAN | Your reality or mine... | Wed May 10 1989 18:49 | 8 |
| I have played GO and have a board & instructions. If you fancy a game
at lunchtimes give us a call.
For those that don't know the game it is very easy to learn the rules
but is bloody hard to beat an expert.
martin
|
143.5 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Wed May 10 1989 20:05 | 15 |
|
� For those that don't know the game it is very easy to learn the rules
� but is bloody hard to beat an expert.
GO players are rated on the same "kyu" (learner) and "dan" (expert)
system as the martial arts. For players only a moderate number of
standards apart an appropriate number of stones handicap given
to the weaker player makes for a quite interesting game: it is one
of the few board games where a novice can play sensibly against
an expert.
/. Ian .\
|
143.6 | | SHAPES::ALFORDJ | Dragon Riders do it in between... | Thu May 11 1989 01:25 | 11 |
|
Which "GO" are you referring to,
1. the board game with black and white reverse coloured "buttons" where
one attempts to turn over your opponents "buttons" by trapping his
between two of yours in a straight line;
or/
2. the very complex, not very popular board politics/war game that was
confusingly called GO as well, that had a 60 to 80 page rules book.
|
143.7 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Thu May 11 1989 12:16 | 18 |
|
I don't recognise either of the games you describe: GO is a Japanese
variant of a tactical game that probably originated in China. It
is played by placing black (or white) 'stones' on the intersections
of a 19x19 grid. When your stones surround your opponents according
to a simple definition of "surrounded" (ie every adjacent vertex
is occuppied by one of your stones and no more than one vertex interior
to the enemy 'army' is vacant, they are "captured" and removed. You
may play anywhere on the board, except you may not commit suicide.
There are a couple of other minor rules, and you score at the end
by counting up who controls the most territory.
ie the rules are very simple. The strategy however is horrendously
complex: the game is mathematically much more complex than chess,
and a vast number of books have been written on the subject.
/. Ian .\
|
143.8 | I've never heard of 'Go' but ... | YARD::BIRCH | Summer's here | Thu May 11 1989 12:55 | 7 |
| > the board game with black and white reverse coloured "buttons" where
> one attempts to turn over your opponents "buttons" by trapping his
> between two of yours in a straight line;
I always thought that was called 'Othello'
Karen
|
143.9 | | INCH::CROUCH | lunchtime, doubly so | Thu May 11 1989 13:57 | 15 |
| re< Note 143.8 by YARD::BIRCH "Summer's here" >
> I always thought that was called 'Othello'
It is now, but it used to be called Reversi (and still is by many
games players, including me).
Go is as Ian described it. As a matter of no interest whatsoever,
one of the positions in Go is called 'atari', from where the
computer company got its name.
The second game that Jane mentioned was indeed also called Go; my
brother has a set, but I've never actually played the game.
Andy
|
143.10 | insert element of confusion... | SHAPES::ALFORDJ | Dragon Riders do it in between... | Thu May 11 1989 14:08 | 14 |
| > I always thought that was called 'Othello'
Yup, you're right, I remembered that on the way home, put it down to
late night confusion !!
> The second game that Jane mentioned was indeed also called Go; my
> brother has a set, but I've never actually played the game.
Neither have I, it was far too complicated.
Jane.
PS I cann't play GO, but I can play Othello ;^}
|
143.11 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Thu May 11 1989 14:55 | 12 |
|
There is also a game called "Go-moko" (I think) played on a Go board,
where each player tries to put 5 of his (or her) own stones in a
line - like a bigger better version of 'oxo' ...
Incidentally beginning Go players are advised to play on a quarter
board...
I have heard [rumours] of a computer version of Go used as a DECwindows
demo. I'll see if I can track it down...
/. Ian .\
|
143.12 | ????? | KERNEL::PEWTER | | Thu May 11 1989 15:25 | 5 |
|
The game on Decwindows is called Reversi....
This is getting VERY confusing
|
143.13 | Othello <> Reversi | YARD::BADMAN | Nipple end in tears ... | Thu May 11 1989 20:37 | 44 |
| Just a quick point.
Othello is *not* the same as Reversi.
The difference ?
In 1881, Othello was invented in England.
In 19XX a Japanese geezer whose name I do not recall at the moment
but will check it out if anyone's REALLY interested introduced a
new rule to REVERSI.
In reversi, the game started on an *empty* board and the first four
moves of the game had to be made on the centre four squares. If
you think about it, this actually meant that there were TWO possible
starting positions once these four squares had been occupied :
XO XX
OX or OO
After some years of quibbling about which was the best position
to start from, experts came to the conclusion that the first postion
was preferable. An equivalent could be drawn here to Draughts where
there is a definitely favourable opening move.
So, our enterprising Japanese geezer decided to change the rules
so that the game started in the first position to save the hassle
of players having to make the moves. He called this version of the
game OTHELLO.
I believe that OTHELLO was copyrighted by some games company.
Strange really; I wonder if I could invent a new form of chess called
truss in which the white kings pawn is two moves forward and black
starts the game and then copyright it ???!!!
BTW, if anyone in the crescent wants a game of Othello sometime,
I've got a good two player version on the system ... give me a shout!
Jamie.
|
143.14 | Continuing the rathole.... | INCH::CROUCH | Rotating knives | Thu May 11 1989 21:17 | 22 |
| re < Note 143.13 by YARD::BADMAN "Nipple end in tears ..." >
> In 1881, Othello was invented in England.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> In 19XX a Japanese geezer whose name I do not recall at the moment
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> but will check it out if anyone's REALLY interested introduced a
> new rule to REVERSI.
^^^^^^^
> So, our enterprising Japanese geezer decided to change the rules
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> so that the game started in the first position to save the hassle
> of players having to make the moves. He called this version of the
> game OTHELLO.
^^^^^^^
Could you clarify this please Jamie? I always thought that Reversi
came first.
Andy
|
143.15 | Typo. | YARD::BADMAN | Nipple end in tears ... | Fri May 12 1989 14:36 | 6 |
| Whoops. For my first reference to the game, change Othello to Reversi.
Jamie.
|
143.16 | | CHEST::BARKER | | Fri May 12 1989 16:48 | 15 |
| Of even less interest, I think the other game of Go ( i.e. the
Waddingtons type board game ) was a Travel game, where you had to
whizz round the world by different means and see lots of different
sights. Terribly Dull.
I used to play Go ( the Japanese one ) in a Pub. None of us had
a clue about anything except the rules, so sometimes the games
used to go ( excuse the pun ) on for ages. I never won because I
took the drinking ( it was a Greene King/Adnams pub ) more seriously
than the game.
I took up Darts instead.
Chris
|
143.17 | I did it in the Library! | LARVAE::WILLIAMS_L | Lisa with an S not Lizzzzza with a Z | Wed May 17 1989 20:15 | 5 |
| I prefer Cluedo.
Regards
Miss Scarlett
|