T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3.4 | CL: Display limits | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Mar 31 1992 23:27 | 1 |
| Need to allow >24 items to be displayed. Priority 8.
|
3.1 | CL: History | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Mar 31 1992 23:30 | 1 |
| Need to provide option to examine the history of an item. Priority 6.
|
3.98 | CL: Postpone by number of days | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Mar 31 1992 23:31 | 1 |
| Need to be able to postpone an item by x working days. Priority 4.
|
3.173 | LOW: Customisation of colours | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Mar 31 1992 23:32 | 1 |
| Colour customisation would be nice. Priority 1.
|
3.91 | CL: Database location | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Mar 31 1992 23:42 | 3 |
| Datafile is currently hardcoded to be C:\CALDATA.DAT. Needs to be
user-selectable (how? customize option, or environment variable set in
AUTOEXEC.BAT?) Priority 3.
|
3.87 | CL: Future items | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 10:10 | 2 |
| At present, no items scheduled for the future can be viewed / deleted /
postponed, etc. Need a way of listing items for a given date. Prio 6.
|
3.5 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:12 | 1 |
| or at least, it must prevent you entering more than 24 items.
|
3.99 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:13 | 1 |
| IMO, priority 7.
|
3.92 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:14 | 5 |
| Customize otion.
Assuming tdl works from a options file, this should be settable once.
Particularly since c: is the last place I want something like this.
|
3.88 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:15 | 3 |
| IMO, priority 8. I see this as a reasonable serious restriction.
M.
|
3.6 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:36 | 2 |
| That would be a good temp workaround - if I can't FIX the 24 item
problem quickly, expect this as an interim.
|
3.100 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:37 | 1 |
| Noted.
|
3.81 | CL: Arrow Keys problem - 10 | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:38 | 22 |
| Copied tdl.exe to c:
ran tdl
created new datafile
inserted one item
inserted another item
Tried to use arrows - Hung
Rebooted
invoked tdl
"Error reading infile version no."
less than useful message, however remembered late one eveing at your place,
editing and deleted caldata.tmp.
invoked tdl. no sweat
insert three more items.
used arrows - hung
tried again deleting caldata.dat & .tmp
Same result.
|
3.78 | CL: Mouse control | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:39 | 3 |
| enhancment - Mouse Control
Priority 3
|
3.93 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:40 | 5 |
| C: was never intended to be the permanent place, so don't worry about
that. I'm tending more towards an environment variable, simply because
the customisations are stored in the data file (which we need to be
able to find). How strongly do you feel about this...if there was an
options file, the problem becomes finding *that*.
|
3.76 | CL: Edit lines | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:41 | 3 |
| Enhancement - Ability to edit lines
Priority 7
|
3.89 | Should be fairly easy anyway | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:41 | 1 |
| Agreed, priority uprated.
|
3.94 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:46 | 9 |
| I don't feel that strongly, but beware of depending on the Autoexec.bat too
much.
Many applications edit the autoxec.bat and some of them don't do it very
cleverly, particularly if it is an application that has been installed before.
Therefore you need to ensure that the variable is near the front of the
autoexec.bat.
|
3.79 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:46 | 1 |
| Nice, noted, but long way off.
|
3.82 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:51 | 18 |
| okey dokey, tried a few more things as suggested.
Added future item, tried the arrow keys, rebooted.
Added past item.
Past item higlighted in white on red
Current items highlighted in white on blue
Initially cursor rested on past item, as soon as I moved it, it would move among
the "today" items but it would not return to the "past" item. I therefore
couldn't delete/postpone it.
However, if I then deleted/postponed something, it would then return to the past
line and allow me to amend it. Again, however, if I moved off it I could not
move back on to it.
Does that help ?
|
3.77 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:52 | 1 |
| Hadn't thought of that one - should be easy to do, and a good idea too.
|
3.72 | CL: Close, not delete | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:53 | 7 |
| The facility to close something is required, rather than delete. This I see as
important, say priority 7.
However, this then leads into the ability to purge/display/amend them, although
this is of lower priority, say 4/5
M.
|
3.70 | CL: Postpone item text | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:55 | 5 |
| when postponing something the text is something like "new text for line",
I would suggest something more clearly different from the original text would be
better.
Say something like "Updated task details"
|
3.83 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:55 | 2 |
| OK, I'll try this at home later. May call you if I can't reproduce the
problem!
|
3.84 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:56 | 7 |
| More info -
The system hangs whenever you try to use the arrows with no tasks for before
today. Although I have tasks in the future, and HAD a task in the past
(postponed) it hung when I tried to use the arrows.
M.
|
3.73 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:57 | 5 |
| What's the objective - to maintain a list of "done" items for reporting
or something? If so, I'd considered that, and will add to the list...
(I think what I'm saying is "what does it mean if an item is closed?"
And how are such items to be treated by TDL?)
|
3.74 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 14:06 | 10 |
|
I want/need the ability to be sure when I did something within the near-past.
After a couple of weeks, it is only relevant that it was done, but in the short
term I can see that I would need to be able to look and see "oh yes, I did that
on thursday and x agreed.
I'm not for a moment saying that I would do this with all items, just that in
some cases it would make a big difference.
M.
|
3.85 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 14:42 | 2 |
| Last bit, problem has become less urgent since all I shall do is retain an item
for 30-March which just says "Started using TDL"
|
3.75 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 14:46 | 11 |
| I've been thinking about this.
For *MY* use, then this is essential.
Rather than using tdl to run my private life, ring dentist etc etc, I intend to
use it as my main diary system. This means that I shall need to use it to find
out what I was doing, for SAMS etc.
Whether this is the same for all uses is debatable.
Therefore, for me, v. high prio.
|
3.90 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 14:47 | 4 |
|
see 22.*
I'd appreciate this for closed items.
|
3.66 | CL: Delete caldata.tmp | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 15:33 | 2 |
| caldata.tmp should be deleted during initialisation. A check needs to be made as
to existance first, of course.
|
3.106 | LOW: Pre-alert | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 15:35 | 6 |
| An ability to preview, or to have lead times. IE, this job is due for 10/04,
lead time to produce the document of 7 days, tdl should be able to switch to
another screen "pre-alert type thing" and say, this is what you should have
started.
low priority - 1
|
3.2 | Get on with it then....... | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 17:51 | 6 |
| After using it, and it has got some use this afternoon, IMO History is vital
part of req'd functionality.
Therefore Prior 8/9
M.
|
3.3 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 18:13 | 2 |
| See? The more you use it, the more you want! What a wonderful hack...
Upgraded to P8.
|
3.95 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 18:26 | 8 |
| Is c:\caldata.dat hardcoded with the device name ?
I accidently invoked it from a different disk and it failed to find my datafile
and thought it might as well generate another. It would appear to be important
to have the datafile in c: and to make sure that tdl.exe is invoked from the
same place.
M.
|
3.63 | CL: Datafile error | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Wed Apr 01 1992 18:36 | 6 |
| Error reading input file
Fatal error: 4
Need an answer fast.
M.
|
3.96 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 01 1992 20:27 | 1 |
| Yep, it's hardcoded as "C:\CALDATA.DAT"
|
3.71 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Thu Apr 02 1992 00:56 | 1 |
| Fixed X.002
|
3.67 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Thu Apr 02 1992 00:57 | 3 |
| Fixed X.002 (no check for existence done. However, if it doesn't exist,
the delete returns an error. I never check the return status [that's
girl's stuff]).
|
3.68 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Thu Apr 02 1992 00:58 | 1 |
| In fact, I don't even record, let alone check, the return status.
|
3.69 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Thu Apr 02 1992 00:58 | 5 |
| Maybe in X.003:
"Failed to delete CALDATA.TMP which wasn't there"
I'll think on it.
|
3.107 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Thu Apr 02 1992 00:59 | 2 |
| We can come back to this and spec out what is needed later. Certainly
possible.
|
3.64 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Thu Apr 02 1992 01:00 | 1 |
| Some work done in X.002, but I am NOT convinced it is fixed.
|
3.61 | CL: Location of caldata.dat | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Thu Apr 02 1992 16:40 | 8 |
| Something strange is happening with caldata.dat
I know you've hard coded the dev/dir but it ain't working that way.
WIf invoked from windows, it uses c:\windows\caldata.dat It works fine, but it
DEF. uses that file.
M.
|
3.153 | LOW: Prioritise activities | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Thu Apr 02 1992 16:40 | 3 |
| The ability to prioritise activities.
Priority 3
|
3.154 | | BARYON::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Thu Apr 02 1992 17:39 | 2 |
| Yeah, I thought of that too. Initially, how would it be if it just
listed the items in priority order for each day? (Highest first)
|
3.155 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Thu Apr 02 1992 17:45 | 2 |
|
I think that is about all that is required.
|
3.156 | | BARYON::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Thu Apr 02 1992 19:04 | 6 |
| OK, I'll look at priority based on 1 to 5 basis. Now, is prio 1
important or unimportant? (ie, which is higher, 1 or 5?). Personally
I'd choose 1 as high (unlike I've done in here, and I regret it) -
people talk about a "priority one" job (or even "my first priority").
Thoughts?
|
3.157 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Mark Watkins @MCO | Fri Apr 03 1992 10:30 | 6 |
|
so you should. Normal rules should have applied !!!
1 is high. Digital's normal rules are that 1 is a show stopper and 5 is when you
get to it.
|
3.7 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Apr 21 1992 11:53 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.003.
|
3.86 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Apr 21 1992 11:55 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.002.
|
3.65 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Apr 21 1992 11:59 | 1 |
| More convinced now. Closed unless problems occur.
|
3.62 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Apr 21 1992 11:59 | 1 |
| Problem understood, and will be fixed in X.003 (but it ain't yet).
|
3.59 | CL: Print task list | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Fri Apr 24 1992 17:58 | 4 |
| Requirement: Priority 4
The ability to print, or at least write to a text file either today's, Some
other days' or outstanding tasks.
|
3.55 | CL: Postponement text | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Fri Apr 24 1992 18:01 | 4 |
| Requirement: Priority 6
When postponing an item, the ability to retain existing text, edit existing text
or enter new text.
|
3.56 | | FACIAL::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Sat Apr 25 1992 21:35 | 2 |
| How about, by default, the existing text is copied into the edit buffer
(just like the Edit option in X003)?
|
3.57 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Mon Apr 27 1992 10:27 | 2 |
| A good idea, provided that there is a key which will clear the field. f13 is
typical.
|
3.53 | CL: Sticky cursor | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:29 | 3 |
| Requirement - Prior = 4ish
Sticky Cursor
|
3.50 | CL: Menu keys | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:42 | 8 |
| Initial Feedback -
Insert and Delete should work from I & D also.
Therefore, display could be "SCREEN" and use 'S'
'ESC' is not intuitive and annoys the hell out of me. <Cr> would be better, or
even any other key or even a prompt to tell me to use escape.
|
3.51 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:46 | 5 |
| >'ESC' is not intuitive and annoys the hell out of me. <Cr> would be better, or
>even any other key or even a prompt to tell me to use escape.
In fact, make that any key + bleep when you put the message on the screen to
cause the user to look at the screen.
|
3.39 | CL: Delay menu selection | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:55 | 1 |
| "DELAY" should be a letter from the word, not TAB.
|
3.37 | CL: Postponing items text | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:56 | 1 |
| When postponing, the current message should be the default.
|
3.41 | CL: Display popup menu | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:58 | 4 |
| Should be consistent. You're using characters from words without needing <Cr>. I
like this, but it doesn't always work. For example, display/History. History
does not have it's h highlighted, although it can ber used, and stil needs a
carriage return.
|
3.46 | CL: Wrong menu bar displayed | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Tue Apr 28 1992 18:02 | 19 |
| Enter TDL
Type D (display)
Type H <Cr> (history)
Type Z (customize)
Type Esc (since customize (with a z ?) is not yet implemented)
Study display (main window)
Try and work out how to use the wrong menu bar.
It reminas with the Display/History Menu bar. It isn't just a redraw problem
isince main menu commands won't work. It appears to be a problem with re-drawing
the history, you are redrawing the main screen by mistake.
Clear ? Good.
M.
p.s. exiting from history is otherwise fine.
|
3.47 | | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Tue Apr 28 1992 18:03 | 4 |
|
The only way I have managed to clear this is to re-enter history and then exit
properly.
|
3.44 | CL: Delay versus Postpone | FUTURS::WATKINS | Milky, Milky. Lovely | Tue Apr 28 1992 18:06 | 7 |
| You need to differentiate between Delay and Postpone a little more intuitively.
Postpone is more like "Re-queue following action" Reschedule ?
Requeue ?
Adjourn ?
Delay is more like "re-queue following no action" Postpone ?
|
3.48 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Apr 28 1992 18:17 | 5 |
| I actually found this last week (although I hadn't realized the wrong
menubar displayed), but figured you wouldn't spend too much time in
customize anyway....
Can fix - probably - everything you've mentioned fairly easily.
|
3.42 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Apr 28 1992 18:19 | 5 |
| Yeah, the reason the display pop-up is inconsistent is because that is
from a library of routines (that I didn't write) - they do all the
windowing, but that one is a "higher level" one in that it provides the
full pop-up. However, I'm pretty sure I have the source to the pop-up
part of the library, so I'll look at that with a view to modifying it.
|
3.40 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Tue Apr 28 1992 18:31 | 1 |
| Fixed in X004.
|
3.35 | CL: write only modified datafile | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed Apr 29 1992 10:19 | 2 |
| Keith, you only need to write out the datafile when it has been
modified. Don't waste IO time writing out an unmodified one.
|
3.33 | CL: displaying closed items | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Fri May 08 1992 18:47 | 1 |
| Only offer to show closed items if there are indeed any to show.
|
3.31 | CL: Show all items | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Fri May 08 1992 18:54 | 2 |
| Have an option to show all items, from the beginning of time to just
after it ends.
|
3.169 | MED: mono display | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Fri May 08 1992 18:55 | 1 |
| Option to allow monochromatic display (principally for laptops).
|
3.29 | CL: Postponing dialogue box positions | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed May 20 1992 11:46 | 2 |
| Don't hide the highlighted line with the date/details boxes when
postponing items.
|
3.27 | CL: full item details | SAC::EDMUNDS | It's only life after all | Wed May 20 1992 12:30 | 2 |
| Need to record entry date/time and modification date/time for all
items.
|
3.25 | CL: Alarms | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:52 | 2 |
| Would be nice to be able to set alarms against items. Which, I think,
won't be too difficult.
|
3.28 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:53 | 1 |
| In X.100
|
3.32 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:54 | 1 |
| In X.100
|
3.30 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:54 | 1 |
| n/a in X.100
|
3.34 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:55 | 1 |
| n/a in X.100 (better design)
|
3.36 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:55 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.100
|
3.38 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:56 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.100
|
3.43 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:57 | 1 |
| n/a in X.100
|
3.45 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:58 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.100? You tell me...
|
3.49 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:58 | 1 |
| n/a in X.100
|
3.52 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:59 | 1 |
| n/a in X.100
|
3.58 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:59 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.100
|
3.23 | CL: weekdays in insert date dropdown | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Thu Jun 25 1992 17:04 | 3 |
| Put days of week as well as date in the "Insert item" "other" date
drop-down. Obviously the developer has never tried entering an item for
next Tuesday. Typical.
|
3.21 | CL: Put control box back on main window | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Fri Jun 26 1992 12:11 | 1 |
| ...and stop trying to be clever by removing it, pillock.
|
3.19 | CL: Remember main window position on exit | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Fri Jun 26 1992 12:36 | 1 |
| Please.
|
3.16 | CL: Postponing overdue items | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Fri Jun 26 1992 17:25 | 6 |
| OK, suppose you have an item dated yesterday, and you postpone it by
one day. Should it be resceduled for today, or for the next working day
following today?
The current implementation is that it goes to today, but I think that's
wrong (just been caught out with it).
|
3.14 | CL: Inserting multiple items on one date | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Fri Jun 26 1992 17:59 | 3 |
| Put option on inserting item to do the insert, clear the text but leave
the date the same. Intent is to use for inserting multiple items on
same date.
|
3.12 | CL: Disable buttons when closing an item | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Fri Jun 26 1992 19:22 | 1 |
| Wot it says.
|
3.10 | CL: Search | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Fri Jun 26 1992 19:35 | 1 |
| Some sort of search capability would be nice.
|
3.151 | MED:Compress datafile on write | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Fri Jun 26 1992 19:47 | 1 |
| LIke it says.
|
3.147 | MED: SAving files | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Fri Jun 26 1992 19:48 | 6 |
| LIke some help on this one. I think what I'd like is a periodic,
automatic save of the datafile to an alternate directory - what I'm
thinking here is like once every five minutes (if it's modified) to a
network drive.
Comments?
|
3.8 | CL: Insert item, date OTHER | SAC::EDMUNDS | HEEL, Thumper, HEEL! | Fri Jun 26 1992 19:56 | 1 |
| Fix it so you don't have to click twice on the date drop-down box.
|
3.101 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:16 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.100
|
3.97 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:17 | 2 |
| Fixed in X.100 (use environment variable TDLFILES to point to
*directory* to use for the files. Default is C:\)
|
3.80 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:18 | 1 |
| In X.100
|
3.108 | CL: Pre-alert | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:19 | 1 |
| Partially answered by alarms in X.101, but see later topic.
|
3.60 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:21 | 1 |
| Partially answered in X.100, but see later topic.
|
3.54 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:21 | 1 |
| Is this still necessary in the windows version (X.100)?
|
3.26 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:23 | 6 |
| .0� Which, I think,
.0� won't be too difficult.
Was I ever wrong. I've never written such buggy and hard-to-design code
(point 2 explains point 1). Anyway, it's there in X.101, but see later
topic.
|
3.24 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:23 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.101
|
3.22 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:24 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.101
|
3.20 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:25 | 1 |
| Fixed, X.101
|
3.17 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:25 | 4 |
| OK, it now postpones by x working days from 1) due date if that is
today or later or 2) today if due date is earlier than today.
Comments?
|
3.15 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:26 | 1 |
| In X.101
|
3.13 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:27 | 1 |
| Done, X.101
|
3.11 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:28 | 1 |
| In X.101
|
3.9 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 14:28 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.101
|
3.143 | Printing discussion | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 17:54 | 1 |
| Well, printing is there, but it isn't very clever. What should change?
|
3.140 | Alarms discussion | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jun 28 1992 17:56 | 5 |
| Alarms did not come nearly as easily to TDL as I wanted. They're there,
but I'm not especially happy with the user interface to them. However,
I've played around so much now, I'm getting punch drunk. So, how could
they be improved? (1: need to be able to set them for a given date, but
how should the user interface look?).
|
3.105 | LOW: date display | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Mon Jun 29 1992 09:30 | 2 |
| Could do with an easy way of displaying tomorrows items only (and maybe
one or two days after that only as well).
|
3.18 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Mon Jun 29 1992 09:46 | 1 |
| I'm convinced the new behaviour is correct.
|
3.148 | | SBPUS4::Sir | I'm having a bad year | Mon Jun 29 1992 14:38 | 9 |
| Bad idea.
I use it on a laptop, I don't always connect my network drives, they are not
always available.
You need backup procedures anyway, so I wouldn't write anything extra in this
direction.
|
3.149 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Mon Jun 29 1992 17:58 | 3 |
| OK, configurable (coz I want it). Would be saved in the options file,
so when on the laptop you wouldn't have it, but you could enable it on
the desktop.
|
3.166 | LOW: PC lock | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jun 30 1992 18:47 | 2 |
| How's about a PC lock facility? (Not because it's relevant, but because
it would be useful).
|
3.136 | New Versions ? | SBPUS4::Mark | I'm having a bad year | Mon Jul 06 1992 11:26 | 2 |
| When can I start using it ? I need the bugless version. I will however settle
for one with less bugs than now.
|
3.137 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Mon Jul 06 1992 13:52 | 1 |
| Forgot to copy it to diskette. It's at home. Available Wednesday.
|
3.104 | MED: bugs with Insert Item | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Wed Jul 08 1992 14:47 | 10 |
| 1. Error in date bombs TDL out
2. The date formate characters in the dropdown don't match what's
set in the desktop options of windows
3. The "Other" radio button isn't automatically selected when the date
box is modified.
4. Main screen should only be repainted when inserting an item that
will actually appear on that screen.
|
3.102 | HIGH: Postpone after search | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:22 | 3 |
| Do a search, then select an item from the display to postpone. The
wrong text comes up in the Postpone box (indicating, I suspect, that
the WRONG item will be postponed).
|
3.138 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sat Jul 18 1992 22:34 | 1 |
| When will you start using it?
|
3.103 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sat Jul 18 1992 22:34 | 1 |
| Unable to reproduce.
|
3.144 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Sun Jul 19 1992 18:21 | 2 |
| Much improved in X.103. Considered closed unless feedback says it isn't
right yet.
|
3.139 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Mon Jul 20 1992 16:51 | 1 |
| about an hour ago
|
3.112 | X.103 comments | SBPUS4::Mark | | Mon Jul 20 1992 16:53 | 5 |
| What's the timer ? Why should it be enabled ?
ALT (for menu)
Right hand arrow (5 times)
Down arrow (once)
|
3.113 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Mon Jul 20 1992 16:53 | 1 |
| wassa floppy-wop ?
|
3.114 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Mon Jul 20 1992 16:53 | 3 |
|
Display all items entered today doesn't work. (It just repeats whatever the
current display is)
|
3.115 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Mon Jul 20 1992 16:54 | 4 |
| In "save as..." some devices are shown with dir's after them, some aren't.
Why and how do I stop it ?
|
3.116 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Mon Jul 20 1992 16:55 | 4 |
| display all items seems flakey.
Sometimes it is all items, somethimes it isn't. I'm trying to re-create the
rror.
|
3.117 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Mon Jul 20 1992 16:55 | 3 |
| display all items includes closed items.
How do I display all open items. (ie, exclude closed)
|
3.118 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Mon Jul 20 1992 17:27 | 27 |
| .0�What's the timer ? Why should it be enabled ?
It's possible to disable it for debugging purposes. You're not meant to
find it. In fact, if you click on the menu bar to the left of "Options"
you'll find it. Good (pub) story about why it's there. Basically, leave
it enabled and ignore it.
.1�wassa floppy-wop ?
A device to (successfully) find out if you're paying attention.
.2�Display all items entered today doesn't work. (It just repeats whatever the
.2�current display is)
Nice one. Not sure when that broke. I'll check it out...
.3�In "save as..." some devices are shown with dir's after them, some aren't.
.3�Why and how do I stop it ?
I think that's a feature of visual basic. It appears to be the name of
the drive, although I'm not certain of that. Is there a particular
issue here, or are you just pointing it out?
.5�How do I display all open items. (ie, exclude closed)
I can put that on the wishlist - an extra menu option on the Display
pulldown ("All open items") - OK?
|
3.119 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Mon Jul 20 1992 17:31 | 4 |
| Wishlist fine for display.
Display of devices with bit after, doesn't affect me, or anything I want to
do. It should be tidied up at some point though.
|
3.120 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 21 1992 00:38 | 12 |
| .7�Wishlist fine for display.
Not needed, I now realise. You just select "to do items" from
"Display" and "all dates" from dates. Ergo, all unclosed items are
shown.
.7�Display of devices with bit after, doesn't affect me, or anything I want to
.7�do. It should be tidied up at some point though.
Feature of Visual Basic. Very unlikely to change.
Other things fixed. New version there in the morning.
|
3.109 | MED: Postponing by one week | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 21 1992 16:54 | 2 |
| Postpone by one week of an overdue item postpones it one week from its
due date, not today (which it should be).
|
3.132 | MED: delete OK button | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Mon Jul 27 1992 19:10 | 1 |
| Need accelerator key on delete - are you sure? OK button.
|
3.158 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Tue Jul 28 1992 12:34 | 15 |
|
Well, the option to add priority is there. However, I assume that it does
what it is supposed to at present - DS.
How are you intending it to work ? All I envisaged is a star next to it, or
maybe prioritised in the list.
Also, when setting the priority, the window background colours (yellow, I
think) if you choose Med or Low but changes to white if you choose high.
Bug or some weird logic ?
M.
p.s. I do have the latest version.
|
3.170 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Tue Jul 28 1992 12:34 | 2 |
| Gonna do this ? I may need to start using a laptop, or at least be in the
position where I can.
|
3.141 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Tue Jul 28 1992 12:37 | 5 |
| The interface for setting alarms is fine. Quite good actually.
I'm waiting for some test alarms to go off, to see what I think of that.
M.
|
3.167 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Tue Jul 28 1992 12:38 | 5 |
| Ok I suppose. But PCs running windows are lockable anyway and I doubt you'd
improve that.
I wouldn't bother since I think there are more important things. But I've no
real objection.
|
3.121 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Tue Jul 28 1992 12:42 | 5 |
| fine, but not intuitive.
M.
p.s. I'm talking about the display bit.
|
3.110 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Tue Jul 28 1992 12:42 | 1 |
| I'd prefer from today. It's more obvious and, I think, makes more sense.
|
3.133 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Tue Jul 28 1992 12:43 | 3 |
| but easily turnonandoffable, please.
|
3.142 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Tue Jul 28 1992 12:53 | 3 |
| well, the alarms didn't work.
What are they supposed to do ?
|
3.159 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 28 1992 13:11 | 15 |
| .5�How are you intending it to work ? All I envisaged is a star next to it, or
.5�maybe prioritised in the list.
Ultimately some kind of icon next to the line. Certainly ordering the
items in priority order.
.5�Also, when setting the priority, the window background colours (yellow, I
.5�think) if you choose Med or Low but changes to white if you choose high.
Oh yeah, so it does. Left over from some earlier experimenting. I'll
remove it so it's always white.
.5�p.s. I do have the latest version.
That's what they all say.
|
3.171 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 28 1992 13:12 | 1 |
| Ditto. The requirement is getting more important.
|
3.165 | LOW: Item history box | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 28 1992 13:16 | 1 |
| Spelling mistake
|
3.134 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 28 1992 13:17 | 1 |
| Customizable turn off confirm box.
|
3.128 | Date Format | SBPUS4::Mark | | Tue Jul 28 1992 13:21 | 1 |
| Date format changes from 27/07/92 to 27-Jul-92
|
3.129 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 28 1992 13:58 | 2 |
| Yeah, I've seen this. If you can isolate how to reproduce this, I'd
appreciate it (I'll try and find it too).
|
3.130 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Tue Jul 28 1992 14:56 | 4 |
| It occurs when you edit the line. It repairs itself if another line is added
for the same day afterwards.
M.
|
3.164 | Maximising | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 28 1992 15:09 | 1 |
| When maximising, scale up the contents of the window as well.
|
3.126 | Null alarms | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 28 1992 15:10 | 5 |
| Something is causing "null" alarms. I think it's related to "complex"
actions (eg, deleting a closed item that had been postponed) or
something. If you can shed any light on how to reproduce it, please do.
I do know that it only shows up when re-starting TDL.
|
3.145 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 28 1992 15:29 | 1 |
| What do you think of printing?
|
3.111 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Tue Jul 28 1992 15:31 | 1 |
| That's how it is now...
|
3.163 | Drop down dates in Postpone Item | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:12 | 2 |
| Put a date drop-down box in the "Postpone item" form (similar to the
one in the "Insert Item" form).
|
3.161 | Address book functionality | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Fri Sep 18 1992 00:42 | 1 |
| Requested by a user.
|
3.124 | Customisation | SAC::EDMUNDS | Sh ot | Fri Sep 18 1992 00:43 | 2 |
| Ability to chose which display to default to (all dates or up to
today).
|
3.162 | | LARVAE::THAYER::Susi | meow | Fri Sep 18 1992 12:31 | 1 |
| (me!)
|
3.122 | HIGH: Subscript out of range | LARVAE::THAYER_S | A deer and a bat | Mon Oct 12 1992 13:08 | 6 |
| I'm getting a "Subscript out of range" error when starting TDL
today. When I choose OK it disappears, but won't let me start
TDL.
Stuck,
Susi
|
3.123 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Frog, earwig, earwig | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:51 | 3 |
| Due to database becoming too large. Problem prevented in X.107.
Keith
|
3.125 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Frog, earwig, earwig | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:52 | 1 |
| Added in X.107
|
3.127 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Frog, earwig, earwig | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:55 | 2 |
| Duplicated in 72. Alarms disabled for now( X.107) : will be fixed
later. This topic closed.
|
3.131 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Frog, earwig, earwig | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:55 | 1 |
| Fixed in X.107
|
3.135 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Frog, earwig, earwig | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:56 | 1 |
| In X.107
|
3.168 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Frog, earwig, earwig | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:58 | 1 |
| I've droped this idea. If anyone wants a PC lock, say so here...
|
3.146 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Frog, earwig, earwig | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:59 | 1 |
| Printing must be OK. This closed unless I hear otherwise.
|
3.150 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Frog, earwig, earwig | Mon Oct 26 1992 18:00 | 2 |
| Dropped the idea - database is saved on every update, and that isn't
slow. Argue if you disagree.
|
3.152 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Frog, earwig, earwig | Mon Oct 26 1992 18:00 | 1 |
| Dropped. Argue if you disagree.
|
3.160 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Frog, earwig, earwig | Mon Oct 26 1992 18:01 | 1 |
| Added in X.107.
|
3.174 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Who's a furry mouse curser, then? | Tue Dec 15 1992 00:09 | 1 |
| Done.
|
3.172 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Who's a furry mouse curser, then? | Tue Dec 15 1992 00:10 | 1 |
| Answered (?) by colour customisation.
|