[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference award::copis_users

Title:	COPIS VAXination Users Conference
Notice:	Please use conference ORCHRD::FMAP_USERS - see note 1.1
Moderator:	ORCHRD::KIPNES

Created:	Wed Jul 13 1988
Last Modified:	Fri May 18 1990
Last Successful Update:	Fri May 02 1997
Number of topics:	171
Total number of notes:	402

51.0. "SEP SHIP PLAN COMPARISON" by AIMHI::NEWMAN () Tue Oct 11 1988 14:55

    I COMPLETED SHIP PLAN COMPARISONS FOR RA70,RA82,RA90 AND WILL LIST
    BELOW THE DISCREPANCIES.
    
    I USED "PD3" AT TD FOR USA AND AN IEG SUBSET FOR ALL INQUIRIES.
    
    RA70,RA82,RA90 - Q1F89 (USA) SO/IO/IEG UNITS HAVE SIGNIFICANTY LOWER
    NUMBERS THAN COPIES DEC10.
    
    RA70,RA82 - Q2F89-Q4F89 MATCHED
    
    RA90 - Q2F89-Q4F89 DIFFER WHEN AT THE USA LEVEL FOR SO.  IO AND
    IEG(SO/IO) MATCH.
    
    NOTE:  I PULLED SPP FROM COPIS DEC10 ON OCT 5TH.  ALSO MY INQUIRY
    IS IN QUARTERLY BUCKETS AND IS THE SEP-1988 PASS.
    
    BARBARA NEWMAN

T.R	Title	User	Personal Name	Date	Lines
51.1	September Ship Plan Quantities Incorrect	CINEMX::COPUSER78	Tom Malomo	`Mon Oct 17 1988 16:28`	7
	Barbara, at the time you your inquiry on the VAX, the Ship Plan pass for September was incorrect. We discovered this on Thursday 10/13 and are in the process of correcting it. Please read the Message of the Day (MOD) each day - we will post a message when the September Ship Plan is ready. When this happens, please do your VAX inquiry again. If you have any questions please give me a call - Tom Malomo, DTN 269-2411.
51.2	Missing Ship Plans (?)	BTO::TIBBITS		`Thu Oct 20 1988 11:59`	17
	Perhaps that would explain why I found the ship plan for the 82XX by using PS4 on 10/12, but can't find it today?! Although the MOD says that the new ship plans were available 10/18, I've had little luck pulling them today. I've been using PS4 and looking for the aggregates: 82XX, 83XX, 85XX, 8800, 8810, Aquarius, Aridus and PSTAR. The screen comes up with all zeros. I did find info for the 86XX and CIX64. Is this a ship plan problem or am I doing something wrong? I've been using the following parameters: Pass Date: Sep-1988 Desired Plan: S Month/Qtr: Q as well as F Option/Planning Group/Rev/Area: Level: TD Default Units/$: U Regards, Vicki
51.3	Use "FA" instead of "TD" for CPU AGGs	SHOTIM::COPUSER78	Tom Malomo	`Thu Oct 20 1988 14:36`	5
	Vicki, the problem is with the "level" code you entered on the VAX. For CIX64 you should use "TD" as the level. For all the others, you must use "FA". I used "FA" for 82XX and got the same quantities as on the DEC-10 - i.e. Sept=55,Oct=49,Nov-48 etc. If you have any more problems let me know.
51.4	I'M STILL CONFUSED!	CINEMX::LEAF	BARBARA LEAF DTN 266-4398	`Fri Oct 21 1988 15:35`	7
	I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHEN TO USE FA VERSUS TD FOR THE AGGREGATE WHEN PULLING SHIP PLANS. I WENT INTO AGGREGATE EXPLOSION TO SEE WHETHER IT IS DESIGNATED UNDER "MEMBER AGGREGRATE LEVEL" IS THIS THE RIGHT PLACE TO LOOK? IF INDEED TD EQUALS THE SUM OF EM AND FA, WHY WOULDN'T TD WORK FOR THE AGGREGATES ASSUMING THAT EM = 0 AND FA = 1 ? I'M CONFUSED!