| Andrew,
> 1. When will TPAS Inquiry function be available?
I am finishing testing on the last screen of the TPAS Inquiry module.
I will then be building and testing the VMS Install kit.
The release of this will be the end of this month. It has to be
timed with my moving the TPAS II to the ACADMY Cluster and TPAS I
to the AWARD cluster. I will be posting a note when available.
> 2. When we upgraded to TPAS V3.2, we encounter the following TPAS
> error:
I have tried to re-produce this error unsuccessfully. I have set all
my logicals the same. You showed the LNM$TPAS logicals. Are those the only
logicals set for TPAS ? This is the last table to be translated and it
may be that a process, group, job or system logical is set and therefore
causing this error.
Are you sure that the area where you are processing from can get to
the TPAS$AMPS file and it can open and read that file ?
Any other info to help me re-produce the error will be useful.
regards,
Lois
|
|
Lois,
Only when we included TPAS table in the process table (LNM$PROCESS_TABLE)
then we do not encounter the problem. Is that means we have to include
TPAS table into process table everytime we call TPAS?
My the other questions are:
1. When will monthly feed files be available to copy to local site?
2. After we copy the monthly feed files to local environment, do we
have to run the following commands to rebuild TPAS databases?
TPAS_SITE_IMPORT_DB.COM
TPAS_SITE_IMPORT_STKRM_DB.COM
TPAS_SITE_LOAD_NOR_DB.COM
3. I notice that when we were testing TPAS-II Ver3.0, most billing codes
(SUBSID_BILLG_CD) with pattern '000%' have the field
DB_FOUND_PART_INDCR in TRNSFR_AREA_TABLE in TPAS$DB set to 'Y' value.
But after we upgraded to V3.2 and rebuilt TPAS databases, the
DB_FOUND_PART_INDCR have set to 'N'. What is the reason for the change?
Regards,
Andy
|
| Andrew,
> Only when we included TPAS table in the process table (LNM$PROCESS_TABLE)
> then we do not encounter the problem. Is that means we have to include
> TPAS table into process table everytime we call TPAS?
Have you tried running with the logicals set at GROUP, JOB or SYSTEM ?
Did any of these cause you any problem ? I have tested the code with
logicals set at all levels and have not been able to reproduce.
Does you process have the TPAS Rights id TPAS$SUPPORT, TPAS$DB_ONWER
or TPAS$DB_READ ? If it doen't then it cannot access the LNM$TPAS
logical name table.
> My the other questions are:
> 1. When will monthly feed files be available to copy to local site?
The TPAS_DB and TPAS_NOR_DB files will be ready by the last fiscal
Thursday (AM) of the month.
The TPAS_STKRM_DB will be ready the last fiscal Saturday of the
month (night).
The exact times should be listed in the installation instructions
and note 22.4.
> 2. After we copy the monthly feed files to local environment, do we
> have to run the following commands to rebuild TPAS databases?
>
> TPAS_SITE_IMPORT_DB.COM
> TPAS_SITE_IMPORT_STKRM_DB.COM
> TPAS_SITE_LOAD_NOR_DB.COM
These command stream are to be run just prior to opening up your
system after month end. These command streams load the new databases
for the new fiscla month.
>> 3. I notice that when we were testing TPAS-II Ver3.0, most billing codes
> (SUBSID_BILLG_CD) with pattern '000%' have the field
> DB_FOUND_PART_INDCR in TRNSFR_AREA_TABLE in TPAS$DB set to 'Y' value.
> But after we upgraded to V3.2 and rebuilt TPAS databases, the
> DB_FOUND_PART_INDCR have set to 'N'. What is the reason for the change?
The reason was because the test database was not yet complete.
The Sales Subsidiaries (000%) do not need the part number on the
Corporate Parts Master File. This was done for sales configurations,
and other such things. That is why Order MLP and NOR is important
to the TPAS II software for shipments to subsidiaries.
Lois
|