T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4.1 | lost files | TRITON::LAMOUREUX | | Wed Mar 22 1989 10:29 | 4 |
| The note was not deleted on purpose. We had disk problems on the
system and your note was lost during the rebuild. Could you explain
what your question about Euclid-IS documentation was? I will be
more than happy to respond if I can.
|
4.2 | < More about the Documentation > | 21568::RAMGIRI | | Mon Apr 10 1989 17:50 | 10 |
| Al,
I am glad you mentioned about the lost entry.
Talking about the Euclid_Is documentation, I got answers to
my questions too. As a mater-of-fact I am now involved in the
testing of Euclid documentation. We (ESG_SE) are doing the
technical evaluation of doc sets working with a group in Westboro.
-Ram
|
4.3 | What are you doing with it? | 31378::BOYACK | Here today. Gone to Maui! | Wed Apr 26 1989 18:36 | 3 |
| Are you in a group that is going to Q.A. the Euclid documentation?
Steve
|
4.4 | Our group isn't involved in Q.A | CURIE::RAMGIRI | | Tue May 09 1989 17:37 | 14 |
| Re. .3
------
Steve,
No, we (ESG, Systems Eng.) are not involved in the Q.A. of Euclid.
We are testing the Euclid Documentation for technical accuracy and
stuff like that. We haven't got full doc sets though, we are doing
piece-by-piece and we are expecting the next batch of doc sets from
France soon. So far it seems good, considering few errors here
and there, we also found some bugs in the software. Basically
we are helping Grahm Slicker's (spell aint sure) group in productizing
Euclid.
-Ram
|
4.5 | Correction to Euclid Docs | 16646::BYERS_BI | | Fri Jun 09 1989 20:11 | 8 |
| Ram,
I have just received a copy of the corrections to the Basic Solid
Modeling Manual as suggested by General Dynamics. This is the training
manual. Would a copy be helpful to your activity? Contact me at
ALL-in-One @SDO.
Bill Byers
|