| Title: | VAX MAILGATE for MEMO |
| Moderator: | STKHLM::OLSSON |
| Created: | Sat Feb 25 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Tue May 14 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 216 |
| Total number of notes: | 933 |
I did produce a MEMO message (don't know how) which cannot be handled by the
MEMO gateway. Therefore the gateway crashes and doesn't send an acknowledge
to MEMO. After a while the gateway restarts and the same occures again.
So we have a loop and a message in the MEMO queue which blocks the
queue.
I think the gateway should receive the message (even if it's corrupted)
and then send an acknowledgement. If there is something wrong with the
message a nondelivery notification should be generated and/or the corrupt
message should be requeued.
Rainer
==============================================================================
Time: 1991-01-28 14:04:44.12; message from server MRMEMO1:
%MRIF-E-MISSUSERID, missing userid
%MRMEMO-W-TRACE, traceback forced from the Server Handler
-MRMEMO-I-FSM, receiving from MEMO after data received from MEMO
-MRMEMO-I-RING, ring: '36 13 36 ][ 4A 52 1A 1A 13 36.', substates: 00000030
%TRACE-W-TRACEBACK, symbolic stack dump follows
module name routine name line rel PC abs PC
SRVLOG SRV$LOG_HANDLER 3943 000001C9 001E379D
----- above condition handler called with exception 0935E83A:
%MRIF-E-MISSUSERID, missing userid
----- end of exception message
SRVMRC SRV$MRC_POST 4820 0000005E 001E7879
SRVACT POST_MEMO 4962 0000003B 001EB33B
SRVACT SRV$ACT_R 5290 00000210 001EB6FF
SRVDSP SRV$DSP_FSM 3423 000002A6 001E342A
SRVMMO SRV$MMO_ONE_LIFE 4376 000001EF 001E03BF
SRVMMO SRV$MMO_MAIN 4208 00000017 001E01C3
00239BAE 00239BAE
KOTERM KOTERM 804 00000039 002375A2
00239B89 00239B89
KODOC KODOC 1768 00000097 002347E4
00239B89 00239B89
00264DB2 00264DB2
ADA$ELAB_DDS ADA$ELAB_DDS 0000000E 001C0C0E
00239B89 00239B89
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67.1 | empty MHSUSERID causes problem | MUDIS3::RROSENBERGER | Rainer Rosenberger @MFR, PZ-SOGY | Mon Jan 28 1991 19:01 | 21 |
I found the reason for the problem in .0:
I did sent to a user with a DDS entry having all X.400 attributes
defined as SA attributes and the MHSORADDRESS did point to the MRX
mailbox (and node). So I added the subscriber in the recommended way,
i.e.
BUILD DDS SUB/MHSo=(MHSMAIL=mrxmbx, ADDR=mrxnode)
This caused the memo gateway to encode the TS address only in the route
terms. There was no USERID field. After using an DDS entry like
MOD DDS SUB/MHSo=(MHSU=mrxmbx, MHSMAIL=mrxnode)
everything worked fine. Therefore the gateway should put the DDS
attribute MHSMAILBOX into the NBS USERID field if the DDS attribute
MHSUSERID is not specified.
Regards,
Rainer
| |||||
| 67.2 | Fair enough | STKOFF::SPERSSON | Pas de Probleme | Tue Jan 29 1991 12:01 | 13 |
OK, point taken.
We will put this on the "list to fix". Since this seems to be a problem
with a reasonable workaround (build correct DDS records) we won't
provide a patch unless you twist our arms :-)
(I'm trying to find time to look into 54... it's difficult 'cause
officially I'm 100% assigned to a customer project)
cheers,
Stefan
| |||||