Title: | VAX MAILGATE for MEMO |
Moderator: | STKHLM::OLSSON |
Created: | Sat Feb 25 1989 |
Last Modified: | Tue May 14 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 216 |
Total number of notes: | 933 |
A customer complains that when using MEMO and MRX she still, with version 2.1, cannot use 'ADMD' and 'PRMD' to specify X400 addresses. Instead they must always be truncated to 2 (AD and PR) letters. Were you not going to change this on V2.1?? Or have we overlooked something? Regs, H�kan
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
65.1 | Yes, documentation error | STKOFF::SPERSSON | Pas de Probleme | Wed Jan 16 1991 20:59 | 21 |
Hi H�kan, I just tested this and you're right. In fact the only tags that work are ADMIN_DOMAIN and PRIVATE_DOMAIN, or unique abbreviations thereof (all the way down to A and P). The documentation (MRMEMO Operator's Manual Appendix C) says that you could use ADMIN_DOMAIN, ADMDNAME, or AMDNAME and PRIVATE_DOMAIN, PRMDNAME, or PMDNAME interchangeably, but that's incorrect. The numeric tags (2 and 3) should work. For clarity this only affects servers with DDS validation or address translation enabled Do you think you could talk friendly to your customer about this? cheers, Stefan | |||||
65.2 | Could you send a SPR form?? | EEMELI::MITTS | back on the chain-gang,.. | Thu Jan 17 1991 09:22 | 8 |
So should I SPR the documentation :-) ?? > Do you think you could talk friendly to your customer about this? Sure will, she is a very nice girl.... H�kan | |||||
65.3 | A note's as good as an SPR | STKOFF::SPERSSON | Pas de Probleme | Thu Jan 17 1991 18:01 | 9 |
> So should I SPR the documentation :-) To clarify, There are some indications in the actual code that the intended functionality is what made the documentation. So it's a matter of taste really whether you regard it as a software or documentation bug. No SPR is necessary. Stefan |