[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

5175.0. "Time for Plan B?" by IOSG::HOLTD (Dave Holt) Mon Mar 10 1997 04:44

                     ----------------------
                     | ClieNT Server NEWS |
                     ----------------------

             The Independent Observer of Microsoft,
                 Windows NT and Other Phenomena

     ClieNT Server NEWS is published weekly by G-2 Computer
      Intelligence Inc, 3 Maple Place, PO Box 7, Glen Head,
                    New York 11545-9864, USA
          Telephone: (516) 759-7025 Fax: (516) 759-7028
 
                   London, 10 - 14 March 1997
                        Issue Number 191

CS191-01 HP & MICROSOFT REPORTED HEADED FOR THE ALTAR

Those old year-old rumors of an alliance between HP and Microsoft
are alive and kicking again and the skinny we're hearing has
Microsoft CEO Bill Gates and HP CEO Lew Platt strolling out hand-
in-hand at Microsoft's upcoming Developer Days March 19 to plight
their troth. If it's true, the question is how much of their hand
they're going to show. The alliance they've been working on is
reportedly pretty broad in scope but a fly in the ointment
appears to be DEC which, we hear, has so far managed to thwart
such an axis by holding its alliance contract with Redmond under
Microsoft's nose and threatening legal action if Microsoft
attempts to duplicate such a relationship with anybody else. We
gather that bad blood created by such threats has kept Microsoft
CEO Bill Gates and DEC CEO Bob Palmer from the joint appearances
that were originally envisioned when their alliance was signed
though one has to wonder about Microsoft's good faith in that
regard. After all that alliance is based on DEC threatening to
sue the pants off Microsoft for poaching its intellectual
property in the form of the Mica code that became NT (CSN No
178). Microsoft "settled" by paying DEC about $105 million
including the $75 million Microsoft kicked in to bolster DEC's NT
service and support. Whether the HP-Microsoft entente is also
based on IP trespass remains to be seen but money is supposed to
be changing hands. (We know of at least one other company that
thinks it's got Microsoft by the IP short hairs and is courting
alliance too.) Depending on how far Lew and Bill push it, they
could wax eloquent over NT as HP's strategic direction, HP as
Microsoft's Internet partner, HP as NetPC provider, HP as service
provider and - this one should really rankle DEC - HP as NT-Unix
integrator for the enterprise. As for the DEC-Microsoft alliance,
well, nobody but DEC takes it seriously.
 
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
5175.1PLACEK::waldek.rpw.dec.com::agatka::calkaWaldek CalkaMon Mar 10 1997 08:115
Dave

get OfficeServer ready ASAP, we might need it SOON.

Waldemar
5175.2MAIL2::RICCIARDIBe a graceful Parvenu...Mon Mar 10 1997 08:403
    .0
    
    That depressed me.  Last line was like a dart in the eye.
5175.3DECWET::LENOXBeep, beep!Mon Mar 10 1997 10:466
Well at least HP, IBM, Novell, Sun and other computer
manufacturers are listed in Microsoft's Encarta, but
Digital Equipment Corp. isn't.  Maybe Microsoft is
getting a head start on rewriting history by not 
including a mention of DEC.  
5175.4The night they sold ol' Dixie down...SCASS1::WISNIEWSKIADEPT of the Virtual Space.Mon Mar 10 1997 15:119
    as the song goes...
    
    just take what you need and leave the rest.. but you should never
    have taken the very best...
    
    Why do I feel some days like the dance band on the titanic...
    
    John W.
    
5175.5BIGUN::nessus.cao.dec.com::MayneChurchill's black dogMon Mar 10 1997 16:076
> As for the DEC-Microsoft alliance,
> well, nobody but DEC takes it seriously.

They got that bit wrong. We don't take it seriously either.

PJDM
5175.6BBQ::WOODWARDC...but words can break my heartTue Mar 11 1997 00:1619
    So...
    
    let me see if I got this right?
    
    1 - we kill OpenVMS off by neglect
    2 - we align ourselves with Micro$lop
    3 - we get all gung-ho about Win-NT
    4 - we dump A1 and other mail systems for MS-Exchange
    5 - we dump a whole heap of other software because it conflicts with
    Micro$lop (e.g. rdb, DECMessageQ, and a whole heap of others)
    <insert any others you care to mention>
    n - Micro$lop get behind us (to stab us in the back!)
    
    reminds me of an old saying "how do you make a 'Small Business'?
    Mis-manage a large one!"
    
    {sigh}
    
    H
5175.7GLDX02::ALLBERYJimTue Mar 11 1997 09:246
    >  1 - we kill OpenVMS off by neglect
    
    That's unfair.  We've worked much harder at killing OpenVMS than 
    merely neglecting it.
    
    Jim (with his tongue firmly planted in cheek)
5175.8QUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centTue Mar 11 1997 09:345
Well, here's a first (I think).  Microsoft has killed off one of their own
products and asked Digital to replace it.  And did we ever!  See
http://www.digital.com/fortran .

				Steve
5175.9It's greed that killed the MBA class...SCASS1::WISNIEWSKIADEPT of the Virtual Space.Tue Mar 11 1997 11:3743
    Locustsoft seems to want to partner with everyone in the industry
    for their betterment... where's the win-win senero I've heard so 
    much of in business, I'm not seeing it...
    
    Let's review:
    
    IBM... 
    
    That little OS/2 affair
    
    Digital Equipment... 
    
    OpenVMS Affinity, All-In-1/Exchange, WNT intellectual property
    affair...
    
    HP... 
    
    Mercede, HPUX, Mail and Messaging affair (actually they're just warming
    up the band for that wedding march now...)
    
    
    And a whole host of targeted and destroyed friends and competitors...
    
    
    Stacker... deleted because of built in compression
    
    Cyrix just got dumped and may mean the end for them 
    
    Netscape... will be assimilated by explorer or random incompatablities
    generated by "The next Beta O/S"
    
    and don't forget Lotus, Corel, Wang, and everyone else who's ever 
    "Partnered", "Joined with", or been kissed on the cheek by the 
    Gates machine...
    
    It can't be that Gates is "That Smart"... It has to be that business
    "people are "That Greedy" and "That Stupid" to even try and deal 
    with the devil on his terms...
    
    
    JMHO
    
    John W.
5175.10Love hurts...STAR::DIPIRROTue Mar 11 1997 11:4614
Re: 5175.5

>> As for the DEC-Microsoft alliance,
>> well, nobody but DEC takes it seriously.
>
>They got that bit wrong. We don't take it seriously either.

That made me laugh out loud. This fact was painfully obvious at the
NT Wizards Symposium in Seattle last week. There is some cooperation
going on...at lower levels, but mostly you hear Digital people
preaching to Digital people about the alliance and how great it is.
The haven't gotten the message yet. Perhaps instead of those
laminated cards they sent to every employee, jars of vaseline would have
been more appropriate.
5175.11PCBUOA::KRATZTue Mar 11 1997 11:573
    re .9
    Citrix got dumped, not Cyrix.  Cyrix has some neat products
    coming out.
5175.12Mark Minasi & monkeysSAYER::ELMORESteve [email protected] 4123645893Tue Mar 11 1997 12:2947
        re:

>    going on...at lower levels, but mostly you hear Digital people preaching
>    to Digital people about the alliance and how great it is.

    Isn't that so true.  I have always been curious why we are able to
    market to ourselves, convince ourselves, about the greatness of our
    products, but are so helpless at marketing the same material to the
    outside world!

    I too attended the NT Wizards conference.  Two things struck me.  One
    was a statement by Mark Minasi (writer for NT Magazine and author of
    several books on NT).  He presented to an audience of perhaps 400-500
    people (perhaps more) on WNT Futures.  During that talk he digressed
    poking fun at Alpha (saying most companies refer to "alpha" products
    as something un-releasable, pre-"beta", which is pre-product).  A few in
    the audience reacted more seriously by defending Alpha (over Intel), to
    which Mark responded more seriously.  Basically, he led the audience to
    suggest that Alpha was maybe three-times the performance of Intel.  We
    all inwardly thought, wow, he admits we are faster.  How proud we are!

    Then he said, performance leads get interesting when the ratio is about
    ten times Intel performance.  Then the lead is worth the risk of going
    against mainstream Intel.  At ten-times, he'd even pay a little more
    for it!

    Before defenders [of Alpha] start downtroding this note or Mark Minasi,
    realize that whether he is right or wrong, he may very well represent a
    *perception* that is true.  The perception is all that matters even if
    we know better.  Again, it goes back to how well we have marketed to
    ourselves, and not those outside of Digital.

    Mr. Minasi has never used an Alpha.  On that note, I couldn't help but
    think how much marketing mileage we could get by convincing him to see
    our perspective.  I thought, here is one of a few well regarded,
    non-MS, non-Intel, people that could help Digital if he simply had a
    machine to try.  More globally, there are only a few persuasive,
    independent authors in the WNT rags.  Why don't we spend a few
    marketing dollars to rotate our best WNT PCs to these people. If we
    are truly better, perhaps then their perceptions would change! 
    Perhaps then they would tell the world in a way that our marketing
    can't.  [In fact Mark said he would.]  

    How cheap it would be.  Maybe even better than monkeys!

    --Steve
                                                 
5175.13the last wordUSDEV::LEVASSEURTue Mar 11 1997 13:004
    .9 IMO you last paragraph neatly sums up the state of this totally
    psychotic and out of control industry. 
    
    sigh....ray
5175.14MinasiOTOOA::GMACDONALDIts badluck to be superstitiousTue Mar 11 1997 14:3216
I also attended the NT Wizards Symposium and was there for Mark Minasi's
comments.  While his assessment as to whether Alpha has to be 10 times
faster that Intel are true or not, I disagreed with his comment that people
shouldn't buy Alpha "because somebody may have a 16-bit Clipper application
or whatever that they want to run."

I thought his comments around Alpha were somewhat disrespectful.  But, he
is one of the best presenters I've ever seen.  Very funny, lots
of analogies, etc.

I'm also not sure why the event was held in Seattle.  Microsoft had no or
very little presence there that I could see.  It kind of showed that
Microsoft places very little value on our partnership.  If Microsoft won't
send people there, it should be somewhere in the middle of the country.

Don Henley was great.
5175.15bhajee.rto.dec.com::JAERVINENOra, the Old Rural AmateurTue Mar 11 1997 14:3512
    re .14:
    
>If Microsoft won't
>send people there, it should be somewhere in the middle of the country.
    
    The only question is, in the middle of _which_ country...
    
    :-)
    
    Microsoft's European TechEd will be in Nice this year... it's not in
    the middle of any country...
    
5175.16axel.zko.dec.com::FOLEYhttp://axel.zko.dec.comTue Mar 11 1997 14:366

	Don Henley was there? Why? (Eagles NT? On the Border with
	Windows95? Life in the Fast Lane with Exchange? Hotel Redmond?)

						mike
5175.17Everybody is using IX as a postscript these days;-)SCASS1::WISNIEWSKIADEPT of the Virtual Space.Tue Mar 11 1997 14:36146
>                      <<< Note 5175.11 by PCBUOA::KRATZ >>>
>
>    re .9
>    Citrix got dumped, not Cyrix.  Cyrix has some neat products
>    coming out.

    
    
    Yes, my mistake!  Serves me right for getting emotional about 
    this...
    
    JMHO 
    
    John W.
    
    
             <<< HUMANE::DISK$SCSI:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DIGITAL.NOTE;1 >>>
                        -< The Digital way of working >-
================================================================================
Note 5177.0            Will there be a "bag" left to hold?             6 replies
CSC32::D_DONOVAN "SummaNulla(The High Point of Not" 123 lines  10-MAR-1997 13:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	I was reading Note #5175 and remembered this article in this
week's "Business Week" about Citrix and MicroSoft.  Any comments
or feelings about how this "resembles" our NT Cluster "strategy"?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           "http://www.businessweek.com/1997/11/b351864.htm"


                           OF MICE AND MICROSOFT

           How Citrix' overnight success turned so sour so fast

       Dancing with an elephant is tricky in the best of
       circumstances. Dancing with an elephant that changes course
       on a dime can be downright hazardous. Just ask Edward E.
       Iacobucci, chairman of Citrix Systems Inc. in Fort
       Lauderdale, Fla. The software company saw revenues triple to
       $45 million last year from just $15 million in 1995. At its
       peak last year, the company had a market cap of nearly $1.5
       billion. Most of that amazing performance was based on a
       relationship with Microsoft Corp. that came down to this:
       Microsoft endorsed Citrix technology that lets a dozen or
       more computers share Windows programs running on a central,
       networked computer. With the software giant's blessing,
       Citrix was golden.

       The merry dance ended on Feb. 26, when Citrix announced that
       Microsoft was considering adding features to new versions of
       Windows to do part of what Citrix' products do. With Citrix'
       Microsoft relationship in question, investors fled and the
       stock plummeted 60% on Feb. 27, to 10 5/8 from 26 1/4. On
       rumors of a Microsoft rift, it already had fallen nearly $6 a
       share earlier that week. Citrix' market capitalization
       briefly dropped below $250 million.

       FRIEND OF BILL. What's surprising is that the market was so
       surprised. After all, the reliance on Microsoft was listed
       prominently among ''risk factors'' in public disclosures made
       in connection with Citrix stock. The documents even alerted
       investors to the possibility of Microsoft becoming a major
       competitor. ''They were clear, to my knowledge, that
       Microsoft might end up with a similar technology,'' says
       James E. Allchin, a Microsoft senior vice-president.

       Part of what may have lulled Citrix investors into a sense of
       security was Iacobucci's history with Microsoft Chairman
       William H. Gates III. Iacobucci says he worked with Microsoft
       ''when Microsoft was smaller than Citrix.'' Before starting
       Citrix in 1989, Iacobucci worked for 11 years at IBM and
       headed the IBM-Microsoft team that developed the OS/2
       operating system. Gates even wrote the foreword to
       Iacobucci's OS/2 Programmer's Guide. Microsoft was an early
       investor in Citrix, owned 6.8% of its shares, and had a board
       seat.

       All that meant little when it came down to business: Citrix
       was serving a market that Microsoft figured it needed to be
       in. Citrix products allowed customers to hook up all sorts of
       computers--including Macintoshes and stripped-down ''network
       computers''--to servers that let them use Windows or Windows
       NT programs.

       Microsoft says it began exploring the development of such
       ''multi-user capability'' because customers were asking for
       it. Microsoft blessed the Citrix approach so customers could
       get immediate gratification. But, says Allchin, it ''was just
       a question of time'' before Microsoft would develop its own
       product. Coming now, the timing is sooner than the market had
       anticipated, says Thomas C. Offut, vice-president of business
       development for Wyse Technology Inc., a network-computer
       maker and strategic partner with Citrix.

       Citrix still has a business, with Microsoft's own version
       months or perhaps years away, says Chip Gliedman, director of
       research for technology consultants Giga Information Group
       Inc. ''Every company that has made its living extending
       Microsoft's capability has had to learn to dance between the
       feet of the elephant,'' he says. ''I'm not writing Citrix
       off, and I'm advising our clients who are deploying Citrix
       not to do so.''

       UNDEAD. Indeed, addressing industry analysts at a Robertson,
       Stephens & Co. technology conference the day after the
       announcement, Iacobucci borrowed a line from Mark Twain,
       assuring investors: ''The reports of my death have been
       greatly exaggerated.'' Citrix, he points out, has licensing
       agreements with Microsoft and other strategic partners, $137
       million in cash, and no debt.

       And while Microsoft plans to build more components into
       Windows that make multi-user and remote-user capability
       possible, both Iacobucci and Allchin point out that the
       software giant may license some technology from Citrix in its
       multiuser programming. ''Microsoft is a big enough company
       that it can do anything it wants when it wants to,''
       Iacobucci says. ''The fact that we're still here
       [negotiating] bodes well.'' Indeed, that's what happens when
       you dance with elephants. You get crushed--or learn to dance
       faster.

       By Gail DeGeorge in Miami, with bureau reports

                      -------------------------------

                               RELATED ITEMS

            TABLE: The Saga of Software Supplier Citrix...

            CHART: ...And How Far It Fell

            PHOTO: Edward Iocobucci, Citrix CEO

                           Return to top of story

                      -------------------------------

    [SIGNUP][ABOUT][BW_CONTENTS][BW_+!][DAILY_BRIEFING][SEARCH][CONTACT]

                                  [Image]

                    Updated Mar. 6, 1997 by bwwebmaster
   Copyright 1997, by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.

    
5175.18The rule of 10x+SCASS1::WISNIEWSKIADEPT of the Virtual Space.Tue Mar 11 1997 15:28108
    re: .11
    
    "Alpha needs to be 10x the performance of Intel to justify the risk."
    
    
    Absolutely, 100% correct at the workstation space:
    
    Let's review what we've seen of the 10x+ rule in our business:
    
    1987 VAXstation 2000 1 mip (roughly)
    1988 Sun Sparc stations 10 mips (and a company was built)
         VAXstation 2000 1 mip (roughly) 
    1989 Sun Sparc stations 10-15 mips (and software started to migrate)
         VAXstation 3100 4 mips
    1990 Sun Sparc 25-30 mips (software portfolios fully migrated)
         VAXstation 4000/76 (12 Mips)  Workstation software growing
         sparce...
    
    VAX 10000+ application portfolio began seriously migrating from 
    workstation class systems because much cheaper faster machines 
    were available, the magic of an installed base had very little
    hold on those software vendors and customers when faced with a
    10x ramp...
    
    
    So let's move up a little time:
    
    1994 4086  Intel         75  mips and <500 applications
         20164 Alpha        300  mips and <100 native applications
    
    1995 5086  Intel        200  mips and >2500 applications  
         20164 Alpha        600  mips and <300 native applications
    
                                          FX!32 work began
    
    1996 5086  Intel        500  mips and >10k applications
         21164 Alpha       1000  mips and >1000 native applications
                                           
                                           FX!32 is on line for the rest
                                           of the applications but not at 
                                           full performance
                                           
    1997 6086 Intel            Mips and More Mips...
    
         21164 Alpha           Lowered prices, eliminated other marginal
                               risc vendors, but less than 10% of the 
                               WNT marketplace. 
    
                             
    
    No where on the real curve did Alpha do 10x+ the performance of 
    Intel (the market leader) except at the high end and who leads
    these days with mainframes?
    
    So why would anyone take a chance?  
    
    They need the raw performance? They don't like Intel? They  
    like Digital? The read a nice review about alpha.  A salesman
    convinced them that 64-bit migration would a difficult thing
    for them? 
    
    Take your pick all those reasons add up to 7-10% of the WNT Server 
    marketplace (where alpha is today)...
     
    Those reasons don't seem to be a compelling reason to choose Alpha 
    over a market driven "Safe" choice for most software vendors and 
    customers.  They're not good enough reasons most of the time to 
    get software vendors to do a native "Port" for Alpha so we had to
    develop FX!32.
    
    
    --
    
    To phrase the 10x+ rule:
    
    In order to attract software vendors and customers to a platform, that
    platform's initial performance characteristics must be 10x the existing
    competitive platforms.  There after step increases of 20-30% per year 
    will cement the attraction and eliminate the competition.  The race
    begins again when the competition gets to >50% of your current 
    performance...
    
    --
    
    
    We've never been better than 2-5x the performance of Intel's chips
    at the low end or 2-5x better than Sun or HP's chips at the midrange
    and then not for any extended period of time.
    
    It's hard to build critical mass for a new architecture without some 
    compelling reason (performance) to move to it...
    
    With Mercede and the 32-64 bit conversions on the horizon we have 
    yet one last chance to slam dunk alpha.
    
    Don't talk costs, don't talk about what the market would pay for 
    2x pentium's performance.. Get the prices down, attack the 
    pentium marketplace with 10x the performance at the same price...
    
    of course that just my opinion...
    
    John W.
    
    (Digital has already had more chances with Alpha they we deserve in 
     the marketplace and it's shame on us if we blow this window of
    opportunity until mercede arrives...)
    
    
5175.19TLE::REAGANAll of this chaos makes perfect senseTue Mar 11 1997 15:309
    On Thursday night, the entertainment for the symposium was a Don Henley
    concert.  Timothy B. Schmidt made a guest appearance.  One of the
    charities during the week as the Walden Woods organization.  I sure
    Digital/Microsoft/Oracle/somebody made a reasonable donation to the
    charity for Don to show up.  Speakers got special seating (we were
    let into the ballroom about 5 minutes before the rest of the attendees
    so we could rush up front.  I was in the 3rd row!)
    
    				-John
5175.20We do have supporters.MAIL1::DERISETue Mar 11 1997 15:3123
    As for Windows NT Magazine, they have actually published some pretty
    positive articles about our products, including Digital Clusters for
    Windows NT, FX!32, and as recently as the February issue they gave a
    great review of the Personal Workstation, both Intel and Alpha flavors. 
    They have also published positive reviews for our service and support. 
    Windows NT Magazine is actually quite refreshing after going through
    the traditional PC rags.  I used to be a big fan of PC Magazine, but
    they hardly, if ever, say anything good about Digital.
    
    As for Mark Minasi, I agree he probably needs some education about
    Alpha.  However, in his earlier session, he did state a couple of
    things that I thought were interesting.  He stated that he firmly
    believed in 64-bit NT and that this should be a priority for Microsoft. 
    He was very favorable about the 64-bit addressing that will be
    introduced in NT V5 for Alpha.  Though he did mention the non support
    for virtual memory for 64-bit memory access will require much more
    attention to system configurations.  He also stated that anyone buying
    software should insist that it be supported on Alpha.  By the way, this
    also seems to be a thread being espoused by Windows NT Magazine in
    general.
    
    So, I think we do have our supporters out there.  We just have to do
    better at helping them help us.        
5175.21NCMAIL::SMITHBWed Mar 12 1997 09:171
If we have to rely on some trade mag writer to help us, we truly are doomed!
5175.22it only helpsMAIL1::DERISEWed Mar 12 1997 09:354
    re .21
    
    I don't think we need to rely on them, but having a few on our side say
    positive things about our products doesn't hurt!
5175.23I think we need help from anyone who will give it...12680::MCCUSKERWed Mar 12 1997 09:523
re .21

Are you suggesting we don't need help from the likes of trade rags?  
5175.24NCMAIL::SMITHBWed Mar 12 1997 09:5910
I am suggesting that we need to help ourselves by:

	- effective and consistant marketing
	- lower prices to compete
	
The trade rags just reflect reality as they (and most customers and
stock analyst) see it.

	- no one knows about our products
	- the ones we have are too expensive
5175.25Other comments he made...STAR::DIPIRROWed Mar 12 1997 10:564
    	He said something else, on a different note, which struck me very
    funny. He referred to Computer Associates as the place "where software
    goes to die." He certainly didn't hold back in sharing his opinions
    with the audience!
5175.26Thoughts from the common man . . .OASS::BURNAMAN_BAnd now, live, from Atlanta . . . Wed Mar 12 1997 12:1035
    <RE: .24 >
    
            - no one knows about our products
    
    I agree completely with what was said and I have been saying it for
    years myself, but I would go on to augment this by saying that:
    
            - no one knows about our company!
    
    Digital has spent/squandered a small fortune (size is relative) on
    a so-called branding campaign.  My relatives have told me independently
    that had they not known someone who worked for Digital, they would have
    had no clue that Digital was a computer company - the ad's did not con-
    vey this to them.  One even called them "useless noise".
    
    If Digital is serious about staying in business, then a major change in
    strategy needs to occur.  Our advertisements, in my opinion, need to be
    in the form of testimonials from well-known companies extolling the
    virtues of Digitals many significant successes over the years, Digitals
    many strengths (past, present and, probably most importantly, future) and 
    Digitals products.
    
    Digital needs to continue to do "whatever it takes" to make it easier
    for customers and partners to do business with us.
    
    And finally, if there is no non-compete clause in the agreement we ink-
    ed, then lets compete, for crying out loud!  We've got good products,
    too.  While no MBA, I still remember what my Business 101 class had to
    say about advertising, which was:
    
    Advertising is the act of telling someone that you have something that
    they may be interested in buying.  The purpose of advertising is to 
    generate demand for your product(s).  
    
    Bruce (I got an A in the class, does this make me VP material?) in Atlanta
5175.27your next question pleaseMKTCRV::KMANNERINGSWed Mar 12 1997 12:336
     >>Bruce (I got an A in the class, does this make me VP material?)
    
    No Bruce, no, don't even think it would. It takes a very special kind
    of talent, very special indeed.
    
    ..Kevin..
5175.28More MS "Alliance" feedback...MSDOA::HICKSTThu Mar 13 1997 11:5719
    Wow... back a few notes, someone was relating about Micro$oft and the
    Digital Alliance, etc.
    
    Having come back from the NT Symposium, I have to add my voice to the
    chorus.  It was painfully evident that Microsoft doesn't take the
    "Alliance" seriously.  I was really struck with this when the MS
    executive (Bob whatever) gave the speech on the first day.  He had a
    half dozen Digital-specific slides from which he READ the bullets in a
    DISTRACTED and DISINTERRESTED manner.  Then he launches into heartfelt
    praise for MS's internal web pages that review financials, and some
    other MS internal stuff of interest to no one but MS.  What a pile of
    drivel!
    
    You're right.  We spend 98% of our time marketing to ourselves, patting
    each other on the back and telling each other how great we're doing. 
    Meanwhile, the rest of the industry (and most of the dwindling customer
    base) couldn't give a rat's @$$.
         
    - Tim
5175.29bhajee.rto.dec.com::JAERVINENOra, the Old Rural AmateurThu Mar 13 1997 12:422
    re .28: Didn't he also refer to OpenVMS as "MVS" in his speech?
    
5175.30WOTVAX::HILTONSave Water, drink beerThu Mar 13 1997 13:555
    1st time I presented the MS alliance to a customer, he said: "Great,
    but everyone has an alliance with MS"
    
    
    Greg
5175.31two people called it OpenMVSTROOA::MSCHNEIDER[email protected]Thu Mar 13 1997 14:108
    re: .29
    
    Yes the Microsoft presenter did call it OpenMVS ... but then again so
    did Bruce Claflin from Digital.  I have to agree that the stuff on MS
    web pages was quite painful .... it was like they discovered something
    new, well at least new to them and had to tell the world.  Perhaps we
    might show them some of our internal websites so that they realize that
    this was not something invented in Redmond.
5175.32Press ReleaseSMARTT::WOZNIAKFri Mar 14 1997 10:33206
                               [ PR Newswire]

                           [Vulcan Communications]

              [ Yahoo | Write Us | Search | Headlines | Info ]

  [ Business - Company - Industry - Finance - PR Newswire - Business Wire -
                                  Quotes ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to Digital Equipment Corp news page
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday March 14 9:14 AM EDT

Digital Microsoft Alliance for Enterprise Computing Momentum Continues for
Windows NT

Two Major Goals in Sight for 1997

Strong Customer Demand Positions Digital and Microsoft to Achieve More Than
One Million Microsoft Exchange Seats Delivered by Digital by Mid-Year

Microsoft Windows NT 5.0 Beta with 64-Bit Very Large Memory Support Will Be

Delivered on Digital Alpha This Year

MAYNARD, Mass., March 14 /PRNewswire/ -- Digital Equipment Corp today
announced the Digital Microsoft Alliance is on track to reach two major
milestones for Microsoft(R) Windows NT(R) Workstation and Server. In less
than a year since the introduction of Microsoft Exchange Server, Digital and
Microsoft Corp have joined forces to win more than 750,000 Microsoft
Exchange seats with companies such as Lockheed Martin, British Telecom,
Lehman Brothers Inc., Volkswagen, and Swiss Telecom PTT. With the release of
Microsoft Exchange 5.0 on March 11, 1997, the companies expect to have more
than one million seats under contract by mid-year. Digital also announced
that the beta of Microsoft Windows NT 5.0 with 64-bit Very Large Memory
(VLM) support will be delivered on Digital Alpha this year, giving customers
significantly faster access to data.

"Digital has been a strong supporter of Windows NT for more than five years,
and through our Alliance for Enterprise Computing has established itself as
a leading supplier of Windows-based solutions to the enterprise," said Bill
Gates, CEO of Microsoft Corporation. "This has been proven through our joint
engagements with customers and our joint successes with Microsoft Exchange.
Microsoft will continue to work closely with Digital in such areas as
providing 64-bit VLM capabilities on Windows NT for Digital's Alpha
processor, which is the leading RISC platform for Microsoft Windows NT
today."

"Our strategic alliance with Microsoft has made the Windows NT environment a
robust, enterprise-level solution," said Digital Chairman Robert B. Palmer.
"As more and more companies embrace Windows-based solutions, our Alliance
continues to grow in breadth and depth, successfully delivering Windows NT
products and solutions worldwide."

Momentum Continues

British Telecom selected Digital and Microsoft to implement Microsoft
Exchange for more than 100,000 users and will provide a new range of
corporate intranet services to BT's corporate customers. This solution is
based on Digital's high-performance Alpha and Intel systems; "firewalls;"
and Microsoft's suite of Internet software products including Internet
Information Server, which is incorporated in Windows NT Server; Microsoft
Internet Explorer; and Microsoft Exchange Server.

A recent contract with Lockheed Martin calls for Digital to implement more
than 120,000 Microsoft Exchange seats in more than 50 countries. This is one
of the largest Microsoft Exchange contracts to date.

In addition, Digital is implementing Microsoft Exchange internally, and has
migrated more than 35,000 of its own employees on five continents.

Test Drive Microsoft Exchange Server 5.0

As part of the Microsoft Exchange Server 5.0 "Cyber Launch" on March 11,
1997, a Digital AlphaServer 4000 system was deployed at Microsoft to support
the Microsoft Exchange Server 5.0 Testdrive. The Digital AlphaServer 4000
allows any user on the Internet to "test drive" the new features of
Microsoft Exchange Server, which include web browser (HTTP), POP3, and LDAP
access. To test drive Microsoft Exchange Server 5.0 users can access the URL
at: http://www.exchangeserver.com/testdrive.

Reduced Cost of Ownership, Other Benefits

Digital and Microsoft also are working together to dramatically lower total
cost of ownership by delivering cost-effective Windows NT Workstation
solutions. Digital supports the Microsoft Zero Administration Kit for
Windows NT Workstation announced on March 12, 1997. Digital will participate
in the Microsoft Zero Administration initiative for Windows to further
reduce the end-user operation costs on Digital's Personal Workstations for
Windows NT. As the industry leader, Digital is already helping customers
reduce the total cost of ownership in the workstation area with Intel and
Alpha-based Digital Personal Workstations for Windows NT.

Swiss Telecom, which provides more than five million Swiss users with
telephone, pager and fax service, is installing 30 Windows NT clusters to
serve as the middle tier between 15,000 PCs and its high-end mainframe
systems. The clusters, each consisting of two Digital Prioris servers and
RAID array 310 storage, will support a broad mixture of Digital and non-
Digital equipment.

Kvaerner, a $10 billion, Norwegian-based ship building, travel, oil
exploration and construction conglomerate, has chosen a Windows NT
technology- based intranet solution to link 40,000 of its employees in 400
offices around the world. Another Alpha and Intel solution, Kvaener will
deploy the Microsoft Internet software portfolio, including Microsoft
Internet Explorer. In addition to network backbone support, Digital is
providing total Internet planning, design, and implementation.

New York Mercantile Exchange, the world's largest trading center for
petroleum products and precious metals, recently purchased 50 Digital
Prioris servers and more than 1,100 Digital Venturis PCs. These systems,
which complement their existing Alpha servers, will provide the
infrastructure for the trading floor the quarter following the scheduled May
1997 opening of the Exchange's new building in Manhattan. "We've used
Windows NT in development for 18 months," said Allen Feryus, senior vice
president of Information Services and chief information officer, "and have
not had a single Windows NT- related failure, lockup, or issue. We have
every confidence in its ability to support mission-critical applications."

Microsoft Windows NT 5.0 Beta with 64-Bit VLM on Alpha This Year

Digital and Microsoft are working to deliver Windows NT 5.0 with 64-bit VLM
support by the end of this year. Customers with enterprise applications
requiring efficient access to very large databases will benefit from the
greatly increased performance of 64-bit computing. With the growing trend
toward high-volume transaction and query-based applications, VLM is expected
to become an important technology for many of today's businesses. This
capability will be supported by the new 64-bit VLM interface being
implemented in Windows NT 5.0.

"We are pleased," said Palmer, "that customers will first take advantage of
Windows NT with 64-bit VLM support on our industry-leading platforms."
Digital's Alpha RISC architecture already boasts a full 64-bit capability
for high-performance scalability in client/server computing across the
enterprise. With Windows NT 5.0 on Alpha, applications will be able to take
advantage of significantly faster access to data because data is mapped
directly into memory. For example, a Digital AlphaServer 8400 system with up
to 26GB of memory running Windows NT 5.0 will be able to fully use all of
this memory for data access. All existing Windows NT-based applications will
be compatible with Windows NT 5.0.

Digital -- Leading Microsoft Service Advantage Partner and Solutions
Provider

As a leading partner in the Microsoft Service Advantage program, Digital
delivers the worldwide services and support large organizations need to
successfully plan, build, and manage mission-critical systems based on
Microsoft products.

Digital is a leading integrator and provider of management and support
services for Windows NT-based solutions. With more than 1,300 high-level
Microsoft Certified Systems Engineers (MCSEs) and Microsoft Certified
Solution Developers (MCSDs), Digital has more than any other vendor and 10
percent of the world's total. To meet growing customer demand for Enterprise
integration services, Digital plans to increase this number to 2,500 by the
end of 1997.

Digital is a worldwide Microsoft Authorized Support Center (ASC) and was
selected for its ability to provide a comprehensive range of high quality,
integrated support services for organizations using Microsoft products in
distributed environments. Microsoft recently recognized Digital as the ASC
having the most MCSEs. In addition, Digital handles the highest support call
volume for Microsoft products with the lowest escalation rate of all
Microsoft ASCs. To provide global support for Microsoft products, Digital
also has more than 450 service locations in more than 100 countries. Digital
consistently achieves top ratings from analysts and customers for the level
and quality of support provided.

Digital is one of Microsoft's largest Solution Providers. Digital has met
the stringent requirements for Partner Level status and will be a Partner
Level Solution Provider in every major Microsoft location. Digital's
relationship with Microsoft as a Partner Level Solution Provider extends the
reach of both companies to apply the best technology and enterprise services
to particular customer problems.

The Digital Microsoft Alliance for Enterprise Computing (AEC) was
established in August 1995 to meet customer demand for Microsoft-based
solutions and support in enterprise-wide computing. The Alliance combines
Microsoft client/server products with Digital's leadership in enterprise
systems, service, support and systems integration, enabling customers to
deploy business solutions on the Microsoft Windows and Windows NT operating
systems with assurance of integration into the most complex business
environments. Users can visit the site at: http://www.alliance.digital.com.

Digital Equipment Corporation is a world leader in open client/server
solutions from personal computing to integrated worldwide information
systems. Digital's scalable Alpha and Intel platforms, storage, networking,
software and services, together with industry-focused solutions from
business partners, help organizations compete and win in today's global
marketplace.

NOTE: Digital, the Digital logo, and AlphaServer are trademarks of Digital
Equipment Corporation. Microsoft, Windows NT, Windows and Win32 are either
registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United
States and/or other countries. SOURCE Digital Equipment Corporation

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Help

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to Digital Equipment Corp news page
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                           Questions or Comments?
    
5175.33Why does Microsoft remain silent?STAR::JACOBIPaul A. Jacobi - OpenVMS DevelopmentFri Mar 14 1997 14:0912
    >>> Digital Equipment Corp today announced....

    This announcement would be more believable if it was made by Microsoft! 

    Since the announcement was from Digital, it sounds more like damage
    control.  Customers don't believe in the alliance precisely because
    they only hear Digital talking about the alliance, while Microsoft
    remains silent.


    						-Paul

5175.34MS stands by Alpha chip ACISS1::DIDATOBuy a VAX at Sears???Fri Mar 14 1997 14:565
    Interesting announcement by Microsoft today, see
    http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,8811,00.html
    for article titled "MS stands by Alpha chip"
    
    Tony 
5175.35Not directly from MicrosoftSTAR::JACOBIPaul A. Jacobi - OpenVMS DevelopmentFri Mar 14 1997 18:049
    >>> Interesting announcement by Microsoft today

    Sorry, but I don't think that this announcement is directly from
    Microsoft.  This sound like re-hash of our press release.


    						-Paul

5175.36Let's hear it from the horse's mouthUNXA::ZASLAWSteve ZaslawFri Mar 14 1997 18:1144
The article is below. I read only that Mr. Heskett claims Microsoft did
something. But he offers no evidence and sites neither press release nor MS web
page to document his claim. 

            MS stands by Alpha chip 
            By Ben Heskett
            March 14, 1997, 7:30 a.m. PT 

            Microsoft (MSFT) today showed
            continued support for the struggling
            Digital Equipment (DEC) Alpha
            microprocessor by pledging to deliver
            64-bit Very Large Memory (VLM)
            support for the platform in its next
            version of Windows NT. 

            Windows NT 5.0, due in beta in the
            second half of this year, targets the
            midrange server and emerging
            workstation market. Support for VLM is
            a feature that will be attractive to small
            niche of the market that uses
            graphic-intensive applications, such as
            oil companies. 

            VLM allows more information to be
            processed in memory, which can speed
            up end-user access to applications and
            files, as well as minimize the time users'
            spend waiting for a query to be processed
            by a centralized database. 

            By supporting VLM on the Alpha
            processor, Microsoft continues to show
            support for a processing architecture that
            beats the clock speeds of rival processors
            but has stumbled in gaining mass
            acceptance and attracting third parties. 

            VLM is one of many features that will
            debut in NT 5.0. Also due is the
            long-anticipated Active Directory
            service that is a large step forward from
            NT 4.0's limited directory scheme.
5175.37Still Waiting for horse to say something positiveACISS1::DIDATOBuy a VAX at Sears???Mon Mar 17 1997 10:346
    I have to agree, at first it looked like a case of Heskett having a
    preview of a Microsoft Press release, but searching Microsoft's site
    reveals no such releases, so Heskett may be looking at Digital's Press
    release with the belief that Microsoft would back up the statements.
    
    Tony
5175.38STAR::KMCDONOUGHSET KIDS/NOSICKMon Mar 17 1997 13:5515
    
    
    Have a look at 
    
    
    http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?970314.edecnt.htm
    
    "Microsoft to deliver 64-bit version of NT for Alpha chip" with quotes
    from Bill Gates.
    
    
    
    Kevin
     
    
5175.39Please explain the oil company statement.HGOVC::JOELBERMANMon Mar 17 1997 21:393
    Will one of you NT wizards explain the 'VLM helps niche companies like
    oil companies with their graphics' statement.
    
5175.40LGP30::FLEISCHERwithout vision the people perish (DTN 381-0426 ZKO1-1)Mon Mar 17 1997 22:3410
re Note 5175.39 by HGOVC::JOELBERMAN:

>     Will one of you NT wizards explain the 'VLM helps niche companies like
>     oil companies with their graphics' statement.
  
        Oil exploration these days is done with graphic display and
        manipulation of very large sets of seismic data -- probably a
        good application for VLM.

        Bob
5175.41Seismic Analysis is primarily Unix-based todayWAYLAY::GORDONResident Lightning DesignerTue Mar 18 1997 08:2611
>        Oil exploration these days is done with graphic display and
>        manipulation of very large sets of seismic data -- probably a
>        good application for VLM.

	And I have a friend who's a geophysicist for one of the major
players in that that field.  They resell Sun, IBM and SGI systems, but the
software hasn't been ported to Alpha.

						--Doug


5175.42BIGUN::BAKERat home, he&#039;s a touristTue Mar 18 1997 17:1914
    'VLM helps niche companies like oil companies with their graphics'
    
    VLM - Virtual Logical Marketing
    
    We think they are a niche company because they dont manufacture computers 
    too. I suspect that they dont see themselves as a niche company at all.
    In fact, I suspect we just lost their business because our words dont
    show an understanding for the criticality of such analysis to their
    business. 
    
    - John
    
    
    
5175.43DANGER::ARRIGHIand miles to go before I sleepTue Mar 18 1997 17:504
    re .42
    
    Reread .36.  The "niche" came from a non-DEC source who also referred
    to us as "struggling".
5175.44Official Announcement (from CNN)GYRO::faux.zko.dec.com::skinnerInternet Business GroupTue Mar 18 1997 18:413
From CNN

http://www.cnnfn.com/digitaljam/9703/18/microsoft_hp/
5175.45The full bad news: from www.microsoft.comNEWVAX::PAVLICEKLinux: the PC O/S that isn&#039;t PCWed Mar 19 1997 16:48245
   ______________________________________________________________________
                                      
   
   HP and Microsoft Announce Joint Strategy to Simplify Enterprise
   Computing With Integrated Products and Services 
   Joint TCO Strategy Delivers Windows NT-Based Solutions in
   Heterogeneous Environments 
   
   PALO ALTO, Calif. - March 19, 1997 - Hewlett-Packard Co. and Microsoft
   Corp. today announced a three-point strategy to help customers lower
   the total cost of ownership of large enterprise-computing environments
   and simplify their management. To support the strategy, the companies
   are introducing a series of products, services and programs to reduce
   enterprise-computing costs while greatly increasing the productivity
   customers can expect from their computing technology. Specifically,
   the companies agreed to offer the following:
     * Products and services for addressing total cost of ownership (TCO)
     * Microsoft(R) Windows NT(R) Server network operating system-based
       enterprise solutions
     * Solutions for heterogeneous environments
       
   Lewis E. Platt, HP chairman, president and chief executive officer,
   and Bill Gates, Microsoft chairman and chief executive officer,
   detailed the strategy during a press conference here at HP
   headquarters.
   
   "Customers are deploying Windows NT Server in the enterprise and have
   told us they want these solutions integrated into their overall
   computing environment," Gates said. "We are excited to be working more
   closely with HP, a leader in integrating and supporting heterogeneous
   enterprise environments. We look forward to this enhanced
   collaboration to better serve our customers' needs."
   
   "HP and Microsoft bring to the marketplace important qualities that no
   other vendors can match," Platt said. "Microsoft has industry-leading
   products, and HP leads the industry in meeting the needs of enterprise
   customers. This powerful combination will make HP the leader in
   Windows NT, HP-UX and heterogeneous enterprise solutions. Combining
   these attributes in a focused approach will create enormous value for
   our customers." 
   
   Products and Services for Addressing Total Cost of Ownership 
   
   HP and Microsoft intend to adopt a common approach for defining,
   assessing and managing the TCO of enterprise information technology.
   This new approach is designed not only to reduce costs, but to extend
   the total value that information technology provides customers through
   simplified management of enterprise environments.
   
   The joint TCO initiative will focus on products, services and
   technology that help customers build, implement and manage
   cost-effective enterprise environments. The first deliverables from
   this agreement are intended to include the following:
     * Joint delivery of TCO assessment services to provide
       recommendations on how to improve an IT organization's ability to
       lower costs and increase productivity to its end users. Joint TCO
       assessment services are available immediately.
     * Incorporation of Microsoft's Zero Administration for Windows(R)
       initiative into HP's overall enterprise-computing management
       efforts. HP plans to develop technology that allows end users
       access to the enterprise network from any smart-card-enabled
       Windows operating system-compatible PC. Combining Microsoft's Zero
       Administration for Windows initiative with HP's smart-card-enabled
       PCs will enhance security while providing more flexible
       utilization of Windows-based computers. These capabilities will
       lower costs by optimizing all available PC resources.
     * HP's unveiling specific plans for the NetPC - the HP Net Vectra PC
       series - with an expected entry-level selling point of about
       $1,000. HP is expected to ship the NetPC in the second half of
       this year.
     * Combining HP OpenView System and Network Management software,
       along with Microsoft Windows technologies and management products,
       including Systems Management Server, to bring predictable,
       measurable cost controls to IT environments. Using HP's new
       Service Management Strategy's tools and services, including
       Systems Management Server, HP will enable predictable service
       levels based on explicit cost and service agreements between
       business end users and IT organizations.
     * HP intends to deliver a new TCO capability based on HP's
       internally deployed PC-Common Operating Environment (PC-COE).
       PC-COE is a set of services and tools that has helped HP reduce
       its desktop computing costs by $200 million per year. HP also
       establishes a new organization within the HP OpenView division to
       market TCO solutions.
       
   Windows NT Server-Based Solutions for the Enterprise 
   
   Responding to customers needs for Windows NT-based enterprise
   solutions, HP and Microsoft have agreed to collaborate on numerous
   Windows NT-compatible enterprise products, services and programs.
   Specifically, the companies said they intend to do the following:
     * Promote Microsoft Exchange Server as a strategic Windows NT
       messaging solution for the enterprise. The companies are adopting
       a common messaging technology strategy and will recommend
       Microsoft Exchange Client and the Microsoft Outlook(R) desktop
       information manager as a messaging client for both
       Windows NT-based Microsoft Exchange Server and HP-UX-based
       OpenMail Server environments. For Windows NT environments, HP
       plans to recommend Microsoft Exchange Server. HP therefore plans
       to discontinue further marketing and development efforts on
       OpenMail for Windows NT.
     * Expand HP's messaging practice skill base to follow the market
       trend to Microsoft Exchange Server. HP consulting services for
       Microsoft Exchange Server will provide assessment, architectural
       design, implementation and management consulting to enable the
       delivery of an integrated, scalable and cost-effective messaging
       infrastructure for the enterprise. In addition, HP says it will
       offer transition services to Microsoft Exchange Server for
       customers of Windows NT Server. The services are available
       worldwide immediately.
     * Open, and jointly staff, an Enterprise Solutions Center in
       Redmond, Wash., that optimizes Windows NT Server-based enterprise
       solutions running on HP NetServer systems. The center will provide
       performance optimization services and proof of concept testing for
       leading enterprise software vendors, integrators and customers.
     * Expand HP's education services for Windows NT Server and the
       Microsoft BackOffice(R) family environments to include skills
       analysis, custom education training plans, curricula and
       certification programs.
     * Launch HP consulting services for customers that want to implement
       Windows NT Server-based enterprise environments. HP will offer a
       full range of planning, implementation, and operation consulting
       and integration services.
     * Deliver high-availability Windows NT Server-based products and
       services. HP plans to adopt Microsoft Windows NT Server clustering
       technology (code-named "Wolfpack") as its strategic clustering
       technology for its Windows NT Server-based solutions. As one of
       Microsoft's core Wolfpack partners and a Microsoft Authorized
       Support Center (ASC), HP will introduce two services that will
       provide scalable levels of support to ensure maximum availability
       in enterprise-class environments. The new services - Critical
       Systems Support and Personalized Systems Support - will enhance
       the Microsoft Service Advantage family of services and join HP's
       existing high-availability services for HP-UX environments.
       Microsoft endorses HP as a strategic partner for high-availability
       Windows NT services.
     * Endorse Microsoft Internet Information Server and HP NetServer
       systems as a comprehensive platform for Internet, intranet and
       extranet solutions. Microsoft and HP will jointly promote
       Web-based solutions that customers can easily integrate into their
       environments. The companies also will collaborate on a variety of
       Internet solutions, such as a Web-based project for Stanford
       University's Graduate School of Business based on Windows NT and
       HP desktops and servers.
     * Launch programs to aggressively integrate Windows NT Server into
       existing enterprise environments. The programs will combine
       up-front consulting, migration tools and post-sales support as
       part of a low-risk approach for customers when migrating to HP
       NetServer systems from other competitors' hardware platforms. The
       first migration program is expected to focus on the
       financial-services market.
     * HP intends to port HP's Virtual Vault technology to Windows NT,
       which will allow for secure transactions across the World Wide
       Web.
     * HP announces the availability of HP OpenView IT/Operations on
       Windows NT Server by the end of 1997.
       
   Solutions for Heterogeneous Environments 
   
   HP and Microsoft intend to collaborate on joint products, services and
   technology that make it easier for customers to integrate and manage
   heterogeneous computing environments. Development would focus on the
   following areas:
     * Tools and procedures taking advantage of industry standards that
       provide users with reliable messaging within mixed HP OpenMail and
       Microsoft Exchange Server environments. These tools and procedures
       will provide messaging services and common calendaring as well as
       directory synchronization.
     * Complementary, scalable, enterprisewide network and systems
       management solutions. Specifically, HP will market Microsoft
       Systems Management Server as part of an OpenView IT/Administration
       package and Microsoft will distribute, with the next major release
       of Microsoft Systems Management Server, the HP OpenView
       IT/Administration and IT/Operations agents. HP plans to
       incorporate standardized Web-Based Enterprise Management (WBEM)
       technology, including the Common Information Model (CIM) into its
       management products. HP and Microsoft are supporting the
       standardization effort of WBEM.
     * Microsoft supporting HP's development of single sign-on solutions
       to simplify user access and administration in heterogeneous
       environments. This will resolve the need for multiple passwords to
       access resources that exist in heterogeneous operating
       environments.
     * Collaboration on the DirectX(R) set of APIs as part of HP's and
       Microsoft's efforts to continue aggressively pursuing the
       technical computing market. Microsoft will license HP's
       soon-to-be-announced large model rendering technology and include
       it as an integrated component of Microsoft DirectX. HP will offer
       DirectX on all HP-UX technical workstations. This will enable
       independent software vendors to easily deploy 3-D technical
       engineering applications across HP-UX and Windows NT Workstation,
       based on a common set of APIs.
     * Launch HP high-availability support services to complement HP's
       current consulting and education programs for heterogeneous
       environments. These services will address integration of a wide
       variety of environments, including Windows NT, HP-UX, mainframe
       and other UNIX environments.
       
   About HP 
   
   Hewlett-Packard Co. is a leading global manufacturer of computing,
   communications and measurement products and services recognized for
   excellence in quality and support. HP has 112,800 employees and had
   revenue of $38.4 billion in its 1996 fiscal year. 
   
   About Microsoft 
   
   Founded in 1975, Microsoft (NASDAQ "MSFT") is the worldwide leader in
   software for personal computers. The company offers a wide range of
   products and services for business and personal use, each designed
   with the mission of making it easier and more enjoyable for people to
   take advantage of the full power of personal computing every day.
   
   Microsoft, Windows NT, Windows, Outlook, BackOffice and DirectX are
   either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. in the
   United States and/or other countries.
   
   Other product and company names herein may be trademarks of their
   respective owners.
   
   
   
   Satellite coordinates:
   
   March 19
   
   3:45-4:15 p.m. EST
   
   Galaxy 2, Transponder 6 
   
     
   
   March 20
   
   10:30-11 a.m. EST
   
   Galaxy 3, Transponder 22 
   
   Note to editors: If you are interested in viewing additional
   information on Microsoft, please visit the Microsoft Web page at
   http://www.microsoft.com/corpinfo/ on Microsoft's corporate
   information pages
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   (c) 1997 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Legal Notices.
5175.46Maybe HP would like our marketing slides?SCASS1::WISNIEWSKIADEPT of the Virtual Space.Wed Mar 19 1997 17:1318
    So now it'll be interesting to see the cross licensing of patents
    pitch, We have engineers on site pitch, and we have a special
    integration between "Pick Yer O/S" and WNT pitch, and we have a 
    migration strategy for "Pick Yer O/S" to WNT pitch from HP...
    
    Hey WNT marketing.. Maybe we could make some money selling our 
    Power Point old WNT "Alliance" presentations to HP for their sales reps... 
    
    It looks like HP is going to repeat exactly what happened to us...
    
    It's good to know my skills are resusable if I hurry and move to 
    HP...
    
    And Digital stock is now at 27 1/2...
    
    JMHO,
    
    John W.
5175.47Pros and consBBRDGE::LOVELL� l&#039;eau; c&#039;est l&#039;heureWed Mar 19 1997 18:5729
    The downside view ;
    
    	"How much of our original proprietary clustering know-how
    	 made it into Wolfpack and is now in the hands of HP for free?"
    
    The upside view ;
    
    	Despite all the buddy-buddy talk and fine wordsmithing
    	 on the press release, MS and HP are agreeing to have competing
    	 (or at least heavily overlapping) products in the following
    	 key areas ;
    
    	- Enterprise Messaging.  OpenMail on HP-UX against Exchange/NT
    	  Of course this will be positioned as giving HP customers a
    	  choice.  I bet our IOSG and MIG engineers plus our salesfolks
    	  could give a different point of view.
    
    	- Internet/Intranet Web Server.  Netserver goes head-to-head
    	  with IIS.  Should be a short fight.
    
    	- Enterprise network management.  Openview and SMS try to figure
    	  out who is master and who is slave in what will be positioned
    	  as an "open" peer-to-peer" "cross-platform" "enterprise" 
    	  solution. (Sound familiar to anyone who remembers our DECmcc
    	  Netview deal?)
    
    Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
    
    /Chris/
5175.48Official ResponseWOTVAX::HILTONSave Water, drink beerThu Mar 20 1997 04:30241
Posted without permission, but distribution at the bottom says it's gone to
    all Digital employees.
    
    
                  I N T E R O F F I C E   M E M O R A N D U M

                                        Date:     19-Mar-1997 04:36pm GMT 
                                        From:     Robert Bismuth
                                                  BISMUTH.ROBERT@A1@SALES@PKO
                                        Dept:     VP Corp Strategic Alliances
                                        Tel No:    

TO: See Below

Subject: DIGITAL responds to HP-Microsoft announcement                          1


     	On March 19, Hewlett-Packard and Microsoft are announcing a 
  strategic initiative for Windows NT Enterprise environments.  Their 
  announcement focuses on three areas:

     	o  Total cost of ownership (TCO) program announcement: 
     	   service offering program and NetPC desktop system 
     	   (to be delivered late in CY97);

	o  Enterprise Windows NT solutions: limited mail and 
     	   system management;
 
	o  Very limited program/service for integrating 
     	   Windows NT and HP-UX 

  An opportunity for DIGITAL 
 
     	Due to the lack of depth and narrow nature of this announcement, 
  it poses no threat to DIGITAL.  It actually generates significant     
  Windows NT, DIGITAL UNIX and services sales opportunities for DIGITAL.

     	Hewlett Packard finally sees that it must get into the Windows NT   
  market.  Microsoft is happy to get another major systems vendor 
  supporting Windows NT opening up access to HP's UNIX customer base.  
  HP's belated and limited support for Windows NT solutions is in fact a 
  "me-too" endorsement of DIGITAL's established and successful Windows NT   
  product and services solutions strategy, plus DIGITAL's AllConnect and 
  Affinity Programs.

     	HP is starting almost from scratch and does not have the   
  background and relationship DIGITAL has with Microsoft.

     	DIGITAL has been associated with Microsoft for over 12 years. 
  DIGITAL has been involved with Windows NT for five years and been in an 
  extremely close alliance with Microsoft for the last 18 months.  For a 
  significant amount of that time, DIGITAL has delivered Windows NT 
  services and solutions to enterprise customers worldwide. 

     	Microsoft has stated that it is important for people to understand  
  that its relationship with Hewlett-Packard does not constitute an 
  "alliance."  Rather, it has labeled it an "initiative" -- not even a 
  partnership.  The advantages DIGITAL enjoys as an ally of Microsoft -- 
  cross-training/certification of field resources, RISC parity with Intel, 
  joint sales engagement, etc. -- are completely missing from this 
  initiative with HP.

     	This is because, while HP is making a few concessions toward 
  Windows NT, it remains primarily a UNIX solution-focused company.  This 
  is particularly true for high-end enterprise servers where HP has no 
  available Windows NT server, since Windows NT does not support the 
  PA-RISC architecture.  HP is limited to Pentium levels of performance 
  until Merced is available from Intel in late 1999.

     	As a result, HP will continue to push UNIX much more strongly 
  than Windows NT and Microsoft's field will continue to experience HP's 
  "bait and switch" tactics of using Windows NT to land HP-UX sales. 

  Total Cost of Ownership program

     	Hewlett-Packard will be announcing support for Microsoft's 
  "NetPC" strategy for lower-cost PCs.  HP is in fact only one of many 
  vendors, including DIGITAL, who are simultaneously announcing such 
  support and plans on March 19 at CeBIT as a part of a wider Microsoft/
  Intel industry initiative. 

     	HP's TCO service program shows little originality or 
  differentiation.  It is based on an openly available Microsoft blueprint 
  for total cost of ownership program -- something many service providers 
  are adopting.  It is analogous to DIGITAL's PC Utility service offering. 

	PC Utility has been available for several years, offering 
  customers everything necessary to lower their cost of ownership with 
  respect to PC systems.  DIGITAL's PC Utility service has achieved many 
  significant customer wins worldwide. 

     	In addition to the obvious immaturity of the HP program, HP is 
  also not signing up to put its SI and support staff through Microsoft 
  certification.  Currently DIGITAL has 1,300 certified engineers, with a 
  commitment to increase this number to 2,500 within a year.  With 450 
  service locations worldwide, plus established practices dedicated to 
  Microsoft-based solutions, DIGITAL's lead is extremely difficult to 
  duplicate.

     	HP also will be announcing high-availability services for Windows 
  NT, including support for and adoption of Microsoft's WolfPack 
  clustering product.  This new and immature service will compete with 
  DIGITAL's established high-availability services.

  Enterprise Windows NT solutions

     	HP is discontinuing OpenMail for Windows NT. This is more 
  motivated by business considerations than its relationship with  
  Microsoft.

     	Given Microsoft's Exchange Server pricing and penetration into 
  the enterprise market, projected revenue from OpenMail on Windows NT 
  does not justify continued product investment. 

     	At the same time, HP is also very clear that it is continuing to 
  sell OpenMail on HP-UX.  Microsoft is providing no special 
  interoperability between these two mail environments: HP will live with 
  SMTP and LDAP for interoperability.

     	Unlike DIGITAL, HP is not moving internally to an Exchange 
  infrastructure.  This bifurcated mail strategy and lack of internal use 
  severely limits HP's ability to impact the mail/messaging market with 
  Microsoft Exchange. 

     	HP is dropping part of OpenView (the Norton Administrator for 
  Networks component bought from Symantec) and integrating with Microsoft 
  SMS for that functionality.  The appropriate system management agents 
  will be distributed freely on both HP and Microsoft's Web sites.  
  Microsoft is not adopting OpenView; rather, this move gives Microsoft-
  based solutions -- whether from HP or other vendors, such as DIGITAL -- 
  increased access to HP's customer base. 

     	Just prior to this announcement, Hewlett-Packard announced its 
  version of a very limited interoperability program for customers wanting 
  to use both Windows NT and HP-UX.  This program lacks the depth of 
  DIGITAL's AllConnect program and will be limited to use through a single 
  HP SI practice.

     	Finally, HP will be announcing enterprise solutions training 
  courses and an Enterprise Solutions Center.  HP's center will not be a 
  customer center.  It will be focused on ISVs characterizing applications 
  on HP Intel systems.  This is extremely limited compared to DIGITAL's 
  centers in Bellevue, Wash., and Valbonne, France, which allow activities 
  by customers, partners and ISVs.

  Conclusion

     	Since announcing the Alliance for Enterprise Computing in August 
  of 1995, Microsoft and DIGITAL have already implemented a proven 
  worldwide engagement model founded on trust and a common goal of 
  Windows-based enterprise solutions and services.  Customers around the 
  world have achieved new competitive advantages from solutions delivered 
  through this successful alliance.  HP's narrow announcement with 
  Microsoft cannot compare to this success. 

     	The substantial mind share which has been built by the Alliance 
  for Enterprise Computing continues to expand between DIGITAL and 
  Microsoft employees.

     	The bottom line?  HP lacks a Windows NT strategy and direction.  
  It has realized it needs a Windows NT strategy and attempted to achieve 
  it with this announcement.  But HP hasn't succeeded. 

     	This announcement with Microsoft does not yet show evidence of a 
  real Windows NT strategy or any measurable ability to deliver Windows-
  based solutions in the enterprise.

     	Rather, HP has announced a series of limited entry points into 
  the Windows NT market and is positioning Windows NT very much at the 
  low end of the market with HP-UX still their real play in the enterprise 
  market.

     	Clearly, HP has embarked on a "me too" strategy.  Its customer 
  base will be somewhat confused by the apparent endorsement of Windows 
  NT, yet its lack of depth in terms of products and services. 

     	In fact, HP has endorsed DIGITAL's strategy.  In addition, 
  DIGITAL, unlike HP, can deliver and support Windows NT Enterprise 
  solutions today!

Distribution:  This message was delivered to you utilizing the Reader's 
Choice delivery services.  You received this message because you are a 
Digital employee.  If you have questions regarding this message, please 
contact the author.




Distribution:
TO:
ROGER WORTHINGTON@HHL                   RON MARTIN@HHL
ROY ALLAN@HHL                           SANDRA FAULKNER@HHL
SARAH BAILEY@HHL                        SARAH CLARKE@HHL
SARAH SMART@HHL                         SEAN MCGETTRICK@HHL
SHARON MOSS@HHL                         SHAUN POWLES@HHL
SIAN EADON@HHL                          SIMON ANGOVE@HHL
SIMON BARNES-DAVIES@HHL                 SIMON COUPLAND@HHL
SIMON LAST-SUTTON@HHL                   STEFAN AALTEN@HHL
STEFAN TRYBUS@HHL                       STEPHEN BEGLEY@HHL
STEPHEN BROWN@HHL                       STEPHEN HITCHCOCK@HHL
STEPHEN HOOKER@HHL                      STEPHEN LUCKMAN@HHL
STEPHEN PALMER@HHL                      STEPHEN TENNANT@HHL
STEPHEN WATLING@HHL                     STEVE TAKHAR@HHL
STEVE WALLIS@HHL                        SUE GLEDHILL@HHL
SULMAN BAWHAB@HHL                       SUSAN HINES@HHL
SUSAN OAKE@HHL                          SUZANNE SAUNDERS@HHL
TERRY ARNOLD@HHL                        THOMAS MCINTYRE@HHL
THORKILD JOHNSON@HHL                    TIM MAULLIN@HHL
TIMOTHY PUGH@HHL                        TIMOTHY WARBURTON@HHL
TOM WEBBER@HHL                          TONY BROCKWELL@HHL
TONY WEST@HHL                           TRACIE MCNULTY@HHL
TUCK CHEANG@HHL                         VAL BOLAM@HHL
WENDY COLLINS@HHL                       WENDY OSBORNE@HHL
WILLIAM PENDERGRAST@HHL                 WILLIAM SILK@HHL
WILLIAM STEWART@HHL                     YOICHIRO UCHISHIBA@HHL
ALLAN TAYLOR@LZO                        ANDREW CARTWRIGHT@LZO
ANDREW DODD@LZO                         ANDREW MCCORMICK@LZO
ANNE ATKINSON@LZO                       BARRY WELLS@LZO
BRIAN KNIGHT@LZO                        CHRISTOPHER MOORE@LZO
CLIVE DARRINGTON@LZO                    CONSTANCE MEACHIN@LZO
DAVID BEAGLE@LZO                        DAVID DOUGLAS@LZO
DAVID HAYTHORNE@LZO                     DAVID NIELD@LZO
EDWIN BARBER@LZO                        GARETH FRITH@LZO
GEORGE INGRAM@LZO                       GRAHAM PRIESTLEY@LZO
GREGORY HILTON@LZO                      IAN CHITTY@LZO
JAMES MASON@LZO                         JANE LYNCH@LZO
JANET BOULTON@LZO                       JANET SHIELDS@LZO
JENNIFER BURTON@LZO                     JOANNE MUNRO@LZO
JOHN A SCOTT@LZO                        JOHN KAMSIKA@LZO
JOHN PETTS@LZO                          JULIE SUNDERLAND@LZO
KATHERINE DUNKERLEY@LZO                 KEVAN JONES@LZO
KEVIN MORLEY@LZO                        MARCIA SMITH@LZO
MARION HAYTHORNE@LZO                    MARK ABEAR@LZO
MARK COOK@LZO                           MICHAEL FORD@LZO
NEALES BURROWS@LZO                      NEIL CLARKE@LZO
NEIL HILDITCH@LZO                       NORMAN LONGDEN@LZO
PAUL CARTER@LZO                         PAUL DENHAM@LZO
PAUL SMITH@LZO                          PAUL STEPHENSON@LZO
PETER GRAYSHON@LZO                      PETER MOORE@LZO
PETER WADE@LZO                          RAYMOND HOWARD@LZO

5175.49BIGUN::nessus.cao.dec.com::MayneA wretched hive of scum and villainyThu Mar 20 1997 04:454
Is it time to drag out the rumour that HP ported Windows NT to PA-RISC a while 
back, but it ran so slowly they hushed it up? 8-)

PJDM
5175.50DYPSS1::SCHAFERKalh�un!Thu Mar 20 1997 08:222
    i hope to read .48 12 mos. from now and see how accurate that memo
    is/was.
5175.51One view of it from outsideUNXA::ZASLAWSteve ZaslawThu Mar 20 1997 10:3864
+ MICROSOFT-HP NT ANNOUNCEMENT TURNS OUT TO BE DAMP SQUID   

After all the overheated and hysterical hyping of the event, 
Hewlett-Packard Co and Microsoft Corp pulled out the merest 
mouse of an agreement to get closer on Windows NT, simply 
affirming that HP needs to step up its NT effort in order to 
sell more personal computers and leap into the top three 
manufacturers worldwide, and that Microsoft, which is weak in 
consultancy and support, and not prepared to invest very much 
in it, needs all the skills that it can rally from partners 
such as HP. The agreement doesn't even seem to do very much to 
put Digital Equipment Corp's nose out of joint. Hewlett-Packard 
made all the right noises, saying it would "aggressively 
integrate" Windows NT with its computers, and that it would 
develop a a NetPC to the standards established by Microsoft and 
Intel Corp, to be shipped in the second half of 1997 and priced 
at about $1,000 - but it was careful to say that, as a company 
twice the size of Compaq Computer Corp, it could afford to 
support both Unix and NT equally. The agreement on Microsoft 
Exchange is only that the two will ensure that it interoperates 
with HP OpenMail where preview material had suggested Hewlett 
would favor the Microsoft offering over its own. Microsoft is 
to make its DirectX multimedia package available under HP-UX 
Unix. Separately, Novell Inc said it had an agreement with 
Microsoft to incorporate its linguistic technologies into 
future Microsoft products, billing it a "multimillion-dollar" 
agreement. And Rational Software Corp unveiled software based 
on its Rational Rose visual modeling language for use with 
Microsoft's Visual Basic, the fruits of a development and 
marketing collaboration with Microsoft.

Source:

               ---------------------------------- 
                  | C O M P U T E R G R A M  | 
               ---------------------------------- 
                          INTERNATIONAL 
 
     THE DAILY NEWSPAPER FOR DATA PROCESSING, COMMUNICATIONS 
        AND MICROELECTRONICS PROFESSIONALS AND INVESTORS 
 
   Computergram International is published five days a week by 
       ComputerWire Inc, 928 Broadway, Suite 800, New York 
          NY 10010 Tel: 212/677-0409 Fax: 212/677-0463. 
                     US Editor: Peter White 
          Editor Computergram International: Tim Palmer 
          Editorial Team: William Fellows, John Abbott 
                     Gary Flood, Rose Farrow
                   Contributor: Nick Patience
            Staff writers: Joanne Wallen, Wale Azeez 
             Editorial e-mail: [email protected]
                  Sales Director: Mark Satchell 
     Sales and Circulation Enquiries: [email protected] 
              Copyright (c) 1997 ComputerWire Inc 
            not to be reproduced in whole or in part 
                   without written permission.

                Read Computergram on the web at:
            http://www.computerwire.com/computergram


               New York, Published: March 20 1997 
                        Issue Number 3124 
5175.52NETCAD::COLELLAThu Mar 20 1997 17:3734
    Digital To Enhance NT Backup Software 
    (03/20/97; 12:24 p.m. EST)
    By Martin J. Garvey, InformationWeek
    
    MAYNARD, Mass. -- Digital Equipment will
    announce next week new capabilities for its
    backup software that lets Microsoft Windows NT
    users interoperate with its legacy customers.
    
    The company will announce new software
    modules that will make it possible for OpenVMS
    server customers running its Archive/Backup
    System to back up and store data from Win NT
    clients.
    
    Another new product, Digital's NetWorker Save
    and Restore software module, will let customers
    complete online backup and restoration of
    Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange
    databases. The NetWorker products are
    licensed from Legato Systems.
    
    Digital will also supply an application interface
    to its Archive/Backup System for SAP R/3 data.
    "Everyone's going toward application-specific
    hot backups," said Giga Information Group
    storage analyst Anders Lofgren, who added that
    that DEC's new modules are just the first wave
    of an expected NT storage strategy.
    
    "I'm expecting [Digital] to make an even bigger
    push toward NT."