T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5136.1 | | FUNYET::ANDERSON | Where's the nearest White Castle? | Thu Feb 13 1997 15:02 | 3 |
| I thought paydays were Thursday.
Paul
|
5136.4 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Ora, the Old Rural Amateur | Thu Feb 13 1997 15:58 | 4 |
| And we only have 12 paydays... maybe I should relocate :-(
:-)
|
5136.5 | Early paychecks? | GAAS::TSUK | Michael Tsuk | Thu Feb 13 1997 16:18 | 4 |
| But if a holiday (such as New Year's Day) falls on a Thursday, don't
we get paid on the Wednesday before?
-Michael
|
5136.6 | The clock may stop at 52 | ALFA2::ALFA2::HARRIS | | Thu Feb 13 1997 17:01 | 14 |
| Watch out for HCRA and extra paychecks. When I was TFSOed at the end
of 1993, I received a 53rd paycheck under an accelerated payment
schedule, plus two paychecks in 1994 from which HCRA contributions were
mistakenly withheld. John Hancock said that my account was never credited
with the three contributions, and the payroll department was unable to
tell me where the money had gone. The Digital employee who was supposed
to represent me first promised to help, did nothing, and finally stopped
returning my calls.
Fortunately, I had selected the minimum contribution, so I was out only
$15. I guess my "rep" figured that I would give up if she stonewalled
long enough, and she was correct.
M
|
5136.7 | Leap year doesn't affect the _rule_ after all | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Thu Feb 13 1997 20:19 | 9 |
| I stand corrected. Since 1 Jan is a holiday, there will, indeed, be 53
paydays this year. The rule is even simpler then:
If January 1 is a Wednesday, there are 53 paydays, the first being on
January 2nd and the last being on December 31st.
Otherwise, there are only 52.
/john
|
5136.8 | But John... | USPS::FPRUSS | Frank Pruss, 202-232-7347 | Thu Feb 13 1997 21:48 | 2 |
| If there is SOME year with 53, and MOST years have 52, shouldn't SOME
year have 51? Or is this a SERIOUS Leap Year?
|
5136.9 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Thu Feb 13 1997 23:18 | 3 |
| No 51. 53 only because 365 mod 7 is 1.
/john
|
5136.10 | Not quite | GAAS::TSUK | Michael Tsuk | Fri Feb 14 1997 08:52 | 8 |
| Re: .7
No, leap years that begin on Tuesday also will have 53 paychecks. Total
of five years out of every 28.
[Sorry, I can't help myself. :-)]
-Michael
|
5136.11 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Feb 14 1997 10:10 | 1 |
| Argh. Aren't calendars fun.
|
5136.12 | Definitely 53 paydays this year. See 4921.* | MILORD::BISHOP | The punishment that brought us peace was upon Him | Fri Feb 14 1997 14:03 | 29 |
| See note 4921.*. This is definitely a 53-payday year.
I haven't submitted an HCRA claim yet (will be doing a large one at the
end of this month), so I hadn't yet seen if they got it right.
Apparently they haven't.
Call them up to complain. The representative you'll be talking to
probably won't have the faintest idea what you're talking about. If so
ask to speak to the supervisor/manager. I dealt directly with her
during last year when my automatic payments were messed up, and I found
her very helpful and responsive (in spite of my being, let's say,
slightly less cordial than I should have been :-).
Point out to her that we get paid a 53rd time on December 31st as
January 1st (the Thursday) is a holiday. As I mentioned in
4921.something, I went back to the previous years when this happened
and there were definitely 53 paystubs.
If it isn't resolved by the time I get my first reimbursement in a
month's time, I'll join the fray then. Since I'm witholding the maximum
$40 per week, that means that John Hancock or Digital will be trying to
hold onto $40 of my money at the end of the year. The nice thing is
that if it isn't resolved by then, the total deductions for the year
for HCRA that show up on my final paystub will be $2120 not $2080. I
think that makes it pretty clear. :-)
Good luck!
- Richard.
|
5136.13 | See 3606.* not 4921.* | MILORD::BISHOP | The punishment that brought us peace was upon Him | Fri Feb 14 1997 14:06 | 7 |
| oops...I should have looked more closely at 4921.*. Only note there
that refers to this is my 4921.3. The original discussion was in
3606.*.
Sorry if I confused anyone.
- Richard.
|
5136.14 | How big is the hit? | USPS::FPRUSS | Frank Pruss, 202-232-7347 | Fri Feb 14 1997 16:02 | 5 |
| Uh, oh.
What will this do to our bottom line this year?
Do our competitors pay weekly?
|
5136.15 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Feb 17 1997 16:56 | 8 |
| > What will this do to our bottom line this year?
Our fiscal year is not the same as the calendar year. Some fiscal quarters
have 13 weeks and some have 14. I believe financial statements usually have
a footnote when they compare 13 week quarters to 14 week quarters.
I believe HCRA accounts will have 53 weeks of deductions this year. If you
put in for $10 a week, there will be a total of $530.
|
5136.16 | Why not monthly? | PTOJJD::DANZAK | Pittsburgher � | Tue Feb 18 1997 00:27 | 3 |
| Er, why don't we save money and pay MONTHLY? Seems like we could do a
LOT less paperwork...?
j
|
5136.17 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Feb 18 1997 01:40 | 13 |
| > Er, why don't we save money and pay MONTHLY? Seems like we could do a
> LOT less paperwork...?
Against the law in Massachusetts. (Long discussion elsewhere in this
conference when someone high up announced a biweekly pay scheme as a
method to slightly reduce everyone's pay by transferring a week's
interest from the employees to DEC. The Corporation had to give up
the idea after the Massachusetts law was made clear. Note: Yes, there
are other companies in Massachusetts which pay biweekly or monthly by
agreement with the union. Here there is no union to agree to allowing
an exemption from the Massachusetts weekly payday law.)
/john
|
5136.18 | | BBQ::WOODWARDC | ...but words can break my heart | Tue Feb 18 1997 04:55 | 18 |
| ha!
here in Oz, most of the permies get paid monthly, and it is a
king-sized pain in the behind. Yes, I've heard all the arguements about
budgetting your money for expenditure across the month, blah blah blah.
But the fact is, that things get *very* tight around the week before
payday, no matter _how_ careful you are :'\ (isn't that right Andy?
;')
One of the reasons, now as a contractor, I prefer fortnightly payments,
although if I could get weekly, I'd probably go for that ;')
So, my advice is, compromise at being paid fortnightly, but dig your
heels in if the management come up with the bright idea of paying you
monthly. Remember, some months are longer than others - every third one
is five weeks!
H
|
5136.19 | UK perspective | IOSG::ELLIOTTR | Russell Elliott | Tue Feb 18 1997 06:27 | 9 |
|
In the UK we get paid monthly (which is the norm across many/most UK
industries), but we get paid 3 weeks in advance, 1 week in arrears
(which is not the norm).
This seems to be a happy compromise. If money's tight running up to
payday then you can only blame yourself for bad budgeting.
Russ.
|
5136.20 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Ora, the Old Rural Amateur | Tue Feb 18 1997 07:22 | 6 |
| Practically all of Europe pays monthly, at least for white collar
people.
I might rather have a poblem saving up from weekly payments for all the
bills at the end of the month...
|
5136.21 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Feb 18 1997 08:36 | 9 |
| I had always been paid monthly before I came to work for DEC (as had my
father), so I never allowed myself to get used to a weekly paycheck and
always set them aside until the end of the month.
But it is always nice to be able to "borrow" against paychecks already
received from time to time rather than from a savings account. Having
my checkbook register appear negative drives my wife nutz, though.
/john
|
5136.22 | Bell Labs - monthly, but ... | LANDO::JBENNETT | | Tue Feb 18 1997 08:37 | 10 |
| When I worked at Bell Laboratories (back in the mid-70's!), they
"paid" monthly, but employees had an options to get an advance
(up to 50%) on the 15th of each month and the remainder on the 30th,
or an option to get advances on the 10th & 20th (up to 30% each)
and the remainder on the 30th ...
I have no idea how this schema developed, but it is an interesting
alternative!
John
|
5136.23 | Go figure | USPS::FPRUSS | Frank Pruss, 202-232-7347 | Tue Feb 18 1997 11:16 | 5 |
| When I worked at UCLA in the 70's, it was a CA law that employees had
to be paid at least twice a month, except for state employees who were
paid...
Monthly!
|
5136.24 | | KANATA::TOMKINS | | Tue Feb 18 1997 12:04 | 4 |
| Here in Canada we get paid bi-weekly, on thursday, an automatic deposit
into your bank account. My wife get's paid on the 2nd and 4th friday of
each month.
rtt
|
5136.25 | DIGITAL sees no benefit in paying us in advance | maze.zko.dec.com::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Tue Feb 18 1997 16:49 | 12 |
| re: .17
As I remember it, monthly *per se* isn't illegal in Massachusetts, just
that your pay may not be more than one week in arrears. The proposed
scheme was two weeks in arrears. And strangely enough, all those benefits
of paying bi-weekly seemed to evaporate when the Mass-legal scheme of one
week in arrears, one week in advance was considered.
So a monthly scheme of 1 week in arrears, three weeks in advance would be
legal under Mass law, but DIGITAL would perceive no benefit.
Ray
|
5136.26 | | DECC::OUELLETTE | | Tue Feb 18 1997 19:45 | 3 |
| > but DIGITAL would perceive no benefit.
... except perhaps half the cost of writing all of the checks.
|
5136.27 | | AYOU68::DONNELLY | Joe Donnelly, Ayr, Scotland | Wed Feb 19 1997 04:46 | 10 |
| re .19
>In the UK we get paid monthly (which is the norm across many/most UK
> industries), but we get paid 3 weeks in advance, 1 week in arrears
> (which is not the norm).
The manufacturing plant in Ayr, Scotland pays weekly, but then as far
as Digital is concerned Ayr is not in the UK.
Joe
|
5136.28 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Feb 19 1997 09:49 | 3 |
| re .26:
The interest loss would more than offset the gain from reducing paperwork.
|
5136.29 | Four Weeks??? | ACISS2::JPETERSON | | Wed Feb 19 1997 12:43 | 9 |
|
I wonder how many field engineers in MCS/US would go for extending the
pay period out to bi-weekly or monthly??? I for one would not
appreciate waiting 4 weeks to receive any overtime $$ after being
dragged out on standby calls - usually late in the evening.
No whining - just fact.
JP
|
5136.30 | | DECC::OUELLETTE | | Wed Feb 19 1997 14:01 | 8 |
| The interest loss is a one time change.
The gain from reduced paperwork is recurring.
Question is how many years of gain to offset the loss.
1 week's interest on 1 week's pay is the cost of writing how many checks?
My guess is something like a dozen would more than cover the cost.
R.
|
5136.31 | Save a bundle, do it monthly. | PTOJJD::DANZAK | Pittsburgher � | Wed Feb 19 1997 17:34 | 14 |
| When I worked at AIR (American Institutes for Research) we did monthly
pay checks with the option of 'mid-month' advance.
I do bills monthly.
I never understood why Digital doesn't want to bank the payroll for a
month, get interest on it, and reduce paperwork.
But then again - our beancounters are from planet X. THey see the
solution of needing to get more money as CUTTING people instead of
GETTING MORE money....
I digress..
|
5136.32 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Wed Feb 19 1997 22:02 | 6 |
| > I never understood why Digital doesn't want to bank the payroll for a
> month, get interest on it, and reduce paperwork.
Against the law in Massachusetts.
/john
|
5136.33 | DIGITAL <> Massachusetts, exclusively | WOTVAX::HILLN | It's OK, it'll be dark by nightfall | Thu Feb 20 1997 02:33 | 5 |
| >Against the law in Massachusetts.
So what? Most of Digital's staff don't work in Massachusetts, so why
not do what's done in other matters? Namely, allow for local
exceptions.
|
5136.34 | Could you Note a Little Quieter Please | NQOS02::nqsrv208.nqo.dec.com::SLOUGH | Dennis Slough; Novi, MI dtn 471-5154 | Thu Feb 20 1997 08:01 | 7 |
| Shhh! Please don't talk 'em into monthly paychecks. I've been there. I much
prefer the weekly direct deposits. It's easier on my finances and the check
stubs that arrive in the mail every Thursday are great motivators.
Regarding bill-paying, I can't see doing that once a month, my creditors and
suppliers post bills with due dates that are all over the month. I pay them as
they come in. -- Dennis
|
5136.35 | | CPEEDY::ZALESKI | | Thu Feb 20 1997 08:32 | 5 |
| When I worked at Raytheon, the pay was once a month on or about the
25th of the month. The first month was a suprise but after the first
month it all works out. It is a change from once a week at the last
job. Just requires some planning. I can't see where it is against some
law as they are a Mass. company.
|
5136.36 | | DECCXL::WIBECAN | That's the way it is, in Engineering! | Thu Feb 20 1997 09:53 | 42 |
| >> I can't see where it is against some
>> law as they are a Mass. company.
It's not against the law to pay monthly. It is against the law to wait until
the end of the month to pay for the work completed during the preceding month.
You can pay monthly if you pay at least three weeks in advance of the work
being completed.
BTW, the bi-weekly pay scheme does not just cost one week's interest one time.
It's one week's interest every two weeks; that is, it's recurring.
Consider a representative two week period. Say you can receive a paycheck for
each week at any of three points: before the first week, before the second week
(that is, between the two weeks), and at the end of the two weeks. There is a
week's worth of interest on each paycheck during each week of the period, for a
total of four paycheck-weeks worth of interest. Either you get the interest or
the company does. For different pay schemes, the interest (in paycheck-weeks)
over the two weeks is distributed as follows:
Pay Company Your
Scheme Interest Interest
Weekly, end of week 3 1
Weekly, start of week 1 3
Bi-Wkly, start of wk 1 0 4
Bi-Wkly, start of wk 2 2 2
Bi-Wkly, end of wk 2 4 0
Considering a 4-week month, with 16 paycheck-weeks of interest:
Pay Company Your
Scheme Interest Interest
Weekly, end of week 10 6
Weekly, start of week 6 10
Monthly, start wk 1 0 16
Monthly, start wk 2 4 12
Monthly, start wk 3 8 8
Monthly, start wk 4 12 4
Monthly, end wk 4 16 0
This is true for every single pay period, not just the first one.
Brian
|
5136.37 | | CATMAX::SKALTSIS | Deb | Thu Feb 20 1997 11:56 | 8 |
| >job. Just requires some planning. I can't see where it is against some
>law as they are a Mass. company.
Actually, I heard that they pay a monthly fine of something like $5000
for doing this, but that the cost of the fine is much less than the
float benefit.
Deb (who hopes that doesn't give the beancounters any ideas)
|
5136.38 | where there's a will there's a way | XAPPL::DEVRIES | downsized: your footage may vary | Thu Feb 20 1997 13:18 | 5 |
| re: with monthly paychecks, it gets pretty tight the week before payday
I have the same problem -- and I get paid weekly! :-)
-Mark
|
5136.39 | | GAAS::TSUK | Michael Tsuk | Thu Feb 20 1997 13:37 | 4 |
| When I was in graduate school, I was on a fellowship that paid
my stipend *three times a year*. Ouch. I much prefer weekly.
-Michael
|