T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4766.1 | Only wanted one since I was 5 | TROPPO::MORETTI | | Mon Aug 12 1996 00:41 | 21 |
|
A Ferrari
My boy to grow and drive for Ferrari
A tour of the Ferrari factory
Ferrari to win the world championship
I am a very materialistic person ever since my dad died a couple of
years ago. He worked his guts out all his life and died after he had
paid all his debts and raised 8 kids on a single wage!!
My values were generated by my father's lifestyle and work ethic.... we
must seem greedy to people but lie is short so aim high.
CRIM
ps I am also going to spend at leats a year working for the UN to help
improve some of the under-developed countries when my house is paid for
just to balance my money-grabbing outlook.
|
4766.2 | Time is everything. | COPS01::SPANGLER | | Mon Aug 12 1996 09:17 | 1 |
| Good health and the time to enjoy it.
|
4766.3 | Don't Worry. Be Happy. | STAR::KLEINSORGE | Fred Kleinsorge | Mon Aug 12 1996 11:01 | 89 |
| .0 poses the question: "Is Digital a vital process to us?", with the
answer "I think NOT!". And then makes some general observations about
Digital... and life.
OK, for what it's worth...
Digital *was* not only a major part of my life, as any job is, but
it *was* much, much more. Notice the past tense.
When I came to Digital 17 years ago, I had been in New York City for
a year, working for another company. First time away from home, and
thousands of miles. What I found at Digital was a community, and an
extended family. We were all young transplants from other places,
without direct roots to the place we lived, and the social network
that "home" provides. My best freinds were DECies, we ate, drank,
and slept DEC. I met my first wife at DEC... and my second.
As I moved through what was once a very fluid company, from Software
Services, into Engineering, from NY, to MA, to NH -- many of those
friends followed the same roads. When I became chronically ill, it
was my health that came first to those I worked with, and for... not
the job.
A half-dozen years or so ago, I couldn't imagine not working the rest
of my career at DEC, or that it would not be an integral part of my
life.
But over the last half-dozen or so years, DEC changed. And as I've
approached 40, I've changed as well.
It wasn't the hard times that caused the change -- before the hard
times came, there was a shift from being a place where we all lived
and breathed DEC, to a bloated, balkanized collection of groups all
pulling against each other, with no sense of overall purpose (the
last vestage of this was when we *all* knew we were the VAX/VMS company)
and only interested in their little peice of the pie. From the top
there started a slow creeping change as the bean counters tried to
make employees interchangeable parts. The MBA's in their $1000 suits
took to heart the Harvard Business School concept of a temporary
workforce. We've been out-of-control since Gordon Bell quit in
disgust over his inability as CTO to make the company respond to
change (of course, that's my characterization of why Godon quit).
The hard times simply brought these problems to a rapid, crushing
collapse of loyalty and cohesion. The company cuts benefits, and
tries to tell us that being screwed out of your pension is a "good"
thing... but of course it *is* a good thing if you plan to leave
the company (and infinitely cheaper and more predictable than a
defined benefit plan). It cuts vacation time. It outsources basic
functions. It hires ex-DECies as contractors who were the *deadwood*
that we layed off, for six figure consulting incomes. Being profitable
is meaningless in this jungle, we reward the money losing groups, and
create self-fulfilling prophecies by predicting a failure, cutting
investment based on the prediction, leading the marketing push to
tell or customers a product is dead, and then noting how the
prediction was right.
A couple years ago, after a life threatening stay in the hospital,
something dawned on me that was sad, and yet liberating... no matter
how hard I worked, and no matter what I contributed to the company:
1) It had no effect on if *my* job would exist in 6 months.
2) I wouldn't get a raise anyway (this was during the salary
freeze).
3) I woudn't get promoted either (among other reasons ;-), there
was also a promotion freeze that was not well publicized).
4) Burned-out 1 performers didn't get rewarded any better than
2 performers who worked 9-5, and golfed every Tuedsay afternoon.
and more importantly, I realized that I wanted to be able to enjoy
my home, my daughter, and my wife.
There are still some great people at DEC, but frankly, they are a
dying breed (sorry if anyone is offended). I'm slowly putting down
some roots where I am, and making non-DEC freinds. I'm working less
hours that I ever have in my career, and am doing the best work that
I've ever done - just not as much of it.
I'm no longer as intensly loyal to DEC, or emotionally concerned
about it's future. I'm grateful to DEC for the opportunities that
it gave me over the years, and for the pretty good living I make
for someone with only a couple years of community college education.
I'm now delivering 100% to DEC, no longer 150%. I'm just pushing
ahead doing what I'm told, and what my skills allow. If DEC
fails... life will go on. If I'm layed off... life will go on
(perhaps as one of those six-figure-income contractors). When I
go on vacation I *don't* dial in to the office to read my mail ;-)
I've got a suntan this year!
|
4766.4 | | POMPY::LESLIE | Andy Leslie | DTN 847 6586 | Mon Aug 12 1996 11:09 | 12 |
| Fred's experiences reflect mine - growing nearer to 40 (or in my case
passing that date last Jan.) sobers your expectations and made me more
realistic about a lot of things.
People are important, family and friends are very important, work is
necessary and to be enjoyed where possible.
In some ways DEC was a family to lots of folks I knew, but they have
died or moved on in outlook. No Corporation ever gave birth in a
hospital side-room and made me cry with delight.
/a
|
4766.5 | | TUXEDO::GASKELL | | Mon Aug 12 1996 11:13 | 4 |
| There are a lot of things that are important to me. But, after much
thinking, two things stands out above the rest. To me, justice and
fairness are the most important to me (and unfortunately all too rare
in this muddled world).
|
4766.6 | | POMPY::LESLIE | Andy Leslie | DTN 847 6586 | Mon Aug 12 1996 11:27 | 8 |
| For some reason this reminds me of the following story:
In the 1970's a radio reporter in Washington phoned around all of the
Ambassadors asking what they'd like for Christmas.
Almost universally, they replied along the lines "Peace and an end to
world hunger", except the Brit, who replied that he'd quite like a pair
of slippers, thank you.
|
4766.7 | The movie "JACK" | COPS01::JNOSTIN | | Mon Aug 12 1996 11:52 | 6 |
| I urge every movie going fan to see the recently released movie: "JACK"
with Robbin Williams. Pay attention to the ending of the movie and
think about it and how it may relate to you. Then if you care to, note
your comments here and how it relates to this base note.
Thanks
|
4766.8 | | BUSY::SLAB | The word for today is legs ... | Mon Aug 12 1996 13:06 | 5 |
|
Does neatness count?
And will you be taking points off for spelling/grammar mistakes?
|
4766.9 | | CSC32::PITT | | Mon Aug 12 1996 13:35 | 3 |
|
respect.
|
4766.10 | life is what you make it! | ALFSS2::JONES_F | | Mon Aug 12 1996 14:37 | 20 |
| Spend the time with people that will attend your funeral!
Work hard when you work Play hard when you Play the rest will
take care of itself. Seems that alot of people want to find security
in the company they work for Wrong! you find it in yourself your own
ablities to do a job and learn from your errors. The single most
important thing is attitude. Sure it is hard to keep a good attitude
when all we know and love seem to be falling down around us but what
difference will it make to you in a hundred years anyway! This place
has changed in the past 19 1/2 years that I have been working here,
most people are quick to point out the bad stuff but there have been
some good or I would have been gone. Think a full minute, there have
been many people that have come and gone and they leave a little of
themselves when they leave. What they leave may be good or not good,
but each of us are richer for have known them, we learn.
It seems the good of a person dies with them but the bad goes on
forever. If you are in a rut get out (a rut is a grave without ends)
you can, you did have something to do before you where here.
Fronnie Jones
|
4766.11 | What's Really Important | NCMAIL::YANUSC | | Mon Aug 12 1996 15:25 | 20 |
| What I want is the following:
1. A loving relationship with my wife, which I believe I am getting
closer to attaining after 17 years of marriage. And not just the
words, but to really mean it.
2. A wonderful life for my daughter, with a loving husband at her side.
3. Lastly, for myself, my family and everyone possible, I want us to be
able to meet our Maker and to be able to say the same things that Saint
Paul said in II Timothy:
"I have fought the good fight, I have run the good race."
If you can truly say this, and know in your heart that it is true, then
all else is pretty small in conparison.
My 2 cents.
Chuck
|
4766.12 | In a nutshell | WRKSYS::DISCHLER | I don't wanna wait in vain | Mon Aug 12 1996 16:22 | 5 |
| Life.
Health.
Love.
Security.
Fun.
|
4766.13 | <What matters to me> | IVOS02::VILLALOBO_GI | | Mon Aug 12 1996 17:04 | 6 |
| Reading this thread reminds me of something. I couple of years ago,
my father died. I visit his grave now and then. I have yet to see
a tombstone that says "He/she had a wonderful career at..." That says
it all to me.
Gil
|
4766.14 | yeah yeah.... | CSC32::PITT | | Mon Aug 12 1996 18:35 | 14 |
|
re .13
That reminds me of something I read in one of those wisdom books that
said
Nobody ever died saying "I wish I'd sent more time at the office".
How true. .3 really said it all. Ditto. Last year was the first year
that I took a vacation and didn't dial in to see if I could help or
if things were under control. Scary thing was, I didn't think of work
at all, not once, and that was a big first for me. Maybe it's age.
Maybe it's reality. Either way, it's about time......
|
4766.15 | I agree with these, especially Fred in .3 | TLE::PUDER | Windows 95 = Macintosh 89 + 8MB | Tue Aug 13 1996 12:05 | 8 |
| My work is not the most important thing in my life, but my workplace is where I
spend a fifth of it. DEC used to be like a second family, a place where you
could find some of all those other things folks have posted here (except,
perhaps, the Ferrari); a place I would go even if they didn't pay me, just for
the fun of it. Now it's just where I go so that I have $$ for the other 4/5 of
my life. (Well, the fun isn't _completely_ gone, it's just a lot rarer).
:Karl.
|
4766.16 | Pursuit of WOW | CSCMA::SICIENSKY | | Tue Aug 13 1996 13:26 | 19 |
| I think this is a good place for an exit. Tonight I log off for the
last time at Digital. I think I leave because I have figured out what
is important to me, and as previous noters have pointed out, it's not
the company you work for.
What's important to me - hope, for the future and what I can contribute
to it, meaningful work, where I feel useful and valued, good health
both for me and my family, a few good friends who can cry on my
shoulder and me on theirs when needed - and, of course, a good horse
and a good guitar.
I am like .3, it took well over forty years to understand a few
important things, but as one of my colleagues said - "you live to
learn", and it may take another forty years to figure out a few more
important things. But at least for now, I think I am taking a step
finally in the pursuit of WOW.
- a first a last time noter..
|
4766.17 | IS ALL YOU NEED! | NEMAIL::HEINZ | | Tue Aug 13 1996 17:24 | 1 |
| LOVE!
|
4766.18 | With help from my common little miracle: Alexa | SUBPAC::POTENZA | Sic parvis magna | Wed Aug 14 1996 05:11 | 6 |
|
I hope to find the strength within myself
to improve who I am.
Potsy
|
4766.20 | | SWTHOM::COSTEUX | l'Homme ne m�rite pas la Terre... | Wed Aug 14 1996 11:21 | 9 |
| RE .-1
You've reached the SERENITY....
... we should have had a loooong time ago ...
JPC
|
4766.21 | Sense of community | IROCZ::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Thu Aug 15 1996 17:01 | 23 |
| Someone raised an important point in one of the early replies. That Digital
drew a lot of people from far away and that for these people, Digital was like
a second family. I was one of those people and in the 1980's, about 1/3 of my
coworkers were in this situation.
There has been a lot of discussion in here about how Digital no longer feels
like a second family, but not much discussion about the other side of the coin,
which is how to achieve a sense of community outside Digital.
The problem for me is that I have not been able to achieve a sense of com-
munity outside Digital. The dilemma is that even if I don't work overtime, I
don't have huge amounts of energy to put into the task of building a sense of
community outside Digital. Another dilemma is the tradeoff: Do I commit myself
to a much longer commute and/or spend a fortune on housing in an attempt to
achieve a sense of community while staying with Digital? Do I choose a place
to live that has a strong sense of community and then make a career change to
a career that can be done within a reasonable commute of this location?
Please don't tell me to telecommute. I have thought about this, but this too
would require a career change (though less of a change than the above) and,
more importantly, feels very isolating to me. I know that the corporate tele-
commuting group keeps saying that telecommuting is not isolating, but I'm
not convinced.
So to answer the question, the most important thing to me is a sense of
community. "Things" have no value to me except to the extent that they make
it possible to achieve something that I do value.
|
4766.22 | Get out from behind the tube and explore life | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel Without a [email protected] | Thu Aug 15 1996 17:36 | 15 |
|
I get my sense of community from friends who used to work at
Digital but now work elsewhere. Thru them, I meet other people,
in and out of the industry. Thru them, I fully expect at some
point to find another place to work.
It's not like it used to be, but frankly, I'm still having fun.
My weekends are mine and I live for them. No company will ever
own my time like Digital did in the '80's. Work is only a place
where I make money that allows me to enjoy life just that little
bit more.
mike
almost 16 years here!
|
4766.23 | Telecommuting makes new communities | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Thu Aug 15 1996 19:15 | 28 |
| re: .21 (telecommuting & isolation)
Just FYI...
Telecommuting can be as isolating as you let it be. Yes, you lose
some face-to-face contact with coworkers. And, yes, you lose some
contact with the grapevines around (if there are enough grapes around
to have a vine, that is... 8^( ).
But...
Telecommuting can increase contact with your family and friends (due to
lack of wasted commuting hours, etc.). It can help you build your life
outside of Digital (a common theme in many of these notes). And you
can still exchange valuable bits of insight with coworkers through
electronic means (how this is achieved is left as an exercise to the
reader ;^).
So, telecommuting _can_ produce social interaction, but the face of it
_does_ tend to change.
-- Russ
(who has been telecommuting for years from the glorious rural land
of northcentral Maryland. My office can contain 5 teddy bear hamsters
[always], 2 cats [when hungrily eyeing the hamsters], 2 dogs, [when
attempting to herd the cats], 2 children [when attempting to herd
the dogs], and 1 wife [when attempting to herd the kids]. I ain't
exactly dying from loneliness out here! 8^)
|
4766.24 | | STAR::KLEINSORGE | Fred Kleinsorge | Thu Aug 15 1996 20:55 | 68 |
| re: .21
It's a tough nut to crack. When we were young, when we were starting
our careers, and when DEC commanded a sense of loyalty and purpose -
the common bond was the company, our products, programming,
engineering, amd our sense of common purpose.
Well, now we aren't all that young. The attraction of all night
stands with a terminal, a couple gallons of Coke, and a couple
pounds of peanut M&Ms has worn off. We have no sense of common
purpose. There is no longer any sense that we are in control over
our jobs, or that we can influence the direction - or fate - of
the Company.
So, how does a transplant become part of a community... that's a tough
one. I guess the "easiest" way is to meet and marry someone from the
area. Instant roots in a way. That's what happened to me with my
second wife.
Some other suggestions:
- Join a Church. They typically love to have volunteers for
various activities, and help to make a new commer welcome
into their community.
- Find a hobby where enthusiasts get together locally. There
are lots of them around.
- Volunteer for a community group, or board.
- Join a actor/singer group. I know people who belong to
community theater, local community bands, choir groups,
and even some professional theater groups have volunteer
groups (like the American Stage Festival).
- Become a Mason (of course you'll need to find a Mason to
sponser you).
- Join the Rotary Club.
_ Walk next door and introduce yourself to your neighbors.
Invite them over to dinner, or a cook out. I find that
New Englanders have a tendancy not to make the first move
in this respect... not that I'm any better, Charlie Christ
lives across the street from me - and I've yet to walk
over and invite him to a cookout :-)
- Volunteer as a coach, or help out with a local sports team
(I guess I know a lot of people with coaching experience
who have done this).
- Become a Republican (or in MA, a Democrat) and get active
in politics.
- Go back to school at night. You may meet a lot of well
educated transplants trying to get their MBA's.
- Invite a coworker over for dinner and *don't* talk about
work!
But it ain't easy. None of these things will come to you. You have
to actively seek them out, and be willing to be turned down (without
feeling personally rejected). New Englanders take about 30 years
before they decide you're one of their own ;-) Fortunately, there
are a lot of transplants around who aren't so picky ;-)
|
4766.25 | | METSYS::BENNETT | Straight no chaser.. | Thu Aug 15 1996 21:31 | 3 |
| Integrity.
John
|
4766.26 | Digital's not important anymore | COPS02::JNOSTIN | | Thu Aug 15 1996 23:59 | 16 |
| I'd like to say with some regret, that Digital is not important to me.
Other than a place to work and earn a paycheck, Digital has taken away from
me my loyalty, devotion, and pride and to some extend my health. I'm
really sick of the TFSO's, lack of direction by the SLT, and hearing
from our CEO that the Company's setback is only a "glitch".
There are still too many managers that do not value employees and do
not uphold the "Digital Ethics". I worked for one such group in the
past and I was treated unfairly (which I won't get into here). Those
people know who they are and what they tried to do.
Life is just too short. I really don't expect to have a career anymore
or retire from Digital. It's kind of a sad ending. My friends, family
and health are what's important to me now.
I hear there is "life after Digital".
|
4766.27 | Digital - mired in mediocrity? | SHRCTR::SCHILTON | Sacred cows make the best hamburger | Fri Aug 16 1996 09:11 | 25 |
| The old saying about being careful about what you wish for because
you just might get it, has "come true" for Digital as a struggling
corporation.
For the last 4 or 5 years we, as employees, have been told to look
out for ourselves, that we should actively manage our own careers,
develop outside of these 4 walls, educate ourselves.
From the replies to this basenote, it seems we are and we have.
And that, in my opinion, is a big reason why Digital can't seem to
"break-through", make that big push that would get us really going
again. Without a sense of belonging, or feeling valued, the company
will not get the 110% out of people that it used to, and that it now
so sorely needs.
The "sum of our parts" would be so much more powerful....and instead
all we see are individuals struggling along in their cubes, heads down,
defensive, suspicious, or learning all they can while they're here,
then leaving for bigger/better. Neither scenario benefits this
corporation, that's for sure.
It's sad really...
|
4766.28 | | STAR::KLEINSORGE | Fred Kleinsorge | Fri Aug 16 1996 09:45 | 39 |
4766.29 | The company is down the list | FRSBEE::MAYALL | | Fri Aug 16 1996 10:52 | 28 |
|
Digital is not the company it was when I started 19 years ago. Back
when I started, my father had already been working for Digital 16
years. He told me "if you work hard, you will be rewarded." He told
me of his visits from Ken, and how they were rewarded for taking
chances and failing as well as succeeding.
In 1991 my father retired with 30 years service. I'm glad he left
before DEC became Digital. I was once a foolish youth who gave 150%,
every day, I've taken 40 sick days in 19 years, and felt guilty if I
took any. But life has changed. I've worked like a dog, earned my
undergrad and have 4 courses remaining for my MBA. Digital, isn't my
life, my wife, children, my brother, sisters, parents, & good friends
are my life.
I gave everything I had to DEC and got stiffed, I gave the same to
Digital and the results are the same. I've earned everthing I got,
which is much less than I deserve If I had mastered "Digital Politics",
I would have been better off. I didn't, I won't, and I pay.
I think the chances of my Father having a headstone that reads...
"Worked for DEC (Digital) 30 years" are very slim.
My wife, my kids, my family, God, nothing else matters
Mark
|
4766.30 | Don't go there - a bad path... | SSDEVO::LAMBERT | We ':-)' for the humor impaired | Fri Aug 16 1996 14:16 | 10 |
| re: .28
Careful. You start walking on the slippery slope of asking people if they
actually DO anything that justifies inflated salaries (some corp.
consultants that I have known...) and you never know where it will lead.
I mean, we may just start questioning the salaries of all those VPs (which
no one seems to know what they do), and we can't have THAT, now can we?
-- Sam
|
4766.31 | 20% of a working life! | KERNEL::CLARK | STRUGGLING AGAINST GRAVITY... | Mon Aug 19 1996 10:49 | 40 |
|
The interesting theme to emerge from the previous 30 replies is not so
much what is important, but what isn't! (DEC/DIGITAL)
In the beginnings of the crisis years we were encouraged to tighten
our belts for the good of the company, and ultimately for those of us
who still remained with the company.
It's always difficult to measure ones own performance, because one
is invariably biased, but notwithstanding this lack of objectivity, I
feel I've done my bit to help the company through it's lean times.
That was part of the old DEC culture.
The company has welched on its part of the deal!(Thus far)
It has affected my health.
It has affected my attitude to my peers.
It has affected my attitude to my job.
It has intruded into my private life.
These issues are important to me.
How does one retrieve these things?
With only seven years to go, I feel that working for DIGITAL was
turned into a gamble some years back, and that the stakes were adjusted
heavily against the employee.
The chances of recovering the "lost" years are looking more and
more remote.
Dave
|
4766.32 | Balance??? | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Tue Aug 20 1996 21:18 | 11 |
| It sure seems to me that if you take a look back through these notes,
there are some husbands, wives and children who probably are thankful
that Digital is doing so poorly.
After all they just got their spouses, mothers and fathers less
dedicated to the job and more dedicated to them...
Sounds good to me... too bad it took Digital's poor financials to bring
this about though..
|
4766.33 | | BBQ::WOODWARDC | ...but words can break my heart | Wed Aug 21 1996 00:45 | 1 |
| * Harry chuckles
|
4766.34 | | STAR::KLEINSORGE | Fred Kleinsorge | Wed Aug 21 1996 11:02 | 37 |
4766.35 | sad, but accurate (IMHO) | KANATA::ZUTRAUEN | always lookin' to learn | Wed Aug 21 1996 14:10 | 7 |
| re: -.1
Bang-On!
It's a sad commentary, but accurate!
Too bad no-one's listening......
|
4766.36 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | So far away from me | Wed Aug 21 1996 14:35 | 2 |
| There are many companies who have not gone this route. Mostly in the
service sector.
|
4766.37 | Ears are everywhere ;-) | N2DEEP::SHALLOW | Psalms 121 | Wed Aug 21 1996 23:45 | 8 |
| re: .35
Would it come to you as a surprise that someone IS listening? Don't
think for a minute they aren't. I have it on good authority that
someone IS listening, and are preparing to do something about the
complaints heard round the world in various notes. Stay tuned...
Bob
|
4766.38 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Eddie Stobart Truck Spotters Club | Thu Aug 22 1996 04:16 | 6 |
| re.34:
A very good note but you spoil it all with phrases such as "MBA's in their
$1000 suits" and "you can't when companies are managed by the MBA types".
Dave.
|
4766.39 | | DECWET::KOWALSKI | DECwest SMS engineering | Thu Aug 22 1996 11:41 | 10 |
| re: .37
> think for a minute they aren't. I have it on good authority that
> someone IS listening, and are preparing to do something about the
> complaints heard round the world in various notes. Stay tuned...
Heads up! Incoming employee questionaire about corporate communications
to mollify management.
/m
|
4766.40 | | STAR::KLEINSORGE | Fred Kleinsorge | Thu Aug 22 1996 12:13 | 43 |
4766.41 | Lou G is highly respected on the street | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Thu Aug 22 1996 12:38 | 7 |
| I know a computer compnay which is being run by somebody who knew nothing
about computers but knew how to run a tobacco and biscuit company. He even
bragged about not needing a vision to turn around the fortunes of the
faltering computer company.
For all practical purposes, he has done a remarkable job.
- Vikas
|
4766.42 | | STAR::KLEINSORGE | Fred Kleinsorge | Thu Aug 22 1996 13:15 | 19 |
|
I'm wasn't sure who Lou G wass, or what the company was (I'm
now told it's Lou Gerstner of IBM), however, what impresses the
(Wall) "street" always impress me. The street would be impressed
if Digital sold off all it's business, and started making fruitcakes
- as long as it had the right numbers (P&L, Revenue, ROI, etc).
But that wouldn't impress me much. A company is (or should be)
more than just a financial instrument, run by people using Other
Peoples Money.
"Lou" doesn't need to provide the vision. But someone needs to. In
a conglomorate, you don't have to have a common vision, but each of
the disparate business do.
IBM can run on it's own momentum until long after I die, without any
vision - but with really cool commercials that project to the public
the sense that they do.
|
4766.43 | "No Excuse Management" | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Thu Aug 22 1996 13:24 | 13 |
| I was talking about IBM. By all measures, they have nicely recovered from
their stumble. They were in worse shape than we were and they went on the
recovery path much later than we did. However, they have completed the
successfull turnaround. Nobody is making jokes about IBM's survival.
This was done by a non-technocrat CEO. IBM hasn't got into tobacco or
biscuit business.
Publicly owned corporation can NOT ignore Wall St. It is not a coincidence
that well run and *well-managed* companies are also darlings of the street.
- Vikas
|
4766.44 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Thu Aug 22 1996 13:48 | 11 |
|
Well, if we are going into the fruitcake business, I have the
perfect recipe that I worked up from an existing Southern
fruitcake recipe. Even those people who hate fruitcake love
this one. So, I say that we have a fighting chance in changing
our product base. Say, what??? I do believe that the new
Fab 6 building could be converted to huge vats for the mixture.
Anyone care to work up the presentation???
justme
|
4766.45 | A big ;-) | STAR::KLEINSORGE | Fred Kleinsorge | Thu Aug 22 1996 14:19 | 40 |
| News Release:
In a stunning announcement, Digital Equipment Corporation
today announced the sale of all it's computer related business
units, and unveiled it's plan to become the worlds premier
provider of fruitcake, and fruitcake related products.
J. Gardner, the newly appointed Senior VP of marketing revealed
the plan at a splashy gala event held here in Maynard Mass.
"We found that the low-fat, low-calorie, high-fiber, and addictive
fruitcakes that we had been offering as a add-on, were not only
being purchased in large quanities - but were incredibly profitable",
explained Gardner.
"With the steady decline in the profitablilty of non-Intel systems,
we realized that by concentrating on fruitcake as our core competency,
we could sell off, and downsize most of the company - and become more
profitable than Microsoft".
Most analysts at the meeting agreed that the numbers look solid, and
easily achievable. The $15billion that the company is expected to
get for the sale of it's computer related business units will be paid
out as a one-time dividend. Trading in DEC stock was briefly halted
on the New York Stock Exchange when the price jumped an incredible $200
a share from it's $17-1/2 opening price to $217-1/2 on a volume of
over $50 million shares.
Gardner hinted that a name change might be in the works for the company
noting that they wer not in the watch business anymore.
...
In a related story, an investor group headed by Ken Olsen is rumored
to be interesting in purchasing part or all of the business units
being sold off by Digital Equipment Corporation.
"What the heck", Ken Olsen was quoted as saying.
|
4766.46 | | DSNENG::KOLBE | Wicked Wench of the Web | Thu Aug 22 1996 16:35 | 8 |
| From "Shannon on DEC"
Digital insider reports that while the upper management supports the
fruitcake core to be the "one cake no frosting" strategy of Digital of
there have been distrubing rumors from wall street that there is in fact
only one fruitcake in the world that is being sent from person to person.
The fruitcake futures market has begun a sharp decline. liesl
|
4766.47 | | CSC32::I_WALDO | | Fri Aug 23 1996 10:35 | 6 |
| >>>only one fruitcake in the world that is being sent from person to
>>>person.
There is certianly more than one fruitcake in the world.
Oh, you're talking about cakes! Sorry.
|
4766.48 | | BBQ::WOODWARDC | ...but words can break my heart | Sun Aug 25 1996 21:11 | 1 |
| I resemble that remark ;')
|
4766.49 | Life is what you make of it! | DV780::WATSONC | | Mon Aug 26 1996 01:30 | 52 |
| Back to .0 ...
I have two goals every day of my life. My first goal is to look at myself
in the mirror each morning (usually after a shower when I am putting my
contacts in) and ask the following question: "How are you going to do the
right thing today -- for your family, for your customers, for your
co-workers, for those you supervise, and those that supervise you,
... ?" My second goal is to take another look at myself in the mirror each
right before I go to bed and ask another question to myself -- "Did you
do the right thing today -- for your family, your customers, ... ?"
In fact, I am just like everybody else in that I often forget to ask
these questions regularly. But, as I grow older, I find that I depend
more and more on answering these questions each day just to keep my
sanity. There are times when I am quite pleased with my answers.
Other times, my answers are quite sobering and I am ashamed to look at
my self. However, no matter what my answer is, I know that the next
day presents new challenges: to accept the consequences for my mistakes
and try to redeem myself; to meet a new person and reach out to them or
to find an old aquaintance and do the same; to look at old problems
with fresh ideas and new solutions; ... I cannot change the past, but
each day is an opportunity to change the future.
What I am trying to say is that life is about looking inside yourself
and using that knowledge to affect the outside. Life is what you make
it. I have learned the hard way that the important things in life have
much more to do with how you treat the world around you, and have less to
with how the world treats you. Am I happy about the things that have
happened within Digital? Not at all! Am I frustrated with watching
fellow employees lose their job and watching our competitors beat the
pants off us? I certainly am! But Digital is just like anything else
encounter in life (e.g., Am I going to do the right thing for Digital
today? -- Did I do the right thing for Digital today?).
It is not my desire to impose my religious beliefs on anyone in this
forum. However there are two things from my faith that I have run
across that I would like to share. The first is the "Golden Rule,"
which says to treat others as you would like them to treat you.
Sometimes the most simple things make the most sense. I believe such
is the case with this axiom of life. The second thing is the famous
"Prayer of Serenity." It goes something like this:
God,
grant me serenity to change things when I can...
to accept the things I cannot ...
and the wisdom to know the difference.
Finally, I will share the wisdom in something a friend once told me.
He said, "Don't sweat the small stuff in life. Remember that
everything in life is small stuff!"
|
4766.50 | And now, fish | DECCXX::WIBECAN | Get a state on it | Mon Aug 26 1996 11:53 | 15 |
| >> In a stunning announcement, Digital Equipment Corporation
>> today announced the sale of all it's computer related business
>> units, and unveiled it's plan to become the worlds premier
>> provider of fruitcake, and fruitcake related products.
Reminds me of a cartoon I saw once. A guy was sitting at a desk beneath a sign
that said "Bob's Computer Company," but "Computer" was crossed out and "Fish
Cleaning" written in. He was busy cleaning a fish, and he had a distressed
look on his face. A co-worker was saying something like, "Don't be so upset,
at least you still have a job."
(Yes, I do believe it said "Bob's" in the sign; I recall finding the name
apropos.)
Brian
|
4766.51 | | AUSSIE::WHORLOW | Digits are never unfun! | Tue Sep 10 1996 23:47 | 77 |
| G'day,
Been here for allbut 10years and have seen some changes in my time...
and sometimes life has not been that rosy...
but
I enjoy working here - I tried four times before I got a job here and
I'm glad still that I succeded.
So listening to folk in this stream,some decisions seem not fair.. life
is 'not fair'. The 'company' does not make decisions - some person does
in response to information received and problems perceived. Sometime
those decisions are not palatable, even to the decision maker. That's
life. Remeber when you decided to eat that anchovy pizza that gave you
the indigestion. You lived through your mistake... Sometime apparent
mistakes affect others.
Some MBAs are good, very good, some pass the MBA on others capabilities
and the certificate delineates neither. The $1000 suit sounds like sour
grapes. If you want to be there, go to school, make the financial and
time investment and become one. Don't want that, then you don't 'want'
enough. There was a tv article last night. A down and out woman in
london, lived on the streets around the UK from teh age of 16 to the
age of 51. Heavy into drugs and alcohol, rejected by family, abused as
a child. Decided that enough was enough. Cleaned herself up, moved to a
convent, earned a BA(honours) at Oxford, is reading for an MA and is
determined to become a Phd. She 'wanted' enough.
Yes there are some who seem to be paid highly for glories past - but
that is what a continuing n%pay increase per annum means. Yes there are
some that appear above their talents - I recall someone saying their
(not digital) MD was an idiot. he was unhappy that I pointed out that
at least that person was MD, which he was not... If a Consultant is not
earning their keep, then go and ask them questions and learn from them.
Maybe in time, you may aspire to be a consultant.
So you don't play politics to get ahead... recognise that going up the
ladder involves politics as a skill. Don't want that? then don't aspire
up the ladder. If some politics works against you, then recognize that
someone is better than you are at it. Read "how to survive company
politics" - it says you have to use politics even to stay in the job
you like, at the pay you earn - for if you are good, then someone may
want to move you up, and if not, then down!
So what do I think is important:
*my family (as #1 son announces engagement, and #2 son gets his first
job)
*Earning my keep - if I can do better that the next person at my job,
then maybe I have a better chance of getting some of the peanut butter
*Enjoying working with the colleagues around me - I see them more hours
than I see my wife, so I had better have fun working
*my out of work hours as a volunteer bush firefighter, first aid
instructor
*my church and the friends I have there
*My home
Note work is high on the list - it butters my bread, and I want that to
keep on happening. I am very aware that talented people have been lost
to the company even tho they did work hard and well. That's sad for
them (tho many have gone to bigger things). I have to say that I have
been fortunate that I saw the job I did going away well in advance, so
I went to school and did a business degree and then changed what I do
for a crust...
So I believe that the company programs for career choice is something
that is goodness and if that in the end keeps you happy with life (and
out of Digital) so be it - but if it moves you to a more interesting
change of career that's worth valuing.
my 2�
derek
|
4766.52 | | STAR::KLEINSORGE | Fred Kleinsorge | Wed Sep 11 1996 20:21 | 54 |
| >...
>and the certificate delineates neither. The $1000 suit sounds like sour
>grapes. If you want to be there, go to school, make the financial and
>
Since I was the offender here, I offer another mea culpa to the
offended MBA's. The "$1000 suit" was an unfortunate label that was
glib at best. And worse, it detracted from the point, which was not
the cost of the apparel, or even the income that can be derived from
an Ivy League MBA. In retrospect, if I could "modify" the original
replies, I would alter it so as not to lead you to the mistaken
impression that this was some type of "sour grapes" in terms of the
relative income levels that a MBA makes to myself, or anyone else.
The point rather had to do with a management style, and philosophy,
that views corporations as financial vehicles, as opposed to, say,
a "Computer Manufacturing Company". Also the philosphy of the
"temporary workforce", which I first read in the Harvard Business
Review, which in my opinion has the side effect of hollowing out the
company. And on even a higher level, the institutional ownership
of corporations as financial investments. No longer is stock in
companies like DEC overwhelmingly owned by real people, who are
interested in long term investments, or interested in what the company
actually *does*. Instead the stock is owned by mutual funds, pension
plans, and a whole host of institutions, and as parts of "baskets"
of investment instruments - and are focused purely on the returns
*today* or maybe as far out as next quarter.
My feeble mind associates the decline in the relationship between
corporations, and employees with much the above. And the above
with the stereotypes from the excesses of the 80's, the investment
bankers, the Ivy League MBA's, the "Other Peoples Money" kind of
stuff. So it's easy to take aim, and say it's the "MBA's in their
$1000 suits", just like it's easy to say "Lets shoot all the lawyers"
when you talk about the problem with the legal system.
We can leave the debate about the compensation a MBA makes to the
next discussion about why corporate executives in general are overpaid.
Or why pick-a-profession is overpaid. Or why everyone should write
a $10 check made out to CASH and mail it to Fred Kleinsorge at
ZKO3-4/W23 ;-)
...
I will offer another mea-culpa about a peanut-butter reply that when
I re-read it did sound like sour grapes (hey, do I get sympathy because
it was my 40th birthday?). In retrospect I regret entirely to the point
that I deleted it the other day. I was also informed (by a informed,
and respected source) that the "peanut butter" was the chunky variety -
which _was_ good to hear, but which was also depressing because "creamy
style" was the conclusion that was easily reached without conflicting evidence
to the contrary... and not just by me, but by many. Too much
information is never shared, and misinformation fills the void.
|
4766.53 | .34 | STAR::KLEINSORGE | Fred Kleinsorge | Wed Sep 11 1996 20:42 | 51 |
| Better living though creative editing. Both .38, and .51 took
justifyable issue with MBA pot shots in the original .34...
which has been nuked, and is rewritten below. With luck, the
next guy starting this thread from .0 will not go off the
tracks because of my cheap shots.
----
.32 It's a hell of a way to achieve balance, but nonetheless
DECs loss is often a personal gain.
I feel sorry for the ones who can't cope with the stress.
The relationships that get *worse* because of it.
I know that there is a business school theory, turned into
real world experiment, that believes that a temporary workforce
is a good thing, and that people must learn expect instability,
and get used to change... but it's a hell of a way to live.
By sacrificing long-term, happy, loyal employees, for the
short-term bottom line - you can no longer expect 100% efforts
by employees, or that they will turn their ideas into saleable
products for the company.
How do you manage a workforce where there is no mutual loyalty?
Where many of your key people have transportable skills,
transportable pensions, transportable everything? Where there
is no job security, regardless of your skills and efforts.
Management becomes a lesson in herding cats.
The shame of it is that you can have *both*. It doesn't need
to be a either/or thing. DEC *could* be that place that you
just love to go to work at every morning - *and* you can still
have a life.
But you can't when companies are driven by forces that only
understand this quarters Profit and Loss. Maybe it's a
commentary on institutional ownership of public corporations
that forces a single focus on short-term profits. I dunno.
Maybe it's the same everywhere. But it sure does suck.
With a focus on short-term profits, you can't take a longer
look to build a business - you need to already be there. NT
will succeed because Bill Gates doesn't care if it loses
money for 5 years, because he is *building* a business, and
has a long-range strategy. He can do it because he has not
_yet_ lost control of the company, and because overall the
company is still profitable.
Well, when the revolution comes, at least I'm a member of
Dogbert's New Ruling Class ;-)
|
4766.54 | only ten, is that enough? | ESSC::KMANNERINGS | | Thu Sep 12 1996 06:06 | 9 |
4766.55 | calma... calma. | BBRDGE::LOVELL | � l'eau; c'est l'heure | Thu Sep 12 1996 06:38 | 20 |
4766.56 | and who is this Cerutti character anyway? | DSNENG::KOLBE | Wicked Wench of the Web | Thu Sep 12 1996 14:41 | 5 |
4766.57 | | AUSSIE::WHORLOW | Digits are never unfun! | Mon Sep 16 1996 19:57 | 45 |
4766.58 | | POMPY::LESLIE | Andy Leslie, sage sayings 2p a bag | Tue Sep 17 1996 04:20 | 16 |
4766.59 | why TRY to segment your life? | REGENT::POWERS | | Tue Sep 17 1996 10:00 | 18 |
4766.60 | | DECCXX::WIBECAN | Get a state on it | Tue Sep 17 1996 10:32 | 27 |
4766.61 | | SSDEVO::LAMBERT | Short Timer | Tue Sep 17 1996 13:51 | 12
|