T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4707.1 | De-DEC it and then donate it. | VMSNET::M_MACIOLEK | Four54 Camaro/Only way to fly | Tue Jul 09 1996 18:30 | 18 |
| I'd like to see us donate old stuff to charity, but consider:
Is the other company's brand name on the box when they donate
it. I.e. when it runs like hell, or worse, breaks, does it
make them look bad? Probably not, because they didn't make the
box. They just bought it, used it, expensed it and junked it.
If digital makes the box, and donates it, it still says digital.
If it breakes it's a "POS computer". Our internal systems are
screwed up enough, we'd probably be tricked into going to repairing
the thing, or replacing it.
What I'd do, is rip every reference to digital off the box and
then donate it. Seriously, if you're a school kid and you worked on
a donted TRS-80...
Regards,
MadMike
|
4707.2 | and it's still working just fine. | SYOMV::FOLEY | Rebel with a [email protected] | Wed Jul 10 1996 00:14 | 12 |
| I kinda like the concept of having the "digital" still there, and
having the serial numbers (which should be on the front, and easily
deciphered) in a real live VALID database (unlike SMART) that sez -
"Donated to <mumble> <date>.
I recently donated an LP29 to local college, that I bought from a scrap
dealer (it still worked, I used to maintain it) - and the college
placed it on contract. They won - (got a better printer than the LP37 -
for free), I won (took a decent sized deduction from my taxes) and Digital
won (more maintenance dollars).
.mike.
|
4707.3 | Also in France | HERON::KAISER | | Wed Jul 10 1996 02:59 | 16 |
| Here in France, Digital pays a fairly heavy tax ("taxe professionalle") on
all its equipment as long as it's owned; it's based on the purchase price,
so the tax on even a PC325 is bad.
In Valbonne we'd like to get rid of our obscenely large inventory of
obsolete equipment (getting current equipment for current use is another
question, and a very emotional one, which I won't go into here). Of course
much of this obsolete equipment is still usable for someone, so many of us
would like to donate some to schools and charitable organizations.
But we can't. In order to meet legal requirements, we must have it
destroyed, and be prepared to certify that it was destroyed.
Lose-lose.
___Pete
|
4707.4 | Policies for everything... | JGODCL::ISERIEF | | Wed Jul 10 1996 05:41 | 22 |
| We have policies for everything....
Go to Corporate VTX Infobase:
step choose
1 16 Policies and Procedures
2 1 Repository of Corporate level policies
3 2 Contents of policy repository
4 2 Corporate Accounting and Reporting Policies
5 1 Business Controls section
6 13 CF302-22 => CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS POLICY
don't forget also to look at CP002-03 => CORPORATE CONTRIBUTIONS
After step 3 above do:
4 3 Corporate Policies
5 4 CP002-03 => CORPORATE CONTRIBUTIONS POLCIY
Have fun,
HI
|
4707.5 | Something is terribly wrong here | BRAT::MONBLEAU | | Wed Jul 10 1996 10:46 | 61 |
| One of the charitable organizations I support is the American Indian
College Fund, a non profit organization that raises funds and resources
for 27 member Native American Colleges. Most of these schools are in
dire conditions with many fighting on a daily basis to hold or become
accredited. With Indian reservations some of the worst pockets of
poverty in the country, you can imagine what their fund raising efforts
are like.
Furthermore, in an effort to balance the federal budget, proposed cuts
naturally singled out the BLM and specifically, funds earmarked for the
reservations. (Hard to break a 400 year old habit of oppressing the
Indians.....)
Most of these schools have minimal to poor to almost no libraries.
So as I am learning about all of this and thinking about the tons of
obsolete PCs and other equipment we have, I get real excited about the
prospect of Digital helping these colleges by getting them on-line and
using PCs to expand their library and research resources.
How naive I am........
I wrote a several page proposal and submitted it to corporate
contributions and asked what we could do. I offered to do the work,
serve on a comittee, head up a project, whatever it would take. I got
an answer, which was a start at least, but it was a no-option, no-
recourse, slam dunk into the circular file.
I'll tell you, as an employee of our moral, ethical, community oriented,
socially involved company, I was very disappointed, and even a little
bit disgusted.
There's something about destroying perfectly good resources that could
mean so much to others that seems to me to be biblically (is that a word?)
sinful.
I went through the proper channels but I don't know if there were any
other "humans" on the other end - only automatrons. And the legal
liability BS around the logo and our "responsibilities" is a total
crock. Years ago we gave away old stuff left and right; this is no
legal matter. Remember, Digital has killed the matching grant program
and many other charitable efforts as a cost cutting measure - (Oh yeh,
we did still pay out six digit bonuses to failures who got fired.....)
I understand cost containment and had no beef about the Matching
cancellation - but I did expect it to get reinstated at some point. And
disposal of old equipment, as was pointed out in the original note is a
tax write off - a win/win!!!!
This is not your father's oldsmobile. I just don't think Digital
gives a s___ any more. Our leaders have more important things to do -
save the company, make BIG bucks for themselves, and write ludicrous
contracts of employment for other company's failures - (Ed, Enrico....).
So, I continue to make my paltry tiny $$$ contribuitions to the AICF in
hopes they will be able to pick up a text book or two........
|
4707.6 | Planning to stick around | MSBCS::BMORRISON | | Wed Jul 10 1996 12:20 | 14 |
| This note may not directly apply, but I could not help giving out
my thoughts.
As we continue to CAPsize (woops Rightsize is correct word), it
would seem to me that Digital should offer to sell an exiting
TFSO'd indvidual the unit off his/her desk at a HUGE discount.
This individual could take a long some good memories as well as
a product that they are very familiar with when going on to
the next life.
The company would then not have to worry about inventoring and
depreciating the equipment as well as possible logistic and
crushing expenses.
|
4707.7 | Not exactly what may be on your desk | ICS::GREENE | | Wed Jul 10 1996 13:37 | 14 |
| RE: .6
Actually what you describe does exist (sort of).
The TFSO'd employee has the option to purchase up to 2 pieces of
equipment that meets certain conditions, such as zero book value, less
than 486, etc. I recall that there is an administrative fee that varies
depending on the model.
I saw the list from someone that got tapped recently.
hth,
kjg
|
4707.8 | | IROCZ::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Wed Jul 10 1996 19:37 | 12 |
| Having TFSO'd employees take their old equipment with them only makes a small
dent in the huge volume of old but still-working equipment we send to the scrap
heap.
Over the last two years, I helped send tens of thousands of dollars worth
(internal cost when purchased) of usable but surplus equipment to the scrap
heap (PDC). I felt bad about doing so, but there was no alternative: we couldn't
find any takers for it in-house, we were prohibited from donating it to out-
siders, and we didn't have any space to store it.
The PDC prides itself on the fact that it recycles most of the materials from
the equipment it receives. But that misses the point. Most of the value in
computer equipment is in the manufacturing, not in the materials. So is most
of the energy investment.
|
4707.9 | | USPS::FPRUSS | Frank Pruss, 202-232-7347 | Thu Jul 11 1996 02:18 | 13 |
| The paper trail of memos that resulted from trying to arrange for the
donation of a COMPAQ LTE !286! laptop to a seminary that "standardized"
on these units boggles the mind.
They have a fleet of docking stations to accept minimaly configured
units (as were use by PCSA "road warriors" in days past").
This is "written off" at 0$, but I still can't get anyone to sanction
parting with it.
Thus it occupies valuable cc's in my home office..
fjp
|
4707.10 | High School Donations | NAC::TRAN | | Thu Jul 11 1996 09:23 | 30 |
| About 1 or 2 months ago, I was also looking to acquire some equipment
to "donate" to my old high school.
I was planning on holding some "training" classes to get the kids off
the streets, and at the same time develop their skills in the IT field
(i.e. HTML, Networks, word processing, graphics, etc.) - possibly start
their young lives in the right track - in the IT industry. I graduated
from Brockton High School in '91. Unfortunately, the school system
their has other things to worry about besides their computer equipment...
Anyways, I contacted someone in the corporate donations department.
They told me that, at the time, there was nothing they could do. The
only way Digital could donate old equipment was if it was on Dial and
the value was $0. Otherwise, unless the High School was planning on
making a New Computer Equipment Purchase - Digital could give a
discount (discount off what? already overpriced PCs?). The other reason
they said they tended to shy away from donating equipment was "who's
going to maintain the equipment?" They said, "they'll come back to
Digital and ask us to maintain them (for free?)."
I used to work in Desktop Support for CCS. I had the opportunity to
walk around several buildings....and I often saw cubes and cubes of
offices filled with unused "Idle" equipment. I thought, "what a waste!"
Why can't we donate these equipment? From the previous notes, it looks
like there would be some benefit to Digital....????
Does anybody have any suggestions on where I can go from here? Thanks
much in advance!!!
/t2
|
4707.11 | | HERON::KAISER | | Thu Jul 11 1996 09:48 | 10 |
| Re .-1, "they'll come back to Digital and ask us to maintain them (for
free?)."
Why should that bother anyone? I bought a new Digital PC using my own
money, I have a worldwide warranty (it's right here on paper), and it's
still impossible to find anyone to maintain it near where I live.
All we ask is equal treatment. :-)
___Pete
|
4707.12 | pathetic | ANNECY::HOTCHKISS | | Thu Jul 11 1996 09:54 | 9 |
| Pathetic isn't it.I, like most,was ready to help out the local school
and give my time to train etc etc but came across the same
difficulties.But it's worse - I have been asked to run a one day
session in a local college to show the Internet - so could we roll in
three or four machines for the day and connect them up.Try borrowing
kit?It makes giving it away look easy.
Know what I'll do?I will lend them MY own crappy old 386 machines(I
have two) and take along my portable for the demo.
Pathetic
|
4707.13 | This is one way to donate, but you have to own it first. | NETCAD::CREEGAN | | Thu Jul 11 1996 13:02 | 4 |
| Wasn't there a man in Stoneham-area who would take older computers
and "re-vamp" them and donate them to schools? I remember reading
a newspaper article, but I forget the man's name and where he lives.
Does anybody know of a person like that?
|
4707.14 | | HERON::KAISER | | Thu Jul 11 1996 14:29 | 7 |
| > I have been asked to run a one day session in a local college to show the
> Internet ...
I bring them in to the Valbonne site on Saturday mornings. Heaven knows
there's no other obvious way to get access to the kit.
___Pete
|
4707.15 | | IROCZ::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Thu Jul 11 1996 18:00 | 5 |
| > I bring them in to the Valbonne site on Saturday mornings. Heaven knows
> there's no other obvious way to get access to the kit.
Try getting a bunch of visitors into a U.S. Digital facility on a Saturday.
Much harder than getting equipment out of the building for a few days.
|
4707.16 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | A swift kick in the butt - $1 | Thu Jul 11 1996 18:31 | 5 |
|
Don't you have unmanned key-carded entrances over there, Bob?
8^)
|
4707.17 | Security has been cooperative | HERON::KAISER | | Fri Jul 12 1996 03:07 | 12 |
| >> I bring them in to the Valbonne site on Saturday mornings. Heaven knows
>> there's no other obvious way to get access to the kit.
>Try getting a bunch of visitors into a U.S. Digital facility on a Saturday.
>Much harder than getting equipment out of the building for a few days.
I notify Security ahead of time so they can check the names, prepare
badges, and be ready to open the secure gates. So far they've been very
cooperative. In fact they asked me if I'd be willing to do one of my
Saturday sessions for *them*.
___Pete
|
4707.18 | Why not donate Multias to the schools ? | SHRCTR::SRINIVASAN | | Sat Aug 17 1996 12:37 | 15 |
| Few days ago I looked at one web page and found out that Multia's are
being sold at an auction - Starting bid - $25. I heard we have 40,000
of them in stock ( thanks to the agrresive inventory management by
Larry Cabrinaty ( remember him ? ).
This company could have captured the mind sets of schools of
Massachusetts, if only they have donated 10 multia's to each school in
the state, on the condition that they should buy the monitor and
maintenance agreemnt from digital.
But we have better things to do, like hiring a VP to decide to crush
these Multias or sell it in an auction for $25.
Jay
|
4707.19 | NOT $25 - more like $750 at final bid | WHOS01::ELKIND | Steve Elkind, Digital SI @WHO | Sun Aug 18 1996 09:18 | 10 |
| Be careful with that $25 price. That's a come-on. Often the final
bids at onsale.com wind up being higher than the price you can pay in
someone's 800-number catalog operation (there's a sucker in every
crowd).
In the case of the Alpha-based Multias (actually, the Universal Desktop
Box which apparently we decided not to sell, and does NOT include any
SW license since it was intended for things like the Linux market) go
for >$700, and do not include monitor or keyboard. Still a bargain,
but a far cry from $25. At least it builds up the Alpha user base 8^).
|
4707.20 | 40,000 at $25? Not quite | FUNYET::ANDERSON | Just say NO to Clinton & Dole! | Sun Aug 18 1996 22:13 | 4 |
| I don't believe we ever had 40,000 Multias of any variety in inventory. I think
the most we ever had at one time as about a third that number.
Paul
|
4707.21 | GiGi's for everyone! | SUBSYS::JAMES | | Mon Aug 19 1996 14:36 | 14 |
|
We created a product called GiGi. It looked like a Commodore 64. The
Product lines forecasted 28,000 sold in the first year. We sold about 300.
Nobody knew a VAX was needed to make it run. (It was basicly a VRT-less
VT125). We started shutting down production at FVS +3 months. Still made
about 10K.
A year later, in June, we gave away 5 GiGi's and an LA34 to every
University on Earth.
I got a call in July demanding that we restart the line because "they
we're moving like crazy!". We didn't restart it.
|
4707.22 | Had all but forgotten about those! | STOWOA::16.125.64.71::willis | Digital Services - http://www-rpoc.ogo.dec.com | Mon Aug 19 1996 14:53 | 5 |
| Wow. Memories. My first program (Modula 2) in college was written
using a GiGi terminal. You just stirred up some memmories....
C'Ya,
Wayne
|
4707.23 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Mon Aug 19 1996 14:54 | 6 |
| Wanna see how fast/high Bob P. and Ed C. can jump? Call somebody
in the press and point to see the Alphas being auctioned off and
claim Digital is abandoning Alpha... "look, here's proof".
I bet it takes a lot less time than it took to find out about broken
bonus promises.
;-)
|
4707.24 | leave it out willya? | ESSC::KMANNERINGS | | Mon Aug 19 1996 16:02 | 9 |
| >>>>Wanna see how fast/high Bob P. and Ed C. can jump? Call somebody
in the press and point to see the Alphas being auctioned off and
claim Digital is abandoning Alpha...
No thanks Kratz, you can spare me that one. I hope someone is
troubleshooting this pr problem, and I find you have some valid points
when you criticise our marketing strategy, but Alpha is what we bet the
farm on, so we might as well look after its image as best we can, don't
you think?
|
4707.25 | | SHRCTR::SRINIVASAN | | Mon Aug 19 1996 21:59 | 15 |
| re .20
Well ! Information I heard was that we had 40,000 in inventory. Even if
you go by your account we had nearly 14,000. I doubt we sold more than
few hundreds here and there.. I think the starting price is $25. In the
auction the price may be at $700 ( without monitor !)-- But I wonder how
many people will even pay this price for Multia, considering the fact
that one can buy a Pentium PC ( without monitor ) for the same price !!
By the way does any one care to guess as to how much inventory of Full
motion video kits (Remember the Kiosk at Lechmere ? ) were dumped in to
scrap market ? By the way this is another one of the projects in which
a digital executive ( who is no longer with the company ) wasted millions !
|
4707.26 | | BBRDGE::LOVELL | � l'eau; c'est l'heure | Tue Aug 20 1996 11:12 | 10 |
| Just a data point among the invective in this thread....
You will currently have to bid $731 or better to secure one of
these auction clearance units (up from $705 yesterday). The $25
figure is the minimal opening bid and is irrelevant to this discussion.
If I lived in the US, I'd power-bid for one in a flash just to have a
reliable, fast and compact file and network server.
/Chris.
|
4707.27 | my thoughts | MAASUP::LAVELLE | | Thu Aug 22 1996 14:54 | 12 |
| I think one point that is being missed is that the market place will
drive the price of an object. If we indeed have ~14,000 or whatever
number of Multias languishing in warehouses for a list price of $4000+,
and the popular price people are willing to pay is around $900-$1000,
the real value to a customer is hitting you in the middle of your
forehead, if you (the corporation) would bother to notice. Would you
pay $80,000 for a loaded Ford Taurus just because Ford say's that's
it's value? Or will the market and competition force it down to
$20,000 (where it probably is still too high)?
.02
Bryan
|