T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4687.1 | | SHRCTR::PJOHNSON | aut disce, aut discede | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:23 | 3 |
| Are there people who can read VAXnotes but can't read VTX?
Pete
|
4687.2 | sometimes | GAVEL::MCGUINNESS | | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:48 | 6 |
|
Well, I just tried vtx, and I got the message
'server is not responding'
so I guess the answer would be yes, and thanks .0 for the info
|
4687.3 | one take... | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:49 | 8 |
|
This is a medium that gives a greater audience to give some
things a much needed push to be seen. How many usually
log into VTX over how many usually run to notes instead???
Notes is more exciting to read than VTX and gives instant (?)
feedback from others.
IMHO
|
4687.4 | | DECWIN::MCCARTNEY | | Mon Jul 01 1996 11:25 | 4 |
| RE: .1
Yes, they're called UNIX users. They have a gateway to VAXnotes, but
nothing exists to let them get to VTX.
|
4687.5 | VTX/WWW gateway | SHRMSG::DEVI | recycled stardust | Mon Jul 01 1996 11:28 | 11 |
| Well -
If they have a web browser, they can get to VTX through the gateway.
Just point their browser to:
http://vtxgwy.imc.das.dec.com/cgi-bin/vtx
FYI - the VTX/WWW gateway has been running within Digital for about 2
years...
Gita
|
4687.6 | | SPECXN::BARNES | | Mon Jul 01 1996 11:58 | 3 |
| re;If they have a web browser...
some are not so privileged....
|
4687.7 | VTX on the Web! | IRNBRU::ANDREW | | Tue Jul 02 1996 06:40 | 5 |
| Re: .5
I have been looking for this link for ages! Isn't it amazing how difficult
it is to find information in this company through 'official' channels. Thank
heavens for individual know-how! ;-)
|
4687.8 | Rules don't seem to apply to VPs | STAR::JACOBI | Paul A. Jacobi - OpenVMS Development | Tue Jul 02 1996 18:42 | 11 |
| >>> Details of Q1, FY97 transition package for U.S. employees
Except, of course, if you happen to be a VP, your transition package
may consist up to 2 year full-time pay! See 4688.6. Ah! the perks of
management.
For the rest of us poor souls, all you get is a pat on the back!
-Paul
|
4687.9 | | DIODE::CROWELL | Jon Crowell | Wed Jul 03 1996 11:28 | 5 |
|
re: .-1
Where do you get the pats on the back?
|
4687.10 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jul 03 1996 11:36 | 3 |
| It's actually a shove out the door.
Steve
|
4687.11 | | ACISS1::BATTIS | Chicago Bulls-1996 world champs | Wed Jul 03 1996 12:36 | 4 |
|
I notice Mr Palmer hasn't put a reply in here for quite some time,
maybe 13+ months. Maybe, just maybe, he can respond in here to some of
the concerns of the employees. It's just a thought.
|
4687.12 | You agreed instead to be here at the whim of the company | ALFSS2::WILBUR_D | | Mon Jul 08 1996 12:36 | 7 |
|
.8 What you did not negociate a two year pay package as part of your hiring
contract?
|
4687.13 | Work on that 3 yr project, but we may dump you next week... | GEMEVN::GLOSSOP | Alpha: Voluminously challenged | Mon Jul 08 1996 12:56 | 9 |
| > -< You agreed instead to be here at the whim of the company >-
And quite a number (though definitely dwindling...) were hired at a point
where if you did a good job, kept your skills current, etc., you were
in a de-facto position of having continuing employment. "at the whim"
is part of the problem, here. If you take that attitude toward employees
and customers (unpredictable, unreliable, etc.), you may find that both
groups don't listen very well to cries of "wolf", and will increasingly
tend dump you at their next reasonable opportunity.
|
4687.14 | Location-Choice and Personal Holidays Paid? | NWTIMA::STAMPGR | | Wed Jul 10 1996 13:30 | 7 |
| How are the Location-Choice and Personal holidays handled by the
TFSO? Is the exiting employee payed for both along with accrued
vacation?
Regards,
Greg
|
4687.15 | | MASS10::GERRY | Is that NEARLINE enough for you | Wed Jul 10 1996 13:46 | 6 |
| Location-Choice, Personal holidays???
Are these different from your normal holiday(vacation) allowance??
currently (for old contract persons) 20+ days per year
Gerald
|
4687.16 | In the U.S. Holiday is not Vacation | NWTIMA::STAMPGR | | Wed Jul 10 1996 14:06 | 12 |
| re:-.1
Holidays and vacation are two different things in the U.S.
Vacation is what you accrue based on length of service. Holidays
are mostly set days specified by the company (New Years, Christmas,
Thanksgiving, etc.), with a couple of floaters (Location Choice and
Personal).
Regards,
|
4687.17 | one logical interpretation | WRKSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Jul 10 1996 15:39 | 31 |
| I would expect that if you were to be laid off, you would get paid for
your personal-choice holiday, if you hadn't taken it yet this fiscal
year, but not for the location-choice holiday unless that had already
occurred. But that's a guess. I don't know what would happen if the
location-choice holiday occured during your limbo period, but I would
expect that you would get paid for it.
I'm talking about US only also, so both of these holidays are different
from your accrued vacation time.
And I'm *GUESSING* as well, so if the real answer suddenly becomes
important to you :-( ask someone official.
/Charlotte
On a separate note, several friends of mine work for companies where
your vacation time and *sick time* come out of the same pot (separate
from company holidays, though). This is a dumb idea! One of my
friends crawled into work several days last winter while she had a bad
case of the flu, because she already booked a nice vacation that was
going to use all her vacation time, so she couldn't take any sick time.
And of course most of her coworkers came down with the flu soon after.
Great productivity enhancing time-accounting scheme, eh? It must save
money on paper somehow, but the logic of it escapes me. (Maybe her
company's beancounters assume that the company pays so poorly that
employees all spend their vacations sitting at home and so it's no
great loss if someone has to unexpectedly shorten a planned vacation
because of a case of the flu a month before? If you've booked a
cruise, though, the only way to shorten it is usually to cancel it
completely, and lose most or all of your money, as well as losing out
on your whole vacation - that's nasty.)
|
4687.18 | | NWTIMA::STAMPGR | | Wed Jul 10 1996 16:19 | 10 |
| re: -.1
For further clarification:
Our Location-Choice Holiday in the West was never scheduled. It
is meant to be scheduled individually at anytime as the Personal
Holiday is.
Regards,
|
4687.19 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jul 10 1996 17:53 | 6 |
| I don't see that there's any basis for being paid for a future or untaken
personal holiday. Vacation time is considered part of compensation,
holidays aren't - they're days you get paid (if you're salaried) but you
don't have to come in to work.
Steve
|
4687.20 | | DECWIN::MCCARTNEY | | Wed Jul 10 1996 18:37 | 8 |
| But if you resign without taking these days within the current year,
even if your last day is January 2, you get paid for these days. Thus,
I think it's a legitimate question of if you get paid for them as part
of TFSO. Sounds like something that personnel will have to provide an
answer for.
Irene
|
4687.21 | use the floaters first, just in case | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Thu Jul 11 1996 16:27 | 16 |
| Re: Note 4687.19 by QUARK::LIONEL
�I don't see that there's any basis for being paid for a future or untaken
�personal holiday. Vacation time is considered part of compensation,
�holidays aren't - they're days you get paid (if you're salaried) but you
�don't have to come in to work.
I'm with Steve here. Particularly when some locations require you to
take your Location Choice holiday on a specific day. (In Ohio the
Location Choice day is treated like a Personal Day, i.e. you can take
it whenever you want.) Anyway, what with job security the way it is,
and with the uncertainly surrounding whether or not you'd get paid for
a Location Choice or Personal Day when the axe falls, I'm sure to
always take those two "floaters" as my first two days off.
BD�
|
4687.22 | What about non-floaters? | LOCH::SOJDA | | Thu Jul 11 1996 16:42 | 8 |
| So what happens with a standard, fixed holiday?
If I am TFSO'd on July 31, do I still get paid Labor Day, Thanksgiving
+ Friday after, and Christmas? I may be wrong but I would have assumed
the answer was a flat no -- its your tough luck.
Larry
|
4687.23 | That's the way it is | ALFA1::ALFA1::HARRIS | | Thu Jul 11 1996 23:13 | 3 |
| When TFSOed, one *is* paid for an untaken personal holiday, as it is
apparently considered equivalent to a vacation day. One is not
compensated for future fixed or location choice holidays, however.
|
4687.24 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Antisocial | Fri Jul 12 1996 10:52 | 5 |
|
How about if the future vacation falls within the "still emp-
loyed" timeframe created by a severance package and a number
of weeks of pay?
|
4687.25 | | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Fri Jul 12 1996 11:06 | 26 |
| Re: Note 4687.24 by BUSY::SLABOUNTY
� How about if the future vacation falls within the "still emp-
� loyed" timeframe created by a severance package and a number
� of weeks of pay?
I would *guess*, not being a human resources person, that you only get
credit for days up to your official last day of employment. If the
severance package takes you several weeks beyond your last day of
employment, I wouldn't think you'd get credit for any holidays or the
accumulation of vacation hours through that period - you're no longer
employed during that period.
On a related note, I hope management pays some attention to discussions
like these. It's so sad to see that we are now so concerned with how
many hours of credit we'll get if we're fired instead of being
concerned with how we can best serve our customers.
The "invisible cost" of the continual layoffs is a major force to be
reckoned with. I would be so bold as to propose that BP announce a
12-month (or more!) moratorium on layoffs so we can regain our focus.
Let's see if we can't figure out how to improve our revenues/profits
with what we've got instead of (supposedly) reducing our expenses as we
continue to jettison our most valuable resources - us.
BD�
|
4687.26 | | ACISS2::MARES | you get what you settle for | Fri Jul 12 1996 11:41 | 7 |
| re .25 "12 month moratorium on layoffs"
I agree. But it would take true leadership and proactive effort --
qualities in short supply in Digital's SLT.
Randy
|
4687.27 | only for 1st 4 weeks | MAIL1::MORENO | Frank Moreno | Fri Jul 12 1996 12:15 | 9 |
| re: .24
Due to the circumstances around Digitals dumping the Disaster Recovery
business, I can tell you what we were told - you accumulate vacation
time during the 1st 4 weeks - you're still an employee during that time
- but not for the additional weeks pay that you receive based upon
length of employment (the additional 4, 6 or 8 weeks, based on amount
of years employed).
|
4687.28 | Q1FY97 round? | ACISS2::LENNIG | Dave (N8JCX), MIG, @CYO | Tue Sep 10 1996 21:15 | 8 |
| I'm hearing rumors that there is another round impending...
Guess it shouldn't come as any surprise, given the charge at the end of
FY96 and the fact we are approaching the end of (rumored very bad) Q1.
Hopefully, they'll do it 'big' rather than in dribbles...
Dave
|
4687.29 | Hi JNOSTIN - you found it then! | TGRAPH::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Wed Sep 11 1996 10:39 | 1 |
|
|