T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4526.1 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Mr. Creosote | Thu Apr 04 1996 17:33 | 31 |
| re basenote, I don't expect my opinions to be taken too seriously since I'm
about to leave, but I'd suggest:
- stop laying off competent people, but find profitable positions for them to
participate in; get people working, the opportunities are there!
- don't lock skilled people into dead-end jobs.
- solve the problem of `too many chiefs, not enough indians'
- expenses; pay up front where possible, and where not possible, reimburse the
employee promptly.
- cash distribution; stop wasting money on pointless excercises such as the
never ending reorganisations, and stop penny pinching in areas where people
need equipment and other resources to do their job.
- stop the pay freezes and pay people what they're worth.
- scrap the bonus based `incentive schemes'; they don't pay out, and are
consquently demoralising.
- concentrate on what the company can do, and stop trying to be `trendy'.
- don't patronise the employees.
- let people get on with their jobs!
Just my thoughts,
Chris.
|
4526.2 | | MOVIES::POTTER | http://www.vmse.edo.dec.com/~potter/ | Thu Apr 04 1996 17:56 | 3 |
| Nah, it would never work!
//atp
|
4526.3 | | MARIN::WANNOOR | | Thu Apr 04 1996 20:36 | 4 |
| Eric,
A leopard does not changed its spots. I don't buy that you are
suddenly all nice and rather altruistic.
|
4526.4 | | E::EVANS | | Fri Apr 05 1996 11:15 | 4 |
| Starting a "make-nice, kissy-kissy topic" does not sound like Eric to me.
Jim
|
4526.5 | Bait. | KAOM25::WALL | DEC Is Digital | Mon Apr 08 1996 13:44 | 7 |
| re .0 "make-nice, kissy-kissy"
I think you've just shown your contempt for anyone who tries to enter a
serious reply to this string.
Rob Wall
|
4526.6 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Mon Apr 08 1996 14:39 | 5 |
| > Starting a "make-nice, kissy-kissy topic" does not sound like Eric to me.
Quick, somebody check the PGP authentication!
Atlant
|
4526.7 | LongFileNames begat LongCalendarDates??? | R2ME2::DEVRIES | Mark DeVries | Mon Apr 08 1996 17:26 | 4 |
| Sheesh - it seems like April Fool's Day is about a week long this year!
-Mark
|
4526.8 | | RUSURE::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Tue Apr 09 1996 10:37 | 16 |
| Re .3:
Who cares if I'm nice or not. Now you've got a place to post good
ideas to make Digital and employees into a team. Take it as a
challenge to the people who called my other topic divisive as a
challenge to put their money where their mouth is. If they were really
against the testing idea because it was divisive, and not for other
reason, then they will put as much energy into suggesting team-building
ideas. Let's see them.
-- edp
Public key fingerprint: 8e ad 63 61 ba 0c 26 86 32 0a 7d 28 db e7 6f 75
To find PGP, read note 2688.4 in Humane::IBMPC_Shareware.
|
4526.9 | | SPSEG::PLAISTED | UNIX does not come equipped with airbags. | Tue Apr 09 1996 11:26 | 1 |
| Ok, here's the first one: free beer.
|
4526.10 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Apr 09 1996 12:41 | 4 |
| Grahame - ok if it's Budweiser? Or were you planning to supply us from your
own stock? :-)
Steve
|
4526.11 | who's payin? | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Alpha Developer's support | Tue Apr 09 1996 14:54 | 3 |
| would I be divisive I asked for coffee?
Mark
|
4526.12 | not in some places... | TROOA::MSCHNEIDER | Digital has it NOW ... Again! | Tue Apr 09 1996 17:48 | 1 |
| Beer = Budweisser ???
|
4526.13 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Apr 09 1996 17:51 | 4 |
| I was yanking Grahame's chain - I know that he is a home-brewer. (Also,
there's a Budweiser plant a few miles from ZKO.)
Steve
|
4526.14 | | RUSURE::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Wed Apr 10 1996 09:54 | 9 |
| The suggestions in .1 are actually pretty good. I'd like to see more
along those lines.
-- edp
Public key fingerprint: 8e ad 63 61 ba 0c 26 86 32 0a 7d 28 db e7 6f 75
To find PGP, read note 2688.4 in Humane::IBMPC_Shareware.
|
4526.15 | Now back to our regularly scheduled program, already in progress... | SPSEG::PLAISTED | UNIX does not come equipped with airbags. | Wed Apr 10 1996 14:52 | 12 |
| BUD is out. In a pinch it could suffice. Prestone works in desperation.
If only there were a way to maintain or increase my current standard of living,
I would have no problem changing careers from software engineer to softdrink
engineer. I would, of course, have to learn a new vernacular. Let's see, is
that pass gas by value, reference or descriptor?
My job code changed recently from senior software engineer to engineering
supervisor. You will all please excuse me whilst I duck out and take an IQ test.
Grahame
|
4526.16 | another homebrewer | SX4GTO::OLSON | DBTC Palo Alto | Wed Apr 10 1996 20:24 | 11 |
| actually, 'free beer' could be substantially modified into 'you won't
be fired if you have a beer on premises in your office after 5pm friday
afternoon, or at any other vaguely appropriate time, as determined by
yourself, because we actually do trust you to behave appropriately.'
Silicon Valley is a heckuva place to work for Digital. One wishes
we could remove one more of what is reputed to be among our teetotaling
founders' legacy policies, and throw a beer bust like any normal firm
in the valley.
DougO
|
4526.17 | "poets!" | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Alpha Developer's support | Thu Apr 11 1996 10:02 | 4 |
| DougO, I'm surprised! :-) Isn't there a pub located real close to
the DBTC in Palo Alto?
Mark
|
4526.18 | | CALDEC::GOETZE | erik goetze; Tired: Word; Wired: BBedit | Thu Apr 11 1996 20:35 | 1 |
| at least 3, maybe 6 or more nearby depending on your definition of close.
|
4526.19 | | SX4GTO::OLSON | DBTC Palo Alto | Thu Apr 11 1996 23:26 | 6 |
| the problem, gentlebeings, is that you get sneered at if you sling open
your laptop in said establishments. On nights I'm working late, eating
fast food, it'd sure be nice if enjoying my chosen libation at my desk
wasn't a firing offense.
DougO
|
4526.20 | (hic) | SHRCTR::PJOHNSON | aut disce, aut discede | Fri Apr 12 1996 16:17 | 3 |
| Is it still? It really *is* about time for a change, methinks.
Peet
|
4526.21 | | MARIN::WANNOOR | | Fri Apr 12 1996 17:50 | 5 |
| .16 hi dougo - how're you?
I agree, we need a beer bust, which is rather civilly done
in the valley anyway. So doesn't the group go to BlueChalk
anymore?
|
4526.22 | | SX4GTO::OLSON | DBTC Palo Alto | Fri Apr 12 1996 18:40 | 4 |
| fine here, Ashikin, but they gave me a new hat to wear and its keeping
me working nights ;-). A person works up a thirst that way.
DougO
|
4526.23 | If you choose to take Eric seriously, then ... | ZPOVC::GEOFFREY | | Thu Apr 18 1996 01:21 | 82 |
| Since Eric has reiterated his call for serious suggestions about team
building, I for one will take it at face value and suggest a few:
1) Keep the "incentive pay" idea, but make it an honest incentive. Too
many managers in Digital are using it as a "bait-and-switch" tactic,
where the target is abstract, or the employee is unable to see any
feasible way of meeting the target. Or even worse, where the metrics
and conditions are calculated to virtually exclude the possibility of
actually getting paid the full amount of the incentive. I've heard it
referred to as the "Carnival game" approach, you know, the ones where
you're supposed to toss a 3-inch ring over a 4-inch pole to win the
giant stuffed panda bear, and you always get the 5 cent prize instead ...
2) Palmer said that Digital can't afford to pay people more, and then
qualified it by saying that the company must sometimes pay more, when
it must compete with other companies to retain certain skills. He did
seem to recognize that he was losing some skilled people, but perhaps
he and others at the SLT level don't realize what those losses are
doing to the day-to-day operations of the company. Does he or anyone
else have a strategic "map" of the required skillsets vs. positions
in the company, and is it accurate? I don't believe he does. In the
absence of this, it seems that every employee must do this for himself,
and communicate this to his management. The people who have survived
the layoffs the best are the ones who communicate, making sure that the
managers know what they do, and how well they do it. If you take for
granted that your manager (or their manager) is aware of your overall
performance and value to the company, then you are in trouble.
3) Give away Alphas to anyone who will write a line of application
code for it. Applications sell systems, and we are woefully short of
applications that justify the higher price of an Alpha system. We have
internal dogfights galore about the technical superiority of one chip
over another, but the first question a *customer* asks is whether or
not the software they want runs on it. I've had to answer that with a
"NO" too many times. One potential developer I talked to said he'd
rather try to get a rebate from the IRS than to try and get help from
Digital to do a port of his code. At the same time, I saw piles of
workstations sitting unused in other Digital facilities, locked up in
cost center or cross-charge battles, or some such nonsense.
4) Everybody else says it, and I'll say it, too: Digital is a difficult
company to buy something from. We can't quote it right, we can't sell
it through this channel, we can't deliver it on time, we can't send the
right invoice to the right person, and we can't find the paperwork to
honor the warranty or service contract after the fact. Change this, or
the company will strangle in its own red tape. As long as we have 15
different order numbers at 15 different prices that refer to the same
physical part, we deserve to get kicked in the butt by HP, Compaq, etc.
5) Remember one of the qualities that got us to the top: service. We
still have something of a reputation left for service, but it may start
fading fast, especially with the ongoing MCS layoffs and deconstruction
of the SI organization. The one thing to our benefit is that all of our
competitors are getting even worse press about service levels than we
are. I see customers waking up to the true costs and benefits of full
service at the desktop and department levels, and that buying cut-rate
hardware with no service isn't such a great deal after all. We need to
truly fulfill all of our existing committments to quality service, and
develop some leading-edge marketing for new service offerings. But it
will take a major blow to the heads of certain product groups to get
them quit with the proprietary Digital-only approach. Our alliance with
Microsoft is a good start, but we need similar alliances with network
tool vendors, database vendors, and strategic applications vendors. Our
people should walk into an account armed with the latest and jazziest
tools, no matter who developed them. We should put as much effort into
developing service processes as we do into engineering processes. And
we should be able to go head-to-head with anyone (including the Big 6)
in our target areas of expertise.
We've always positioned ourselves as a "solutions" company, but that
concept seems to be going out of vogue with many customers. To me, the
main opportunity is to be the "execution" company, who can relied on to
execute the solution right the first time. Andersen, EDS, D&T, et al.,
are all considered solutions companies too, but all are starting to
show weak spots when it comes to actually doing a quality job. I don't
know if Digital has the management wherewithal to do a better job than
the others, but it's the only window of opportunity I see ...
Anyway, if you've read this far down the note, then I will reward you
for your perserverance with this: That's all for now ...
Geoff
|