T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4411.1 | Not perm. surley ? | MARVEL::MCGAUGHRIN | | Thu Feb 08 1996 11:03 | 8 |
|
My understanding was that MCS were targeting contractors/temps/etc and
not permanent employees. Basically, the gist of it was all employees
of this nature would have their current contracts reviewed and their
Management Team would have to justify their next extension.
|
4411.2 | who knows? | CSLALL::GKOPPS | | Thu Feb 08 1996 11:19 | 2 |
| We have been told that some percentage of permanent employees will be
included in the process.
|
4411.3 | | MAIL1::CRANE | | Thu Feb 08 1996 12:29 | 5 |
| .2
Yep, I heard we (I) will know on Feb. 19th. They said temps first but I
don`t think we have any here in KYO Admin. There will be permanent
employees effected but know idea how many. 9% seems high but not out of
the question.
|
4411.4 | New Motto, "Profit Before People" | SYOMV::FOLEY | Instant Gratification Takes Too Long. | Thu Feb 08 1996 17:50 | 25 |
|
re: .-1 I agree on knowing by the 19th, although we were given no firm
date, "in a couple of weeks" was the term used. A real morale booster
there, let everyone stew *again* for a couple of weeks, wondering who
is gonna get it, and when. What do you think customers will think about
the firings *this* time? I really fail to see the point in deleting
your Service Engineers when you are supposed to live up to real-time
contractual obligations, Hell we can't cover what we have now, never
mind do it with LESS.
I suspect that the temps we have left are CRR's and admin types from
what I've heard, but in Upstate-Connecticut they killed off the temps a
while ago, so I have to believe that so-called "permanent" employees
will be targeted now. Isn't "permanent employee" now considered an
oxymoron at digital these days?
My understanding of all this is that the indians are to be killed to
make up for gross mis-forecasting by some bean-counters in the amount of
profit/revenue in the "Productivity Services" area. That was the only
area significantly off in profit/revenue. It's not like we actually
LOST money, what was that about "the best quarter" I just read the
other day? Oh Well...
.mike.
|
4411.5 | I know already... | ACISS1::CORSON | Higher, and a bit more to the right | Thu Feb 08 1996 20:04 | 13 |
|
Number I heard was 4% of the US workforce (maybe that is where the
4% in your pension is coming from?) before 1 Apr 96. MCS and the ABU
I believe are first. SBU, etc. rolling thru during March.
Personally, I am getting whacked Monday. I'm relieved. Enough is
enough. The long and short for this cowboy is real simple, I don't
believe these guys anymore.
Not going to rant and rave. It has been a real slice. Will put all
my "official" thoughts in the Goodbye Note when the time comes.
the Greyhawk
|
4411.6 | SI in Canada... | CGOOA::BARNABE | Guy Barnabe - Digital Canada | Thu Feb 08 1996 22:29 | 6 |
| Well, the same goes for SI in Canada. Major blood letting... not
sure of the numbers yet. Many good friends...
-- sadenned,
Guy
|
4411.7 | | TROOA::SOLEY | Fall down, go boom | Thu Feb 08 1996 23:17 | 13 |
| We were told today, SI in Canada goes from 110 to 80. It was not clear
from the double talk if the 80 figure has been reached already or if
there are still more to come.
We're locked in a death spiral, we can't make the margins the company
needs on the skills we have, so we shed people instead of reskilling.
At the end of the day in SI what you sell is people so as staffing goes
down less get's sold, we have plans to hire more when the business
picks up but customers won't pay premium price for new hires off the
street they want names and resumes and experience, so we have to lure
skilled people away from the competition at top dollar and even at our
premium price we can't make the margins the company needs...
|
4411.8 | Not Greyhawk? | CHEFS::RICKETTSK | Rebelwithoutapause | Fri Feb 09 1996 10:31 | 5 |
| Do I read .5 aright? We're losing Greyhawk? If so then there's still
something seriously wrong with this company, profits and a soaring
share price notwithstanding.
Ken
|
4411.9 | Best of luck Greyhawk! | NETCAD::GENOVA | | Fri Feb 09 1996 11:00 | 8 |
|
Best of luck Greyhawk, I think we (Digital) are making a big mistake!
But I know you'll land on your feet running!
All the best, I've enjoyed reading your informative strings.
/art
|
4411.10 | | MAIL2::CRANE | | Fri Feb 09 1996 12:28 | 1 |
| Good luck Grayhawk. I`m waiting to find out for myself.
|
4411.11 | | ACISS1::CORSON | Higher, and a bit more to the right | Fri Feb 09 1996 15:03 | 6 |
|
I've gotten dozens of messages. Thanks all. Watch this file for
my goodbye open letter. It's gonna be fun. But all things considered,
I'd rather be in Philadelpha...
the Greyhawk
|
4411.12 | | GRANPA::MWALLA | ARaggedyAnnPersonInABarbieDollWorld | Fri Feb 09 1996 16:18 | 8 |
|
Re: I'd rather be in Philadelphia...
I don't think so! We're gonna get hit hard here on the 19th
as well..."significantly," to quote our manager.
---Mar()
|
4411.13 | looks like we're headed north, too %*( | MIMS::PICKETT_K | | Fri Feb 09 1996 18:02 | 8 |
| re: last,
Good luck Mar()!
Hope you come thru this ok.
Kim (cook island pen pal)
|
4411.14 | Why MCS??? | ZUR01::SUTTER | Who are you ??? - I'm BATMAN !!! | Fri Feb 09 1996 18:19 | 20 |
| Just coming back from an MCS Change Forum day, I'm surprised to see
this type of news coming back up again. -- How will be doing the
additional Compaq deal? -- And how will we be able to digest
the 'Paradigm Shift' we are supposed to go through with this
uncertainty poping up again? -- How are we meant to go to a much harder
'solution provider' attitude from the cozy high-margin insurance type
of remedial work that is deteriorating? -- John: this needs a lot of
high-skilled and high-motivated workforce to succeed !!
Can't understand it, if it's really true..
Heard that MCS was making about 400M$ out of the 160+M$ that DEC was
reporting for this quarter(!), so slaughtering the cash-cow is one way
to commit suicide ..
:-(
Regards,
Arnold
|
4411.15 | | INDYX::ram | Ram Rao, SPARCosaurus hunter | Fri Feb 09 1996 20:48 | 3 |
| Why MCS? Just look at the last two quarterly reports from a bean counters
perspective. MCS revenues are flat, with margins declining. This is a
serious problem that needs to be addressed.
|
4411.16 | | ACISS2::FULTON | Other Vehicle = Federation Starship | Fri Feb 09 1996 23:29 | 1 |
| If you get rid of all the rowers, the ship won't go...
|
4411.18 | You cannot shrink to Greatness | VNABRW::UHL | let all my pushes be popped | Sat Feb 10 1996 13:40 | 11 |
| sorry to see this happening...
all the best to Greyhawk....
"No company ever shrank to greatness"
Grow To Be Great - Breaking the Downsizing Cycle
by Dwigth L. Gertz & Joao P.A. Baptista
The Free Press
ISBN 0-02-874047-5
will we be the first? ;-)
|
4411.19 | ... medicine too early? ... | EVER::CIUFFINI | God must be a Gemini... | Sun Feb 11 1996 12:56 | 15 |
|
Re: -1
Sure, we will be great at shrinking!
But seriously folks, how is it that a multi-billion dollar company
does not have the s-t-r-e-t-c-h ( ie. flexibility ) to swing with a
quarter of missed (artificial) targets planned (probably) by the
very people who are not overseeing the downsizing?
Seems rather odd considering all the positive press I just read in
Digital Today (Americas) or whatever the current publication is called.
jc
|
4411.20 | Even the customers are concerned | EEMELI::SYVANEN | Tero Syv�nen MCS @FNO 879-4567 | Sun Feb 11 1996 15:43 | 11 |
|
A comment from a concerned customer :
"You should raise the service fees and get more people, so we could
trust you ..."
What are we doing ?
Tero
|
4411.21 | big smoke screen | WETONE::LICATA | Mark @548-6455 | Mon Feb 12 1996 01:36 | 11 |
|
Its all quite simple. We use various excuses to LAY OFF employees
that are well compensated, read "old timers". At the same time business
is unfolding and requiring us to re-hire, weeks/months later, at cheaper
wages. Hence mission accomplished, HR has righted the wages of field
engineers which has been troubling them for some time.
Watch closely how many "new" field persons are hired before this time
next year.
Mark
|
4411.22 | IS ANYONE LISTENING?? | ACISS2::CHRISMAN | | Mon Feb 12 1996 09:40 | 32 |
|
You are hitting it right on the head Mark!! The field is still making
more money than any other part of Digital. It has been knocked down, left
with far less manpower then what it already takes to maintain our
current customers. JOHN RANDO AND BOB PALMER please listen you still
have some of the best in class people working their tails , brains, and
and literally their lifes for you guys. You have given us no modern
tools, hardly any training, held layoffs over our heads for over five
years. We've had every number a statistics major from MIT could think
up thrown in our face. We rowing as hard as we can!!!
The Change Forums have been conveying the messages to reunite with the
vision of our Senior Leadership Team, we are trying as hard as we can to
work with you. THIS IS A PLEA BY THE WAY!!!!! We are setting forth the
very core values that Digtial have asked us too, Why does that not go
for the senior management team? We are only asking for some trust and
to be treated as part of our own company.
Hey Mark, remember working those long nights at MCI?? I'm still at MCI
and really loving it. They are continually on the move nothing but
positive growth and positive attitudes. Wouldn't I love to see Digital
that way again.
Give us the tools and training and we can build MCS into the Global Leader
that we profess to be. Don't ruin the a powerful and profitable part
of Digital by looking at a few quarters of numbers!! You need to invest in
us!!! We are assets to this company not expenses. Plus what is most
important to me just treat us as intelligent individuals that have
something to contribute.
Chris C
|
4411.23 | Can't get to current TFSO Policy | GRANPA::GHALSTEAD | | Mon Feb 12 1996 10:31 | 3 |
| Where is the latest TFSO policy ? In VTX you only get the table of
contents. When you request E-mail softcopy all you get is table of
contents.
|
4411.24 | Last of the Loss Reserves | GRANPA::LSEARS | | Mon Feb 12 1996 10:56 | 6 |
| What I've heard is that this is the last time the company can use the
loss reserves for TFSO packages, so many organizations are trying to
take advantage of this "last opportunity" to reduce their workforce. It
is happening not only in MCS but in SI and ABU Sales Organization.
|
4411.25 | 1+1=...er... | RDGENG::WILLIAMS_A | | Mon Feb 12 1996 11:27 | 25 |
| re .15,
MCS revenues flat, with Margin declining...
I'd be happier with revenue declining, but margins flat. Don't laugh -
some of the 'new' services lines (eg S/W utility) bring in large
revenue streams but at signif low margin. When aggregated up, the bean
counter gets confused - aka margins declining in total, whilt revenues
flat. Can we report MCS money 2 ways please:
'Old MCS' (broken, so I'll fix it for you). Revenue, Margin.
'New MCS' (newer services, low margin) Revenue, Margin.
Don't believe me ? Run the figures on a large S/W Utility or PC Utility
deal... The Sad thing is these *may* be great service lines to get
into, as long as we *understand* how the money gets added up, and what
it actually means once it has been.
AW
|
4411.26 | 2+2=3.5? | SWAM1::GOLDMAN_MA | Oy To the World! | Mon Feb 12 1996 12:16 | 36 |
| re: -1 and -2 (I think)...
You both hit that nail right on the head. MCS revenues being flat
*is* a good thing. Thousands of older (cash cow-type) machines are
being replaced by Alphas. Your average 6xxx machine BMC's (Basic
Maint. Charge) is about $584+ for just the system, your average
Alpha 2100 is about $223. If revenue is flat, we're actually increasing
our customer base and the number/type of services we are selling to
each customer. And yes, the two big revenue services we are pushing
these days (PC Utility and SW Utility) are very low margin. I would
not be surprised, either, based upon the differences in reliability, etc.,
if the margin on break/fix for an Alpha is a lot lower than on a VAX.
And we *will* make another cut, then find ourselves re-hiring in 4-6
months, this time at a lower wage for a different skill set (desktop
and networking, etc., instead of VAXes and other large servers).
Reducing MCS headcount again is about the worst mistake I've heard yet.
This rivals the post-it note ban a few years ago for poor logic. What
we need is to re-skill and re-deploy the people we have, give them the
tools they need to do their jobs, and then bring on a few fresh faces
for the desktop markets, etc., to boot.
But it's easier to lay people off and make that bottom line look really
good for a quarter or two, then re-hire the same folks as temps or hire
younger people at a lower wage. Why invest in people? It's only what
made Digital great in the first place and has made MCS the strongest
part of this company for all the bad years. Remember a short 5
quarters ago when MCS was part of a select group of Digital businesses
making any money, and was shoring up the poor profits/revenue from
hardware sales, etc.?
Sigh. Life goes on in its inexorably idiotic way. Murphy's Law that
we'd get another layoff just when everyone was starting to feel pretty
good about working here again.
M.
|
4411.27 | | IROCZ::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Mon Feb 12 1996 17:45 | 4 |
| > What I've heard is that this is the last time the company can use the
> loss reserves for TFSO packages,
Why?
|
4411.28 | Having fun tonight... | ACISS1::CORSON | Higher, and a bit more to the right | Mon Feb 12 1996 21:36 | 9 |
|
'Cause I'm taking it all...
Sheez, ask a dumb;-) question.
the Greyhawk
|
4411.29 | There are 250+ leaders! | GRANPA::SFAIRCLOTH | | Wed Feb 14 1996 17:43 | 4 |
| I think NBC NEWS referred to 'corporate anorexia'. I can relate. The
person(s) remaining will cover not just 4-5 vacant positions, but 6-7.
And, we've got to pay the leaders' salaries!
|
4411.30 | Global or what?? | KERNEL::TALBOT | Trevor Talbot | Thu Feb 15 1996 04:54 | 18 |
| Hi,
I have 2 questions for you:
1) Are these MCS layoffs global or just in the U.S? I've not heard a whisper so
far about this in the U.K.
and
2) Is this the bad news that caused our stock to drop by 4 dollars in 1 day??
regards,
Trev
p.s. I wish the best of luck to those being capped!
|
4411.31 | | MAIL1::CRANE | | Thu Feb 15 1996 06:49 | 5 |
| .30
Just in the U.S.
It COULD have sent the stocks down but I still think it was the
announcement of grawhawk that sent it down.
|
4411.32 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Thu Feb 15 1996 10:52 | 5 |
|
It was the Cirrus Logic maybe not going through with the
wedding with Digital Semiconductor. Stay tuned...
|
4411.33 | HP following Digital stock?! | TRUCKS::WINWOOD | golden bridge is just around the bend | Fri Feb 16 1996 04:57 | 5 |
| If that's so then the fact of HP stock also shedding a couple of $
is due to 'contamination' from our fall? If so, then that's a nice
twist on the usual way of things!
Calvin
|
4411.34 | | GLRMAI::WILKES | | Fri Feb 16 1996 14:00 | 1 |
| HP is up more than 7 today on better than expected earnings
|
4411.35 | | GRANPA::MWANNEMACHER | going, going, gone | Mon Feb 19 1996 10:37 | 6 |
|
Well, I am a casualty of the latest round. Was a big one here in the
COP BASE unit, around 20%.
Mike
|
4411.36 | | MAIL1::CRANE | | Mon Feb 19 1996 11:08 | 2 |
| I also got it Mike. Not so big here but I am a victim never the less.
Who is to say its all that bad? Good luck Mike.
|
4411.37 | Chop, Chop, Chop, Chop. | SWAM1::GOLDMAN_MA | Oy To the World! | Tue Feb 20 1996 17:57 | 17 |
| Exactly half of my counterparts in the US were hit Monday. We are a
very small group anyway, only 8 people to begin with. I expected
perhaps 2 people to "get it", because revenue in our product is in a
serious and unavoidable decline, but not four!?! Yeesh. What a shock.
And what a combination of guilt and relief to still be here when others
equally well qualified and experienced are not.
Deep, depressed sigh.
Sign me --
Home alone and lonely,
M.
|
4411.38 | Makes you wonder.... | BSS::R_LOGAN | | Wed Feb 21 1996 15:54 | 11 |
| ...and how many other very talented people will we continue
to lose who voluntarily leave due to continued layoffs and
a new found decline in moral??
I'm already seeing this happen, people not in jeopardy looking
harder at other opportunities.
What a shame, Digital has been able to replace these employees
with folks with similar technical skills; however, the people
skills and Digital specific knowledge for the most part are not
present.
|
4411.39 | Where is the official word? | FSAEUR::ROE | | Thu Feb 22 1996 03:56 | 2 |
| Has anyone seen an official internal or external press release, notice,
memo or spin etc. on these layoffs?
|
4411.40 | | TINCUP::KOLBE | Wicked Wench of the Web | Thu Feb 22 1996 13:22 | 5 |
| I would imagine that upper management feels no need for a 'spin'
on this. This is the way it works now. People get laid off when-
ever the business decides they aren't needed. Then if conditions
change they are replaced by contractors. The variable workforce has
become our reality. liesl
|
4411.41 | Here we go again, again. | SYOMV::FOLEY | Instant Gratification Takes Too Long. | Thu Mar 14 1996 19:00 | 9 |
| And so it goes..To quote a well-known radio commentator -
"And now, Page 2."
Word on the street is now that MCS Worldwide will get whacked beginning
in Q4. I'd hope it's just an ugly rumor, but given past history, I
believe it.
.mike.
|
4411.43 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Fri Mar 15 1996 15:15 | 3 |
| According to CNBC this morning, the new politically-correct term in
U.S. businesses is now "dehiring". The terms "layoff", "rightsizing",
and "downsizing" are now passe. k
|
4411.44 | | NETCAD::SHERMAN | Steve NETCAD::Sherman DTN 226-6992, LKG2-A/R05 pole AA2 | Fri Mar 15 1996 15:25 | 4 |
| Hmmm. So, the difference between "dehiring" a marriage and annulling a
marriage is that ... oh, never mind ... ;^)
Steve
|
4411.45 | | FUNYET::ANDERSON | OpenVMS Ambassador | Fri Mar 15 1996 15:44 | 3 |
| So if someone swears in a note, the moderators will dewrite it? Doubleplusgood.
Paul
|
4411.46 | I usually do... | SMURF::PBECK | Rob Peter and pay *me*... | Fri Mar 15 1996 16:15 | 1 |
| You don't get off a bus, you deride it?
|
4411.47 | | SWAM1::BALDWIN_LE | Leon Baldwin | Fri Mar 15 1996 16:17 | 2 |
|
You don't logout, you delogon?
|
4411.48 | | BSS::BRUNO | The guy mom warned you about | Fri Mar 15 1996 16:22 | 3 |
|
I was exiled from Japan. Does that mean that I am disoriented?
|
4411.49 | | WMOIS::CONNELL | Story does that to us. | Fri Mar 15 1996 16:45 | 5 |
| Does this mean denial is more then a river?
Bright Blessings,
PJ
|
4411.50 | | SPECXN::WITHERS | Bob Withers | Fri Mar 15 1996 16:51 | 1 |
| When I go to the aeorport, I get on and off deplane.
|
4411.51 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Don't like my p_n? 1-800-328-7448 | Fri Mar 15 1996 18:09 | 3 |
|
After the beachfront fantasy, I land?
|
4411.52 | | CSC32::D_RODRIGUEZ | Midnight Falcon ... | Sat Mar 16 1996 00:12 | 4 |
| If I left Des Moines, did I des Des Moines? If I did, doesn't it mean
I left and came back?
Better yet, would it still be Des Moines if I never left?
|
4411.53 | deranged | HGOVC::JOELBERMAN | | Sun Mar 17 1996 21:23 | 13 |
| And if I change a database from normal form did I denormalize it?
And if I use non-normalized no-zero numbers in machine form (whew), am
I using denormals?
And if I lower the pitch of my guitar do I detune it?
And if I go down the stairs do I descend?
And if I ask someone about a briefing they gave, do I debrief them?
And if I reply to notes like this am I deranged?
|
4411.54 | New speak again - Unhire | GVAADG::PERINO | Jo�l PERINO @GEO (821)4085 | Mon Mar 18 1996 10:47 | 5 |
| I find this dehire rather ungood, unagreable and even unappropriate
I would prefer unhire. At least it starts like unemployment.
Joel
|
4411.56 | | LEXSS1::GINGER | Ron Ginger | Mon Mar 18 1996 14:34 | 1 |
| this topic is degenerating rapidly
|
4411.57 | Back to the subject.... | MSDOA::SCRIVEN | | Mon Mar 18 1996 16:13 | 10 |
| Now... to get back to the topic....
I've heard this rumor with some "other" stuff attached; like, it's not
only MCS, it's ALL OVER THE COMPANY; that Bob Palmer's forecast was
$50M off so he's got to make it somehow....
Any other info.....?
Toodles.....JPs (I'm MCS and a tad nervous)
|
4411.58 | a little math | SAYER::ELMORE | through the looking glass | Mon Mar 18 1996 16:56 | 11 |
| Let's see, to make things easy:
$50M / ~$100K (gross cost of employee w benefits, space...etc.)
That's a 500 person downsize.
$50M / ~$50K ... double that to 1000 person downsize.
--Steve
|
4411.59 | | VMSSG::FRIEDRICHS | Ask me about Young Eagles | Mon Mar 18 1996 17:12 | 7 |
| I kind of liked the term that one of the news magazines gave it..
"Corporate Bulimia"
Cheers,
jeff
|
4411.60 | more than a rumor | SPEZKO::WARNER | | Mon Mar 18 1996 17:52 | 19 |
|
>> Let's see, to make things easy:
>> $50M / ~$100K (gross cost of employee w benefits, space...etc.)
>> That's a 500 person downsize.
>> $50M / ~$50K ... double that to 1000 person downsize.
Depends upon in what timeframe. In my (former) organization it was
$1.8m before the end of the fiscal year - essentially a quarter. If
for Digital it is $50M before the end of Q4 make that $50m/ ~$25k per quarter
and about 2000 people. I think that MCS will come close to that number all
by itself when all is said and done.
I've heard the April 1st MCS layoff rumor from enough reputable sources
for me to take it as fact. My group was cut last week... Guess we
are back in the cycle.
Anne.
(still in Digital, no longer in MCS)
|
4411.61 | | SWAM1::GOLDMAN_MA | I'm getting verklempt! | Tue Mar 19 1996 13:15 | 22 |
| I've heard the rumor from two different sources. Heard that whole
groups (ones we consider pretty essential) are going away, others will
be shrunk to almost nil and absorbed into different groups.
Heard that MCS New Biz and MCS Base will re-join at the hip, and become
rather like what used to be called ASG. Since MCS New Biz and Base are
the result of a reorg, does that mean they are going to be deorganized?
-:) Sounds that way to me.
Since my function was cut from 8 nationwide to 4 nationwide a mere 4
weeks ago today, I have high hopes that no further cuts will occur
until they decide not to offer my product anymore or something. Of
course, if they lay off any more engineers, they might just as well do
away with my service, because there isn't anyone out there to deliver
it!
Cheers,
M.
M.
|
4411.62 | quasi downsizing in SHR | PASTA::MENNE | | Tue Mar 19 1996 14:55 | 5 |
| I heard that 50 out of 125 in SHR got the word, 3 weeks to find a
job or out the door. I also heard that 12 already got new jobs
in Digital. Sounds like they just want to move people around or
at least keep the managers around. The Good ol Boy network is
probably alive and well.
|
4411.63 | Whate The package | SUBPAC::BACZKO | Now, for some fishin' | Tue Mar 19 1996 15:10 | 3 |
| What's The Package?? How many weeks?
Les
|
4411.64 | The package is ----- | ICS::TOOMEY | | Thu Mar 21 1996 12:24 | 5 |
|
RE: .60
The package is 8 weeks.
|
4411.65 | huh? | STOWOA::RYAN_J | | Thu Mar 21 1996 13:40 | 5 |
| Re: .64
I had heard no package, only four weeks notice.
JR
|
4411.66 | What about other benefits? | SHRCTR::LBURGOS | | Thu Mar 21 1996 14:57 | 2 |
| I heard 12 weeks. Does anybody have an idea on how medical benefits
are terminated?
|
4411.67 | | SPECXN::WITHERS | Bob Withers | Thu Mar 21 1996 15:30 | 12 |
| I think "desire" comes first in this case 8-)
>================================================================================
>Note 4411.55 MCS Layoffs <again> 55 of 64
>NEMAIL::KENT 3 lines 18-MAR-1996 10:55
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -< Ceipt? >-
>
> What's the significance then of sire and desire?
>
> Peter
>
|
4411.68 | | MKOTS3::FLATHERS | | Thu Mar 21 1996 16:44 | 3 |
| the new 'package' is a well guarded secret !
|
4411.69 | | FABSIX::J_RILEY | The older I get,the better I was. | Thu Mar 21 1996 20:36 | 4 |
|
I heard 12 weeks maximum with no lump sum at the end. Ask
somebody with 10, 15 or 20 years of service what they think of the
package and see what answer you get.
|
4411.70 | same as before | NCMAIL::JAMESS | | Fri Mar 22 1996 08:51 | 7 |
| I heard same as last time, 4 weeks continuous pay plus
0-6 years 4 weeks lump sum
6-15 years 6 weeks lump sum
15 + years 8 weeks lump sum
Steve J.
|
4411.71 | lump sums - discontinued? | STOWOA::RYAN_J | | Fri Mar 22 1996 09:18 | 4 |
| I thought lump sums were discontinued - If this part is true, you would
just contine to receive weekly checks for that time period.
JR
|
4411.72 | I can't tell you..... | SHRCTR::LBURGOS | | Fri Mar 22 1996 09:29 | 7 |
| I'm one of those 20 year people, but I don't believe I can tell
you here what I think!
Any ideas on how medical coverage goes? Does it go for the 12 (or
whatever) weeks?
Louie
|
4411.73 | Minimum benefits, then COBRA | NEMAIL::HANLY | | Fri Mar 22 1996 12:34 | 18 |
| Louie,
I hope all is well. As far as I know, you only get full benefits for
the length of your package, e.g. if you 12 weeks pay, you get 12 weeks
of benefits. Thereafter, you are on your own. They do let you sign up
on COBRA, which does give you a discount on the normal rates for up to
a year. If your health plan accepts COBRA, all stays as before except
your weekly payment is higher because you are no longer subsidised by
DEC. Check with your Human Resources Representative (if you can find
one) for the details.
There are lots of rumours on lay-offs here in LEX, and none of them are
good.
Best of luck,
Ken Hanly DTN 238-4656
|
4411.74 | | PADC::KOLLING | Karen | Fri Mar 22 1996 13:07 | 2 |
| I thought COBRA coverage was 18 months, not 12 months...
|
4411.75 | | SUPER::GOODMAN | | Mon Mar 25 1996 09:04 | 7 |
| If your company provides medical insurance they are required to provide
you with COBRA as long as you pay the monthly bill. COBRA is available
for 18 months and is provided to you at the company group rate. You
must contact the company and request coverage. You no longer get the
company subsidy.
Robin
|
4411.76 | Some Numbers | DABEAN::SCOBLICK | | Tue Mar 26 1996 03:34 | 18 |
|
Expect to pay over $1000/mo for coverage under COBRA. The formula is:
1.02 * (What you now pay + What DEC now pays)
e.g. Plan B, married, no kids = $1100
e.g. Plan B, married, three kids = $1300
rgds,
Frank
|
4411.77 | | PATE::SCHIAVONE | Are you ready.... | Tue Mar 26 1996 07:59 | 12 |
| >> Expect to pay over $1000/mo for coverage under COBRA. The formula is:
>> 1.02 * (What you now pay + What DEC now pays)
>> e.g. Plan B, married, no kids = $1100
>> e.g. Plan B, married, three kids = $1300
Funny, my girlfriend's COBRA for her full coverage HMO was $60.00/wk
That's a lot less than these numbers...maybe single has a lot to do
with it???
|
4411.78 | Don't depend on COBRA | EXCENT::MCCRAW | | Tue Mar 26 1996 08:27 | 11 |
|
You should secure private insurance ASAP and not depend on COBRA. Remember
COBRA is just a bridge that you want to cross ASAP. COBRA is only for
12 - 18 months. If you contract an extended illness during the COBRA
coverage period your in big trouble since COBRA has a fixed time frame.
When it's over it's over! And try getting insurance when your ill.
My advice is start shopping the minute you walk out the door of your
current employer and use COBRA for what it was designed for.
Pete
|
4411.79 | Lots of blood in Dallas | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Tue Apr 02 1996 09:46 | 8 |
| Well, approximately 30 people in MCS here in Dallas got it yesterday.
I'm the only one left out of a group of 3 contractors and 3 employees,
with instructions to shutdown our project, finish getting my
Microsquish certification and find a new job within Digital.
Bob
|
4411.80 | | SCASS1::BERNAL | We all smile at 5:00 pm | Tue Apr 02 1996 10:28 | 1 |
| 2 more in San Antonio ,
|
4411.81 | 40% | GRANPA::GHALSTEAD | | Tue Apr 02 1996 12:22 | 1 |
| 4 out of 10 in the VA, NC geography
|
4411.83 | | MAIL1::RICCIARDI | Be a graceful Parvenu... | Tue Apr 02 1996 13:25 | 8 |
| blood, blood, more blood....
Twice I heard in June again.....
Once that this was sooo deep this time, that it would be at least 9
months before we shed more....
|
4411.84 | | SPEZKO::FRASER | Mobius Loop; see other side | Tue Apr 02 1996 14:47 | 6 |
|
Wholesale in MKO, ZKO and Stow from what I'm hearing.
Andy (hit a few minutes ago - bye folks)
|
4411.85 | My guess is four | SWAM1::STERN_TO | Tom Stern -- Have TK, will travel! | Tue Apr 02 1996 16:11 | 2 |
| Anyone want to start a pool to see how many new Vice Presidents this
will be followed by?
|
4411.86 | 45000-50000 Is this the Target?? | SUBPAC::BACZKO | Now, for some fishin' | Wed Apr 03 1996 13:25 | 5 |
| I have heard that the new target number is in the mid to high 40's.
Sounds like the recent hiring spree seen by many areas is taking it's
toll on the bottom line.
|
4411.87 | | ICS::TOOMEY | | Wed Apr 10 1996 12:05 | 8 |
|
I've been following this note for several weeks on and off. Replies
were hot & heavy. Now replies are practically non-existent.
I wonder why ?? Any feedback ???
|
4411.88 | | WREATH::SNIDER | Because that's the way it IS! | Wed Apr 10 1996 12:20 | 2 |
| The last one out did indeed turn out the lights.
|
4411.89 | channel conflict elimination? | ASABET::SILVERBERG | My Other O/S is UNIX | Wed Apr 10 1996 12:26 | 8 |
| Speculative article in a recent Computer Reseller News, based on
COMPAQ service problems with Digital MCS Channel conflicts, that
Digital is 1). eliminating channel conflict by reducing headcount,
2) getting out of the MCS business and turning it over to indirect
channels providers to increase customer and partner satisfaction.
Mark
|
4411.90 | Been there, seen that | MR2SRV::guinep.mro.dec.com::wwillis | MCS Rapid Prototyping & Offer Creation | Wed Apr 10 1996 14:05 | 10 |
| > I've been following this note for several weeks on and off. Replies
> were hot & heavy. Now replies are practically non-existent.
>
> I wonder why ?? Any feedback ???
In my relatively short time here, I have noticed that when the axes
start swinging, people usually keep their heads out of sight....
C'Ya,
Wayne
|
4411.91 | | SPEZKO::FRASER | Mobius Loop; see other side | Wed Apr 10 1996 14:28 | 10 |
| Feedback - thanks to the current round of layoffs, many of us are
out of here as of Friday. There's more to life than Notes! :*)
All the best to those who are left - I wish you all well and
successful, especially in MCS which has some excellent people and
some indifferent management.
Good luck folks - I'll miss you!
Andy ["[email protected]"]
|
4411.92 | throwing it away | CSC32::R_NICKLES | | Wed Apr 10 1996 16:04 | 5 |
| Yesterday, I found brand new Digital computer equipment still in the
packaging in the TRASH - and promptly brought the items to security. I
wonder if layoffs are the only real way of saving money or if we are
just throwing it away in other ways.
|
4411.93 | sounds like one of the known scams | maze.zko.dec.com::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Wed Apr 10 1996 16:50 | 7 |
| re: .92
People have successfully stolen things this way. Someone on the inside
throws likely-looking stuff in the trash, and someone on the outside
retrieves it.
Ray
|
4411.94 | Well-known to the Villians, Thieves, and Scoundrels Union | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Wed Apr 10 1996 17:21 | 8 |
| This is also a ploy sometimes used for international smuggling.
Discard the object on the airplane and the cleaners-working-
with-the-smugglers fetch it.
In America, all trash from international arrivals is supposed
to be incinerated by a bonded trash hauler, I think.
Atlant
|
4411.95 | | ABACUS::MCCRACKEN | | Wed Apr 10 1996 17:53 | 5 |
| I wondered about this....when leaving one evening I noticed a
man in front of me wearing a large backpack. By the way
he was walking it was obvious filled with "something" rather
heavy. Did security "notice/question/inquire"? No! I found
this very interesting/troublesome to think about.
|
4411.96 | | CSC32::R_NICKLES | | Wed Apr 10 1996 17:58 | 5 |
| Anyway, how do you go about avoiding a cut? I am very thankful to
still be here. I am the only contractor in VMS still here. So I am
quite fortunate, and I know that contractors are the first to go...
|
4411.97 | | STOWOA::tavo.ogo.dec.com::ODIAZ | Octavio Diaz | Wed Apr 10 1996 18:56 | 35 |
| RE:
<<< HUMANE::DISK$SCSI:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DIGITAL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< The Digital way of working >-
===============================================================================,
Note: 4411.89 MCS Layoffs <again> 89 of 96
ASABET::SILVERBERG "My Other O/S is UNIX" 8 lines 10-APR-1996 11:26
-< channel conflict elimination? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speculative article in a recent Computer Reseller News, based on
COMPAQ service problems with Digital MCS Channel conflicts, that
Digital is 1). eliminating channel conflict by reducing headcount,
2) getting out of the MCS business and turning it over to indirect
channels providers to increase customer and partner satisfaction.
Mark
Unfortunately, almost nothing of what CRN printed is true. Thsi morning at the MCS
HQ Change Forum, Rando pointed to this CRN article and show very openly his
indignation. He plans to do something about it. I haven't read the article, but
Rando mentioned that it reads that we are cutting about 20%!!! That would translate
in several thousand people. My understanding is that there were about 500 people.
BTW, headcount reduction was caused by being way off the expense goals. And as far
as channels are concerned, it is much more efficient to sell services at point of
sale. If we sell more systems through channels, it is just obvious that we need to
sell our services through channels. MCS have several programs, both sell-through and
sell-to partners, but in no way conflict with our goals. And as far as I know, and I
am just a single contributor, but Rando is very open about it, Digital has no
intentions of either selling MCS or turning the business completely to our partners.
O. Diaz
SW Support Offers Manager
MCS Availability Services
|
4411.98 | | TINCUP::KOLBE | Wicked Wench of the Web | Wed Apr 10 1996 19:10 | 5 |
|
>BTW, headcount reduction was caused by being way off the expense goals.
This is what we have been hearing. However, I want to know why the people
who MADE the bad estimate are not being fired? liesl
|
4411.99 | | USAT02::HALLR | God loves even you! | Wed Apr 10 1996 23:10 | 2 |
| I know for a fact that MCS does compete directly with Digital's
business partners.
|
4411.100 | | SPECXN::WITHERS | Bob Withers | Wed Apr 10 1996 23:33 | 6 |
| >BTW, headcount reduction was caused by being way off the expense goals.
One of our needless expenses is, in my opinion, the execution of these Change
Forums. Perhaps, if we had cut these instead, more people would be around.
BobW
|
4411.101 | | STOWOA::tavo.ogo.dec.com::ODIAZ | Octavio Diaz | Thu Apr 11 1996 14:38 | 21 |
| RE: .100
There are many things that from a different point of view I could say we can do without,
but I was impressed when I joined MCS in 94 to see the Change Forum program. It showed
me that there is (or tries to be) a "group", and that the group had a vision, which not
too many groups at the time had. I have benefited from all the information sharing and
learnings I got from the many Change Forums I have attended, but most of all they showed
me that MCS cares.
At Change Forum, in a workshop (and keep in mind that the Change Forum Attendance is not
restricted), we talked obviously about the pain everybody feels when seeing coworkers
asked to leave the company. And everybody is willing to do almost anything to save a
job.
But at the same time we talked about the fact that those staying, because everybody
tries to cut on every other expense lines before cutting jobs, that those staying have
no way of doing their jobs as they are suppose to, therefore possible impacting revenue,
which could provoke more job cuts, etc., etc, etc. This is a very difficult situation.
If Digital doesn't cut enough running expenses, then it is left with no money to invest.
If doesn't invest, I'll guarantee that we will never get back to a more stable position.
Tough but that is business. And for all I know I could be next on the list.
|
4411.102 | .101 made readable (please color within the lines) | SMURF::PBECK | Rob Peter and pay *me*... | Thu Apr 11 1996 15:17 | 27 |
| <<< Note 4411.101 by STOWOA::tavo.ogo.dec.com::ODIAZ "Octavio Diaz" >>>
RE: .100
There are many things that from a different point of view I could say we can
do without, but I was impressed when I joined MCS in 94 to see the Change
Forum program. It showed me that there is (or tries to be) a "group", and
that the group had a vision, which not too many groups at the time had. I
have benefited from all the information sharing and learnings I got from the
many Change Forums I have attended, but most of all they showed me that MCS
cares.
At Change Forum, in a workshop (and keep in mind that the Change Forum
Attendance is not restricted), we talked obviously about the pain everybody
feels when seeing coworkers asked to leave the company. And everybody is
willing to do almost anything to save a job.
But at the same time we talked about the fact that those staying, because
everybody tries to cut on every other expense lines before cutting jobs, that
those staying have no way of doing their jobs as they are suppose to,
therefore possible impacting revenue, which could provoke more job cuts,
etc., etc, etc. This is a very difficult situation. If Digital doesn't cut
enough running expenses, then it is left with no money to invest. If doesn't
invest, I'll guarantee that we will never get back to a more stable position.
Tough but that is business. And for all I know I could be next on the list.
|
4411.103 | programming with staff and unleavened bread in hand | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Thu Apr 11 1996 16:05 | 28 |
| Re: Note 4411.96 by CSC32::R_NICKLES
� Anyway, how do you go about avoiding a cut? I am very thankful to
� still be here. I am the only contractor in VMS still here. So I am
� quite fortunate, and I know that contractors are the first to go...
I don't believe you can avoid getting cut. Long ago we discovered that
many good people got cut, so just being good is no guarantee. I've even
heard of consultants working for customers charging billable hours
getting the axe. And it doesn't matter if you're in a strategic
position: the same time that Digital is scrambling to get people
Microsoft Certified, they've laid some off. In this day and age, your
getting the axe is determined by seemingly random forces beyond your
control. You're either in the right place at the right time or your
not. Perhaps the CEO is fairly secure, but besides him I can't imagine
anyone feeling safe.
As for contractors being the first to go, that has not been true in all
cases. I know of cases where the perms were let go and the contractors
stayed. Again, I know of no consistent scheme that determines who gets
cut and who doesn't.
My advice, fwiw, is just be sure you're employABLE. If Digital asks you
to leave at least be sure your skills are transportable so that another
company would want you. And keep your personal network connections
active.
BD�
|
4411.104 | Surviving contractors | CSC32::T_BUNDRICK | | Fri Apr 12 1996 10:41 | 14 |
| Yo Rick! I'm still here too, sorta...
Got bumped from SYSMGT-B in January, but found another spot in Mission Critical
- still working as a contractor.
I've heard that it is a real good feeling to be shot at and missed... but after
2 or 3 times and they're still shooting - ya get scared!
As was said in .-1, stay employable...
Still hanging on..
Tim
(vmst04)
|
4411.105 | MCS Change Forum Inquiry -- | ICS::TOOMEY | | Fri Apr 12 1996 12:36 | 8 |
|
I missed the MCS Change Forum this past Wed. Any feedback out there ?
Thanks,
Bob
|
4411.106 | | STOWOA::tavo.ogo.dec.com::ODIAZ | Octavio Diaz | Fri Apr 12 1996 15:41 | 18 |
| RE: -.1
What kind of feeback?
If it is about layoffs, Rando, same as everyone else, said he can't promise
there will be no more. I would guess he has readjusted his forecast to the
corporation based on current conditions, so unless another unforseeable change,
done for now.
He did touch on the strategic planning work been done in the past couple of
months, but since this work has not been presented and approved, he couldn't give
us any details. We should hear something about this within a month.
The rest of Change Forum, was back to workshops, and as part of the profit theme,
it was simple on how can we stay focused on it in this time of changes and
lay-offs.
|
4411.107 | The truth about COBRA | SUBSYS::MILLER_COLE | | Tue Apr 23 1996 18:28 | 29 |
|
I know it was discussed a few notes back, but I wanted to clarify the
conditions (as I've experienced them) through COBRA.
I was laid off 12/92, with 6 months severance. I continued to pay my
$7/week for health insurance through May, 1993, and then COBRA kicked in.
My insurance increased to $180/month, but I maintained ALL of my health
benefits.
According to the law, a company HAS to provide you with health
insurance (through COBRA) for 18 months. No ifs, ands, or buts. At
the end of the 18 months (which now put me somewhere around November,
1994) I had the option to continue with Blue Cross/Blue Shield.
Again, according to the law, the insurance company can not drop you.
However, now I didn't have the benefit of going through Digital for my
insurance rate, and the month fee jumped from $180 to $306. And that's
for 1 person. Each additional person would have been an addition $306
a month.
Blue Cross/Blue Shield also made one other change to my policy - they
dropped me from drug coverage. Despite my pleas and offers to pay more
money (during the time I was taking very expensive infertility
medication), I was told that all medications simply were NOT covered.
So ... bottom line ... think hard about walking away from your rights
to COBRA. Once you walk away, you CAN'T go back.
|
4411.108 | | ACISS2::LENNIG | Dave (N8JCX), MIG, @CYO | Tue Apr 23 1996 22:36 | 4 |
| The Senate unanimously passed their version of the "Health Insurance
Reform" bill today. The Senate and House versions now go to conference.
Dave
|
4411.109 | MCS layoffs | ICS::TOOMEY | | Wed May 15 1996 13:17 | 4 |
|
Is MCS still going through downsizing ??
|
4411.110 | | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Wed May 15 1996 13:29 | 12 |
| MCS is in an unfortunate state of indecision. They announced a CSO
model for management which was to be implemented around March/April,
then pushed out to May and now on hold.
I've heard scuttle that not all ducks are under the wing or eggs in the
nest or some fool metaphor. :-) And the rumor mill drowns in
negativity.
Sure wish the Corporate office would send out some clear messages.
Nancy
|
4411.111 | | MAIL2::RICCIARDI | Be a graceful Parvenu... | Wed May 15 1996 13:49 | 3 |
| LAYOFFS continue until moral(es) improves :-)
|
4411.112 | | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Wed May 15 1996 13:58 | 4 |
| /me does 200 chin-ups!
ROTFL,
Nancy
|
4411.113 | unknown TLA ? | SMURF::MONTAGUE | | Thu May 16 1996 14:36 | 11 |
|
What's a "CSO model"
> <<< Note 4411.110 by JULIET::MORALES_NA "Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze" >>>
>
> MCS is in an unfortunate state of indecision. They announced a CSO
> model for management which was to be implemented around March/April,
> then pushed out to May and now on hold.
>
>
...
|
4411.114 | Customer Service Organization | MSDOA::SCRIVEN | | Thu May 16 1996 16:03 | 14 |
| CSO = Customer Service Organization.
We here in South Central Territory have already realigned based on the
"proposed" CSO Model, i.e., we've gone from 6 districts to 4. I don't
know that I would call it "an unfortunate state of indecision"; at
least here in South Central. I will say that, since the decision has
been made a essentially implemented, there is MUCH lack of decision on
who now handles what; hence, most of our customer DISsatisfaction these
days.....
Good Luck to ALL OF US.....
Toodles.....JPs
|