T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4385.1 | Page New England with Voicemail for me | NEMAIL::MCDONALDJ | | Fri Jan 26 1996 19:36 | 13 |
| Well, I have some experience and from using my pager for two years now,
I don't have any complaints.
I got mine from Page New England. It's pretty simple. I requested
voicemail service on paging service. When I get a voicemail, I get
beeped. Always. Never any problem and never have to call voicemail to
see if there are messages and my customers can get me at anytime. The
call is also a toll-free number for them. It's very slick and
customers like it a lot. You determine the urgency of returning the
call. Listen to the message and respond accordingly.
FWIW
Jane
|
4385.2 | | TROOA::SOLEY | Fall down, go boom | Fri Jan 26 1996 20:39 | 3 |
| SkyTel two way paging gets around the reliability problem since the
system keeps sending the page until your pager confirms reciept but
it's probably expensive and may not be available yet in your area.
|
4385.3 | Ask for new vendor | ODIXIE::PFLANZ | | Sat Jan 27 1996 06:54 | 21 |
| Craig,
I have been working with sky-Tell for about 5 years now. Their service
tends to go back and forth, between good to terrible. It got much
worse when we centralized our paging procurement, leaving us without a
local contact. They are just not responsive now.
specifically, on your problem, they do have pagers with different
frequencies and with lower baud rates, which do tend to be more
reliable. I made them switch all of ours out to the low baud rate type
to improve my service and keep messages clean. a few months ago they
unilaterally called each person and told them a new pager was coming
and to return the old one when they activated it. They "upgraded them
to the higher baud rate again, in order to save on their cost of paging
at slower baud rates, or so I am told.
My suggestion, do not use them if you can not have a local resource to
hold accountable.
Joef
|
4385.4 | Astronaught Tom your breaking up... | SWAM1::WOLFE_LE | | Sat Jan 27 1996 12:52 | 11 |
| The frequency of the pager is very important in determining it's range
and reliability. The lower frequency pagers (152 mhz) tend to have a
longer range due to the wavelength. The lower wavelength travels over
obstructions and mountains more consistantly. The higher frequency
(900 mhz up) tend to penetrate buildings better, but have a
shorter range due to the straighter traveling high wavelength. Another
factor which is important is the strength and location of the pager
company's transmitters. Ask them about their locations if they are
not satellite repeaters.
-Lee
|
4385.5 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Sat Jan 27 1996 20:32 | 14 |
| Hello,
Not to get to far off of the subject but what types of paging
software are people using? I currently use DECalert which is now
TARGET->>Alert for automated paging from DECscheduler and DCL
com files or UNIX scripts, using the RUDEM software. This stuff
was owned by Digital and is about 7-8 years old. TARGET now owns
it and hasn't updated it in a couple of years. Any neat automated
software beeping tools available, that works on OpenVMS, Unix,
WindowsNT?
I'm currently using Mobilemedia/Metromedia for pagers. This is
in HLO Hudson Ma. Digital Semiconductor.
Ron
|
4385.6 | Another case of false economy? | HSOSS1::HARDMAN | Digital. WE can make it happen! | Sun Jan 28 1996 13:07 | 25 |
| IHMO, SkyTel pretty much sux. I have had 3 of their nation-wide pagers
in the last 6 months. None have worked very well. One was brand
spanking new and died less than 24 hours after I received it. All of
them have suffered from "Out of range" messages (In such "remote" areas
as Mid-town Manhattan!), pages that never come through, pages that are
cutoff or garbled, etc.
I've tried to get our internal "pager group" involved, but it seems
that no one ever answers the phone there. I finally gave up on the
phone tag game (I'd leave them voice mail, then they'd leave me voice
mail, ad infinitum). :-(
I (and I'm sure MANY other Digits) rely heavily on my pager. I travel
to customer sites all over the country, at a moments notice. The pager
is usually the ONLY way to contact me, unless you want to leave a
message at a hotel (and many nights I don't get back to my room before
midnight of later).
The few dollars that we save by using a cheaper pager service is
probably far outweighed by lost business when customers can't contact
us. But the latter numbers don't show up as clearly in some budget
somewhere. :-(
Harry
|
4385.7 | Thanks | FOUNDR::CRAIG | | Mon Jan 29 1996 11:09 | 4 |
| I just checked my SkyTel, and its frequency is 931.4375 MHz. The pager
itself is made by Motorola.
Thanks for all the replies.
|
4385.8 | dissenting opinion on SkyTel | SWAM1::GOLDMAN_MA | Oy To the World! | Mon Feb 05 1996 10:56 | 16 |
| I have a SkyTel pager, acquired last June. Up till then I had a plain
old workhorse Motorola Bravo through AirTouch Paging (nee PacTel). I
like my SkyTel pager, also a Motorola. I did experience a system
outage over July 4 Weekend, a traditionally busy time for me, and that
was a hassle. Other than that, I have received one garbled page in 7
months, and one "out of range" message while in an airplane.
I find that the 800# is really nice for me, since I deal with internal
and external customers nationwide. I know that you can get 800#
service from other paging companies, but SkyTel and SkyPage are pretty
well known, so it makes communicating my pager number faster, too.
Just my opinion, YMMV (or does vary, rather!).
M.
|
4385.9 | | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Mon Feb 05 1996 11:48 | 6 |
| I just got a Skytel with Skyword, so far about 20% of the time
I miss messages, when I inquiry at the customer service desk, they
tell me the messages, so it seems to be in the transmission.
When I push the issue, they ask me to talk to the supervisor.
High Tech......
|
4385.10 | | SMURF::CANSLER | | Mon Feb 05 1996 12:37 | 4 |
|
Complain to MCI..
|
4385.11 | Page, Page, My Life for a Good Page! | RESTRT::THOMAS | | Mon Apr 22 1996 14:34 | 15 |
| re: .5
There is a company called Notification Technologies in (you guessed it)
Colorado Springs. They have a *better* way of paging and monitoring
systems than what you can do with TARGET->>Alert, nee DECalert. They
will support just about any O/S and pager type/company, including text.
I replaced the former product with their product last year.
For info, call 719-535-2855
regards,
Bill Thomas
|