T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4339.1 | I agree.. | JALOPY::CUTLER | | Wed Dec 27 1995 05:46 | 10 |
|
Stephen,
I agree with your comments regarding the commercials, absolutely great and
first class!
Rick C.
GO DETROIT LIONS!
|
4339.2 | 3 who agree | VMSNET::E_MAULUCCI | | Wed Dec 27 1995 12:48 | 3 |
| I think the commercials are GREAT also.
Gene
|
4339.3 | | FREEBE::REAUME | vintage racker | Wed Dec 27 1995 14:08 | 10 |
|
- do we dare do the Superbowl this year, especially now that we have
a top rate commercial. (I'll have to admit, I want to see what the BUD
frogs do this year!)
- great commercials, Microsoft alliance/endorsement, a killer Web
search engine (Alta Vista!) - stock value up .....
....maybe we really are on a roll!
|
4339.4 | "Thanks - a question of $$'s" | AKOCOA::TROY | | Fri Dec 29 1995 21:08 | 10 |
|
More Weekend Tv and TV during the Week are a function of moolah, cash,
green, etc.
Our first priority would be to extend the campaign into most weekends,
second into the week.
Thanks for the Support - we think they are working in the market.
Bill
|
4339.5 | 1996 Picks to click... | LACV01::CORSON | Higher, and a bit more to the right | Sat Dec 30 1995 12:55 | 32 |
|
Have my latest copy of Washington Technology, a biweekly newspaper
for government systems integrators. Being the New Years issue, they
had a section on "What's In - What's Out". Draw your own conclusions...
WHAT'S OUT WHAT'S IN
information highway the Internet
business process reengineering change management
time clocks keystroke monitoring
PC Internet terminal
Newt Gingrich Al Gore
Unisys DEC
flat-fee a ticking meter
content style
the message the medium
Microsoft Microsoft
They also picked the "Five Technologies That Matter Most" for 1996
as:
Key Escrow - the "spare key" decryption technology
PCS - personal communications services
Internet phone - who needs AT&T?
E-Cash - digital money
Java - Sun's virtual machine applet programming language
Have a happy New Years everyone......
the Greyhawk
|
4339.6 | | DIODE::CROWELL | Jon Crowell | Tue Jan 02 1996 08:38 | 7 |
| Glad to hear DEC is in! I was proud also watching the AD with
friends... They all said, "Heard your company's doing great!"..
We are getting positive mindshare...
Jon
|
4339.7 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Jan 02 1996 09:23 | 6 |
| I finally got to see the new TV ads (I ordered them on tape) - excellent. While
visiting relatives, I also heard positive comments (my brother hated the
"Hell has our number" ad, apparently.) My wife was pleased to see women with
a prominent role (and for the voiceover) in the ads.
Steve
|
4339.8 | "DIGITAL a 'buy' in Money magazine | AKOCOA::TROY | | Tue Jan 02 1996 11:12 | 10 |
| re. .5
Another nice mention is for DIGITAL as a stock to buy in the January
issue of Money magazine. The folks who make the forecast see $80/share
at $3.50 EPS by end of year 1996. (these factoids are from memory, so I
may a bit off on the numbers)
Bill Troy
|
4339.9 | The Rose Bowl... | DECWET::WHITE | Surfin' with the Alien | Tue Jan 02 1996 12:44 | 27 |
| Over here on the 'left coast', the Rose Bowl is really a New Year's Day
staple...all of my friends, relatives, etc. plan the days activities around
kick-off, right down to when to pop the nachos in the Microwave 8^).
It was *really* a great experience to sit and watch the game....a game that
I have been watching for years, and have it sponsered by Digital, and to see
my friends and relatives react to both the 'Corporate Computing' and 'Internet'
commercials both run...and I think that is the intagible that makes advertising
well worth the money...customers see the Ad and our proud to be running our
stuff..."It's good to see Digital is out there advertising, we just bought a
bunch of Alpha's". "Oh...hey, nice ad, you work for them don't you? What
do you guys make again?" "You know, I have been hearing a lot about this
company called Digital" "Yeah, this is definately not the same folks we used
to call DEC, that's for sure" "Wow, DEC is advetising during the Rose Bowl,
geez, who would have thought?"
The ultimate compliment...my Uncle, who has done quite well doing all of
his own investing over the years in the stock market...sat me down and
grilled me about Digital, and the 'Alpha thing-a-majigg' everyone at Boeing
keeps talking about...
I must admitt, I *never* thought I would see this day. BP, couple more
financial wins...couple of more Alpha wins...couple more 8400
wins...it just might be time to declare victory in public...I'll bring the
bubbly!!
-Stephen
|
4339.10 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Jan 02 1996 13:00 | 4 |
| I'd hold off on the bubbly until we can get our retail PC side of the house
in order. We blew off the holiday shopping season by our inability to ship.
Steve
|
4339.11 | | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Tue Jan 02 1996 13:40 | 7 |
| And just before the Rose Bowl, was the CompUSA Citrus Bowl. There
were commericals there also! Its a great idea to put Digital's
name in people's minds as they are going to CompUSA to buy a new PC.
I was very impressed.
-John
|
4339.12 | well | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 227-3978, TAY1) | Tue Jan 02 1996 14:11 | 11 |
| re Note 4339.11 by TLE::REAGAN:
> Its a great idea to put Digital's
> name in people's minds as they are going to CompUSA to buy a new PC.
Well, only if they will find the models they want, in stock,
at CompUSA.
Otherwise the net effect could be negative.
Bob
|
4339.13 | What we say vs. what we do not do | ACISS2::MARES | you get what you settle for | Tue Jan 02 1996 14:16 | 11 |
| Repeat 20 times out loud:
Digital does not do retail PC.
Maybe then it will sink in!!!!!!!
Randy
|
4339.14 | And, pray tell, WHY NOT! | ICS::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Tue Jan 02 1996 14:23 | 14 |
| re: <<< Note 4339.13 by ACISS2::MARES "you get what you settle for" >>>
-< What we say vs. what we do not do >-
< Repeat 20 times out loud:
<
< Digital does not do retail PC.
<
<
< Maybe then it will sink in!!!!!!!
<
<
<
< Randy
|
4339.15 | Who came up wit this? | SUBSYS::DCARR | I'd rather be at Newfound Lake | Tue Jan 02 1996 14:56 | 17 |
|
Seeing Digital's ads during many of the bowl games was great, but the
content of one was somewhat questionable. The ad shows the Pepsi and
Kentucky Fried Chicken logos passing each other left to right and the
voiceover says something to the effect "someday the secret formulas
for Pepsi and the Colonel's Kentucky Fried will pass each other on
the Internet".
Say what? What the heck are we endorsing here? I had to watch and listen
to the ad twice and I still couldn't believe my eyes and ears. I can't
envision either Pepsi or KFC thinking this was appropriate use of their
logos - particularly with respect to their secret formulas.
Does anyone else feel this way and could someone from advertising
explain why something so contoversial is used in the ads?
-Dom
|
4339.16 | Pepsi may be a customer. | CSSE::pkodv1.mso.dec.com::vaughan | All it takes is a point of light | Tue Jan 02 1996 15:27 | 5 |
| I know we did have a bid in for some outsourcing work for Pepsi. One of the big concerns was
security, they want to make sure that ONLY authorized people have access the the formula.
I do not know if we won the project, but, from the comercial I would guess we may have.
Dave V
|
4339.17 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Jan 02 1996 16:20 | 8 |
| I am sure that we got permission to use the logos. I took it to mean that
businesses would be using the Internet to transmit confidential information
without worrying about someone stealing the data, though I admit that's due
to my knowledge about Digital's Internet security solutions. My wife thought
it meant someone would be breaking into Pepsi and KFC's systems and stealing
the formulas. I gues sthat it was none too clear.
Steve
|
4339.18 | uncertainty | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 227-3978, TAY1) | Tue Jan 02 1996 16:56 | 15 |
| re Note 4339.17 by QUARK::LIONEL:
> I took it to mean that
> businesses would be using the Internet to transmit confidential information
> without worrying about someone stealing the data, though I admit that's due
> to my knowledge about Digital's Internet security solutions. My wife thought
> it meant someone would be breaking into Pepsi and KFC's systems and stealing
> the formulas. I gues sthat it was none too clear.
But that was the point of the ad: nobody knows for sure what
will be.
(Or was it that we have bets placed on all the horses?)
Bob
|
4339.19 | Digital Internet Tunnels | DELNI::WALSH | | Wed Jan 03 1996 09:12 | 15 |
| The point of the Add was that someday in the not to distant future
companies will use the internet like they use the Telephone companies
today. IE trust it to run their private networks over. We now sell a
product called Digital Internet Tunnels
http:/tunnel.ibg.ljo.dec.com/tunnel.html Which allows you to connect
LAN's over the internet, incrypting all trafix while it is on the
internet. It also includes Personal tunnels which allow home users or
users on the road to connect to their private network over the
internet, eliminating the need for long distance calls, modem banks,
business telephone lines, WATN etc. As a matter of fact I am currently
typing this from my home in Marlboro connected to Tiac using tunnels.
This is pretty neet stuff.
Dan
|
4339.20 | | FUTURS::CROSSLEY | For internal use only | Wed Jan 03 1996 09:29 | 11 |
|
404 Not Found
The requested URL /tunnel.ibg.ljo.dec.com/tunnel.html was not found on
this server.
Regards,
Ian.
|
4339.21 | Sorry missing Slash (/) | DELNI::WALSH | | Wed Jan 03 1996 09:32 | 1 |
| http://tunnel.ibg.ljo.dec.com/tunnel.html
|
4339.22 | Internet Tunnel universally available? | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Wed Jan 03 1996 10:17 | 8 |
| Does this mean that I can use my Powerbook running MacOS or my Alphabook
running OpenVMS, dial into some local internet provider while travelling,
and connect back to my own site inside our group's own firewall?
Or is it somewhat more restrictive, requiring such configurations to
continue to call LD into existing site servers?
/john
|
4339.23 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Wed Jan 03 1996 10:33 | 11 |
|
Currently the clients are limited to I think Windows95. You'd
want to check with the Tunnel folks.
You would dial into your local Internet provider (Ultranet, TIAC,
Compuserve, etc...) and start up the tunnelling stuff and
connect to your systems in DEC. No long distance calls to a
site server.
mike
|
4339.24 | Windows 95 and/or Digital UNIX required | DELNI::WALSH | | Wed Jan 03 1996 10:44 | 6 |
| Windows 95 and Digital UNIX are the only supported platforms for
Tunnels currently. We have plans to go to other platforms in the
future for both Clients and Servers. Macintosh, NT, Solaris, BSD are
being considered. We would love to have partners working on these or
other platforms. Contact Steve ([email protected]) for further info.
He is the prodcut manager.
|
4339.25 | | DELNI::WALSH | | Wed Jan 03 1996 10:46 | 4 |
| Perhaps could a moderator move thisTunnel discussion to its on note.
Dan
|
4339.26 | "Permission - you betcha" | AKOCOA::TROY | | Wed Jan 03 1996 10:57 | 30 |
|
re: use of pepsi and kfc logos.
A couple of points of clarification:
o Trust me, it is a really difficult proposition getting to use other
people's logos - you absolutely need to have the permission of the
involved companies - their logos are among their most prized assets.
And even if the firms involved don't insist on written permission,
the networks do. The largely hidden world of network censors - which
might seem anachronistic in this day of 500 channels, internet for the
masses, etc. is one that carefully controls what goes "on air" - they
for example insist on all of the 'fine print' that goes on the end of
special lease deal automobile advertisements. There are a lot of
hoops.
o The logos were chosen to fit both the ideas of "secret" and being
readily recognized. The rivalries of a couple of other firms closed
out their use - one would agree, one would not. The idea of secure
electronic commerce protection is a core idea we are getting across, and we
believe is a competitive advantage DIGITAL needs to leverage - whether
its implementations be tunneling, secure private networks, or whatever.
o Think about the progress we have made as a company in the past year.
This time last year we would have had no success getting permission and
using another company's logo, it would have been viewed as an unequal
bargain. Especially if we do not have a major customer relationship
with the firms involved.
Bill
|
4339.27 | | RCOCER::MICKOL | Endless Summer '95: Web Surfing | Wed Jan 03 1996 13:36 | 8 |
| Isn't KFC owned by Pepsi anyway?
Bill: Are you saying that permission was received by Coke/Pepsi for that
commercial with the two soft drink delivery guys in the Diner that ends up
with them having a brawl? I find that hard to believe.
Jim
|
4339.28 | | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Alpha Developer's support | Wed Jan 03 1996 14:02 | 8 |
| Jim,
I'll bet the two companies DID have an agreement for that commercial.
They are rivals, but I'd call it a "friendly" competition. Not so when
Polar Soda ran a commercial last year that dinged Coke's reputation.
The lawyers work hard to protect the company.
Mark
|
4339.29 | "Coke/Pepsi etc." | AKOCOA::TROY | | Wed Jan 03 1996 14:53 | 17 |
|
re: Coke/Pepsi driver commercial
Interesting point - I don't know the details. They must have both seen
a real benefit to it, or the sponsoring company was ready to play
Lawyer Wars Big Time. In any case, even if there weren't a specific
network requirement, we would always contact the other firms for such a
use, as I am sure most firms would.
The only general exception on use of names would be saying you are
faster/cheaper/etc. than your direct competitor, and use their name
(Sun, Hp, etc.), but not their logos. We do this most often in SBU
advertising in Print. Obviously, you need to have the right third
party information, such as benchmarks, to back up your claims.
Bill Troy
|
4339.30 | *stepping out ot the rathole* | DECWET::WHITE | Surfin' with the Alien | Wed Jan 03 1996 15:07 | 16 |
| anyway...my point is...this truly is a New Digital, the marketing initiative
is truly impressive, the commercials are sharp. The response I get from
my peers and relatives is a *change*. We are turning this company around in
mind, body and spirit. I love to root for the Underdog, especially when I'm part
of the team. Digital employees are walking a bit taller, a bit quicker.
People are starting to notice us, when I say people I mean mainstream mindshare.
I'm seeing our Hinote Ultra as props in other advertising...it's starting
to be 'hip' to own Digital hardware. Kids are putting posters of Alpha systems
in thier lockers at school...(OK, I made that up...but it might be true!)
This is our finest hour.
IMHO, of course.
-Stephen
|
4339.31 | | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Alpha Developer's support | Wed Jan 03 1996 15:09 | 1 |
| Stephen, can you get me a poster?
|
4339.32 | sure... | DECWET::WHITE | Surfin' with the Alien | Wed Jan 03 1996 15:45 | 10 |
| Actually, you can order our print ad pages from VTX...
I have "we wanted to call it killer compliant mega open 64 bit unix...",
and "there is a difference between massaging your data...", "In Engineering
terms, make cooler stuff happen way faster..." and a couple of 2100 posters
in my cube...can't remember exactly how, but I ordered them from VTX.
I still get called 'the kid' around here, so maybe I was talking about myself...
;^)
|
4339.33 | Then there's A & E, CNBC etc. | SUFRNG::REESE_K | My reality check bounced | Wed Jan 03 1996 16:11 | 10 |
| I watched every bowl game I could manage and I must say it felt
good to see the ads and see Digital, Whatever It Takes flash across
the screen.
I didn't see continued advertising throughout the games, I noticed
our ads were run during the 4th quarter in each game. I can't
remember them all, but I do believe the ads ran in more than just 2
bowl games.
|