[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

4223.0. "Who choose the Corporate Anti-virus utility?" by tennis.ivo.dec.com::KAM (Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO) Sat Oct 28 1995 11:54

    Who's the responsible for the choice of virus protection for the PCs? 
    
    Recently, has a floppy that was infected with the FORM virus, more of 
    an annoyance virus until it gets in the boot sector of the HiNote and
    then it screws up the display and won't allow you to reboot.  On the 
    433SLC it just sends click commands.
    
    I ran F-PROT and it just indicates that the FORM virus was on the
    system.  It wouldn't remove it.  On another system, not owned by DEC,
    Norton Desktop was running.  When the infected diskette was placed into
    the system it would IMMEDIATELY detect and remove the virus.  It
    doesn't allow you to place an infected diskette into the system.  If
    the virus gets by you will still remove it.
    
    The utility that we're using doesn't seem to that effective.  Can the
    Company supply us with some one more reliable?
    
    The system was at DOS 5.0.  I upgraded to DOS 6.2 which appears to
    replace alot of stuff in the boot sector as it removed the FORM virus. 
    It did more that F-PROT that's loaded on the system.
    
    I noticed that DOS 6.2 has an anti-virus utility built-in.  Anyone know
    how it compares to F-PROT, which to me is worthless.
    
    
    	Regards,
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
4223.1CBHVAX::CBHLager LoutSat Oct 28 1995 13:095
Excuse the dripping cynicism, but F-PROT is probably nice and cheap, and is
therefore saving the company money... (just like the CHEFS supercluster saved
a huge amount, especially as no-one'll use it because it's so slow!)

Chris.
4223.2Don't know what you're all complaining aboutVIVIAN::RANCEhttp://vivian.hhl.dec.com/rance/Sat Oct 28 1995 18:2618
     I recently tested what the current version of F-PROT did when I
     inserted a floppy containing the FORM virus.  

     I had discovered the virus on scanning the floppy prior to reading it
     and decided to see what happened when I tried to copy files from the
     floppy.  Under MS-DOS virstop displayed 3 warnings, each accompanied
     by a sound from the PC speaker.  When I tried to get a directory
     listing from File Manager under windows it did the same, overwriting
     my windows with the message.

     Seems good enough to me.

     On the subject of the CHEFS cluster.  It's working fine for me at the
     moment, if only you moaners would stop trying to read your mail
     during work time you'd have no problems  8^)

     	Stuart

4223.3Works great, if you install it properly.HSOSS1::HARDMANDigital. WE can make it happen!Sat Oct 28 1995 19:2022
    You can't just copy F-Prot onto your hard drive and think that you're
    protected! Just becuse the files are on the drive, doesn't make them
    active. You need to add a line to your config.sys as follows:
    
    DEVICEHIGH=C:\F-PROT\VIRSTOP.EXE 
    (assuming you have F-Prot in the F-PROT directory on the C drive)
    
    to activate the virus detection each time you boot.
    
    I've been using F-Prot for years now, and it's always detected any
    viruses I've brought home from customer sites. (Even customer sites
    that were running Norton Anti-Virus!) As for the so-called Anti-Virus
    files that come with DOS, you might as well delete them. They're just a
    waste of disk space. MSAV is one of the least effective Anti-Virus
    programs around. :-(
    
    BTW, Phil Bancroft (MINOTR::BANCROFT) is the PC Virus Specialist with
    Corporate Security. You can also read more than you ever wanted to know
    about computer virii in the POWDML::PC_SECURITY notesfile.
    
    Harry
    
4223.4tennis.ivo.dec.com::KAMKam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVOSun Oct 29 1995 01:372
    I just got a HiNote from Corporate with F-PROT 2.19 and it will DETECT
    the FORM virus but will NOT delete it.  
4223.5F-Prot removes Form Virus and most others!MROA::HEIER_LSun Oct 29 1995 08:498
    F-PROT has always removed the FORM Virus.  You need to boot off of
    a clean, bootable floppy to remove the FORM virus from the boot
    sector of the Floppy disk.  If you need help, please add the
    following notes conference:  POWDML::PC_SECURITY
    
    Regards,
    
    Larry
4223.7BSS::BRUNOBurly Computer NerdSun Oct 29 1995 15:277
         F-Prot has always removed FORM for me, and I encounter it pretty
    frequently.
    
         My guess is that it is configured to just report, instead of
    AUTOMATIC DISINFECTION.
    
                                        Greg
4223.8Check Everything--Save ALLSUBSYS::MCCULLERSun Oct 29 1995 20:0429
    RE: -.0
    
    Bill--
    
    I recently had a vendor conduct a thorough examination of one
    of our tools because of a virus rumor. The sample size was 1000
    diskettes from a population of 6000. The vendor checked the diskettes
    using the version of F-PROT I distributed to the field (you are on
    my distribution list, I believe). In addition to determining if
    there was any virus present on any diskettes, they checked to
    determine if the write-protect tab was set on the diskettes distributed
    from SSB. The results were positive: no viruses, only one of 1000
    diskettes had the write-protect tab in the non protected position.
    
    Although it is possible to have any number of viruses on your system,
    if you use the FPROT utility to check all floppies before you try to
    install them, you will reduce your risk of infection. Note that ANY
    TIME you feel you have received an infected diskette, you should
    contact the source immediately-AND provide them the diskette for
    examination. Your best bet is to follow the setup instructions I 
    provided you in September and check you hard disk on boot-up, and 
    every floppy you insert in your floppy drive.
    
    Call me if you wish to discuss this in more detail (I'll be at THOT
    so I will probably see you there). Good reference in earlier note
    about the PC_SECURITY notesfile.
    
    Mac
    
4223.9Looking into the wrong end of the tube?RICKS::PHIPPSDTN 225.4959Mon Oct 30 1995 05:515
  I never (knock on wood) have run into FORM or any other virus.

  Where do you people get these floppies?!

  	mikeP
4223.10ROWLET::AINSLEYLess than 150 kts. is TOO slow!Mon Oct 30 1995 08:0810
    re: .9
    
  >Where do you people get these floppies?!
    
    From our management.  Seriously.  About a year ago, one member of our
    development team received a floppy from someone up our management chain
    that contained a virus.  I don't remember which one.
    
    Bob
    
4223.11ICS::BEANAttila the Hun was a LIBERAL!Mon Oct 30 1995 08:1014
    re some back
    
    F-PROT is very inexpensive.  In fact, it is FREE for personal use and
    costs very little when used on business' machines (last I checked, it
    was one US dollar per machine, with a minimum of 20 machines).  
    
    However, that is NOT a reflection of its worth.  F-PROT is exensively
    tested and was reviewed last year at the top of the list of available
    virus scanners by PC Magazine.
    
    I've been using it for about three years and cannot remember ever
    having a problem with it.  I am anxiously waiting for a WIN95 version.
    
    tony
4223.12That me - Mr F-PROTMINOTR::BANCROFTMon Oct 30 1995 09:2345
    Phil Bancroft - DTN 223-8732 Corporate Information Security Group
    I chose the F-PROT software kit as the highest Return On Investment
    item I could find.  It has normally rated top or second on anti-virus
    scanner tests.
    There are various files in the kit, regrettable named .DOC which
    explain the capabilities and arguements for the software.  Please read
    the COMMAND.DOC at least before condeming the software.
    I HAVE seen cases where there was a "Circular Infection" (TWO different
    boot sector viruses on the same system) and F-PROT has been unable to
    remove both at the same time.  That meant one was removed, then next
    one came in, that one removed, the original came in.  Fortunately in 
    every case so far, the viruses have NOT been tricky.  That means I was
    able to boot from a diskette, and SEE the C: frive and files (showing
    the virus had not shafted the hard drive like MONKEY will).  I was
    therefore able to safely use FDISK/MBR to replace the MBR and kill both
    viruses at once.
    
    PLEASE do a DIR MINOTR::USER6:[VIRUS] and look at the files.  The top
    files, marked REM are empty files used as remarks to YOU to tell you
    the latest Versions of the tools, and any other vital data.  Following
    that in the directory and things like C_F_PROT.EXE which is the latest
    full F-PROT kit, PKZIPped and then ZIP-2-EXEed to make it self
    exploding.  I also modify it from stream to Fixed Blocked 512 to make
    the copying more reliable.  Any questions on the other stuff, please
    email me or look in the POWDML::PC-SECURITY notes file where many
    sharp people add value to the effort.
    
    FOR THE FUTURE - we have licensed and are piloting the SOPHOS suite of
    tools which eventually will cover VMS, UNIX, AND APLHA servers, and
    DOS, OS2, W95, WIN-NT, and Novell clients.  These server/client tools
    will cover us easier and faster.  F-PROT supplier does not intend to
    go beyond DOS support, so this is a good time to upgrade.  We will
    probably maintian F-Prot as a second line item for stand-alone systems.
    
    The future tool set will prevent file type viruses by encrypted CRC
    checks against a table of "certified" programs, and only when there has
    been a change will the suspect software be scanned.  This combines the
    best of both Integrity Checking (VERY FAST) and scanning.  Updates of
    the software will be server based and automatic.
    
    The effort is evolutionary.  Polite suggestions are welcome.
    Any PC experts and/or virus experts are invited to join our "Anti-Virus 
    SWAT Team" (SWAT = special weapons and tactics, seems appropriate).
    Just send me mail.
       
4223.13I guess F-Prot will die with DOSHSOSS1::HARDMANDigital. WE can make it happen!Mon Oct 30 1995 10:088
    >F-PROT supplier does not intend to go beyond DOS support, so this is a
    >good time to upgrade.  We will probably maintian F-Prot as a second
    >line item for stand-alone systems.
    
    Sounds like a path to extinction... :-(
    
    Harry
    
4223.14NETCAD::SCARAMUZZOAdapters Product Group, LKG1-3 | DTN 226-6977Mon Oct 30 1995 11:0530
    RE: *
    
    F-Prot *WILL* disinfect the FORMS virus. When you run F-prot (as was
    previously stressed, from a clean bootable diskette) you need to
    select as an "Action:" Automatic Deletion when performing a SCAN. For 
    some reason with F-Prot this option has to be selected to fully 
    delete the FORMS virus.
    
    Also someone else mentioned to install VIRSTOP.EXE (a component of the
    F-Prot package) so that it gets executed in your AUTOEXEC.BAT command
    file. This is an excellent idea for ANYONE that has a PC and is concerned 
    about PC VIRUS's. I have it set up as follows in my AUTOEXEC.BAT:
    
    			C:\F_PROT\VIRSTOP /FREEZE
    
    This "freezes" my PC anytime I place a diskette in my A:\ drive that
    has a virus. There has been about 5 times where someone has handed me
    a diskette and I placed it in my A:\ drive and VIRSTOP detected a virus
    on it. Not only does this save your system from getting any virus's but
    helps to alert others who have infected systems..... If VIRSTOP was 
    installed on every system a good chunk of these virus's would be stopped. 
    Kind of like a Polio vaccine.... :-)
    
    A self expanding version of F-PROT can be copied from:
    
                MINOTR::USER6:[VIRUS]C_F_PROT.EXE
    
    Notesfile: POWDML::PC_SECURITY
    
    								-Pete
4223.15Use the latest config for best results!HSOSS1::HARDMANDigital. WE can make it happen!Mon Oct 30 1995 12:3918
    Pete, loading Virstop from autoexec.bat isn't as effective as loading
    it as a device driver. Several versions ago the VIRSTOP.DOC file was
    changed to reflect this. Here's an excerpt:
   
    >The recommended way to load VIRSTOP is to load it from the CONFIG.SYS
    >file, with a command such as:
    
    >                    DEVICE=C:\F-PROT\VIRSTOP.EXE
    
    >Or, if you are using DOS 5 (or 6), you can instead use
    
    >                    DEVICEHIGH=C:\F-PROT\VIRSTOP.EXE
    
    >IMPORTANT! - If any memory managers, such ar 386MAX, HIMEM or QEMM are
    >used, they must be loaded before VIRSTOP.
    
    Harry
    
4223.16VSSCAD::SIGELTue Oct 31 1995 15:258
Re .15

Will F-PROT still do the diskette freeze Pete mentions in .14 if
you load VIRSTOP from CONFIG.SYS as you specified, or is there
something else that needs to be on the command line in order to
take advantage of that feature?

-- Andrew
4223.17Works for meHSOSS1::HARDMANDigital. WE can make it happen!Tue Oct 31 1995 21:577
    Andrew, it's been my experience that F-Prot does indeed lock the system
    (with lots of fanfare and an on-screen warning) if you try to use an
    infected diskette. I've been using it from config.sys for well over a
    year with no problems.
    
    Harry
    
4223.18maintain a standalone virus recovery diskTESA::WILSONDlearning as i goWed Nov 01 1995 13:5751
    clarification: our corporate license with frisk software is for 
        DOS F-Prot and does not include any clauses for Windows95+
        support.  hence, this is not a life threatening decision 
        from FRISK.
    
    clarification: our corporate license, in last discussions with 
    	phil bancroft, is in its third (and option year) of our contract.  
        the license is not free to digital, but digital employees do have
        some free access to it.
    
        SWEEP, from Sophos, is offerring digital platform extensive 
        support, and hence the effort to migrate to SWEEP.
    
    	it is also a "quality" product.
    
    suggestion: if you are concerned with acquiring a virus, you should
    	carry a "virus-recovery" boot floppy.  some virus have stealth
     	capability and will hide, etc...  it also simplifies recovery
        and isolation when a problem is detected.
    
        as some virus are very destructive, having a standalone boot
        floppy, may be the only way to recover.
    
    suggestion: if are concerned about this area, i recommend "Virus
      	Bulletin", "the" international journal.  phil is the digital 
        member on the advisory board.
    
        detailed product reviews are often and comparitive studies every
        six months.  from the january 1995 review, norton v3.0 rated
        poorly, and was not included in the july 1995 review.
    
    		virus bulletin ltd
    		21 the quadrant
    		abingdon, oxfordshire
    		ox14 3ys, england
    
    		44 (0) 1235 555139
    
    suggestion: no scanner is 100%, some are damm close.  so two 
    	scanners are better than one.
    
    	three scanners are better, if you need to resolve false-positives.
    
    comment: please note there is a difference between virus detection,
    	protection and removal.  each require their own specific measures.
    
    comment: as a person defining PCBU Manufacturing Software Policies,
    	all PCs are validated to be free of any known virus, as a final
        step before shipping to manufacturing.
    
    
4223.19ROWLET::AINSLEYLess than 150 kts. is TOO slow!Wed Nov 01 1995 14:5212
    re: .18
    
    >comment: as a person defining PCBU Manufacturing Software Policies,
    >	all PCs are validated to be free of any known virus, as a final
    >    step before shipping to manufacturing.
    
    What tool do you use to do this for PCs that come preloaded with
    Windows 95?  Do you boot a DOS 6.xx floppy and do the check?
    
    Bob
    
    
4223.20SMURF::PBECKRob Peter and pay *me*...Wed Nov 01 1995 15:3512
    re .19                                                     
    
    I can't see why that wouldn't work. Windows 95 does use a modified
    FAT file system (for long filenames), but it creates old-FAT
    compatible names that non-W95 apps like F-PROT can read. I have used
    F-PROT to scan files I've downloaded to my W95 system before using
    them. 
    
    What I don't know (and wouldn't really want to try) is what would
    happen with the VIRSTOP TSR under Windows 95. But from my
    experience, manual scanning does work (well, I've never found any 
    viruses with it, but I've never had a PC infected, either).
4223.21Sweep is niceWOTVAX::buzyal.wlo.dec.com::sharkeyaJames Bond uses LoginnWed Nov 01 1995 17:415
FYI, the Sweep TSR works fine with Windows 95. It caught a virus on a 
floppy that someone brought in

Alan

4223.22NETCAD::SCARAMUZZOAdapters Product Group, LKG1-3 | DTN 226-6977Fri Nov 03 1995 10:078
    
    RE: -2, I have VIRSTOP loaded on my Windows 95 environment currently.
    Although I have yet to encounter a diskette with a virus using VIRSTOP
    and Windows 95. It would be nice to know if someone has detected a
    virus with that environment. I would think that it should be compatible
    but you obviously can't always be sure....
    
    								-Pete
4223.23Hoffman.exe locationCSCMA::MACVICARSat Nov 25 1995 13:098
    I have encountered the Monkey virus on my laptop.  I was going 
    through the documentation and it mentioned hoffman.exe.   I can't
    seem to located it.  Does anyone know where it is?
    Any help getting rid of this virus is appreciated.
    
    Thanks,
    
    Victoria
4223.24SPEZKO::FRASERMobius Loop; see other sideSun Nov 26 1995 06:5210
        Victoria,
        
                For the latest information on PC anti-virus tools and
        virus inoculations, please add POWDML::PC_SECURITY to your
        notebook.
        
        Regards
        
        Andy
        
4223.25exMINOTR::BANCROFTWed Dec 06 1995 16:4113
    F-PROT last 5 or so versions will remove STONED.EMPIRE.MONKEY virus
    (the official CARO name).
    Hoffman was only a dictionary of virus explainations, not an anti-virus
    tool.  It became so poor we declined to renew it.
    http://www.datafellows.fi/vir-desc.htm
    web pages are much better, free, and always current.
    The US storage place for the anti-virus tools is
    MINOTR::USER6:[VIRUS]
     a DIR of that area from a VAX will tell you about the latest version
    numbers of the tools.
    and POWDML::PC_SECURITY is the notes file for the anti-virus effort.
    If all else fails, call your help desk
    If really desperate call me  - Phil Bancroft 223-8732