T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4139.1 | Plan? Of course there's a plan... | XANADU::AMAC::CLARK | Lee Clark, 381-0422 | Fri Sep 22 1995 10:25 | 121 |
| Rec'd the following recently from GPS, make sure your office PC meets min
system requirements...
From: ZEKE::CAMILLERI "Mark A. Camilleri 381-1907 01-Sep-1995 1008"
1-SEP-1995 11:22
To: @ZKO_ALL
CC: CAMILLERI
Subj: Microsoft Windows 95 - GPS Advisory #2
*** DIGITAL INTERNAL USE ONLY ***
TO: All Global Processing Services Customers
SUBJECT: GPS Service Advisory - Windows 95 Features,
System Requirements and Training
EFFECTIVE: September 4,1995
RELEVANT
SITES: All U.S., Canadian and Latin America sites served by
Global Processing Services
ADVISORY: This advisory is the second in the Windows 95 series
of announcements. This advisory is intended to provide
information on Windows 95 features, system requirements,
training and additional technical information
that may prove useful as reference.
Windows 95 has been designed to increase productivity
and ease of use.
New Features Include:
- New User Interface
- Plug and Play - recognizes new hardware devices as
they are installed on your PC
- Long filenames - up to 255 characters when using
32-bit applications
- Preemptive multitasking - allows multiple applications
to run simultaneously with little impact to system
performance
- Improved performance
- Easier network configuration
- Compatibility with most existing MS-DOS based
and Windows based applications. Some applications
will not work, please refer to ALKAID::DISK$LIB:
[DESKTOP.WIN95]Risks.txt for hardware and software
compatibility restrictions.
Minimum Requirements:
- GPS will support Windows 95 customers that meet
the following minimum requirements:
- Storage Requirements for Windows 95 only:
(Does not include applications)
Minimum Typical Maximum
Install Install Install
New Install 30 MB 35MB 65MB
Over Windows 23.5MB 27MB 48MB
Over Windows
for Workgroups 18.5MB 22MB 43MB
- GPS requires minimum of 33 mhz 386DX Processor
- GPS requires minimum of 8mb of memory
GPS Service and Support Structure for Windows 95:
- Customers requesting on-site software installation
will be billed at the PC Installation Service
cost indicated on the list of GPS FY'96 Services
Prices located in VTX GPS.
Training:
- VTX LEARNING has full details regarding Windows
95 classes.
- Windows 95 System Administration (OSCSA-04)
- Migrating Your Computing Environment to
Windows 95 (EY-110E-E0)
- Supporting Microsoft Windows 95 (EY-S411E-L0)
- Windows 95 Differences for End Users (EY-T121E)
- Windows 95 Differences for New Windows Users
(EY-T124E)
- Install & Config Microsoft Windows 95 (EY-T134E)
- CompUSA (1-800-Train-80) has full details regarding
their daytime, evening, weekend classes:
- Making the Transition to Windows 95
- Upgrading to Windows 95
- Introduction to PC w/ Windows 95
Additional Reference Material:
If users would like access to additional technical
information for reference purposes, the following
resources are available:
- Windows 95 Note Conference - RANGER::WINDOWS95
- Pathworks for Windows 95 - RANGER::PW95IFT
- GPS Americas Desktop File Service - ALKAID::DISK$LIB:
[DESKTOP.WIN95]ADD_REF.TXT
IMPACT: There are certain risks that you must consider before
migrating to Windows 95. Those risks involve Windows
95 interaction with TeamLinks, KEAterm, PATHWORKS
and other areas which could have severe impact
on your desktop productivity. Users who have
dependencies on interactions with TeamLinks,
KEAterm and PATHWORKS should review the details
of the risks associated with the upgrade, evaluate
whether the risks will impact productivity and base
the decision and timing on the results of the analysis.
The details can be obtained over the network by
copying:
ALKAID::DISK$LIB:[DESKTOP.WIN95]RISKS.TXT
|
4139.2 | See 4070.26 | SALES::CARR | Sam Carr DTN 244-7224 AKO2-2/D05 | Fri Sep 22 1995 10:32 | 1 |
| This topic is also covered in note 4070 and specifically in 4070.26.
|
4139.3 | My thoughts | MROA::HEIER_L | | Fri Sep 22 1995 10:43 | 11 |
| Hello,
I am going to add my two cents in. Installing a new operating system
on a PC which is stand-alone is easy. Installing a new operating
system into the office/network problem creates many complex issues
which take time to solve and is difficult.
Installing Windows 95 is the easy part. Getting it to work
with an existing infrastructure in a uniform manner is not.
Larry
|
4139.4 | NO stil means No | ICS::TOOMEY | | Fri Sep 22 1995 11:03 | 9 |
|
Yes, I have 488/66 which meets all the requirement. You don't seem
to understand, IM&T has refused ny request for a Win 95 upgrade,
perioed.
regards,
bob
|
4139.5 | Digital has to purchase software | MROA::HEIER_L | | Fri Sep 22 1995 11:07 | 6 |
| Please refer to 4070.26 which talks about internally purchasing
Windows95. Even if you bought a copy of Windows95 for home,
it is illegal to install it on more than one PC or install
personally owned software on Digital assets.
Larry
|
4139.6 | "job requirement" vs "want it now"... | SMURF::PBECK | Paul Beck | Fri Sep 22 1995 11:11 | 7 |
| Another way of looking at it: you like it; you want it, but do you
*need* it to do the work you're doing on your PC? If you're involved
in W95 training you can make a really good case that it's a
requirements. If you use your PC for Office-style applications, you
might have a hard time proving that you'll save the company money by
installing it *now* rather than later. (Besides, why go with W95
when NT is **much** better?)
|
4139.7 | Re: .5 | BBPBV1::WALLACE | OpenVMS: where 24*7 _means_ 168 | Fri Sep 22 1995 11:20 | 5 |
| Illegal to install personally owned software on Digital assets ?
Where's that documented ? I have a legitimate copy, bought by me, of
Microsoft Autoroute, on my Digital-owned laptop. It tells me where to
drive to get from A to B, quickest/fastest/cheapest. It's not much good
to me if it's on my PC at home...
|
4139.8 | I can understand why | AKOFAT::pkodv1.mso.dec.com::vaughan | All it takes is a point of light | Fri Sep 22 1995 11:36 | 10 |
| I have installed the latest and greatest software for people in the past without any training after
explaining to the person that it would be a learning curve for me to support it. The first time they had a
problem that I did not get fixed fast enough for them, because I had no training/knowledge of the
product, they escalated to my management.
I can understand why the person would not want to do the install without training. I know anumber of
people doing PC support for GPS that have not even seen Windows 95 yet, never mind had any
training in it or even a chance to test the install.
Dave V
|
4139.9 | | KLUSTR::GARDNER | The secret word is Mudshark. | Fri Sep 22 1995 11:43 | 20 |
| >> Please refer to 4070.26 which talks about internally purchasing
>> Windows95. Even if you bought a copy of Windows95 for home,
>> it is illegal to install it on more than one PC or install
>> personally owned software on Digital assets.
this is simply untrue...virtually all PC licenses state that
you may not use the software on more than one computer
*at the same time*...this provides for the ability to install
said software on your home system, your work system, your notebook,
and any other systems you may have since it is generally impossible
to use more than one system "at the same time"...
that being said, the problems with having CNS/IM&T/whatever
*officially* install/support Windows95 have been discussed elsewhere...
if you are willing to learn a little about how said software
really works, it is definately possible to install both
Windows95 and PATHWORKS95 and get them to work with the existing
infostructure...
_kelley
|
4139.10 | .8 wrapped | SMURF::PBECK | Paul Beck | Fri Sep 22 1995 12:17 | 17 |
| <<< Note 4139.8 by AKOFAT::pkodv1.mso.dec.com::vaughan "All it takes is a point of light" >>>
-< I can understand why >-
I have installed the latest and greatest software for people in the past
without any training after explaining to the person that it would be a
learning curve for me to support it. The first time they had a problem that
I did not get fixed fast enough for them, because I had no training/knowledge
of the product, they escalated to my management.
I can understand why the person would not want to do the install without
training. I know anumber of people doing PC support for GPS that have not
even seen Windows 95 yet, never mind had any training in it or even a chance
to test the install.
Dave V
|
4139.11 | See Corporate PC Security guide | MROA::HEIER_L | | Fri Sep 22 1995 12:22 | 11 |
| Operating System software is licensed per PC while Application software
is licensed per User. Windows95 License states the software can
be installed on only 1 PC.
As for installing personally bought PC software at work. Please
see refer to page 4.1 in the Corporate PC Security guide CP211-04.
You can obtain this guide by typing VTX SECURITY, pick option 6, then
option #1 and #4 (211.04) Personal Computers
Larry
|
4139.13 | Gartner Group's View | HLDE01::VUURBOOM_R | set prof/person | Fri Sep 22 1995 12:27 | 13 |
| Gartner Group has released a series of reports about upgrading to
Windows95 in a corporation. Their insights and strong advice:
- the real upgrade costs runs around $1500
- wait till the first dot release is available (termed I believe
somewhat greasily as the "Tune Up Pack" by Microsoft)
- IMT's should have a definite plan and timetable and should
communicate and motivitate it
- if they don't they will be sorry as users's will attempt guerilla
tactics to have it installed thereby forcing IMT's hand into a
difficult situation
re roelof
|
4139.14 | | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Alpha Developer's support | Fri Sep 22 1995 12:52 | 6 |
| Gosh Bob, if you believe you need an exception, follow it up!
A friend of mine works at New England Electric, they are not planning
upgrades for at least a year.
Mark
|
4139.15 | my humble hat is on | KLUSTR::GARDNER | The secret word is Mudshark. | Fri Sep 22 1995 12:55 | 14 |
| >> Operating System software is licensed per PC while Application software
>> is licensed per User. Windows95 License states the software can
>> be installed on only 1 PC.
hmmmm...although methinks that's somewhat of a generalization,
I'll grant you, after reading the fine print of some more
of these PC licenses including MS OS stuff, that the single
physical PC restriction does come up sometimes...some would argue
that virtually all of these "break-the-seal" licenses are somewhat
legally indefensible but I agree that encouraging that ideal
could be somewhat career limitting ;-) I therefore offically
back down............
_kelley
|
4139.16 | While not on the topic.... | IP$16.65.80.19::S_WATTUM | 2 years with FTAM? Seems like 20! | Fri Sep 22 1995 13:50 | 4 |
| I have heard that the contracts department in Hell is using the PC license
agreements as their new model for the "immortal soul" agreement.
--Scott
|
4139.17 | :-) | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Alpha Developer's support | Fri Sep 22 1995 14:19 | 53 |
| Subj: I: Latest on Windows 95
Microsoft Windows 95 Stuns World
Redmond, Wash (AP) - Fans and detractors of the long-awaited Microsoft
Windows 95 have been stunned and amazed by the incredible events surrounding
the August 24 release. Windows 95 has been hailed by industry giant Pierson
Holcombe Pewter as "the most advanced operating system ever produced." But
even he could not have predicted yesterday's events.
It began when peace was declared in Bosnia. Said Ahmad G'Hui, spokesperson
for the Serbs, "Now that [Windows 95] has been released, we just don't see
any reason to fight each other. This is an amazing product."
Then France announced its intention to stop all testing of nuclear weapons.
"We used to think that our national boundaries were of utmost import. To
safeguard them, it was necessary to continue testing [nuclear weapons]," said
Jacques Fenetre of the French government. "The Microsoft Network (tm) has
changed all of that. It's such a small planet!"
On the other side of the "small planet", George Bush and Saddam Hussein met
face-to-face for the first time. After a tense greeting, they started
sharing notes about their experiences as Windows 95 beta-testers. Soon the
two lifelong enemies were laughing and chatting like old friends. In a
startling display of candor, Hussein said "If I hadn't been so frustrated
with the beta, I'd have backed off from Kuwait much sooner." Bush laughed and
commiserated with Hussein, saying "Well, Saddam, I *told* you it'd be released
eventually, all you had to do was wait. Hey! Let's play some FreeCell!"
Oil prices dropped as OPEC transferred their accounting software to the
new platform. Loggers in the United States' Pacific Northwest turned
their axes in for spades after seeing a Microsoft Video of spotted owls
using Windows 95. In an economic shocker, the Peso reversed its
downward spiral due to huge Windows 95 sales in Acapulco and Mexico City.
On the health front, Hildegard Wicca, a housewife in Boston, MA, reports
that Windows 95 has removed her facial warts. "I sat down in front of the
computer, pressed 'Start', and felt something odd on my face. When I looked
in a mirror, my warts were gone!" Even more amazing is the story of Mark
Cense, the Los Alamos man who was reported last week as having an incurable,
fatal form of cancer. His doctors were amazed yesterday when, after simply
buying Windows 95 at the local Computer Universe store, his cancer went into
remission.
When asked for a comment on these almost miraculous events, Microsoft's Bill
Gates, recently declared to be the richest man in the United States,
replied "If you think *this* is good, just wait until you see Windows 97!"
Reports that China's release of dissident Harry Wu was contingent on his
returning with "as many copies of Windows 95 as he can carry" are unconfirmed
at this time.
|
4139.18 | A Double Standard ???? | ICS::TOOMEY | | Fri Sep 22 1995 14:48 | 15 |
|
You folks are missing the point. I'm at PKO and can't get Win 95
installed. If you're at OGO (Stow) you "can get it installed". I have
a confirmation e-mail that says OGO people are being upgraded, and
yes, their PC is on the network. ???????
Anyone got reasonable explanation to this ??? Wrong DEC location.
PLEASE.
Regards,
Bob
|
4139.19 | | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Alpha Developer's support | Fri Sep 22 1995 15:03 | 9 |
| Bob,
What are we missing? You need help and cannot get it. Escalate,
escalate, escalate! If your request is critical to your job and/or
company goals, then someone up the chain should help you. That does
not mean you won't have to write justifications, get backing from your
boss, etc.
Mark
|
4139.20 | If you can't beat them, join them! | NEMAIL::KGREENE | | Fri Sep 22 1995 15:34 | 4 |
| Bob,
Just move your office to Stow! It's not that far from PKO.
|
4139.21 | WIN95 Courses at PKO | ICS::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Fri Sep 22 1995 17:34 | 22 |
| I work as an instructor at PKO. On Monday, Sept 25 I am conducting a 5
day Supporting Windows95 class. It is the Microsoft course (540) and
is Digital p/n EY-S411E.
We have empty seats. Lots of them.
On Monday, Oct. 2, I am conducting the same course... also at PKO3.
Call DTN 264-7000 or (603)884-7000 to enroll.
There will be other offerings of this, as well as other WIN95 courses.
Other Windows 95 courses currently being offered are:
EY-T124E WIN95 New Users/ Environment 1 day seminar
EY-T134E Installing and Configuring WIN95 2 day L/L (MS course 544)
EY-T214E WIN95 Differences 1/2 day seminar
Tony
|
4139.22 | Don't break the law ! | WELCLU::SHARKEYA | LoginN - even makes the coffee@ | Fri Sep 22 1995 17:51 | 12 |
| The MS Win95 license says
1. Grant of license. This EULA (End User License Agreement) grants you
the following rights:
. Systems Software. You may install and use one copy of the SOFTWARE
PRODUCT on a single computer.
[there's loads more, but I think thats self-explanatory]
Alan
|
4139.23 | Is your Windows95 license owned by Digital | MROA::HEIER_L | | Sat Sep 23 1995 17:56 | 6 |
| Regarding the original question, the author never has answered the
question if he had a Digital owned license of Windows95. If you do
then GPS will help install the software. Otherwise you will have to
wait until you can procure a Windows 95 license.
Larry
|
4139.24 | Eeniie, meenie, minee, moe... | CSLALL::JKEENAN | Jay Keenan (603) 883-7913 | Mon Sep 25 1995 14:45 | 18 |
| Methinks GPS is being just a touch disingenuous here. "We'll support
Windows 95 if you you have a Digital license', but nobody can purchase one.
At the same Windows NT which can be purchased internally is NOT
supported. Does this mean that when every Tom, Dick and Henrietta can
purchase Windows 95 that support will no longer be offered?
Please forgive the cynicism, but this comes from an extremely
frustrated user who has GPS reply to requests for assistance that NT is
not supported. This was before determining that the problem wasn't on the
server.
Here, and in other notes and conferences, I have seen recommendations for
skipping 95 altogether and going directly to NT. Let's see do I pick the
operating system I can't buy, or the one that won't be supported,
Hmmm...? I know, I'll stick with the one that doesn't perform well enough
for me to work productively.
Jay
|
4139.25 | Just my $.02, but?? | KDX200::COOPER | RuffRuff - BowWow! | Tue Sep 26 1995 18:51 | 8 |
| Hmmm...
Seems to me that if one can't install and make work a simple operating
system on a PERSONAL computer, then one should stick with what they
know...Win 3.1%
I personally would just be happy with a copy of the software, I can
figure out how to install the bloody thing...
|
4139.26 | you picked a bad time | WRKSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Sep 27 1995 10:39 | 7 |
| A calendar should be consulted before courses that would otherwise be
popular are scheduled: those Windows NT courses, which are right here
in the building I work in and would have been interested, were
scheduled across both days of Rosh Hashanah and then again over Yom
Kippur. Oh well...
/Charlotte
|
4139.27 | | ICS::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Wed Sep 27 1995 13:58 | 12 |
| re: .26
/Charlotte,
You describe an ongoing problem... one which affects us all from time
to time. Last time it got me personally, I had to fly from Boston to
Phoenix on Easter Sunday to conduct a one-day seminar on Monday.
I'm sorry for us all. But, then, we can't say nowdays, that Digital,
is exactly a "people" company anymore.
tony
|
4139.28 | | NYAAPS::CORBISHLEY | David Corbishley 323-4376 | Fri Sep 29 1995 16:02 | 14 |
| Being in GPS, but not the Helpdesk, have your call escalated. With any
installation, you must provide the software (even if that is just
buying it from QPC). Someone in the group should know how to do the
install even if that individual didn't.
On NT, not long ago their was no demand for NT support. In these times
of always trying (forced) to cut cost, only those service being paid
for get support. This creates the cycle of I have no customers so I
won't invest in supporting it and I won't take any customers until I can
support it.
I suspect with the recent increase in NT interest the support issues
will be resolved. Probably NT Workstation only at first and then the
Server version.
|
4139.29 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Fri Sep 29 1995 18:43 | 7 |
| RE: .18
The folks in Stow that are getting upgraded may be part of MCS.
MCS has a very agressive plan to move to Windows95 (and Microsoft
Exchange).
mike
|
4139.30 | What are they gonna run it on? | HSOSS1::HARDMAN | Digital. WE can make it happen! | Sun Oct 01 1995 22:47 | 7 |
| re .29 That's an interesting statement, especially since MCS has VERY
few systems actually capable of running Windows95. Those 320p laptops
that all the MCS field engineers carry around (with their impressive 80
meg hard drives!) aren't going to run Windows95... :-(
Harry
|
4139.31 | | ICS::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Mon Oct 02 1995 08:09 | 3 |
| what, Harry? You noticed?
:^)
|
4139.32 | | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150kts is TOO slow! | Mon Oct 02 1995 09:09 | 13 |
| re: .30
Harry,
Mike in .29 is correct. The MCS CIO has decreed that the MCS desktop
will be WIN95, MS Exchange, Office 95, and as little custom code as
possible. Our group is working to make that a reality with the
DECgenisys replacement.
I'm not quite sure where he stands on WWW, but it is a part of our
DECgenisys replacement.
Bob
|
4139.33 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Mon Oct 02 1995 10:21 | 6 |
| RE: .30
Who's to say they won't scrap the 320p's in favour of Ultra's over
time?
mike
|
4139.34 | Who's gonna pay for the hardware? | HSOSS1::HARDMAN | Digital. WE can make it happen! | Mon Oct 02 1995 10:55 | 17 |
| They'll have to scrap the 320p's in favor of _something_. Windows95
just isn't an acceptable solution on a 320p. :-( I'd be very surprised
if the folks pushing the Windows95 mandate have considered the cost of
equipping every MCS field engineer with an Ultra. Even at IEG prices,
we're talking some serious bucks. True, they're really needed, but
where will the money come from?
Our MCS field engineers are using 320p's (20 Mhz 386sx) with mono
displays (forget trying to use any serious software on those, the mouse
disappears while it's moving!), 80 meg hard drives (and doublespace
really slows those things to a crawl!) and a 2400 baud internal modem
(there are no upgrade modems available. I've tried to buy one!) The
320ps were already behind the curve when issued, they're way behind
now...
Harry
|
4139.35 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Oct 02 1995 11:14 | 4 |
| I've seen a couple of notes in the WINDOWS95 notesfile saying that people
have managed to get Windows 95 running on a 320P....
Steve
|
4139.36 | | DRDAN::KALIKOW | DIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&Glory! | Mon Oct 02 1995 11:38 | 4 |
| That's cool...
... and anything else?
:-)
|
4139.37 | the (un)lucky ones ... | TROOA::MSCHNEIDER | Digital has it NOW ... Again! | Mon Oct 02 1995 11:56 | 3 |
| From what I've seen of my local MCS folks, those that have 320P's are
the lucky ones (or maybe not su lucky ;^) ). My local folks are still
terminal-based individuals with a shared desktop PC in the office.
|
4139.38 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Mon Oct 02 1995 12:00 | 7 |
| > That's cool...
> ... and anything else?
> :-)
Not before the battery is exhausted. :-)
Atlant
|
4139.39 | But how _useful_ is it once installed? | HSOSS1::HARDMAN | Digital. WE can make it happen! | Mon Oct 02 1995 19:28 | 11 |
| >I've seen a couple of notes in the WINDOWS95 notesfile saying that
>people have managed to get Windows 95 running on a 320P....
Does the battery last long enough to get through the boot process? Just
installing Windows for Workgroups and DoubleSpacing the hard drive on
the one that I had brought performance to a crawl. I can't imagine how
long it must take to get Windows95 up and ready to run a program on a
320p. I'd get tired of looking at the welcome screen.
Harry
|
4139.40 | boot time for 320p is 2 1/4 min for win95 | SCCAT::SHELTON | some cheese with that whine? | Tue Oct 03 1995 00:28 | 15 |
| re last couple
boot time for 320p with windows95 and drivespace 3
I just did an unscientific test and it took approx 2 min. 15 sec. to boot
to the start menu with windows95. its slow but usable.
btw. with drivespace i get approx 131 meg of usable space. this is
without using ultrapacked files. i kind of feel that would be too much
of a performance hit on the thing.
\cheers
\bob
ps i just loaded it for grins, to see if i could do it, my real laptop is
a 486.
|
4139.41 | | LEXSS1::GINGER | Ron Ginger | Tue Oct 03 1995 10:17 | 1 |
| I put Linux on a 320p and it works quite nicely.
|
4139.42 | RE: .41 - Where did you get the diskette distribution ... | FX28PM::COLE | Somedays the bear, somedays the beehive. | Tue Oct 03 1995 16:34 | 2 |
| ... of Linux? I have a spare 120MB hard disk for my 325sl and would LOVE to put a basic UNIX
on it for home learning. Not every source file, mind you, just the binaries.
|
4139.43 | | CSEXP1::ANDREWS | I'm the NRA | Tue Oct 03 1995 17:04 | 2 |
| It's available on winnah::
(Check nlfdc::linux-users for more info)
|