T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4137.1 | That's not so terrible. | IMTDEV::BRUNO | | Thu Sep 21 1995 18:44 | 6 |
|
Well, we (now former) Storage folk got some pretty nice
bonuses, too. Can't say that I was in the same neighborhood as RP,
but I won't begrudge him his carrot (this time).
Greg
|
4137.2 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Thu Sep 21 1995 18:48 | 7 |
| re .1:
Must be nice!
billl
|
4137.3 | .0 not quite correct | DECCXX::VOGEL | | Thu Sep 21 1995 22:23 | 14 |
|
Re .0
> Palmer and other vice pres's get bonuses. Mr Palmer
> got a healthy $375,000 bonus plus 300,000 shares of
> stock.
According to the Globe story Mr Palmer received *options* for 300,000
shares of stock. There is quite a difference between shares and
options for shares.
Ed
|
4137.4 | stock options for the workers? | ANNECY::HOTCHKISS | | Fri Sep 22 1995 05:26 | 4 |
| You need to be level 18 in Europe to get options so I'm told.Level 18?
You probably don't know anyone of level 18-Vps I guess.Are options
still available to workers in the US.Anybody less than level 18 get
stock options this year-maybe I'm being stitched up?
|
4137.5 | level? | PERFOM::WIBECAN | Acquire a choir | Fri Sep 22 1995 10:05 | 5 |
| I'm not familiar with this "level" concept. I assume it has some correlation
to job title? A brief check in VTX didn't turn up anything; could someone
provide a pointer to a correlation table or something? Thanks.
Brian
|
4137.6 | Why have worldwide job classifications? | NEMAIL::KGREENE | | Fri Sep 22 1995 10:21 | 8 |
| Re: .5
Maybe Europe has a different job classification system than the US?
Ours have SRI's (31-42) for exempt, which replaced the old level 2-~
levels a few years back. I recall that a current SRI of 39 = an old
level 10.
kjg
|
4137.7 | high | ANNECY::HOTCHKISS | | Fri Sep 22 1995 10:44 | 6 |
| if sri 39 is a level 10,the a level 18 would be senior vp at a
guess.I assume you did not get stock options or did you?
AS for coherency of levels-it seems to be some sort of state secret
which is not even divulged to 'managers'.It is spoken of in revered
terms as though mortals aren't allowed to know,only HR.I work in France
and the level/title/range system would do Machiavelli proud..
|
4137.8 | must be more "stopping the bleeding" | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Fri Sep 22 1995 11:17 | 10 |
| Me thinks thou doth miss my point....
or maybe the fact that Mr Palmer is realizing a 'serious'
windfall bonus whilst the 'grunts in the trenchs' still
get single digit raises (if any) every two years does
give the same feeling to others as it does me.
billl
|
4137.9 | When the Boss is Happy We're Happy :-) | HLDE01::VUURBOOM_R | set prof/person | Fri Sep 22 1995 12:36 | 11 |
| > or maybe the fact that Mr Palmer is realizing a 'serious'
> windfall bonus whilst the 'grunts in the trenchs' still
> get single digit raises (if any) every two years does
> give the same feeling to others as it does me.
I assume you are referring to a feeling of joy and happiness knowing
that our CEO can continue to buy those high quality suits and
look good in the marketplace :^) besides you would probably have
wasted most of that raise on food for the kids anyway :^^)
|
4137.10 | He also got stock awards | AWECIM::MCMAHON | DEC: ReClaim TheName! | Mon Sep 25 1995 13:49 | 6 |
| re: .3 He also received stock awards shortly after the close of the
fiscal year.
BTW: I hear that here in Digital Semiconductor, we're going to be
participating in profit-sharing: every employee has to hand over a
check for $10,000! 8-}
|
4137.11 | So what? | AKOCOA::NELSON | | Mon Sep 25 1995 16:03 | 11 |
| Excuse me, but where I come from, executives who do well (ie., cut
costs, improve profits, improve productivity, make $$$ for
shareholders, etc.) get bonuses. Business history is full of
executives who did a hell of a lot less than BP has done, yet got
much bigger bonuses. Call me a vegetarian, but where's the beef?
No, I didn't get a bonus and no, I don't get any profit-sharing,
either.
|
4137.12 | 'scuze me, | ICS::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Mon Sep 25 1995 18:50 | 4 |
| but, I personally think the jury is still out on whether Digital has
"done well"...
tony
|
4137.13 | | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | | Tue Sep 26 1995 13:47 | 17 |
| MVCS...field service is the most successfull area in this company
in Canada MVCS our total bonus worked out to 2.5 % of your base
this was paid in 5 installments, once per quarter and then once
at year end.
Palmers looks more like 30 %
Seems fair.
Brian V
PS I'm out of here 10-OCT...going to work for an OEM
|
4137.14 | article from Globe/VNS | ESBTST::GREENAWAY | | Tue Sep 26 1995 14:12 | 35 |
| Interesting to see the upper chiefs being rewarded. I guess Palmer's 41%
(375k/900k) must be the cumulative sum of all Business Units profit
sharing. Storage 10% + Networks 7ish% + Service 2.5% + ?
Cheers,
Paul
Extracted from VNS publication.
<><><><><><><><> T h e V O G O N N e w s S e r v i c e <><><><><><><><>
Edition : 3395 Monday 25-Sep-1995 Circulation : 4574
...
Digital - Palmer, other VPs, get bonuses
{The Boston Globe, 21-Sep-95, p. 49}
Digital gave chairman Robert Palmer a bonus of $375,000 in fiscal 1995,
although he didn't get a salary increase, according to the company's latest
proxy statement. The executive's salary was kept at $900,016, even as the
nation's 3rd largest computer maker posted its 1st profit in four years in the
year ended July 1. Palmer also was awarded stock options for 300,000 shares
prior to the close of the fiscal year and at the time of his appointment to
chairman in May, the statement said. Palmer also received stock awards
shortly after the close of the fiscal year. In addition, vice presidents
Charles F. Christ, Enrico Pesatori, William D. Strecker, and John J. Rando all
received bonuses.
...
***************************************************************************
|
4137.15 | Free advice is worth every cent.. | ANNECY::HOTCHKISS | | Thu Sep 28 1995 12:06 | 22 |
| re 11
Here's the beef..
The jury is out on whether we have done well and is due to return a
verdict of NO.
Reducing staff is easy.Decimating consulting is easy.Efficiently
producing commodity products is easy too(you can buy cookbooks on the
subject..).In the Digital world,reorganising every six months is easy
too-my cat could do that for us.
So leaving all of these miracles out.What has been done in reality.Are
we a more solid company than before?Do we have a well articulated
vision that our customers share?No we don't
Here's the future.
Commodity servers.Commodity network products.Network connectivity as
the key added value.
Client/server?forget it.IBM glasshouse(watch the DVN)-must be
joking.Communications software business?very doubtful.
We still have a company of 60+ thousand employees with 100+thousand
opinions on everything-ie we do not have a shared vision and our
customers know it.CAll it diversity if you will but chaos is a better
term.
On paper,for a small period,we look good but we are built on sand and
Bob does not deserve a bonus.Period
|
4137.16 | As for advice... | LACV01::CORSON | Higher, and a bit more to the right | Thu Sep 28 1995 20:21 | 16 |
|
Sure he needs a bonus. That Porsche is six years old. CEOs do not
drive six year old cars. Porsches cost *lots* of money. Uncle Sam
needs to take his cut (can you spell 38% tax bracket?), and kids
always need something....
Besides he really didn't get much all things considered (cash,
anyways) compared to all the other bozos running US companies these
days.
While the jury is still out on us, the clock is ticking. If we
don't have revenue growth at the industry average, or better, this
year, the spiral will continue....
the Greyhawk
|
4137.17 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Fri Sep 29 1995 13:18 | 6 |
| As Ken Olsen was driving Digital into the ground in the late 80's,
he had some whopping $10m+ compensation years... and he drove
cheap Fords. Altho Palmer has some nicer cars, he still doesn't
come even close to Ken's self-appreciation.
k
|
4137.18 | Free clue | GRANPA::MWANNEMACHER | NRA fighting for our RIGHTS | Mon Oct 02 1995 09:13 | 3 |
|
Ken started and built the company into a $14 Billion enterprise.
|
4137.19 | Not that we're in bankruptcy | HOZHED::FENNELL | A cowboy's life is not for me | Mon Oct 02 1995 12:27 | 8 |
| There was an article in the Boston Globe Saturday on how the upper management of
Bradlees was getting $300-500K bonuses while the company was in Bankruptcy. It
was done to keep the key people from jumping ship.
Bradlee's management claimed this was normal.
Tim
|
4137.20 | Glad I don't have Bradlee's Stock | SHRCTR::BLOUNT | Green as a pool table, twice as square | Mon Oct 02 1995 13:14 | 6 |
| I was incredulous when I read that article on Bradlees. I mean why
would you want to keep the people on board that drove you into
bankruptcy? If they want to jump ship, let them. Use that bonus money
to get some real talent into the company.
Reb
|
4137.21 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Mon Oct 02 1995 13:47 | 11 |
| Reb:
> I mean why would you want to keep the people on board that
> drove you into bankruptcy?
The board of Bradlees can't fire Sam Walton.
It's not a coincidence that Caldor, another retailer similar
to Bradlees, has also entered bankruptcy protection.
Atlant
|
4137.22 | They aren't necessarily paying the ones who were at the helm when the problem occurred | HOZHED::FENNELL | A cowboy's life is not for me | Mon Oct 02 1995 14:11 | 9 |
| The people Bradlees is trying to keep are not necessarily the ones that caused
the original damage.
It would look a bit better if those bonuses were postponed until they actually
succeeded in turning the chain around before rewarding them with the bonuses.
Tim
|
4137.24 | | AIMTEC::BURDEN_D | A bear in his natural habitat | Mon Oct 02 1995 15:31 | 5 |
| > The board of Bradlees can't fire Sam Walton.
Does Wal Mart own Bradlees? Besides, Sam's dead....
Dave
|
4137.25 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Mon Oct 02 1995 15:39 | 9 |
| Dave:
My point, of course, was that it is quite possible that Bradlee's
execs may have managed as well as anyone could, but that they sim-
ply couldn't compete against the stronger, more aggressive Walmart.
There of course may be a lesson for Digital in all of this as we
compete against Wintel.
Atlant
|
4137.26 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Mon Oct 02 1995 18:23 | 5 |
|
I guess Mrs. B isn't selling then...
mike
|
4137.27 | | COMICS::CORNEJ | | Wed Oct 04 1995 12:38 | 19 |
| re the earlier note about stock options in Europe.
You don't have to be level 18 to get them. Several years back I
received some and I doubt I'll ever get to a level 18. The first
"award" I had was around the time the stock almost reached $200 - I dah
options to buy at $157 - ny the time I could have exercised the options
the price was down to ~$80 and still falling.
Digital eventually offered to buy them back and I made about $100 on
the deal. My other half also worked here at that time and won an
"exelence award" - the SWAS (as then) equiv of my Engineering award.
We had a good weekend in a nice hotel with party and side trips - a lot
more than $100 worth (and the tax man wasn't even interested!).
The moral is that stock options these days are not what they used to
be.
Jc
|