[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

4133.0. "Test http://webforum.research.digital.com/xfront.html" by DRDAN::KALIKOW (DIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&Glory!) Wed Sep 20 1995 15:14

                   <<xposted from LJSRV2::INTERNET_TOOLS>>
           <<... as we use DECnotes to build its replacement ...>>
    
    Hi Webbers --

    The long-awaited (by me, by my management, and by the NIS Group's
    management) public demo site for Workgroup Web Forum is about to
    go public OUTSIDE THE FIREWALL, CyberDeities willing, first thing
    Thursday morning 21 September 1995.

    When the public enters, there'll be a bunch of interesting topics
    for them to read, and to add to...  

    "*Why* is he telling ME this?", you ask...

         Remember the story about the undertaker who was taking a tour
         thru a colleague's mortuary (which happened to be next to a
         large factory) when, as it happened, the factory's noon
         whistle blew...  and 6 of the 8 "corpses" laid out in the
         casket room sat up & took out box lunches?  The visitor
         turned, flabbergasted, to the undertaker, who shrugged... and
         said 
                          "It should look busy!"
    
    :-) What I'd like is that any of you who have a few spare cycles
    and web access to have a look around -- and to participate in the
    THREE forums:

	* Read Me First: Web-Based Groupware 
    ((( * Read Me Second: For DECcies ONLY! )))
        * ... BugStompers 
        * About Workgroup Web 

              :-) Yes I *know* there are FOUR...  But hear me out...

    that are listed on the home page.  If you haven't seen Workgroup
    Web Forum(tm) before, it may be a bit unfamiliar... but rest
    assured that ANY WEB BROWSER that supports HTML Forms can use it. 

    You don't need a Login Name and Password if all's you want to do
    is READ, but if you want to contribute (*PLEASE* want to
    contribute!), you'll have to find the link named [Registration
    Desk] on the "Entrance to the Forums" page and do so.

    Since this is going to be viewed during the course of a real,
    high-stakes, customer- and world-visible demo, I'm counting on all
    of you to "play nice" and not be flip and/or say nasty stuff about
    any persons or corporate entities, either our allies or
    competition.  And *please*, no direct knocks against any other
    groupware SW -- whether produced by our competition, or by
    DIGITAL.  This is of paramount importance.  Professionalism
    requires it!  (I know, this goes w/o saying, so pardon me... :-)

    There's even a "mock poll" item or two, that you can enter to cast
    your "mock votes" -- and I especially encourage you to try these
    out.  Note, if you want to change your vote, and have it *counted*
    in the graphical tabulation, you'll have to seek out & destroy any
    preceding vote(s) you might have cast in that string already. 

    As for --

    ((( * Read Me Second: For DECcies ONLY! )))

    That's a temporary, immediate-feedback area that I plan to use to
    get the "sense of the community" about whether I can or should go
    public as soon as I want to, which is LAST MONTH^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H
    no really, tomorrow September 21 1995 at 0900 !!

    Anything you say in THAT forum will NOT be held against you,
    because I'm going to ZAP it tomorrow or whenever YOU convince me
    It's OK for us to go public.  (I warn you, I'm pretty desperate,
    so it'll take some pretty big problems to stop this tide...)  Like
    the REGISTRATION process ferinstance... :-)

    I'm particularly interested in how that registration process works
    out.  So here's what to expect, with some special comments unique
    to the intra-DIGITAL crazy-quilt of EMail transports we have come
    to know and love.

    I must emphasize this, so this is only the FIRST time I'll say it
    here:  IF YOU HAVE ONLY ALL-IN-1 ACCESS AND NO DIRECT WEB ACCESS
    TO THE INTERNET or IF YOU GIVE AN ALL-IN-1-STYLE or VMSMAIL-STYLE
    ADDRESS IN YOUR REGISTRATION FORM, IT IS HIGHLY IMPROBABLE THAT
    YOUR REGISTRATION WILL GO THRU.  GIVE AN INTERNET-STYLE EMAIL
    ADDRESS THAT YOU KNOW YOU CAN "LISTEN" ON, OR PLEASE DON'T BOTHER. 
           
    The URL to journey to for today's "shakedown cruise" is

           http://webforum.research.digital.com/xfront.html

    and UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES is this URL to be given to ANYONE
    outside DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION until further notice.

    When the CyberRibbon is cut, the URL will be 

                http://webforum.research.digital.com/

    Which for the moment is responsive, slightly useful, but CLOSED.

    The way it works is you use your web-browser to enter the first of
    the above URLs as a reader; you then read the ground rules, you
    fill out an application, which includes a full-name, a user-ID, a
    password, an INTERNET-STYLE EMail address, etc... when ready, you
    hit the SUBMIT button.

    You DON'T have a Membership account just then; sorry, no instant
    gratification.  You have to verify yourself to the registration
    process (thanks to David Marques for adding the extra twiddles to
    the Workgroup Web Forum DISCUSSION application).

    Here's some background detail on how you get confirmed and can
    actually start writing in ALL the above forums.

    When it gets your APPLICATION -- which is as soon as you hit the
    SUBMIT button on the application form (assuming you've filled in
    all the necessary fields) a daemon process on webforum.research.
    digital.com sends out INTERNET-STYLE EMail to the EMail address
    YOU SUPPLIED, ... and you (eventually) receive it.  (NOTE:  This
    is EMail from OUTSIDE THE CORPORATE FIREWALL and may be delayed
    during Prime-Time). 

    When you get this EMail message, you are expected to USE your
    EMail's REPLY function to ship it right back where it came from. 
    INCLUDING the ***FULL TEXT of the EMail the daemon sends YOU***. 
    There are instructions in the EMail message text you will get.  

    If you are an ALL-IN-1 user (who is set up to receive EMail from
    the Internet) PLEASE BE SURE TO REPLY WITH THE MESSAGE TEXT
    INCLUDED and USE EXPRESS DELIVERY.  

    When the registration process on webforum.research.digital.com
    hears back from you, this verifies that there is in fact a live
    human being "listening" on your address.  

    The instant your reply message hacks its way thru our
    message-concentrators and our firewall and arrives back on the
    webforum demo machine and the Daemon hears the Happy News, your
    account is turned on using the Username and Password you supplied. 

    A second piece of INTERNET EMail verifying this Peak Experience of
    your Life is sent to you (and will arrive subject to the usual
    vagaries of Internet and Trans-Firewall EMail transport).

       -< It's OK to add your own Topics (i.e., BaseNotes) !! >-

    This is true both for the "Read Me First" and "Read Me Second"
    forums.

    Feel free to start new strings.  Not to worry if you hate the way
    your stuff looks, or you want to back out.  As long as you're
    using the same account as you were when you wrote the item --
    whatever it is -- you will be able to delete it.
    
    IF YOU HAVE ONLY ALL-IN-1 ACCESS AND NO DIRECT WEB ACCESS TO THE
    INTERNET or IF YOU GIVE AN ALL-IN-1-STYLE or VMSMAIL-STYLE ADDRESS
    IN YOUR REGISTRATION FORM, IT IS HIGHLY IMPROBABLE THAT YOUR
    REGISTRATION WILL GO THRU.  GIVE AN INTERNET-STYLE EMAIL ADDRESS
    THAT YOU KNOW YOU CAN "LISTEN" ON, OR PLEASE DON'T BOTHER. 
           
    Please pardon the length of this, and a sincere thank you from the
    entire Workgroup Web Forum Development, Marketing, & Webmongering
    team for any timely help you can give us, and thru us, to DIGITAL.

Dan Kalikow, Ph.D. --  Consultant & Webmonger, Internet Business Group 
Advanced Technology Group  508/486-2116    Fax: -2851    DTN: 226-2116 
Digital Equipment  Corporation               30 Porter Road, LJO2-1/I1 
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
4133.1Oh and BTW, sorry for the length of .0 ... :-)DRDAN::KALIKOWDIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&amp;Glory!Wed Sep 20 1995 16:3310
    Incidentally folks, PLEASE do not attempt to correspond with me via the
    DECnotes command send/author, which will reach me via the
    DRDAN::KALIKOW address.  That's simply a workstation-of-convenience so
    I can run DECnotes.
    
    Please EMail me ***ONLY*** on [email protected] -- Thanks!
    
    (Please re-send, George Munoz from NEO -- sorry, I can't figure out how
     to reach YOU via internet-style addressing...)
                       
4133.2WRKSYS::FOXNo crime. And lots of fat, happy womenWed Sep 20 1995 16:359
Dan,

Is the "live" version the NH Primaries web site that was very played up
on WBUR this a.m.?  It drove me crazy that they didn't give a URL  (I spent
all my coffee break time searching for it using yahoo, lycos, webcrawler, &c.)

Congrats (I think :-)

Bobbi
4133.3plugh.ibg.ljo.dec.com::needleMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Wed Sep 20 1995 16:453
http://www.fosters.com/ is the one talked about on WBUR this morning.

j.
4133.4Foster's goodies are at http://www.fosters.com/DRDAN::KALIKOWDIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&amp;Glory!Wed Sep 20 1995 16:4916
    Nope, the Fosters stuff (currently running at Workgroup Web Forum
    1.0 Beta, baselevel 4) is public, running on a DIGITAL-provided alpha
    managed by John Regan's group.  Gene Kusekoski & his Merry Band of
    Internet Entrepreneurs in the ZKO tribe of the Internet Business Group
    are the SysManglers, and Phil Kincade & others from Foster's Daily
    Democrat are the editors & WebMasters.
    
    The http://webforum.research.digital.com/xfront.html site is different,
    Digital Marketing-specific, and will go public (hope hope) tomorrow. 
    It's at the latest & greatest code baselevel.
    
    The two sites will point at each other somewhere, I am sure.
    
                             Bobbi -- go for it!!
    (and incidentally I will be notifying a certain Internet Paper Airplane
     manufacturer when it goes up.) :-)                                             
4133.5I am confused! Who am I !!HDLITE::MODIWed Sep 20 1995 19:113
    > Read Me Second: For DECcies ONLY! 
    
    Should this be  "Read Me Second: For Digitalites ONLY !!"
4133.6PADC::KOLLINGKarenWed Sep 20 1995 20:272
    What's a NOS?
    
4133.7Tried registering; no luck :-(WRKSYS::FOXNo crime. And lots of fat, happy womenThu Sep 21 1995 09:308
It's 8:27 on 21-Sep, and I still haven't received the initial ack
from my registration attempt at ~ 16:00 20-sep.  I'd say something's
broken :-(

(Not to mention the whole site seems blindingly slow to  my
alpha-base Netscape 1.1N)

Bobbi
4133.8SPEZKO::FRASERMobius Loop; see other sideThu Sep 21 1995 09:4510
        NOS = Network Operating System (e.g. Novell, Banyan Vines etc.)
        
        I was able to register from my home system last night via AOL
        with prompt response via mail - I'd estimate no longer than 5
        minutes between submitting the application form, receiving the
        pro-forma message to be returned via mail and receiving the
        account information with USER ID in return.
        
        Andy
        
4133.9plugh.ibg.ljo.dec.com::needleMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Thu Sep 21 1995 10:3414
>> It's 8:27 on 21-Sep, and I still haven't received the initial ack
>> from my registration attempt at ~ 16:00 20-sep.  I'd say something's
>> broken :-(

I got my original ack, but never got an account created.  I'll have a look
into this.

>> (Not to mention the whole site seems blindingly slow to  my
>> alpha-base Netscape 1.1N)

What relay are you using?  The response problems are internal.  External
access speed seems quite fine.

j.
4133.10plugh.ibg.ljo.dec.com::needleMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Thu Sep 21 1995 10:436
This is from the mail log.  Looks like you provided a non-repliable address.

j.

Sep 20 16:15:07 webforum sendmail[11214]: AA10668: [email protected], delay=00:00:01, stat=Host unknown

4133.11oops !! I'll try againWRKSYS::FOXNo crime. And lots of fat, happy womenThu Sep 21 1995 10:508
>This is from the mail log.  Looks like you provided a non-repliable address.

Yup it should be [email protected] >sigh< I'm not used to the new alias yet :-(

That's what I get for trying to follow the "proper procedures"

Bobbi, who still is more happy being at
[email protected]  , even though "It's against company policy"
4133.12a queryANNECY::HOTCHKISSThu Sep 21 1995 12:426
    I downloaded a test version and it looks like it is tied into Pathworks
    or a NOS.Surely either of these decisions is a major desgin flaw-I hope
    I am wrong since what we need is a server or serverless model.In a
    server model,any transport and any machine is a server.In a serverless
    model,each client can also be a server.
    So,is it tied to a NOS and can it used any transport?
4133.13re .12 "Tied to Pathworks or a NOS" ... nopeDRDAN::KALIKOWDIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&amp;Glory!Thu Sep 21 1995 13:0416
    I have a sneaking suspicion that you are confusing Workgroup Web(tm), the
    LAN-based groupware solution, with Workgroup Web Forum(tm), the Web,
    WAN-based groupware solution.  Please check me out on this...?
    
    Workgroup Web can be used with ANY LAN transport.
    
    Workgroup Web Forum can be used by end-users equipped with with ANY
    Web-Browser, as long as it supports HTML forms.  The code itself is
    tied to (at the moment) Digital UNIX and Windows NT (Alpha and/or
    Intel), and with NCSA httpd and Netscape's Commercial webserver on the
    Digital UNIX side, and with Process and Netscape's Windows NT https.
    
    See http://webforum.research.digital.com/platforms.html
    
    OBTW, the server's up & announced at
                                          http://webforum.research.digital.com/
4133.14plugh.ibg.ljo.dec.com::needleMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Thu Sep 21 1995 13:058
I think you're talking about our Workgroup Web product, which is different
than Workgroup Webforum.

I'd explain the difference, but I'm confused as well :-).

Let me see if I can entice the engineering group to respond.

j.
4133.15DRDAN::KALIKOWDIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&amp;Glory!Thu Sep 21 1995 13:077
    Fortunately, Workgroup Web Forum(tm) is equipped with SWAB�s, to
    prevent just that sort of DECnotes collision.
    
    �SWAB=SoftWare Air Bag
    
    :-)
    
4133.16CALDEC::GOETZEerik goetze; 543-2132; trees for lungsThu Sep 21 1995 14:088
I read in a web tips doc that "Under construction" signs on web pages
are an immediate turnoff for some web surfers, whose attitude
seems to be "if it ain't ready, why waste my time" and who then
click off to somewhere else. 

I don't know how true this might be, what do you think?

   erik
4133.17One opinion...ATLANT::SCHMIDTSee http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/Thu Sep 21 1995 14:176
erik:

  Immediate turnoff? No. New Englanders are used to the idea of
  some roads being PERPETUALLY under destruction.

                                   Atlant
4133.18now would be a good time to fix itLGP30::FLEISCHERwithout vision the people perish (DTN 297-5780, MRO2-3/E8)Thu Sep 21 1995 15:3313
re Note 4133.13 by DRDAN::KALIKOW:

>     I have a sneaking suspicion that you are confusing Workgroup Web(tm), the
>     LAN-based groupware solution, with Workgroup Web Forum(tm), the Web,
>     WAN-based groupware solution.  Please check me out on this...?
  
        Perhaps a name ECO is in order (*quickly*, now that Web Forum
        is going "public").  The "Workgroup" part of the name, as an
        example, appears on some of the Foster's Daily Democrat pages
        -- in that context the word "Workgroup" is just verbal
        clutter (IMHO, of course).

        Bob
4133.19no 2nd ack yetDYPSS1::DYSERTBarry - Custom Software DevelopmentThu Sep 21 1995 17:146
    Like a previous noter, I got the quick initial mail, to which I replied
    (twice!). I have yet to receive the 2nd mail after having sent my
    reply. (I sent a reply yesterday and one today.) Is the problem with me
    or my set?
    
    	BD�
4133.20NWD002::BAYLEY::Randall_doSoftware: Making Hardware UsefulThu Sep 21 1995 18:124
Is this Foster's the same group that makes Australian
beer and sells it in large cans?


4133.21HELIX::SKALTSISDebFri Sep 22 1995 12:054
    No, they put out a local newspaper in Dover, N.H. I believe that they
    are the only daily in Strafford county.
    
    Deb
4133.22Similar web forum tool from third party ??HDLITE::MODIFri Sep 22 1995 14:5345
    Well, the following came down as a feedback to alpha developers support
    web page. Looks like they have a similar product (WebNotes) which they
    are offering to *give* to Digital.  
    
    I thought this is relevant to what is being discussed here. Any
    interest ?
    
    Navin Modi
    Software Parters Engineering Group
    --------------------
    From [email protected] Thu Sep 21 23:43:51 1995
    To: [email protected]
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Feedback to AXP-developers WWW
    Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 23:40:34 -0400
    From: [email protected]
    X-Mts: smtp
    
    NAME:   Stephen Cloutier
    EMAIL:  [email protected]
    
    COMMENT:
    How about creating some Internet available Web based forums on some of
    the Digital's products?  While compu$serve was a reasonable solution, you
    can easily replace (or augment) those forums with a Web based forum which
    everyone will be able to use.
    
    We will *GIVE* to Digital our Web Forums Product, WebNotes, to use at
    your web site for the purpose of implementing thses forums.
    
    WebNotes is an industrial strength Web based Conferencing (forum)
    system.
    
    Please check out WebNotes at http://webnotes.ostech.com and/or Email me
    if you have any questions about WebNotes, or this message.
    
    This will be an absolutely great way for your customers to interact
    with each other, and with Digital support, technical and marketing people.
    
    Regards,
            Steve Cloutier
            (508) 597 5500
    
    
         
4133.23KLUSTR::GARDNERThe secret word is Mudshark.Fri Sep 22 1995 16:241
	note: Steve Cloutier is an ex-Digit...
4133.24Wish these folks much successWMGEN1::rtpdc6.rtp.dec.com::hickst[email protected]Fri Sep 22 1995 16:419
Wow!

I like it.  I hope we can sell it.  The "Forum" product looks like a good 
alternative to 'Notes.

Cool.  I just hope they end-run the marketing department and make it 
successful.  Otherwise, its doomed to oblivion.


4133.25Thanks, hicks!DRDAN::KALIKOWDIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&amp;Glory!Sun Sep 24 1995 21:5811
    Fwiw, I (and some others) checked out OsTech's port of DECnotes and
    found it OK, but wanting in the kind of object-oriented power that
    simply imho DRIPS out of the underlying architecture of Workgroup Web
    Forum.  Plus, it wouldn't have interfaced so neatly with the other half
    of the story the NIS folks put together:  Workgroup Web, a nifty
    LAN-based groupware system that will (among other things) grow
    customers for Workgroup Web Forum.  When I last looked at it, Ostech's
    WebNotes looked like a port.  That might well have changed by now, but
    imho one does not found a new business by porting an old one.  One
    learns from previus successes & rebuilds stronger.
                                                     
4133.26hicks?LGP30::FLEISCHERwithout vision the people perish (DTN 297-5780, MRO2-3/E8)Mon Sep 25 1995 00:0521
re Note 4133.25 by DRDAN::KALIKOW:

        I must say, however, that OsTech's WebNotes feels like a
        reasonably complete implementation of DEC Notes in the Web
        medium, whereas every instantiation of WebForum that I've had
        a chance to use (admittedly all pre-product) seem to be
        missing something *as a Notes replacement*.

        The underlying architecture of WebForum may be "dripping with
        object-oriented power", but I suspect you really don't know
        the implementation technology of WebNotes -- perhaps the
        power of its technology is what enabled it to be more
        "Notes-like" (which certainly was their objective).

        In the world outside of Digital, of course, being
        "Notes-like" buys you nothing;  the question then to be
        answered is what kind of paradigm would be familiar and
        approachable to the world at large and yet still have
        sufficient power.  What does your investigation suggest?

        Bob
4133.27ok but slowWELCLU::SHARKEYALoginN - even makes the coffee@Thu Sep 28 1995 17:544
    I thought Webnotes was OK but way too slow. If Ostech want to demo and
    sell this - they should put it on a reasonably powerful machine.
    
    Alan
4133.28Answer to 4191.1 _re_ Workgroup Web ForumDRDAN::KALIKOWDIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&amp;Glory!Wed Oct 18 1995 16:5260
    ... methought that it'd be best to leave that basenote unratholed, and
    to answer the second question herein...  Here it is, for reference --
       
Note 4191.1           Announcing Digital LivePoll WWW forum               1 of 1
NQOS01::16.90.112.13::Tab R. Roper "Mountain States " 4 lines  18-OCT-1995 12:08
                             -< External Access?? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there a forum on the .digital.com segment that our customers can use to 
ask questions???? And for a demonstration of WorkGroup Forum??
================================================================================
    Wow, what a softball of a question!! :-)  Tnx, Tab!
    
    My own personal vision (which I would personally bet my house on)
    follows.  I'm not representing these as anything more than that.  
    
    In a matter of mere months, Digital (and its competition, hopefully LED
    by Digital) will be hosting a series of web-oriented conferences
    (hopefully all Workgroup Web Forum, but if not, then too bad for us!)
    for all of its products (probably organized into product families). 
    There will be a subscription-for-entry area where PAYING customers get
    to ask/answer questions.  There will be a more OPEN area used for
    generic support, presales marketing, and the like.  Details:
    
    *  You're thinking of buying a DIGITAL product or service?  Read about
       it on (some infocenter beneath) http://www.digital.com/ and you'll
       probably find a Web CONFERENCING center where trained sales staff
       answer your questions...  and where there's a full NI text-search
       engine available.  Kinda lends new meaning to a FAQ when you can see
       them directly, eh?
    
    *  You've BOUGHT some DIGITAL product or service?  Great, that entitles
       you to N months of the use of UserID X and Password Y that will
       enable your entrance to the Customer's Forum, where even MORE
       highly-trained post-sales support staff answer your questions...
       
       The list goes on and on, but I'll leave it there...
    
    Want to see a CUSTOMER-visible demo (that is starting to garner some
    good notices by its visitors from all over the planet)?
    
    http://webforum.research.digital.com/
    
    Pls pay particular note to the mini-essay on Customer Support in 
    
    http://webforum.research.digital.com/fdd-welcome.http
    
    There are plenty of INTERNAL sites where Workgroup Web Forum is in
    daily use.  The Mother Of All internal Workgroup Web Forum sites is at
    
    http://insight.lkg.dec.com/
    
    ... and leave us not forget that this product, and another great
    product named Workgroup Web, are the work of NIS's (alphabetically-
    ordered) Dah Ming Chiu, Dave Griffin, and Peter Hurley.  Plus all their
    colleagues, management, & friends.
    
    Tnx again for the nice slow pitch! :-)
                                 
    Dan
    
4133.29Thnks -- keep it comingNQOS01::16.90.112.13::Tab R. RoperMountain States Software SalesThu Oct 19 1995 17:1910
Thanks for the response.......

I'm spending a great deal of time lately training/educating our partners on 
Workgroup Web, Forum, and our Internet products.  I'll use these now to do 
live demonstrations with our partners and show them how to do it with their 
customers......

Keep the access coming...

Tab
4133.30Waitron, a moment of your time please...DRDAN::KALIKOWDIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&amp;Glory!Thu Oct 19 1995 21:329
    See that gentleman sitting over at 4133.27 and .29?  Yes, that's the
    one.  Rugged mountain-states type.  Please go over & offer him another
    round of whatever he's drinkin', and it's on me.  Here's a couple bucks
    for your trouble.  
    
    Thanks!
    
    :-)