T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4133.1 | Oh and BTW, sorry for the length of .0 ... :-) | DRDAN::KALIKOW | DIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&Glory! | Wed Sep 20 1995 16:33 | 10 |
| Incidentally folks, PLEASE do not attempt to correspond with me via the
DECnotes command send/author, which will reach me via the
DRDAN::KALIKOW address. That's simply a workstation-of-convenience so
I can run DECnotes.
Please EMail me ***ONLY*** on [email protected] -- Thanks!
(Please re-send, George Munoz from NEO -- sorry, I can't figure out how
to reach YOU via internet-style addressing...)
|
4133.2 | | WRKSYS::FOX | No crime. And lots of fat, happy women | Wed Sep 20 1995 16:35 | 9 |
| Dan,
Is the "live" version the NH Primaries web site that was very played up
on WBUR this a.m.? It drove me crazy that they didn't give a URL (I spent
all my coffee break time searching for it using yahoo, lycos, webcrawler, &c.)
Congrats (I think :-)
Bobbi
|
4133.3 | | plugh.ibg.ljo.dec.com::needle | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Wed Sep 20 1995 16:45 | 3 |
| http://www.fosters.com/ is the one talked about on WBUR this morning.
j.
|
4133.4 | Foster's goodies are at http://www.fosters.com/ | DRDAN::KALIKOW | DIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&Glory! | Wed Sep 20 1995 16:49 | 16 |
| Nope, the Fosters stuff (currently running at Workgroup Web Forum
1.0 Beta, baselevel 4) is public, running on a DIGITAL-provided alpha
managed by John Regan's group. Gene Kusekoski & his Merry Band of
Internet Entrepreneurs in the ZKO tribe of the Internet Business Group
are the SysManglers, and Phil Kincade & others from Foster's Daily
Democrat are the editors & WebMasters.
The http://webforum.research.digital.com/xfront.html site is different,
Digital Marketing-specific, and will go public (hope hope) tomorrow.
It's at the latest & greatest code baselevel.
The two sites will point at each other somewhere, I am sure.
Bobbi -- go for it!!
(and incidentally I will be notifying a certain Internet Paper Airplane
manufacturer when it goes up.) :-)
|
4133.5 | I am confused! Who am I !! | HDLITE::MODI | | Wed Sep 20 1995 19:11 | 3 |
| > Read Me Second: For DECcies ONLY!
Should this be "Read Me Second: For Digitalites ONLY !!"
|
4133.6 | | PADC::KOLLING | Karen | Wed Sep 20 1995 20:27 | 2 |
| What's a NOS?
|
4133.7 | Tried registering; no luck :-( | WRKSYS::FOX | No crime. And lots of fat, happy women | Thu Sep 21 1995 09:30 | 8 |
| It's 8:27 on 21-Sep, and I still haven't received the initial ack
from my registration attempt at ~ 16:00 20-sep. I'd say something's
broken :-(
(Not to mention the whole site seems blindingly slow to my
alpha-base Netscape 1.1N)
Bobbi
|
4133.8 | | SPEZKO::FRASER | Mobius Loop; see other side | Thu Sep 21 1995 09:45 | 10 |
| NOS = Network Operating System (e.g. Novell, Banyan Vines etc.)
I was able to register from my home system last night via AOL
with prompt response via mail - I'd estimate no longer than 5
minutes between submitting the application form, receiving the
pro-forma message to be returned via mail and receiving the
account information with USER ID in return.
Andy
|
4133.9 | | plugh.ibg.ljo.dec.com::needle | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Thu Sep 21 1995 10:34 | 14 |
| >> It's 8:27 on 21-Sep, and I still haven't received the initial ack
>> from my registration attempt at ~ 16:00 20-sep. I'd say something's
>> broken :-(
I got my original ack, but never got an account created. I'll have a look
into this.
>> (Not to mention the whole site seems blindingly slow to my
>> alpha-base Netscape 1.1N)
What relay are you using? The response problems are internal. External
access speed seems quite fine.
j.
|
4133.10 | | plugh.ibg.ljo.dec.com::needle | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Thu Sep 21 1995 10:43 | 6 |
| This is from the mail log. Looks like you provided a non-repliable address.
j.
Sep 20 16:15:07 webforum sendmail[11214]: AA10668: [email protected], delay=00:00:01, stat=Host unknown
|
4133.11 | oops !! I'll try again | WRKSYS::FOX | No crime. And lots of fat, happy women | Thu Sep 21 1995 10:50 | 8 |
| >This is from the mail log. Looks like you provided a non-repliable address.
Yup it should be [email protected] >sigh< I'm not used to the new alias yet :-(
That's what I get for trying to follow the "proper procedures"
Bobbi, who still is more happy being at
[email protected] , even though "It's against company policy"
|
4133.12 | a query | ANNECY::HOTCHKISS | | Thu Sep 21 1995 12:42 | 6 |
| I downloaded a test version and it looks like it is tied into Pathworks
or a NOS.Surely either of these decisions is a major desgin flaw-I hope
I am wrong since what we need is a server or serverless model.In a
server model,any transport and any machine is a server.In a serverless
model,each client can also be a server.
So,is it tied to a NOS and can it used any transport?
|
4133.13 | re .12 "Tied to Pathworks or a NOS" ... nope | DRDAN::KALIKOW | DIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&Glory! | Thu Sep 21 1995 13:04 | 16 |
| I have a sneaking suspicion that you are confusing Workgroup Web(tm), the
LAN-based groupware solution, with Workgroup Web Forum(tm), the Web,
WAN-based groupware solution. Please check me out on this...?
Workgroup Web can be used with ANY LAN transport.
Workgroup Web Forum can be used by end-users equipped with with ANY
Web-Browser, as long as it supports HTML forms. The code itself is
tied to (at the moment) Digital UNIX and Windows NT (Alpha and/or
Intel), and with NCSA httpd and Netscape's Commercial webserver on the
Digital UNIX side, and with Process and Netscape's Windows NT https.
See http://webforum.research.digital.com/platforms.html
OBTW, the server's up & announced at
http://webforum.research.digital.com/
|
4133.14 | | plugh.ibg.ljo.dec.com::needle | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Thu Sep 21 1995 13:05 | 8 |
| I think you're talking about our Workgroup Web product, which is different
than Workgroup Webforum.
I'd explain the difference, but I'm confused as well :-).
Let me see if I can entice the engineering group to respond.
j.
|
4133.15 | | DRDAN::KALIKOW | DIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&Glory! | Thu Sep 21 1995 13:07 | 7 |
| Fortunately, Workgroup Web Forum(tm) is equipped with SWAB�s, to
prevent just that sort of DECnotes collision.
�SWAB=SoftWare Air Bag
:-)
|
4133.16 | | CALDEC::GOETZE | erik goetze; 543-2132; trees for lungs | Thu Sep 21 1995 14:08 | 8 |
| I read in a web tips doc that "Under construction" signs on web pages
are an immediate turnoff for some web surfers, whose attitude
seems to be "if it ain't ready, why waste my time" and who then
click off to somewhere else.
I don't know how true this might be, what do you think?
erik
|
4133.17 | One opinion... | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Thu Sep 21 1995 14:17 | 6 |
| erik:
Immediate turnoff? No. New Englanders are used to the idea of
some roads being PERPETUALLY under destruction.
Atlant
|
4133.18 | now would be a good time to fix it | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 297-5780, MRO2-3/E8) | Thu Sep 21 1995 15:33 | 13 |
| re Note 4133.13 by DRDAN::KALIKOW:
> I have a sneaking suspicion that you are confusing Workgroup Web(tm), the
> LAN-based groupware solution, with Workgroup Web Forum(tm), the Web,
> WAN-based groupware solution. Please check me out on this...?
Perhaps a name ECO is in order (*quickly*, now that Web Forum
is going "public"). The "Workgroup" part of the name, as an
example, appears on some of the Foster's Daily Democrat pages
-- in that context the word "Workgroup" is just verbal
clutter (IMHO, of course).
Bob
|
4133.19 | no 2nd ack yet | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Thu Sep 21 1995 17:14 | 6 |
| Like a previous noter, I got the quick initial mail, to which I replied
(twice!). I have yet to receive the 2nd mail after having sent my
reply. (I sent a reply yesterday and one today.) Is the problem with me
or my set?
BD�
|
4133.20 | | NWD002::BAYLEY::Randall_do | Software: Making Hardware Useful | Thu Sep 21 1995 18:12 | 4 |
| Is this Foster's the same group that makes Australian
beer and sells it in large cans?
|
4133.21 | | HELIX::SKALTSIS | Deb | Fri Sep 22 1995 12:05 | 4 |
| No, they put out a local newspaper in Dover, N.H. I believe that they
are the only daily in Strafford county.
Deb
|
4133.22 | Similar web forum tool from third party ?? | HDLITE::MODI | | Fri Sep 22 1995 14:53 | 45 |
| Well, the following came down as a feedback to alpha developers support
web page. Looks like they have a similar product (WebNotes) which they
are offering to *give* to Digital.
I thought this is relevant to what is being discussed here. Any
interest ?
Navin Modi
Software Parters Engineering Group
--------------------
From [email protected] Thu Sep 21 23:43:51 1995
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Feedback to AXP-developers WWW
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 23:40:34 -0400
From: [email protected]
X-Mts: smtp
NAME: Stephen Cloutier
EMAIL: [email protected]
COMMENT:
How about creating some Internet available Web based forums on some of
the Digital's products? While compu$serve was a reasonable solution, you
can easily replace (or augment) those forums with a Web based forum which
everyone will be able to use.
We will *GIVE* to Digital our Web Forums Product, WebNotes, to use at
your web site for the purpose of implementing thses forums.
WebNotes is an industrial strength Web based Conferencing (forum)
system.
Please check out WebNotes at http://webnotes.ostech.com and/or Email me
if you have any questions about WebNotes, or this message.
This will be an absolutely great way for your customers to interact
with each other, and with Digital support, technical and marketing people.
Regards,
Steve Cloutier
(508) 597 5500
|
4133.23 | | KLUSTR::GARDNER | The secret word is Mudshark. | Fri Sep 22 1995 16:24 | 1 |
| note: Steve Cloutier is an ex-Digit...
|
4133.24 | Wish these folks much success | WMGEN1::rtpdc6.rtp.dec.com::hickst | [email protected] | Fri Sep 22 1995 16:41 | 9 |
| Wow!
I like it. I hope we can sell it. The "Forum" product looks like a good
alternative to 'Notes.
Cool. I just hope they end-run the marketing department and make it
successful. Otherwise, its doomed to oblivion.
|
4133.25 | Thanks, hicks! | DRDAN::KALIKOW | DIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&Glory! | Sun Sep 24 1995 21:58 | 11 |
| Fwiw, I (and some others) checked out OsTech's port of DECnotes and
found it OK, but wanting in the kind of object-oriented power that
simply imho DRIPS out of the underlying architecture of Workgroup Web
Forum. Plus, it wouldn't have interfaced so neatly with the other half
of the story the NIS folks put together: Workgroup Web, a nifty
LAN-based groupware system that will (among other things) grow
customers for Workgroup Web Forum. When I last looked at it, Ostech's
WebNotes looked like a port. That might well have changed by now, but
imho one does not found a new business by porting an old one. One
learns from previus successes & rebuilds stronger.
|
4133.26 | hicks? | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 297-5780, MRO2-3/E8) | Mon Sep 25 1995 00:05 | 21 |
| re Note 4133.25 by DRDAN::KALIKOW:
I must say, however, that OsTech's WebNotes feels like a
reasonably complete implementation of DEC Notes in the Web
medium, whereas every instantiation of WebForum that I've had
a chance to use (admittedly all pre-product) seem to be
missing something *as a Notes replacement*.
The underlying architecture of WebForum may be "dripping with
object-oriented power", but I suspect you really don't know
the implementation technology of WebNotes -- perhaps the
power of its technology is what enabled it to be more
"Notes-like" (which certainly was their objective).
In the world outside of Digital, of course, being
"Notes-like" buys you nothing; the question then to be
answered is what kind of paradigm would be familiar and
approachable to the world at large and yet still have
sufficient power. What does your investigation suggest?
Bob
|
4133.27 | ok but slow | WELCLU::SHARKEYA | LoginN - even makes the coffee@ | Thu Sep 28 1995 17:54 | 4 |
| I thought Webnotes was OK but way too slow. If Ostech want to demo and
sell this - they should put it on a reasonably powerful machine.
Alan
|
4133.28 | Answer to 4191.1 _re_ Workgroup Web Forum | DRDAN::KALIKOW | DIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&Glory! | Wed Oct 18 1995 16:52 | 60 |
| ... methought that it'd be best to leave that basenote unratholed, and
to answer the second question herein... Here it is, for reference --
Note 4191.1 Announcing Digital LivePoll WWW forum 1 of 1
NQOS01::16.90.112.13::Tab R. Roper "Mountain States " 4 lines 18-OCT-1995 12:08
-< External Access?? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there a forum on the .digital.com segment that our customers can use to
ask questions???? And for a demonstration of WorkGroup Forum??
================================================================================
Wow, what a softball of a question!! :-) Tnx, Tab!
My own personal vision (which I would personally bet my house on)
follows. I'm not representing these as anything more than that.
In a matter of mere months, Digital (and its competition, hopefully LED
by Digital) will be hosting a series of web-oriented conferences
(hopefully all Workgroup Web Forum, but if not, then too bad for us!)
for all of its products (probably organized into product families).
There will be a subscription-for-entry area where PAYING customers get
to ask/answer questions. There will be a more OPEN area used for
generic support, presales marketing, and the like. Details:
* You're thinking of buying a DIGITAL product or service? Read about
it on (some infocenter beneath) http://www.digital.com/ and you'll
probably find a Web CONFERENCING center where trained sales staff
answer your questions... and where there's a full NI text-search
engine available. Kinda lends new meaning to a FAQ when you can see
them directly, eh?
* You've BOUGHT some DIGITAL product or service? Great, that entitles
you to N months of the use of UserID X and Password Y that will
enable your entrance to the Customer's Forum, where even MORE
highly-trained post-sales support staff answer your questions...
The list goes on and on, but I'll leave it there...
Want to see a CUSTOMER-visible demo (that is starting to garner some
good notices by its visitors from all over the planet)?
http://webforum.research.digital.com/
Pls pay particular note to the mini-essay on Customer Support in
http://webforum.research.digital.com/fdd-welcome.http
There are plenty of INTERNAL sites where Workgroup Web Forum is in
daily use. The Mother Of All internal Workgroup Web Forum sites is at
http://insight.lkg.dec.com/
... and leave us not forget that this product, and another great
product named Workgroup Web, are the work of NIS's (alphabetically-
ordered) Dah Ming Chiu, Dave Griffin, and Peter Hurley. Plus all their
colleagues, management, & friends.
Tnx again for the nice slow pitch! :-)
Dan
|
4133.29 | Thnks -- keep it coming | NQOS01::16.90.112.13::Tab R. Roper | Mountain States Software Sales | Thu Oct 19 1995 17:19 | 10 |
| Thanks for the response.......
I'm spending a great deal of time lately training/educating our partners on
Workgroup Web, Forum, and our Internet products. I'll use these now to do
live demonstrations with our partners and show them how to do it with their
customers......
Keep the access coming...
Tab
|
4133.30 | Waitron, a moment of your time please... | DRDAN::KALIKOW | DIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&Glory! | Thu Oct 19 1995 21:32 | 9 |
| See that gentleman sitting over at 4133.27 and .29? Yes, that's the
one. Rugged mountain-states type. Please go over & offer him another
round of whatever he's drinkin', and it's on me. Here's a couple bucks
for your trouble.
Thanks!
:-)
|