T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3895.1 | Congratulations, Bob | HLDE01::VUURBOOM_R | Roelof Vuurboom @ APD, DTN 829 4066 | Tue May 23 1995 05:53 | 1 |
|
|
3895.2 | Pesatori for COO? | MAIL1::HARRISON | | Tue May 23 1995 09:29 | 13 |
|
Wonder if there is another shoe....Pesatori for COO?
As we make the turn, Mr. Palmer needs to focus on the employees who
will grow this Company again. It is a tall task to be short term
operational one day and a visionary and leader the next. I, for one,
would like to see Bob continue to focus on programs like the matching
401k, incentive programs and any other motivational programs he deems
necessary.
Congrats to our first Chairman of the Board!
BH
|
3895.3 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Tyro-Delphi-hacker | Tue May 23 1995 09:36 | 3 |
| Yep, just goes to show what a coupla notes in ::DIGITAL can for for you!
Cheers, Laurie.
|
3895.4 | Best to Bob Palmer ! | GRANPA::JNOSTIN | | Tue May 23 1995 10:41 | 5 |
| By best to Bob Palmer. He has done more for Digital as President and
CEO than anyone has done in a long while. He continues to direct
Digital down the road to success. It's been a long time coming, but
certainly worth the wait. All our efforts to make Digital prosperous
again are paying off.
|
3895.5 | What is the impact ? | WOTVAX::RANDEE::morrison | | Tue May 23 1995 11:04 | 14 |
|
Could someone explain the different role of:-
Chairman ...
President ...
CEO ... ?
While pleased for Bob, I'm not sure of the implications.
Thanks in anticipation.
Randall
(NOTE: I didn't ask for an explanation of the role of Vice President)
|
3895.6 | RE: -1 | NYAAPS::CORBISHLEY | David Corbishley 323-4376 | Tue May 23 1995 11:31 | 10 |
| Chairman or Chairperson of the Board of Directors, is as you might
expect, head of the Board. Calls meetings, runs the meeting, etc.
Board represents shareholders.
President is traditional 'head' of company, often called Managing
Director (?) in some countries.
CEO - Chief Executive Officer, similar to President, but may have
narrower role, i.e. we now have CFO (Chief Financial Officer), COO (Chief
Operating Officer), etc.
|
3895.7 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue May 23 1995 12:22 | 1 |
| If there was no chairman until now, who ran the board meetings?
|
3895.8 | | ODIXIE::MURDOCK | eltico... | Tue May 23 1995 15:51 | 10 |
|
Phewwww....
Can Bob spell F A S T T R A C K.......!!!!
Sorry that I am in the "breakdown lane..." :-)
|
3895.9 | HE'S HIS OWN BOSS..... | WMOIS::HORNE_C | HORNET-THE FALL GUY | Wed May 24 1995 10:09 | 5 |
| ....As chairman of the board....would make BOB BOB's boss...cool!!!
horNET
|
3895.10 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed May 24 1995 11:18 | 6 |
| Apparently the board hasn't had a chairman for a number of years.
This move puzzles me - it strikes me as a conflict of interest. Isn't the
board of directors responsible for overseeing the CEO?
Steve
|
3895.11 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Wed May 24 1995 11:24 | 3 |
| It's a vote of confidence from the board. It's also a nice 5-10%
raise for Bob, assuming standard $50k-100k boardmember retainer fee.
KB
|
3895.12 | | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Wed May 24 1995 11:31 | 12 |
| >This move puzzles me - it strikes me as a conflict of interest. Isn't the
>board of directors responsible for overseeing the CEO?
I think there are many precedents for the same person being chairman and CEO
of a large company.
Re who calls board meetings if there is no chairman: There is probably a
protocol for this for U.S. companies; I don't know what it is.
Was KO ever chairman? I don't think so, at least not since the very early
days.
I see the appointment of BP as chairman as a largely symbolic move, a vote
of confidence in his ability to lead the company. But a very strong symbol,
especially for the public.
|
3895.13 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed May 24 1995 12:03 | 5 |
| > I think there are many precedents for the same person being chairman and CEO
>of a large company.
Four of the members of the Digital BOD are listed as "retired CEO and chairman
of ..."
|
3895.14 | Palmer Named Chairman of the Board | FREMP::ACQUAH | | Wed May 24 1995 12:40 | 1 |
| KO was chairman of the board before from both post. ie CEO and board Chairman.
|
3895.15 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | E&RT -- Embedded and RealTime Engineering | Wed May 24 1995 14:23 | 3 |
| Except KO never accepted the title "CEO". He was just the "President".
Atlant
|
3895.16 | ...until now | ALFA1::WS19::HARRIS | | Wed May 24 1995 14:58 | 7 |
| KO was never chairman of the board. Digital never had a chairman of the
board until now.
BP could continue to occupy both positions of chairman and president, or
this could conceivably open the presidency to ....
M
|
3895.17 | Who's looking over YOUR shoulder? | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Wed May 24 1995 19:24 | 6 |
| A previous employer (large media corporation) had one man as CEO and
Chairman of the Board. When he retired as CEO, he kept his position of
Chairman (which, I'm sure, gave the new CEO a warm and fuzzy feeling --
NOT!).
-- Russ
|
3895.18 | | NYAAPS::CORBISHLEY | David Corbishley 323-4376 | Fri May 26 1995 12:42 | 7 |
| Having the CEO or President as Chairman of the Board is not uncommon. Not sure
if Chairman has a vote.
As they oversee all employees, that would include Bob Palmer too.
With most companies, internal Board members do not get additional compensation
as external Board members do.
|
3895.19 | Congratulations, Bob... | POBOX::CORSON | Higher, and a bit more to the right | Tue May 30 1995 12:02 | 6 |
|
It's mostly a vote of confidence by the BOD in RP's strategy for
Digital. Yes, he is his own boss (but then he's been that since he was
15...)
the Greyhawk
|
3895.20 | GATES | CSLALL::JSTONE | | Tue May 30 1995 13:35 | 1 |
| Bill Gates - chairman and president. Not at all unusual.
|
3895.21 | **ring** Irony alert ... | HANNAH::BECK | Paul Beck, MicroPeripherals | Tue May 30 1995 15:16 | 2 |
| I'm not sure I'd put "Bill Gates" and "Not at all unusual" on the
same line, myself...
|
3895.22 | More than one vote? | POLAR::PARKER | Great White North! | Tue May 30 1995 17:38 | 3 |
| Just curious, but how many votes would Bob have on the BOD?
Roy
|
3895.23 | | WMOIS::HORNE_C | HORNET-THE FALL GUY | Wed May 31 1995 10:11 | 4 |
| ...remember folks BILL (i am the king) GATES is a former DIGIT......
hOrNEt
|
3895.24 | Bill G a DIGIT ? Perhaps tha'ts whats wrong with us ? | STAR::PARKE | True Engineers Combat Obfuscation | Wed May 31 1995 10:54 | 9 |
| Re: .23
HUH ?
This is the first I've heard Bill G. referred to as a former DIGIT. I
have heard that he used a -10 somewhere to do his BASIC system for the
MITS though.
|
3895.25 | I don't think so | HANNAH::BECK | Paul Beck, MicroPeripherals | Wed May 31 1995 10:55 | 3 |
| He may have gotten his start plugging TOPS-10 bugs, but as far as I
know, Gates never worked for DEC. I think you're getting him
confused with Dave Cutler (and don't let Dave hear you do that).
|
3895.26 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Wed May 31 1995 16:59 | 5 |
| RE: .25
There would just be another hole in the wall...
mike
|
3895.27 | | STAR::PARKE | True Engineers Combat Obfuscation | Thu Jun 01 1995 10:18 | 7 |
| I heard Microsoft has made a special office for Cutler, in the shape of
one of those geodesic domed hourse. Any non horizontal surface is
considered a "wall". Seems 4 was not enough. (Hows that for a rumor
}8-)} )
Bill
|
3895.28 | And he is | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Mon Jun 05 1995 16:14 | 3 |
| Makes it so much easier to be really off the wall.
/john
|
3895.29 | | CHEFS::CARTERC | | Tue Jun 06 1995 03:50 | 27 |
| Whilst it is common for the Chairman and CEO to be one and the same
person it is a subject of great debate in current 'management
thinking'.
Whilst in Seattle last year I took a class on 'CEO's' and in the
current US management literature it appeared that it is not recommended
for the CEO to be the Chairman.
The main reasoning is that the Board is there to oversee on the
shareholders behalf the running of the company. The board also
determines the CEO's salary...
If board members think there is something amiss in the CEO's running of
the company it is much more difficult for them to do anything about it
if the CEO is also Chairman of the board.
The articles I read said that it can lead to 'sub-groups' discussing
things in private instead of having open and frank board meetings.
Can't comment on the truth of these statements, I just thought it was
interesting as this move appears to go against current thinking.
Xtine
|