T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3841.1 | It's not confusion, it's stupid... | POBOX::CORSON | Higher, and a bit more to the right | Mon May 01 1995 15:37 | 42 |
|
This drives us all crazy in Channels Sales.
For example, yours truly can only recruit, and sign ALPHA
resellers. A "regular" channels sales rep then ramps the account and
gets credit for all sales. If the account wants PCs, it must do them
thru a master reseller, or distributor, who has their own Digital
reps not in the Channels space.
Wait, it gets better.
If the account purchases StorageWorks products with an Alpha CPU,
channels can sell them. If the account wants to sell StorageWorks for
SUN, H-P, or IBM connectivity, it must get the product thru Storage
Business Unit channels reps.
Let's say the account now actually decides to resell Multia, then
it must purchase that product thru C&P's VIPS channels, either direct
or from another master reseller.
The same game gets played for services (MCS), networking products
(officially in July 95), and support training.
Our VARs are completely crazed over this, and I have to believe it
is costing us a bundle in lost sales. Recruitment of new resellers has
come almost completely to a halt because new accounts refuse to go thru
this stupidity. Existing accounts are porting to "vendor neutral" O/Ss
(read Windoze WT and "generic" UNIX) as fast as their little fingers
can type.
And our standing in the VAR community (like VAR Business Magazine's
annual poll of vendor satisfaction) is at its lowest in my ten years at
Digital.
This is all done in the name of product revenue accountability to
the appropriate business unit.
Life at Digital is always two steps forward, two steps back. One of
these days.....
the Greyhawk
|
3841.2 | I'm amazed that the ATDs and VARs even bother | SUFRNG::REESE_K | tore down, I'm almost level with the ground | Mon May 01 1995 16:30 | 22 |
| Greyhawk,
You forgot to mention the different BUs having their own "flavors"
of warranty!!
I had a VAR ask for a simple statement of Digital's warranty policy
last week and I couldn't give it to him. I told him our warranty
depended on type of system being purchased; the warranty deliverables
are no longer determined by Standard or List price purchasing.
Personally I think some people should be locked in a room until they
can produce a "system" quote. Let the decision makers see how much
fun it is when the CPU gets Basic On-site for 3 years, storage products
get a different level/term, networks products are RTD and monitors,
well I don't even want to talk about monitors :-(
A sales rep, ATD or VAR should not have to spend 2+ days working on
a quote just to make a quote "seem" uniform when the customer has
asked for 7 x 24 warranty coverage.
|
3841.3 | | CSOA1::BROWNE | | Mon May 01 1995 16:41 | 5 |
| Re: .2 and .3
Until the issues described in these two entries are addressed, any
talk of a "Turnaround at Digital" are premature! And many of us have
pointed these out to the powers that be until we are blue in the face.
|
3841.4 | Who's on first? | MIMS::GRAFT_J | | Mon May 01 1995 16:45 | 5 |
| Hi,
Don't overlook the maze of service/support contracts.
Jim G
|
3841.5 | | USCTR1::abs002p3.nqo.dec.com::SteveSchustak | | Tue May 02 1995 12:52 | 11 |
| Just as an FYI, although the base note originated from a channels partner, any one perusing this
should be aware that THE VERY SAME ISSUES impact our end user / ABU accounts. I just
finished configuring & quoting a $100k+ Internet solution with at least 3 different levels of
warranty based upon the different BUs "standards". I hate to say it, but I've got to leave it to the
MCS group to work out the diffs upon adding the solution to the client's`contract.
What's so tricky about a uniform warrant anyway? Couldn't we just offer a standard 1 year/
3 year on-site/rtd warranty, with uplifts as needed? The tough part of selling is supposed to be
beating IBM/SUN/HP/COMPAQ/SGI/etc., not "equalizing" CP/PCBU/etc.
SteveS
|
3841.6 | .5 reformatted to be readable | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150kts is TOO slow! | Tue May 02 1995 14:47 | 13 |
| Just as an FYI, although the base note originated from a channels partner, any
one perusing this should be aware that THE VERY SAME ISSUES impact our end
user / ABU accounts. I just finished configuring & quoting a $100k+ Internet
solution with at least 3 different levels of warranty based upon the different
BUs "standards". I hate to say it, but I've got to leave it to the MCS group
to work out the diffs upon adding the solution to the client's`contract.
What's so tricky about a uniform warrant anyway? Couldn't we just offer a
standard 1 year/ 3 year on-site/rtd warranty, with uplifts as needed? The
tough part of selling is supposed to be beating IBM/SUN/HP/COMPAQ/SGI/etc.,
not "equalizing" CP/PCBU/etc.
SteveS
|
3841.7 | | OFOSS1::GINGER | Ron Ginger | Tue May 02 1995 17:29 | 7 |
| I started selling for DEC in 1969. We used to moan all the time about
how hard it was to do business with DEC, all the different product
lines had such different terms.
The trade press has bashed us forever about this.
Have we learned anything in 26 years?
|
3841.8 | | KOALA::ngneer.zko.dec.com::hamnqvist | Mailworks for UNIX | Wed May 03 1995 12:01 | 4 |
| | Have we learned anything in 26 years?
Persistance.
|
3841.9 | | SALEM::DIXON_T | | Wed May 03 1995 16:33 | 5 |
| DOES THE CONFUSION RESIDE IN THE EXPECTATION THAT 7 BUSINESS UNITS
EQUATES TO ONE "COMPANY"? PERHAPS OUR MODEL LOOKS MORE LIKE SEVEN
COMPANIES WITHIN ONE LARGE COMPUTER BUSINESS UNIT CALLED DIGITAL.
|
3841.10 | Change becomes us... | POBOX::CORSON | Higher, and a bit more to the right | Wed May 03 1995 17:31 | 20 |
|
No. It's seven companies within one corporation that happens to
manufacture *computer systems*.
Expect rather unusual creativities to take place over the next
several months as all this gets straighten out.
Had the pleasure of spending nearly two hours with a Digital VP
today and we focused our attentions on "fixing" that problem. The PCBU
still needs to recognize reality as it pertains to large (over $5MM
annual purchases) VARs, especially those rapidly adopting true
client/server applications; but C&P (storage, VIPS, and networks) is
on board and I expect the rest to follow.
At least senior management now appears to recognize the scope as
well as the nature of the problem, and that is goodness in anybody's
book.
the Greyhawk
|
3841.11 | Try adding a multi-national dimemsion | SNOFS1::POOLE | Over the Rainbow | Wed May 03 1995 21:51 | 16 |
| I'd like to add my experience to this one.
I'm the PacRim Program Manager for one of our Global Accounts. This
customer has asked for, and been promised, a single point of contact
for all their dealings with Digital across Asia/Pacific.
(7 companies within Digital) * (how many countries in Asia/Pacific?) =
one very difficult smoke screen
It would be heaps easier if I tossed in my badge and opened shop as a
manufacturer's rep.
From a strictly dealing with Digital basis, I think the resellers got
it easy. Besides, they can always sell somebody else's stuff.
Bill
|
3841.12 | | WHOS01::BOWERS | Dave Bowers @WHO | Thu May 04 1995 10:23 | 9 |
| Has anyone considered:
a) Doing away with warranties.
b) Cutting the price proportionally
c) Letting MCS offer a blanket "system warranty" contract at a reduced rate.
Just a thought...
\dave
|