T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3579.1 | Also for WWW | ODIXIE::JULLIEN | Vincent Jullien - Telecom Network Management Program | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:35 | 9 |
| > Have any of the new TV ads been Digitized in either AVI or MPEG?
> If so, does anyone have any pointers on the network? We'd like
> to have them in the Demo Centers.
MPEG encoded ads could also be included on our WWW Server...
Just a thougt!
Vincent
|
3579.2 | WWW ads | NRSTA1::HORGAN | Tim Horgan | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:53 | 7 |
| re: MPEG encoded ads could also be included on our WWW Server...
It's being looked into. There are concerns about our legal rights to
some of the materials (e.g. Lenny's music), and whether we can
distribute it on non-TV mediums.
/Tim
|
3579.3 | "NOT Lenny and Electronic is being worked" | AKOCOA::TROY | | Wed Dec 14 1994 16:32 | 27 |
|
Let me try to be clear again. We are using original music -
Lenny Kravitz is not involved.
We ARE working through licensing rights to images, voice and music for
a variety of uses - this is work in process. The initial focus was TV
broadcast, and DDBN has the rights for this use.
Electronic access to the TV ads using Internet, WWW, etc. are also in
discussion - and we will come to decision based on a best
implementation - we do not want to be in a situation where we promote
producing Movies in .5 seconds, running the world's largest Internet
demonstration in California, and then have a painfully slow and klugey
computer implementation of the ads. Obviously, the rights to the images
(like use of stock photography) also are being investigated.
Thanks you.
Bootleg approachs will be detrimental.
|
3579.4 | "Product as hero will come in time" | AKOCOA::TROY | | Wed Dec 14 1994 17:42 | 20 |
|
We are stoking the image of the company as alive and viable.
Research cited in numerous previous notes suggested that people did not
listen to our product and service claims up to 87% of the time. This is
about two or three times worse than IBM and HP.
The goal of the campaign is to change the context of how prospects view
the company - where we can we bring forward benchmarks, testimonials,
etc.
We are now moving the copy toward DIGITAL being a credible supplier,
and ultimately an accountable firm to do business with - that we back
up our claims with performance.
As our image stabilizes and improves, so will the advertising woirk
evolve - we still are aiming 80-85% of our total ad spending at the end
user and IT audience - with lots of product specific advertising.
|
3579.5 | What about for trade show demos? | CAMONE::BETTS | | Thu Dec 15 1994 14:18 | 16 |
|
Would it be possible to include the TV ads in the
AlphaServer video demo? This is used for trade shows,
conferences, customer meetings, etc...
Regarding the quality of the ad being displayed on the
computer - at least in our case, it would be at "VCR
quality", that is full screen, stereo sound, and
30 frames per second.
We can MPEG it if we had if we had the source on VHS
or BetacamSP.
Thanks,
Mike
|
3579.6 | | SHANE::PACIELLO | | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:28 | 15 |
| I only have one comment about the new adds, other than the fact that I'm very
pleased with the publicity. Almost everyone I know has commented on Digital's
commercials ('course, most of my friends are arm-chair QB'S too).
The one comment I have is in relation to the bright, continous flickering
that occurs during the commercial. There's no doubt that it catches the viewers
attention, but did anyone ever consider that it's this kind of effect that
**COULD"" trigger a seizure for persons with seizure disorders?
Not trying to throw coldwater on the commercial; I just have sensitivity for
people with disabilities.
Mike Paciello
Program Manager
Vision Impaired Information Services
|
3579.7 | | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Tue Dec 20 1994 17:38 | 13 |
| > attention, but did anyone ever consider that it's this kind of effect that
> **COULD"" trigger a seizure for persons with seizure disorders?
The fact that some flickering images can cause seizures is not generally
known to the public. (I know because I know someone who has this disorder.)
I would not expect the people at Digital who are responsible for these ads,
or the advertising agency, to know this. People who have this condition have
to be cautious about watching TV, viewing movies, and many forms of live enter-
tainment.
The ideal situation would be for Digital's advertising dept to be aware of
this and to consider this in future ads. We don't really need to do this to
get attention in our ads. And let's not do the screeching music(?) the next
time either.
|
3579.8 | I'd bet they know | SMURF::WALTERS | | Wed Dec 21 1994 08:51 | 17 |
|
My expectation is that kind of people involved in advertising are fully
aware of this as many of them would have studied psychology. It's the
mechanism the causes the ads to be attention-grabbing in most people
that causes them to trigger seizures in a few people. If you want to
make someone turn and look at an ad, the best thing you could do would
be to put a flickering monochrome image on the periphery of their
visual field.
Many other common phenomena can have the same effect - such as sunlight
flickering through a fence when driving at just the right speed (not
that people prone to seizures usually drive.) I've found that most
people who have disorders such as epilepsy are usually aware of the
problem and try to avoid exposure to this type of image.
Colin
|
3579.9 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Wed Dec 21 1994 09:49 | 10 |
| I haven't seen the advert in question (they never show DEC adverts
on French TV), but I find anything flickering, or rapid changes of
scene irritating, much like a flickering fluorescent light tube, and
when something like that comes on I tend to turn my back to avoid the
discomfort. As far as I know I have no relevant medical problems.
Presumably if such an advert ever did provoke a seizure the company
displaying it might be liable under some sort of legal action in some
countries? Would this be the advertising agency, the company they were
advertising for, or the company that broadcast the advert?
|
3579.10 | | SHANE::PACIELLO | | Wed Dec 21 1994 11:08 | 15 |
| >> My expectation is that kind of people involved in advertising are fully
>> aware of this as many of them would have studied psychology. It's the
>> mechanism the causes the ads to be attention-grabbing in most people
>> that causes them to trigger seizures in a few people. If you want to
>> make someone turn and look at an ad, the best thing you could do would
>> be to put a flickering monochrome image on the periphery of their
>> visual field.
I expected the same. With all the publicity around the Nintendo-type games
producing the same flickering effect (and the resulting litigation due from
those affected), it would seem that advertising agencies would be more cognizant
of the problem.
The other point that is very valid; people with seizure disorders know when
to turn away.
|
3579.11 | probably not a strong enough effect to be risky | SMURF::WALTERS | | Thu Dec 22 1994 09:14 | 11 |
|
It drove me to the Psychology books last night. Not much info, but the
dangerous frequency range is very narrow, and the intensity and
duration of the effect have to be quite long - upwards of several
minutes. The strobe lights used in the old Disco days were the kind of
risky stimulus that could trigger an episode.
Interesting side bar. Rapid flashing of images may emulate some of the
effects in subliminal advertising, I don't know about the US but I'm
fairly certain that subliminal advertising was made illegal in the UK.
|
3579.12 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Thu Dec 22 1994 12:02 | 8 |
| I am not sure what you mean by a "very narrow" frequency range, but
a television screen can only produce a flicker at a submultiple of the
screen refresh rate, and by the time you get down to a tenth of the
refresh rate it is hardly a flicker, more a change of scene. Depending
on what the "very narrow" range is it could either be completely
impossible to provoke a fit (none of the first few submultiples happens
to hit that range) or highly probable (one of the very few submultiples
that you can choose *does* fall in that range).
|
3579.13 | please notify me if/when MPEG available | PCBUOA::HORGAN | Patrick Horgan, DTN 226-5447 | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:24 | 11 |
| Back to the initial request for digitized versions....
I am very interested. If and when the images are made into MPEG I would
like to be notified. We are building some "Advanced Multimedia" PCs that
among other things, will have MPEG playback included as a standard feature.
I would very much like to be able to include "Digital content" with these
systems.
Thanks in advance...
|
3579.14 | | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Wed Dec 28 1994 15:02 | 8 |
| > duration of the effect have to be quite long - upwards of several
> minutes.
This psych book was probably talking about inducing seizures in normal
people. In people who are susceptible to seizures, it only takes a few seconds
of exposure to this sort of image, and the range of flicker frequencies is wide.
You might have better luck researching this in medical journal articles on
epilepsy, if you can handle the jargon.
|