[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

3379.0. "Big meetings?" by CSOA1::ECK () Mon Sep 12 1994 09:16

    Both Barrons's and Reuters have reported that internal meetings are to
    occur this week whereby senior management will inform employees of
    organizational plans and more details on up to 14,000 layoffs.
    
    Barron's is a weekly financial newspaper and is the Sept 12, 1994
    issue.   Reuters refers to a meeting to be held today with 150 - 200
    people with an internal broadcast later in the week to the rest of the 
    employee population.  
    
    The Reuters article was retrieved from on online
    news service called Telescan and was dated 9/2/94.  They quote Lucia
    Quinn, Vice President of Business Strategy for Digital's Computer
    Systems Division.  "We will annoucne the actual business segmentation
    of the systems portion of the Computer Systems Division on September
    12."  Lucia Quinn told Reuters in an interview.  
    
    Quinn also said Computer Systems Division vice president Enrico
    Pesatori would hold meetings with 150 - 200 engineering and marketing
    managers on Sept 12, and a worldwide teleconference to employees will
    occur later that week
    
    What meetings?  What DVN (Broadcast)?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3379.1NOVA::SWONGERDBS Software Quality EngineeringMon Sep 12 1994 09:433
	The DVN is listed in livewire (and was last friday).

	Roy
3379.2WELSWS::HILLNIt's OK, it'll be dark by nightfallMon Sep 12 1994 10:162
    There's a Livewire announcement of a DVN on 21 September at which BP
    will talk about the future.
3379.3BHAJEE::JAERVINENOra, the Old Rural AmateurMon Sep 12 1994 10:192
    ...but someone has got their time zones confused (assuming it will
    shown simultaneously at least in Europeand Israel).
3379.4dvn from StockholmGVPROD::DOIGTE::ChisholmMon Sep 12 1994 12:332
The Palmer DVN will be broadcase from Stockholm, Sweden according to an 
announcement I just received.
3379.5There in San Diego!ANGLIN::PATCHENMon Sep 12 1994 17:046
    	There's a big meeting going on in San Diego today through
    Wednesday. Humm!!! Maybe that's why the majority of the Great Plains
    District management staff is there.
    
    Regards
    Rick
3379.6I don't think so...CAPO::GOLDMAN_MABlondes have more Brains!Mon Sep 12 1994 20:107
    That San Diego meeting (see note quite a few back) is for MCS types
    only, very exclusive.  MCS Sales, Base, a few Service types, lots of
    marketing and HQ.  I don't think this is the meeting to which the news
    reports are referring.
    
    M.
    
3379.7no missed meeting ....POWDML::LKENNEDYtime for cool change ...Tue Sep 13 1994 06:4713
The work cited in the interview mentioned in .0 is ongoing and there will
be an announcement at the end of the week. This work is a continuation of
the Computer Systems Division implementation announced in July, and the 
plan all along was for an announcement *during the week of* September 12. 
There was no 'missed meeting' on the 12th. Following the announcement will
be several activities including site visits that will focus on the CSD 
implementation issues.

This is not related to the DVN mentioned in earlier replies or to the 
MCS meeting.

/Larry Kennedy
 CSD Business Strategy
3379.8a query...CX3PST::CSC32::R_MCBRIDEThis LAN is made for you and me...Tue Sep 13 1994 15:162
    ...and roughly how many people make up the MCS?  Does anyone know?
    
3379.9and theres TOO MANY CHIEFS TOO!MPGS::CWHITEParrot_TrooperTue Sep 13 1994 15:4849
    at last count
    
    
    16000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    15000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    14000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    13000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    12000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    And with ANY Luck at all........we'll 'loose' another 1000 this week!
3379.10KAOFS::B_VANVALKENBWed Sep 14 1994 13:178
    this particular meeting was capped at 950.
    
    That includes MCS managers MCS sales and some logistics.
    
    another fine $1.5 M expense I'd say
    
    Brian V
    
3379.11But will they come back?BVILLE::FOLEYInstant Gratification takes too long...Wed Sep 14 1994 15:125
    The number I've heard bandied about is $3Million, and not only did managers
    go but "base reps" and "cas" types. Haven't heard about ANY logistics
    types. You think it's bad in MCS? Logistics has us all beat.
    
    .mike.
3379.12GRANMA::MWANNEMACHERThe search is onWed Sep 14 1994 15:186
    
    
    Well I am a CAS type and an LSSC rep, none of us went.  Here it was
    base and our managers.
    
    Mike
3379.13CSOA1::LENNIGDave (N8JCX), MIG, @CYOFri Sep 16 1994 11:3512
    re:
>       <<< Note 3379.7 by POWDML::LKENNEDY "time for cool change ..." >>>
>                          -< no missed meeting .... >-
>
>The work cited in the interview mentioned in .0 is ongoing and there will
>be an announcement at the end of the week. This work is a continuation of
>the Computer Systems Division implementation announced in July, and the 
>plan all along was for an announcement *during the week of* September 12. 
    
    So has anybody heard anything??
    
    	Dave
3379.14groups/segments announcedIVOS02::TOMAN_RIFri Sep 16 1994 14:133
    as to the business segments see livewire--it was posted today
    
    rick
3379.15CSOA1::LENNIGDave (N8JCX), MIG, @CYOFri Sep 16 1994 15:2229
    Interesting reading; clues as to "software" and "staffing"...
    
    (re: staffing; recall that he's committed to a 14K reduction in CSD)
    
    >Software Business Group, under Bill Demmer      
    >
    >	The mission of this group is to develop a profitable layered
    >software business with volume products for both Alpha AXP and other
    >industry platforms.  It will focus on network operating systems, work
    >group software, object-oriented software and enterprise computing. A
    >strategy and organizational concept is being tested by a task force
    >whose work will be completed in early October.
    ...
    >	Within the next few weeks I also will announce the creation of a
    >Software Partner Development group.  This group will report to and play
    >a vital role in the SBU.  It will be separate from the PM&D organization, 
    >but it will work jointly with the PM&D and other SBU groups as well as 
    >with the ABU to assure that the needed portfolio of software partners is 
    >in place.  Responsibilities will include establishing and managing 
    >business relationships with software partners and providing technical 
    >support to help developers write and port their applications.
    ...
    >	I have asked Ed Cotter to take responsibility for making sure
    >that the transition is smooth and that we have an objective,
    >skills-based recruiting process to fill positions in each group and
    >segment.  The process for staffing the new structure will be announced
    >in early October.  At that time, we will provide details on the
    >structure, critical skills required and the process for filling
    >positions, recognizing both internal and external candidates.  
3379.16announcement w/Q&A: PM&D POWDML::LKENNEDYtime for cool change ...Mon Sep 19 1994 18:55638
    re: .13/.14 
    
To: Engineering and Product Marketing Employees
From: Enrico Pesatori
September 16, 1994


Earlier today I met with senior managers from Engineering and Product Marketing 
to discuss our new Product Management and Development organization and how it 
will help us meet the needs of our partners and customers with innovative and 
market-driven products.  A copy of the announcement and Q&A is attached.

In a DVN that will be broadcast next week, you also will have the opportunity 
to hear what I presented to your managers today.  But I did not want to wait 
until then to let you know how important your support is to the success of this 
new organization and to our overall business strategy.

I look forward to meeting with many of you in the coming weeks as we discuss 
our plans and put this new organization to work.






To: All Digital Employees
From: Enrico Pesatori
September 16, 1994




Subject: Announcement of SBU's Product Management and Development Organization


When we announced the restructuring of the Systems Business Unit in July, we 
stressed the importance of a product development process that links our 
engineering and product marketing groups in a market-focused, customer-driven 
organization.  We made a commitment that we would announce the new Product 
Management and Development (PM&D) organization by October 1 and have it in 
place by January 1.  This morning I met with the engineering and product 
marketing management teams to review the new PM&D structure and to announce the 
names of several of those who will lead these groups.  I want to give you a 
brief description of the new organization and the principles behind it.

The new structure is a complete redesign of the way we manage, plan and develop 
our products.  It is an opportunity to build on Digital's well-deserved 
reputation for engineering excellence by removing the barriers we have erected 
between the product development process and our customers.  It is also a major 
step forward in our shift from large, functional organizations to accountable 
business organizations.

The PM&D organization in the new SBU will integrate product management, product 
planning, product development and product marketing into clearly defined, 
market-driven business groups.  Each will have the resources necessary to 
develop profitable, volume products that our channel partners want to sell and 
our customers want to buy. And each PM&D business manager will be accountable 
for his or her results.

The new organization is built on five fundamental principles:

First, to foster innovation.  Our customers are looking for creative ideas and 
fresh approaches to their business problems.  We will focus the considerable 
talents in our engineering and product marketing organizations on meeting 
customer needs.

Second, to return to profitability.  This means delivering channel-ready 
products to our partners and end-users at competitive costs -- costs that 
support competitive prices and competitive margins.    
      
Third, to define businesses and appoint business managers responsible and 
accountable for the success of products over their entire life cycle.  This 
responsibility will be closely aligned with those levels in the organization 
that have the most detailed knowledge of their customers, competitors and 
marketplace economics.

Fourth, to provide product business managers with the resources they need to be 
successful, including:

  Product Management, which is responsible for leading the cross-functional 
  team and delivering business results over the entire life cycle of the 
  product,

  Product Planning, responsible for translating market needs into product 
  requirements,

  Product Development, responsible for designing and implementing channel-
  ready products that meet customer needs, and,

  Product Marketing, responsible for the key market-based aspects of product 
  success.

Finally, PM&D managers will take the lead role in achieving total product P&L 
commitments, working with SBU manufacturing, sales and marketing; the Accounts 
Business Unit; and Multivendor Customer Services.

With this new organization, we will position product development resources 
closer to the market and to our customers.  We will have a better understanding 
of what our channel partners need and how to meet those needs.  We will make 
faster decisions.  And by maximizing revenue and minimizing cost, we will 
restore the SBU to profitability. The PM&D organization is the result of a 
cross-functional team that has spent two months and invested a great deal of 
thought working with me to develop a structure that will maximize our resources 
and meet the needs of our customers.  The design of this organization reflects 
input from the Digital community worldwide.

PM&D is divided into three product business groups, whose managers will report 
directly to me in my role as acting head of the SBU.  These three business 
groups align our core strengths with identifiable customers, distinct 
competitors and market economics.

The primary role of the business groups is to define product and market 
strategies, develop products to execute those strategies and deliver results.  
Within some groups there will be business segment organizations.  Business 
segments will be primarily responsible for defining strategies, developing 
products and delivering results within their product areas.

Both the group and segment managers will be taking on new challenges in filling 
these roles.  Their jobs represent a significant expansion of their 
responsibilities over past positions.

The new organizations and their managers are:

Alpha Systems Business Group		Position Open

  The mission of this group is to grow profitably the volume of our Alpha AXP, 
  UNIX and Windows NT systems business.  It is composed of three platform 
  business segments, each of which is accountable for its financial results, 
  and two operating systems software business segments.

  Server Business Segment		Pauline Nist, Vice President

  Low-end Server Business Segment	Position Open

  Workstation Business Segment		Philippe Ribeyre, Vice President
  					Philippe is also acting as the Low-end 
  					Server Business Segment manager until 
  					that position is filled.

  UNIX Software Business Segment	Don Harbert, Vice President

  Windows NT Software Business Segment	Position Open
  					Don Harbert will act as the Windows NT 
  					Software Business Segment manager until 
  					the position is filled.

In addition, I have asked Dick Fishburn to manage the Alpha Systems Business
Group on an interim basis while we recruit externally.

OpenVMS Business Group			Jesse Lipcon, Vice President

  The mission of this group is to achieve our OpenVMS revenue and profit goals.  
  It will be responsible for the OpenVMS operating system and OpenVMS layered 
  products.  In addition, the group will have business responsibility for all 
  Alpha AXP systems that ship with the OpenVMS operating system and for VAX 
  hardware.

Software Business Group			Bill Demmer, Vice President

  The mission of this group is to develop a profitable layered software 
  business with volume products for both Alpha AXP and other industry 
  platforms.  It will focus on network operating systems, work group software, 
  object-oriented software and enterprise computing.  A strategy and 
  organizational concept is being tested by a task force whose work will be 
  completed in early October.

Other organizations will be established within the SBU to support and foster 
the PM&D implementation.  They include:

Shared Services -- Shared engineering and marketing services and other 
supporting functions will be established to provide a common, cost-effective 
resource across groups and segments.  A task force will make recommendations 
regarding scope, management accountability and principles in early October.

Options -- Given the importance of the aftermarket revenue and profit stream, a 
focused approach is needed to manage this business.  A task force will 
recommend the principles of operation in early October.

Within the next few weeks I also will announce the creation of a Software 
Partner Development group.  This group will report to and play a vital role in 
the SBU.  It will be separate from the PM&D organization, but it will work 
jointly with the PM&D and other SBU groups as well as with the ABU to assure 
that the needed portfolio of software partners is in place.  Responsibilities 
will include establishing and managing business relationships with software 
partners and providing technical support to help developers write and port 
their applications.  

In my role as Vice President and General Manager of the Computer Systems 
Division, I am pleased to announce the appointment of Bob Supnik, Senior 
Corporate Consulting Engineer, as Vice President, Architecture and Technology, 
for CSD.

Bob has played a key role in developing the new PM&D organization.  In his new 
position, Bob will be responsible for evaluating the impact of new technologies 
and long-term trends on CSD's businesses.  He will work closely with the 
Advanced Technology Group to foster the exchange of innovation and to create a 
process for transferring technology between CSD groups.  In that role he will 
lead a small, highly skilled design team.  Bob also will be responsible for 
selecting and evolving the key architectural standards which support the 
division's activities.  And he will initiate an engineering stewardship program 
to preserve those cross-product activities that promote innovation and 
achievement in engineering.     

I also want to congratulate Mahendra Patel, who will be the technology leader 
for the ABU.  He will report directly to Vincenzo Damiani. 

The job of building the new PM&D organization has only begun.  The newly 
appointed group and segment managers are meeting as a team to start work on the 
next steps.  We will begin implementation after October 3, and the new 
organization will become fully operational by January 1.

This will involve a complex transition.  However, those in the engineering and 
product marketing communities should have no doubts about the reporting 
structure as of Monday.  You will report to the same managers you report to 
today.  The same managers are in charge of the transition.  It is very 
important that you continue to meet the engineering and business commitments of 
your current organization.

I have asked Ed Cotter to take responsibility for making sure that the 
transition is smooth and that we have an objective, skills-based recruiting 
process to fill positions in each group and segment.  The process for staffing 
the new structure will be announced in early October.  At that time, we will 
provide details on the structure, critical skills required and the process for 
filling positions, recognizing both internal and external candidates.

I have complete confidence in this new organization and those who will lead it.  
Together with the talented people from engineering and product marketing, they 
will play a key role in returning the SBU to growth and profitability.    


PM&D Implementation

Q&A Package



This Q&A package is grouped around questions about the PM&D concept 
and about employee-specific, customer-specific and partner-specific 
questions.

I. The Concept:

Q:   What is PM&D?

A:   Product Management and Development (PM&D) is a business concept 
     that integrates product management, product planning, product 
     development and product marketing into a single, market-focused process. 
     Organizations that employ the PM&D model are global, have focused P&L 
     accountability and apply resources to deliver competitive products to the 
     markets and manage them throughout their life cycle.	

Q:   How is this different from any number of past changes?

A:   The new product businesses are formulated to serve specific markets. 
     Product marketing and Engineering are united within discrete 
     businesses. Managers are accountable for financial results, are 
     empowered to make business decisions and control key resources. 

Q:   What are the core problems addressed with this change?

A:   The core problems being fixed are the inability to react quickly to market
     changes, deliver efficiently innovative products to customers and  
     motivate our employees. Because the existing structure does not clearly 
     identify business responsibility and accountability, we miss 
     opportunities. 

     Without clear focus for our technical activities and timely connections 
     among all functions, we kept people from doing the very work that would 
     gain market acceptance and thus we lacked competitive advantage in the 
     eyes of our customers.

Q:   What are the major benefits which will result from this change?

A:   This new structure puts resources and decision making closer to the 
     customer, drives accountability and authority for business performance 
     down through the organization, and enables faster decision making. 

Q:   How does this structure relate to our overall product strategy? Our 
     software strategy in particular?

A:   We will complete our current commitments for impending product 
     announcements and continue our work to refresh our product line. The 
     biggest change is that the people making product decisions are also 
     accountable for the business results. We're redesigning the work to ensure 
     that the products we bring to market are those that our partners want to 
     sell and our customers want to buy, and which have high volume 
     potential.

     We are not satisfied with the robustness of our software strategy or 
     product set and work continues to improve both. We will make more 
     software available to our customers through a combination of expanded 
     use of partners and refocused internal development. Several senior 
     managers and technologists are in the process of examining the entire 
     portfolio and I expect a recommendation on software strategy in October.

Q:   Where does Digital's product strategy come from?

A:   The PM&D Group and Segment business managers are clearly 
     responsible for defining and implementing product strategy and 
     delivering competitive products. They will work closely with the CSD 
     Product Strategy, Business Strategy and Architecture & Technology 
     groups.
 
Q:   Who really owns the P&L for products?

A:   Product P&L responsibility resides in the PM&D organizations at the 
     levels with the most detailed knowledge of their customers, competitors 
     and marketplace economics. This is at the segment level for the three 
     platform business segments, and at the group level for the OpenVMS 
     Business Group and the Software Business Group. Decisions, work and 
     resources reside in the smallest business entity to drive market 
     responsiveness and rapid decision-making. 

Q:   Who was involved in formulating the plans to implement the PM&D process?

A:   A Core Team of senior managers from across the corporation have been 
     involved in the design of this structure and support it. We have discussed 
     the changes with product designers, engineering, marketing and sales 
     managers, and product managers from several groups, in the USA and 
     internationally, to test the principles and plan out the implementation 
     process. The design reflects what customers and partners have told CSD 
     management they want to support their business needs and has also been 
     tested with industry experts.

Q:   What was the rationale for organizing around these three major businesses?

A:   Each business satisfied three criteria: identifiable customers, distinct 
     competitors and market economics specific to that group's product set.

Q:   When will more details be available on how the new businesses will 
     interact, be managed, and succeed?

A:   The phased implementation of the new businesses begins after October 3, 
     1994, and a detailed implementation plan will be announced at that time. 
     Our target for full implementation of the new structure is January 1995. 
     In the meantime, we will continue to honor our product and business 
     commitments without interruption through the existing organization.

Q:   Digital has traditionally had a very strong central engineering function. 
     Why put Engineering into the PM&D structure?

A:   By placing Engineering in the businesses we can more tightly connect 
     Product Development and Marketing, and link these to Manufacturing 
     and Sales, enabling the whole organization to react quickly to the market. 
     We can thus focus our limited resources on the most appropriate product 
     mix.

Q:   What will be centrally managed across the product Groups and Segments? 
     How do you cost and allocate these functions?

A:   The PM&D Leadership Team, comprised of the Group and Segment 
     Managers and leaders of several implementation support teams, is 
     currently working on the most effective ways to deploy and manage 
     shared marketing and engineering resources and other support functions 
     needed by more than one Segment or Group. This work is scheduled for 
     completion in October.

Q:   How will the product PM&D Groups and Segments relate to other SBU, 
     ABU and Digital organizations and functions?  For example, how does 
     forecasting get done?

A:   The PM&D Groups and Segments will have direct and regular 
     interactions with SBU Manufacturing and Field Sales, Marketing and 
     ABU around product requirements, forecasts, product marketing and 
     product cost.  SBU management is currently working with other business 
     units across the corporation to plan the deployment of resources to 
     support forecasting, logistics and other critical work. A new forecasting 
     process for the SBU, will be defined under the direction of the 
     Manufacturing organization and implemented by January 1, 1995.

Q:   How will the management team ensure that this new structure is 
     effectively implemented?

A:   The objective is to be fully operational by January 1995. An 
     implementation plan with clear deliverables and milestones will be 
     shared in early October. CSD management has established an 
     implementation team whose work is reviewed regularly, against 
     milestones and deliverables at CSD and SBU management team levels.  
     Progress will be communicated through employee meetings, special 
     editions of Digital Today, Readers Choice, Worldwide Web, VTX and 
     Infoteam, and the managers will be provided with briefing packages to 
     ensure that all the details are available and understood. It's not 
     possible for us to succeed without the understanding and support of each 
     employee.

Q:   What is the role of those who are managing groups or segments on an 
     acting basis?

A:   Acting managers will get the new businesses established by assembling 
     existing resources under an interim management structure.  Our long-
     term intent is to manage the new businesses with the best talent 
     available in the industry. We must now move forward with the new 
     market-focused businesses and implement new processes in order to best 
     bring competitive products to market. We will, however, develop a 
     management team that will draw on the very best talent over time.

Q:   Is the OpenVMS Business Group responsible for AlphaAXP hardware 
     engineering?

A:   No. OpenVMS is charged with the full OpenVMS business, but in the 
     area of development it is only responsible for OpenVMS operating systems 
     and OpenVMS layered products. It uses AlphaAXP hardware provided by 
     the Alpha Systems Business Group to supply OpenVMS systems to its 
     customers. 

Q:   Previous attempts like this failed in part because of difficulty in 
     tracking costs, allocations, etc. If the Group or Segment business manager 
     is going to be accountable for P&L, then that manager will also need 
     control over all of it -- even allocations. How will this control be 
     implemented?

A:   Work is underway to provide the Group and Segment managers with the 
     systems necessary to make market-supporting decisions and to measure 
     their businesses. At the same time they will work through SBU 
     Manufacturing and Sales to achieve their business results.

Q:   How will we ensure that innovation is fostered in the new structure?

A:   It is clear that we must find ways to foster and support innovation within 
     the SBU. In ways similar to those our competitors use, the Groups and 
     Segments will encourage new sources of innovation, springing in part 
     from having a directed organization and talented employees. We will 
     direct both people and resources toward focused markets. This should 
     provide impetus and meaning for bringing ideas forward. We will 
     measure and incent managers to identify innovative programs at all 
     levels with the help of their organizations and to increase revenues from 
     new products. 

Q:   Will the PM&D business segment manager really have responsibility for 
     pricing? 

A:   Yes. The PM&D Business Managers, at Group and Segment levels, are 
     responsible for pricing strategy and setting worldwide list prices 
     throughout the life cycle of the products offered by their unit. They 
     agree to standard discount structures established by the Areas. This means 
     that the initial business plan must make pricing strategies clear.

Q:   How long is this change in our business going to last? When can we expect 
     to see the next change?

A:   The fundamental principles embodied in the PM&D organizations should 
     not change and our intention is to remain stable while best meeting the 
     needs of a changing customer environment and marketplace. Under such 
     circumstances we'll make whatever modifications are needed, when and 
     as they are needed.

Q:   Who owns the salesforce? How do the product Groups and Segments get 
     the attention of the salesforce? 

A:   SBU sales & marketing and the ABU manage the salesforce and the 
     relationships for indirect selling. The PM&D Group and Segment 
     business managers will develop distribution plans for new products that 
     link to those of channels management in the SBU and to those of account 
     management in the ABU. The new PM&D management team, along with 
     ABU and SBU senior management, are working together to develop 
     consistency of operating principles for executing distribution strategies. 


II. Employee Specific:

Q:   How should I approach my current work in light of this change?

A:   It is critical that we keep our eyes on our current goals and not divert 
     attention from essential priorities. The PM&D phase over plan will be 
     communicated by early October with information and schedules for 
     organization changes.

Q:   Who decides who stays and who leaves the company?

A:   These decisions will be made by managers within the individual business 
     units. These decisions will be based upon business needs, on the skills 
     required to satisfy those needs.

Q:   Who is affected by the new structure and who is not? 

A:   All employees currently in the SBU engineering, product marketing, 
     product management and product segment organizations will soon be 
     working in the new PM&D structure. In addition, the business plans, 
     investments and products of the SBU's PM&D product Groups and 
     Segments will impact other parts of the SBU and other parts of Digital.

     We are all affected by this fundamental change in the way we invest in 
     technology and people and the way we bring products to market. All our 
     work will have much more meaning as we measure our performance 
     against market goals.

Q:   What is the process for assessing skills and putting the best people on 
     the job?

A:   The new PM&D managers are accountable within established policy for 
     assessing skills and making the decisions for placement. Human 
     Resources has developed a staffing process for aligning the best skills 
     required to perform the new work. This process is designed to select the 
     most qualified candidates for open positions based on objective criteria 
     and to identify ways that training and education can enhance the skills of 
     selected candidates. We are also supporting an active college hire program 
     to provide the Groups and Segments with access to talent available 
     outside the Company.

Q:   What will be invested in career development and planning and also in 
     skills enhancement and enrichment?

A:   We are increasing our education/training investment. We are going to 
     train the people in our organization with new skills so we can achieve our 
     business and product goals. We are accelerating delivery of education 
     programs, beginning in the fall. Our new programs extend to engineering, 
     marketing, and management personnel worldwide.

Q:   Is there a future in Engineering in Digital?

A:   There is most definitely a future in Digital for innovative engineers with 
     the skills and experience most needed by the marketplace. Engineers will 
     participate in multifunctional teams within PM&D businesses where 
     their personal skills can and should grow. Some engineers, those 
     specializing in applied research and in other specialized activities, will 
     work in the ATG. In addition, Bob Supnik, as part of his new duties as 
     Vice President, Architecture & Technology for CSD, will initiate an 
     engineering stewardship program to preserve those cross-product 
     activities that drive toward engineering excellence.

Q:   Is there a future in Product Marketing in Digital?

A:   There is most definitely a future in Digital for product marketing 
     professionals with the skills and experience needed to develop product 
     marketing plans and programs to drive volume of products in their 
     segment.  Product marketing professionals will work on teams where 
     their personal skills, total business experience and technical knowledge 
     can and should grow.

Q:   How do we preserve the Engineering community if individuals are split 
     between SBU organizations, PM&D organizations and other business 
     units?

A:   To ensure that engineering teams are connected to the market and are 
     part of a business team, we will no longer have a central engineering 
     organization. However, the PM&D management team understands the 
     importance of maintaining a feeling of community throughout the Digital 
     engineering groups, both inside the SBU and beyond the SBU. Managers 
     will be addressing ways to achieve this feeling of community by 
     considering items such as performance reviews, shared project work, 
     common development processes and standards, technical training and 
     seminars, career progression and mobility, etc.

Q:   Is there an implementation plan to ensure appropriate 
     internationalization and localization of PM&D requirements?

A:   Product focused Groups and Segments have worldwide responsibility, so 
     internationalization/localization will be a key requirement. 
     Implementation plans will address how to integrate the critical resources 
     to deliver channel-ready products on a global basis. The Core Team has 
     tested the principles and objectives of this plan with designers and 
     managers representing international groups.


III. Customer Specific:

Q:   Won't product segments and groups favor selling through the captive 
Accounts Business Unit (ABU) for selected accounts?

A:   No, not at all. The ABU is measured on overall business in an account - 
     including systems integration and other business provided by resellers. 
     The incentives are clearly oriented to how the customer wants to buy, not 
     how we want to sell.

Q:   If Digital is more focused on discrete product areas, does this mean that 
     customers won't be able to buy a complete solution any more?

A:   No, the ABU will still be a full service channel for our larger accounts. 
     Other customers will receive full solutions via their indirect channel 
     suppliers. These full solutions will include a higher portion of 
     non-Digital products. The development of indirect channels is a critical  
     step toward achieving the volumes necessary to sustain long-term 
     profitability.

Q:   How does this structure compare with other successful competitors'
     techniques?

A:   The segmentation and structure is similar to those of many competitors,   
     such as Hewlett Packard and Compaq, as is the creation of strong product 
     management and business orientation. We have gone further than most of 
     our competitors in aligning resources by business unit. 

Q:   Given that many products are bought together (HW, SW, etc.) and you've 
     split them into different product Segments, how will the new structures 
     operate in a "customer friendly" manner?

A:   The three SBU product Groups are segmented by customer buying 
     preferences. Selling models for the ABU and the SBU will bring both 
     channel-ready products and consistent messages to our partners and to 
     our direct accounts.

Q:   What happens to Industry Marketing?

A:   What was Industry Marketing will reside in several places:  the activity 
     that supports those specific industries on which we'll focus will reside 
     in the ABU; the activity supporting other partners will reside in SBU 
     sales & marketing; the activity supporting software development will 
     reside in the SBU Software Partners Development group. The phase over plan 
     will provide more detail in a few weeks.


IV.  Partner Specific:

Q:   How does this new approach change your commitment to partners?

A:   This approach reaffirms our commitment to partners in a number of ways. 
     The field will be responsible for managing channel partners and the 
     PM&D organizations will be responsible for developing partner strategies. 
     Cross unit development/channel partners will be managed through an 
     SBU Software Partner Development group working with the line units.

Q:   What is an Expertise Center? How does it support a partner?

A:   The Expertise Centers provide support to application partners for 
     technology, customer events, and demonstrations. Expertise Centers 
     provide proof of concepts concentrated on particular areas such as 
     industries, products, and technologies.

Q:   What will the product Segments do to increase market pull to support 
     Digital's new channels strategy? We plan to increase advertising and 
     marketing programs significantly from historical levels, both in absolute 
     terms and as a percentage of SG&A. We plan to have fully competitive 
     SG&A levels.

A:   Increased efficiency in product marketing and increased market focus will 
     improve marketing activities such as advertising focused on key 
     product/customer sets. This focus will help us apply our scarce resources 
     best for market results.

Q:   How will scarce products be allocated among partners and Digital's 
     Accounts Business Unit?

A:   The ABU and external partners will be treated the same for allocation 
     purposes. In fact, all our business practices will treat internal and 
     external partners in an equal manner.

     

3379.17This is a winnerPOBOX::CORSONHigher, and a bit more to the rightTue Sep 20 1994 15:299
    
    	-1
    
    	Long overdue. Excellent focus. Answers damn near every question
    	everyone has had over the past six months. Is aimed at the
        marketplace as it exists now. If we excute properly, its a winner.
    	About time. I feel great.
    
    		the Greyhawk