T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3369.1 | What value is an ACRONYM anyway? | CXDOCS::COPELAND | | Fri Sep 02 1994 12:26 | 10 |
| >>and that we need a new acronym, and possibly a new name to
>>fit the acronym, for Valuing Diversity.
Why? What's wrong with just using the term Valuing Diversity?
Acronyms have become totally out of control. I am in the technical
documentation field, and for clarity, we try to
limit documentation to contain as few acronyms as possible,
Try to do that with Digital documentation. Impossible!
|
3369.2 | ... and are we still valuing diversity anymore? | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Fri Sep 02 1994 12:28 | 0 |
3369.3 | value is the wrong word....... | MPGS::CWHITE | Parrot_Trooper | Fri Sep 02 1994 12:48 | 13 |
| My thoughts...........
Everyone must Acknowledge diversity....... (A_D) but NO ONE needs
to value that diversity if:
you don't want to
no one seems to value your's in return
your values and morals would be compromised if you were to
Why waste time with it?
p/t
|
3369.4 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Fri Sep 02 1994 13:26 | 4 |
| > Title: ... and are we still valuing diversity anymore?
Well, yes, we are, Barry.... as well as divestiture, divergence, divination,
divisiveness, divarication, and divagating.
|
3369.5 | | WEORG::SCHUTZMAN | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri Sep 02 1994 13:59 | 4 |
|
Mark, did you have alphabet soup for lunch again????
--bonnie
|
3369.6 | one more | MPGS::CWHITE | Parrot_Trooper | Fri Sep 02 1994 14:23 | 5 |
| you forgot one......defication!
there's a whole lot of it going on lately!
p/t
|
3369.7 | | HOTAIR::ADAMS | Visualize Whirled Peas! | Fri Sep 02 1994 15:05 | 3 |
| Valueing Diversity = PC.
--- Gavin
|
3369.8 | | GEMGRP::gemnt3.zko.dec.com::Winalski | Careful with that AXP, Eugene | Fri Sep 02 1994 15:08 | 5 |
| BS.
Only 1/2 :-)
--PSW
|
3369.9 | First -> divestitures; second -> ? | VMSSPT::LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Fri Sep 02 1994 15:08 | 5 |
| .6:
Er, is that "deification", or "defecation"? Big difference there!
Dick
|
3369.10 | got it right the first time. | MPGS::CWHITE | Parrot_Trooper | Fri Sep 02 1994 17:20 | 3 |
| I got it correct, defecate.
me
|
3369.11 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Sep 02 1994 17:45 | 12 |
| Re: .10
No you didn't....
Re: .0
I don't think there's a problem. Inside Digital, the VoD program seems to
be defunct - I certainly don't see the steady stream of announcements from
the corporate VoD office that I used to.
Steve
|
3369.12 | wrong on both counts | ANNECY::HOTCHKISS | | Mon Sep 05 1994 08:54 | 8 |
| re .10 no you didn't -try 'ae'(latin 'faeces)
re .1 right one-'valuing' diversity smacks of discrimination-if you
aren't diverse enough then you have no value and fortunately we don't
have *many* silly laws on positive discrimination in Europe yet.I would
suggest that VD be kept for its original needs(Veneral Disease) and
that the diversity movement find something else to carp on about.
My 2c FWIW
|
3369.13 | Venerable Order of Dweebs | WRKSYS::SCHUMANN | UHF computers | Tue Sep 06 1994 14:42 | 3 |
| Silly me, I thought VOD was Voice Of Despair. (Or was that Volatile Organic
Discharge?)
|
3369.14 | Or is VOD just FUD in disguise? | HLDE01::VUURBOOM_R | Roelof Vuurboom @ APD, DTN 829 4066 | Tue Sep 06 1994 16:16 | 1 |
|
|
3369.15 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Sep 12 1994 10:45 | 2 |
| If we use STD for Short Term Disability, there's no reason we can't use
VD for Valuing Diversity.
|
3369.16 | | BIGQ::SILVA | Memories..... | Mon Sep 26 1994 17:00 | 4 |
|
AoD sounds cool.... how do ya pronounce it??? :-)
|
3369.17 | AA - (Appropriate Acronym) | DPDMAI::EYSTER | Seems Ah'm dancin' with cactus... | Tue Sep 27 1994 10:32 | 7 |
|
I vote for VD. It's appropriate in that we don't all have it, it
doesn't really define anything specific, those infected have it to
different degrees, some try to ignore it, and others try to infect
everyone around them after they get it.
:^]
|