T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3346.1 | Inquiring minds and all that? | SUBURB::POWELLM | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be! | Wed Aug 24 1994 13:06 | 8 |
| > Digital today confirmed that it has sold on the open market all
> 98,533,000 shares it owned of the common stock of Ing. Olivetti & C.
> S.p.a. ("Olivetti").
And did we make a loss on this too? I seem to remember that we
paid over the top when we bought them.
Malcolm.
|
3346.2 | The original announcement | LOVADA::SCHERRER | Patrick - Corp Strategic Alliances | Wed Aug 24 1994 13:12 | 133 |
| From my files...:
**********************
Author: Mary Hoffmann @MRO
Date: 26-Jun-1992
Posted-date: 26-Jun-1992
Subject: OLIVETTI RELEASE
THE FOLLOWING RELEASE HAS JUST GONE OUT ON THE 'PR NEWSWIRE'
AND 'BUSINESS WIRE'.
Dallas Kirk
(508) 493-4562
OLIVETTI AND DIGITAL ANNOUNCE A STRATEGIC ALLIANCE
Ivrea, 26th June, 1992: Digital Equipment Corporation and Olivetti
today announced a significant business alliance which will extend
Olivetti's system offering to include Digital's powerful new Alpha
RISC technology.
Digital has also reached agreement with CIR, to become a
shareholder in Olivetti. This represents a long term association
between Digital and CIR that will contribute to the development of
Olivetti as an independent leading Information Technology company.
Digital will acquire from the members of the shareholders group
20.250.000 shares (4.03%) of Olivetti common stock for a total
consideration of Italian Lira 172,125 billion. Digital has also
agreed to purchase from the members of the shareholders group, an
additional 20.250.000 shares (4.03%) of Olivetti common stock for
the same consideration before the end of 1994, consistent with the
progress of the alliance. Furthermore, Digital has agreed to
purchase on the open market within June 1993, an additional
9.500.000 shares (1.89%) of Olivetti common stock.
Under the terms of the agreement, Alpha will become a strategic
architecture for future Olivetti products. Digital will supply chips
and system platforms based on its Alpha RISC technology, and
networking software.
Digital announced Alpha in February, as the industry's most
advanced 64-bit reduced instruction set computing (RISC)
architecture, designed to be fast, reliable and open. Since then
Alpha has achieved growing acceptance as a leading RISC technology,
with more than six hundred independent software developers publicly
committed to move their offerings to the Alpha platform.
Most recently, Microsoft announced during DECworld, Digital's
world-wide sales and marketing event, that it will port its widely
accepted Windows NT software product to Alpha-based technology.
The agreement also represents a significant extension to the
current Digital-Olivetti technology and OEM agreements covering PCs,
workstations, and networking, as well as joint research efforts into
multimedia applications and communications being conducted at
Olivetti's Cambridge, UK research laboratories.
"Digital's Alpha technology is the logical evolution of our
RISC strategy, particularly when it comes to operating systems such
as Windows NT and UNIX, and also applications software," said
Elserino Piol, Olivetti's chief operating officer. "We will continue
to implement our strategy as it was presented at our `Olivetti Week'
in Rome, and we are convinced that this move will strengthen our
position as a leading global supplier of Information Technology
solutions ranging from individual workstations to Enterprise-wide
systems."
"Digital's decision to invest in Olivetti, reflects our deep
belief that a shared technology strategy creates significant value
for customers of both companies by providing them with a choice of
innovative technologies, and our determination to lead the
development of industry standards," said Kenneth H. Olsen,
president, Digital Equipment Corporation.
"Digital's investment in Olivetti cements our long-term
commitment to provide significant technological benefits to all our
customers," said Carlo De Benedetti. "We are both committed to a
common Open Systems strategy, to build capabilities in specific
areas of excellence, to preserve the independence of individual
market strategies, and to ensure customers that no matter who they
purchase products from, the underlying technology will conform to
open industry standards."
Carlo De Benedetti also emphasized that "CIR will continue to
hold the largest share of Olivetti's equity which is consistent with
its long term commitment to manage Olivetti's business."
Digital will have up to two senior executives sitting on
Olivetti's Board as the alliance progresses.
"The alliance significantly expands the reach of Digital's
technology strategy, and in particular, our Alpha RISC
architecture." said Pier Carlo Falotti, president and CEO of Digital
Equipment Corporation, Europe. "It brings the long-term benefits of
Alpha to a large number of Olivetti's customers through Olivetti's
extensive range of open system."
This alliance marks an important step in the implementation of
Olivetti's vision for the 90's. It is consistent with Olivetti's
strategy of building its offering by adopting and integrating the
best available technologies in a coherent architecture, Olivetti was
among the first in the industry to understand the strategic
implications of Open Systems and it has developed a complete system
offering by integrating its own and other partners' technologies and
products to develop a powerful set of solutions for a wide range of
applications.
As a result, Olivetti's current offering will continue within the
framework of the Open System Architecture, and it will add to its
long term competitiveness by taking advantage of the Alpha
technology.
Olivetti, headquartered in Ivrea, is the leading European-based
information technology group. It is active at the forefront of the
computer and office automation industries, with innovative products
ranging from personal computers to specialized workstations and
networked servers. The Group Commercial subsidiaries and a technical
assistance organization operate in over 30 countries through 4,500
dealers and 1,000 Systems Partners.
Digital Equipment Corporation, headquartered in Maynard,
Massachusetts, is the leading worldwide supplier of networked
computer systems, software and services. Digital pioneered and
leads the industry in interactive, distributed and multi-vendor
computing. Digital and its partners deliver the power to use the
best integrated solutions - from desktop to data center - in open
information environments.
[ends].
|
3346.3 | Keep taking the pills.... | KERNEL::MCGAUGHRIN | What a Marvelous Delivery | Wed Aug 24 1994 13:19 | 18 |
|
Did we make any money on the sale ?
(Purchase Price v Sale Price)
This company is on a serious diet these days, and has been for a while,
the Olivetti sale looks like a case of corporate bulimia, which in
large doses can lead to terminal anorexia.
Looking on the bright side, we put a little weight on last week, a few
corporate ounces, the shares proice went up to 23+.
Doctor McGaughrin
|
3346.4 | 2360 multiplied by 92,000,000 ish | KERNEL::MCGAUGHRIN | What a Marvelous Delivery | Wed Aug 24 1994 13:25 | 20 |
|
If anyone is good at sums, the share price from yesterday was...
digital 24-Aug-94 LIVE WIRE
Stock quotes as of 23rd AUGUST 1994
Company Name Today's Stock price Difference
DIGITAL $ 22 7/8 DOWN 1/4
HEWLETT PACKARD $ 87 3/4 UP 1/8
IBM $ 67 5/8 DOWN 1/8
OLIVETTI LIRA 2360 DOWN 30
SIEMENS DM 678 DOWN 6
|
3346.5 | Nice tax write-off, it appears | POBOX::CORSON | Higher, and a bit more to the right | Wed Aug 24 1994 17:02 | 7 |
|
My calculations estimate Digital got $232,537,000+ for its Olivetti
stock. If memory serves, I believe we paid approximately $480,000,000
for the same amount.
In short, we got hosed.
the Greyhawk
|
3346.6 | Will DEC stock ever see 3 digits again? | USHS01::HARDMAN | Sucker for what the cowgirls do... | Wed Aug 24 1994 21:33 | 5 |
| Well, I guess it could be worse, we could have bought our own stock
and be selling it now. :-(
Harry
|
3346.7 | we got hosed? | STAR::CASSILY | | Wed Aug 24 1994 21:57 | 7 |
| Why do you think we got hosed? It's like any other investment. If you
buy low and sell high, you make a profit; if you buy high and sell low,
you make a loss. When you say we got hosed, it implied that "someone"
or some "entity' did something to hose us. If you make an intelligent
investment that simply turns out wrong, that does not mean you got
hosed, only that you made a mistake, and therefore a bad investment,
not that someone hosed us.
|
3346.8 | | YIELD::HARRIS | | Wed Aug 24 1994 23:38 | 24 |
| re: Note 3346.5 by POBOX::CORSON
> My calculations estimate Digital got $232,537,000+ for its Olivetti
> stock. If memory serves, I believe we paid approximately $480,000,000
> for the same amount.
I don't know how much we paid for the stock, but it seems like we sold it
for about $144M.
$1 = 1565 lira
1 share of Olivetti = 2360 lira
1 share of Olivetti = $1.51
so 98.533M shares * $1.51 = $144M
I never understood why we bought the share originally. I don't think it was
thought to be a good business investment by itself. We did sell re-badge and
sell some of their products in Europe and recently they announced systems
based on AXP processors. But I don't think in the long run that it was all
that good of a deal.
I wonder if this is part of the $350M charge we took last quarter.
-Bruce
|
3346.9 | | TROOA::SOLEY | Fall down, go boom | Wed Aug 24 1994 23:51 | 10 |
| I read a news item this afternoon that said, in short:
We did not sell the stock on the open market and we are not, at this
time disclosing what we got for it. We paid well over market value when
we bought the stock because we were buying goodwill, we sold for more
than the market value was at purchase time so the loss is entirely
in intangibles and yes, all or most of this loss is already accounted for
in the $400M charge we took last year.
Full details are supposed to appear in the Annual Report.
|
3346.10 | wannabet? | ANNECY::HOTCHKISS | | Thu Aug 25 1994 04:06 | 7 |
| this must rate well as one of those profoundly visionary decisions-like
the Philips purchase.I wonder whether the people who made the decision
have had to swallow the pill like the rest of us would if we had
missed,for example a project budget by 5000 dollars?
Answers on a postcard to
Doing-very-nicely-as-a-VP Inc
Cayman Islands
|
3346.11 | A couple of doubts | MLNAD0::ANTONANGELI | Like Maigret in Quai des Orf�vres | Thu Aug 25 1994 04:52 | 12 |
|
The most strange part of this story is that while we are selling
our stock, Olivetti's stock quotes rised �200 (circa 10%) in the last
week (according to the UK live-wire)...
According to .9 we are not selling for the normal price. I can't
know what is the price, but if my memory serves well, the current
Olivetti's price is 3 times lower than what we paid.
Somebody able to help me understand?
�AA
|
3346.12 | what the WSJ says | ASABET::SILVERBERG | Mark Silverberg MLO1-3/H20 | Thu Aug 25 1994 10:48 | 7 |
| The Wall Stret Journal today says we got $140M for the shares, which
cost us $287M, a premium over the market price value of a total of
$84 million. Claims Olivetti only sold $80.2M worth of AXP systems,
and purchased only about $7M worth of AXP product for resale.
Mark
|
3346.13 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Aug 25 1994 10:52 | 7 |
| re .9:
> We did not sell the stock on the open market and we are not, at this
> time disclosing what we got for it.
Tell it to Livewire. The Livewire article says we did sell it on the
open market.
|
3346.14 | Another stinking deal | ENQUE::TAMER | | Thu Aug 25 1994 11:49 | 13 |
| re .12
Marc,
I think the WSJ meant that Olivetti got $80.2M revenue by
Digital reselling/purchasing Olivetti equipment but Digital sold only
~ $6.33M to Olivetti.
All in all we got creamed by the Olivetti, Philips, and Kinezle (sp ?)
deals. All people involved in these deals should be either out or shown
the closest door (or preferrably window).
|
3346.15 | Need money | POBOX::BATTIS | I don't want to be like you,Mordicai | Thu Aug 25 1994 13:07 | 5 |
|
Chicago Tribune says we got $142 million for the stock. Must need
an infusion of cash to sell at a loss.
Mark
|
3346.16 | the flip side | POBOX::CORSON | Higher, and a bit more to the right | Thu Aug 25 1994 13:15 | 9 |
|
OK, my math stinks. Read the WSJ story today. They are probably right
on the money. Still rest on my original statement that we got hosed
bigtime. But look at the bright side - if the Europeans are so much
better at this stuff that we, I feel much better that many of them are
now running significant pieces of Digital. Maybe my kids can go to
college after all.
the Greyhawk
|
3346.17 | channels are getting crossed | PCBUOA::SWANEY | Escape is never the safest path | Thu Aug 25 1994 16:31 | 11 |
|
This is definetly getting confusing,
"The Boston Herald reported we sold 145 million in Olivetti
stock that we paid 85 million for?"
now where did they get that info?
BS
|
3346.18 | | YIELD::HARRIS | | Thu Aug 25 1994 16:35 | 15 |
| re: Note 3346.17 by PCBUOA::SWANEY
> This is definetly getting confusing,
> "The Boston Herald reported we sold 145 million in Olivetti
> stock that we paid 85 million for?"
>
> now where did they get that info?
Maybe they are all having trouble converting Lira/$'s in 1992 to Lira/$'s
now? Plus it seems like we have more shares than we did at the time of
the original buy.
-Bruce
|
3346.19 | today's Boston Globe | SISDA::BWHITE | | Thu Aug 25 1994 17:13 | 16 |
| re. -2
The DEC stock purchase in Olivetti was recorded at $85.4 million, with
an additional amount recorded at $204 million for intangibles (i.e.
business investment)
The stock sold somewhere between $130-$150 million (no exact figures
released) so there was a profit made on the actual stock. However, the $204
million investment has to be written down, and approx. 1/2 has been
written off so far.
Same results as in previous threads - just the accounting angle on the
transactions
source - today's Boston Globe
|
3346.20 | | ARCANA::CONNELLY | foggy, rather groggy | Sat Aug 27 1994 12:21 | 11 |
|
re: .14
> All in all we got creamed by the Olivetti, Philips, and Kinezle (sp ?)
> deals. All people involved in these deals should be either out or shown
> the closest door (or preferrably window).
Weren't these purchases all thought up by Pier Carlo ("we don't need any women
here, we all have them at home") Falotti? He's no longer around...
- paul
|
3346.21 | Outstandind MBAs | MUMPS::RUDACK | | Sun Aug 28 1994 00:58 | 7 |
|
this is most interesting, So how many employees have
to leave beacuse the BOD approved these loses. NO VPs
of course.
/ejr
|
3346.22 | 5 VP's left, but | VNABRW::UHL | | Tue Aug 30 1994 07:57 | 12 |
| if memory serves me correct:
Kienzle GY deal VP's involved... Hans Dirkmann (still around)
J�rg Rieder left in 1993
Pier Carlo Falotti left in 1993
Olivetti deal Pier Carlo Falotti left in 1993
Philips Information Systems Pier Carlo Falotti left in 1993
Per Olov Loof left in 1994
Wolfgang J�ger left in 1994
Werner Oppliger left in 1994
so at least 5 VP's left, however...
if any of those left because of the deals - who knows....
|
3346.23 | It seems we lost "some" money... | MLNAD0::ANTONANGELI | Like Maigret in Quai des Orf�vres | Tue Aug 30 1994 08:38 | 15 |
| From UK LIVE WIRE:
LITTLE REWARD FOR A DIGITAL RISC
Digital's decision to sell its 7.9% stake in Olivetti at a heavy loss
comes as no surprise. Digital first bought 20 million Olivetti shares
at a premium to the market price in June 1992, and then increased its
stake gradually with further market purchases, for a total of $287.8 mn
dollars. Digital has not said the price at which the shares were sold
during late July and August but Wall Street analysts estimate that the
sale of the stake would have raised between $140 mn and $150 mn.
Financial Times, London. 30th August 1994
|
3346.24 | fulltime job? | IJSAPL::OLTHOF | Doar biej mooi met | Tue Aug 30 1994 10:42 | 5 |
| re .22
That must have been a fulltime job, keeping track of the VP's we employ
Henny
|
3346.25 | | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Tue Aug 30 1994 11:48 | 2 |
| Someone needs to check out the meal receipts
|
3346.26 | Penny wise, 100,000,000 pounds foolish | TNPUBS::JONG | Steve | Tue Aug 30 1994 11:51 | 1 |
| It's ironic to mention checking on meal receipts in this topic 8^(
|
3346.27 | | USCTR1::CASH1 | | Tue Aug 30 1994 13:40 | 4 |
| No it is deliberate, more then ironic, you hit right on the head with
penny wise, and pound foolish. I am traveling this week so it gripes
me, more then ususal, especially after seeing the delta of what we
sold versus what we paid.
|