T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3334.1 | | STARCH::WHALEN | Rich Whalen | Tue Aug 16 1994 10:41 | 9 |
| I received a report (by email) two months ago comparing Storage's responses with
the rest of Digital's. I still have it, but don't know if I can post it as it
doesn't give explicit permission. (It was sent to a wide distribution list.)
I don't read HUMANE::DIGITAL regularly, so send me mail if you want me to answer
any questions about it.
Rich
|
3334.2 | | WELSWS::HILLN | It's OK, it'll be dark by nightfall | Tue Aug 16 1994 10:57 | 5 |
| For the UK I recall a mail from HRO saying we will get the results in
September (1994).
By then we'll be two re-orgs further on, so what value will the results
have? (Answers on a postcard)
|
3334.3 | ??? | GRANMA::GHALSTEAD | | Tue Aug 16 1994 11:27 | 7 |
| My management came down and reviewed all the results with us. They were
seeking our input as to ideas to change certain things, make things
better. They were in the process of putting a report together to send
up the line. Since then most of the mamagers are elsewhere. I don't
know if the transfer of info will happen. Also the plan was to do the
survey a year later to see what progress had been made.
|
3334.4 | | SSDEVO::PARRIS | RAID-5 vs. RAID-1: n+1 << 2n, in $$$ | Tue Aug 16 1994 12:11 | 1 |
| Results for Storage and for Digital as a whole are posted in 3046.67.
|
3334.5 | | CTHP12::M_MORIN | A dead man with the most toys is still a dead man. | Tue Aug 16 1994 12:21 | 7 |
| Anyone that I've asked in this building hasn't heard a single thing about
the survey.
Management is unaware...
/Mario
|
3334.6 | | AIMTEC::ZANIEWSKI_D | Why would CSC specialists need training? | Tue Aug 16 1994 14:32 | 7 |
| Hi Mario,
At the US CSC, we have the survey results, but the managers won't pass
them around in electronic format. I'll be glad to share the results
they would provide electonically.
Dave Zaniewski
|
3334.7 | Palmer refered to it so mgnt has info ;^} | ANGLIN::SEITZ | A Smith & Wesson beats 4 Aces. | Tue Aug 16 1994 15:21 | 5 |
| Didn't Palmer talk about the survey in the last DVN? I think the text
is in a different note here but I think he said something about the
message he received from the survey was that the field felt under
challenged. We need more work to do so that we will feel that we are
contributing to the company's turn around.
|
3334.8 | You're kidding,,, right.... | KUZZY::PELKEY | Life, It aint for the sqeamish! | Tue Aug 16 1994 15:46 | 6 |
| And we were supposed to expect results ????
Are we getting just too silly yet... ?????
///back to read only...
|
3334.9 | Spin Doctors working overtime on this one... | SYORPD::DEEP | ALPHA - The Betamax of CPUs | Tue Aug 16 1994 16:01 | 1 |
| Don't hold your breath!
|
3334.10 | survey results... | SOLVIT::OCONNELL | | Tue Aug 16 1994 16:39 | 30 |
| Here in Custom Systems (aka CSS), Management presented the results
of the survey in group staff meetings. The detailed results to the
questions were never published via e-mail.
The manager had a package of overheads that showed specific statements
from the survey [I believe they were the ones that drew the most extreme
(Strongly Agree or Strongly Disagree) responses], bar-graphed to show the
general response from the "Digital" population as compared to the (subset)
Digital Consulting organization and the (further subset) Custom Systems
group (now part of SBU).
They then grouped survey statements according to general topic (ie,
employee faith in management) and presented general results.
Some tidbits I remember:
-the survey company was surprised to see as high a level of company
loyalty while the morale was so low.
-most folks do not believe that the SLT has a plan, or comprehends
the depths of employee morale.
-responses were generally consistent across Digital, DC, and Custom
Systems.
Management did say that a "get well plan" would be developed and
implemented shortly.
Noranne
|
3334.11 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Wed Aug 17 1994 13:06 | 5 |
| > Management did say that a "get well plan" would be developed and
> implemented shortly.
ookkaaaaay...
|
3334.12 | | BSS::RONEY | Charles Roney | Wed Aug 17 1994 14:57 | 6 |
|
> At the US CSC, we have the survey results, but the managers won't pass
> them around in electronic format.
That bad, huh?
|
3334.13 | | PELKEY::pelkey | Life aint for the Squeamish | Wed Aug 17 1994 17:17 | 13 |
| Gee.. They won't pass it around,,, hmmm,,,, well,, if
your part of the problem you can --
a: Get out of the way, and let those who can,, fix it..
b: hide all evidence that YOU could be part of the
problem, and continue with the Smooze fest...
Still wonder what's going on?
The workers aren't the problem...... but we're the ones getting
the walking papers.....
sad..
|
3334.14 | | KERNEL::WRIGHTON | I'll call you back later, alright ! | Sun Aug 21 1994 18:04 | 9 |
|
It seems strange that STORAGE had results at least a month ago that
could be compared to "the company average". This implies that that
ALL results have been available for some considerable time.
Were the STORAGE results used as some kind of sweetener to Quantum ?
<
|
3334.15 | Haven't heard anything | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Mon Aug 22 1994 16:49 | 2 |
| I'm more interested in the business-unit-specific results than the corporate
results. And here in the Networks Business Unit, we haven't heard a thing.
|
3334.16 | nothing heard yet | ASABET::SILVERBERG | Mark Silverberg MLO1-3/H20 | Tue Aug 23 1994 08:11 | 6 |
| Here in ZKO I haven't heard a thing, either from the facility, nor
from my organization. Guess it's just not important enough for
our mgmt to discuss.
Mark
|
3334.17 | US Territories/MCS results, US CSC specifics | YR2000::ZANIEWSKI_D | Why would CSC specialists need training? | Tue Aug 30 1994 09:27 | 219 |
| Scoring is SD (strongly disagree) 5
D (disagree) 4
U (undecided) 3
A (agree) 2
SA (strongly agree) 1
Strength = 4.20 - 5.00 (4)
Operational = 3.70 - 4.19 (15)
Concern = 0.00 - 3.69 (54) 23 @ 2.99 or below
UST MCS US CSC
Score Score differ
1. The ongoing training that I receive helps me do my
job better. 3.44 3.38 -.06
2. Creating a positive work environment is a vital
part of Digital's mission. 3.70 3.85 +.15
3. Recognition at Digital is based on performance. 2.73 2.44 -.29
4. I have opportunities for advancement within
Digital. 2.71 2.83 +.08
5. Processes and procedures at Digital allow me to
meet my customers' needs in the most efficient
manner. 2.17 2.07 -.10
6. At Digital, we are developing products and services
that will allow us to be successful well into the
future. 3.37 3.00 -.37
7. The last time I asked someone in another work unit
for help, I got it. 3.72 4.03 +.31
8. During the last five working days, I completed a
task or assignment. 4.37 4.30 -.07
9. My immediate manager gives me praise when I deserve
it. 3.33 3.01 -.32
10. Senior management's behaviours are consistent with
Digital's stated core values. 2.65 2.32 -.33
11. My immediate manager acts in accordance with
Digital's stated core values. 3.61 3.27 -.34
12. Whenever I need help with a customer, I know whom
to call within Digital for help. 3.04 3.01 -.03
13. I have the right amount of independence from my
immediate manager to do my job. 4.18 4.13 -.05
14. I get enough information from my immediate manager
to do my job well. 3.49 3.06 -.43
15. Senior management sticks to a decision long enough
to see if it will work. 2.41 2.19 -.22
16. My immediate manager understands what I do. 3.48 3.07 -.41
17. I am committed to senior management's direction for
Digital. 3.44 3.06 -.38
18. I have the resources I need to meet the needs of my
customers. 2.76 2.60 -.16
19. I trust my immediate manager. 3.67 3.39 -.28
20. I have good understanding of what Digital has to
offer our customers. 3.42 3.19 -.23
21. My immediate manager has helped me develop
realistic career goals. 2.79 2.61 -.18
22. In the last week, I have told a co-worker to let
me know if I could help him or her. 4.33 4.39 +.06
23. I get enough information from co-workers in my work
unit to do my job well. 3.89 3.98 +.09
24. My immediate manager involves me in decisions which
affect my job. 3.32 3.18 -.14
25. My immediate manager cares about me as a person. 3.71 3.50 -.21
26. I am very loyal to Digital. 4.16 3.84 -.32
27. My immediate manager is consistent and predictable. 3.55 3.32 -.23
28. When errors occur, the emphasis in our work unit
is on making it right instead of assigning blame. 3.66 3.52 -.14
29. My immediate is available when I need to talk to
him/her. 3.54 3.16 -.38
30. My immediate manager helps me remove any barriers
that get in the way of doing my job well. 3.39 2.99 -.40
31. My immediate manager listens to me. 3.72 3.52 -.20
32. I am aware of Digital's future technical direction. 3.06 2.92 -.14
33. My co-workers are committed to doing quality work. 3.87 3.75 -.12
34. Digital management does all it can to make Digital
a better place for us to work. 2.40 2.05 -.35
35. In the past week, I discovered a way to prevent an
error from ahppening in the future. 3.50 3.64 +.14
36. Overall, our training programs are meeting my
expectations. 2.68 2.36 -.32
37. The last training activity I completed helped me
increase my productivity. 3.41 3.34 -.07
38. The last time I asked my immediate manager a
question, I got an answer. 3.88 3.70 -.18
39. My co-workers treat me in a positive and accepting
manner. 4.16 4.14 -.02
40. Policies and decisions made by senior management
are always consistent with our mission. 2.51 2.24 -.27
41. I believe managers at Digital will use the results
of this survey in a positive way. 3.00 2.64 -.36
42. This last year, I have had opportunities to learn
and grow. 3.66 3.77 +.11
43. During the last week, I have seen my immediate
manager do something that meets the needs of our
customers. 3.45 3.07 -.38
44. My immediate manager has discussed my work
performace with me in the last six months. 3.45 3.25 -.20
45. I feel the cooperation among territories, areas,
countries, functions and corporate is excellent. 2.40 2.25 -.15
46. The environment at Digital supports teamwork. 2.75 2.70 -.05
47. My immediate manager emphasizes my strengths rather
than my weaknesses. 3.51 3.44 -.07
48. My immediate manager fairly evaluates my
performance. 3.52 3.42 -.10
49. The people with whom I work respond quickly to the
needs of our customers. 3.82 3.79 -.03
50. I am able to balance my time between my work life
and my personal life. 3.36 3.61 +.25
51. I plan to be working for Digital one year from now. 4.06 3.95 -.11
52. I know what my immediate manager expects of me. 3.78 3.48 -.30
53. My immediate manager always encourages me to be
hinest with our customers. 3.94 3.78 -.16
54. I understand how my work contributes to the
company's profitability. 4.17 3.92 -.25
55. My immediate manager takes corrective action when
employees violate ethical standards. 3.40 2.95 -.45
56. I feel free to take risks in getting my job done
at Digital. 3.46 3.36 -.10
57. Promotions in Digital are based on performance. 2.53 2.18 -.35
58. The job I am now in uses my talents to their
fullest. 2.89 2.85 -.04
59. When I make a commitment to my customer, I keep it. 4.51 4.44 -.07
60. In the last week, I have praised someone within
Digital. 4.10 4.08 -.02
61. In the last week, I have seen my immediate manager
take action that demonstrated his/her commitment to
quality. 3.46 3.06 -.40
62. I feel free to express my thoughts, feelings and
ideas to my immediate manager without fear of
reprisal. 3.53 3.48 -.05
63. I have a good understanding of my customer's needs. 4.26 4.19 -.07
64. My manager creates an environment where diverse
perspectives are valued and encouraged. 3.52 3.32 -.20
65. Senior management has a clear sense of direction
for our company. 2.51 2.18 -.33
66. I am treated with respect. 3.74 3.69 -.05
67. In the last month, I have seen a person in senior
management take action that demonstrated his/her
commitment to quality. 2.70 2.33 -.37
68. In general, meetings I attend help me do my job
better. 2.91 2.59 -.32
69. I believe my efforts directly and positively impact
the success of my work unit. 4.31 4.30 -.01
70. I could clearly explain, to others, the mission of
Digital. 2.91 2.60 -.31
71. I am very optimistic about my future with Digital. 2.75 2.43 -.32
72. I like coming to work each day. 3.40 3.26 -.14
73. The diversity of the people at Digital is one
strength of our organization. 3.78 3.64 -.14
|
3334.18 | | YR2000::ZANIEWSKI_D | Why would CSC specialists need training? | Tue Aug 30 1994 09:35 | 15 |
| I've taken the time to transcribe the paper results my manager let me
view, and posted them in the previous reply.
There's a lot of other text that goes along with the stats, that attempt
to explain the results. There's one important observation that
apparently wasn't made.
There are 23 questions that refer to "immediate manager". For the US
CSC's, all scores for these questions were lower than the US MCS
average. Further, they average .25 points lower than the US MCS
average. This seems to indicate that the US CSC's have a SERIOUS
management problem. Maybe they should send them to a month of
management school instead of to the San Diego boondoggle.
Dave Zaniewski
|
3334.19 | odd! | ARCANA::CONNELLY | foggy, rather groggy | Tue Aug 30 1994 10:36 | 7 |
|
Hmmn...these scores seem to be almost the opposite of what i would expect.
Apparently we all love the SLT and its directions for the company, and our
interactions with other grographical and functional units, but we distrust
our immediate managers and the folks we work with on a day-to-day basis!
- paul
|
3334.20 | Does Not Compute | FILTON::ROBINSON_M | It's only a flesh wound! | Tue Aug 30 1994 11:00 | 23 |
| Yes, there is something wierd. First time through, I read without
surprise because I thought a high number meant agreement, and a low
number meant disagreement.
read it through again, and the first five lines say Strongly Disagree =
5, Strongly Agree = 1. So low number means agreement, high number
disagreement.
Now it does NOT make sense. Statements like 'Digital rewards
performance' I would now expect to have a high number (Strongly
Disagree).
And then there is the section at the beginning reading
Strength 4.20 - 5.00
Operational 3.7 - 4.19
Concern 0.0 - 3.69
Does this mean a score in the range 4.2 - 5.0 is an area of strength
for Digital, whilst 0.0 - 3.69 is an area of concern (ie. poor result?)
In this case the SA/SD ratings must be reversed.
Martin - confused and not convinced
|
3334.21 | Backwards | MSBCS::WIBECAN | Going on an Alphaquest | Tue Aug 30 1994 12:36 | 14 |
| >> read it through again, and the first five lines say Strongly Disagree =
>> 5, Strongly Agree = 1. So low number means agreement, high number
>> disagreement.
From the survey questions as posted in note 2831.27:
1 2 3 4 5 6
Strongly Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly Not
Disagree Agree Applicable
So, a low number should be disagreement, as you expected.
Brian
|
3334.22 | blush | AIMTEC::ZANIEWSKI_D | Why would CSC specialists need training? | Tue Aug 30 1994 14:13 | 3 |
| Thanks everyone. I transcribed the 1-5 meanings incorrectly.
Dave Zaniewski
|
3334.23 | i find this hard to believe | SMURF::KHALL | | Tue Aug 30 1994 14:53 | 7 |
| RE: .21
No Applicable = 6! Is there a little skewing going on here? Or
is someone trying to establish a new meaning for the term "false
positive"?
\ken
|
3334.24 | | AIMTEC::PERSON_D | Get Your Kicks With Soccer | Wed Aug 31 1994 09:10 | 11 |
|
Remember when the survey was taken, just before most of the MCS (CSC)
changes started...
It would have even lower scores in most areas if taken today...
Even lower after next Tuesday...
dp
|
3334.25 | | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | Blue skies, sunshine go away | Wed Aug 31 1994 09:12 | 3 |
|
Next Tuesday?
|
3334.26 | One view on conducting surveys. | SFC01::GREENE | CASE: No Pain, No Gain! | Wed Aug 31 1994 12:22 | 20 |
|
Quote from Capers Jones about leading edge companies vs. trailing edge
companies in dealing with opinion surveys:
"... A normal part of taking good care of employees is an annual
opinion survey, which is normally conducted by a personnel group. ...
Opinion surveys are also strategic measures, since staff feelings and
opinions have a wide and pervasive influence. It is important that,
once such a survey has been conducted, change should follow swiftly.
Nothing is more debilitating to morale than an opinion survey followed
by inaction."
Capers Jones
Applied Software Measurement:
Assuring Productivity and Quality
McGraw-Hill Inc., 1991
|
3334.27 | | FILTON::ROBINSON_M | It's only a flesh wound! | Wed Aug 31 1994 12:54 | 1 |
| ... obviously this is not our view, then.
|
3334.28 | The scale used was 5 point scale | TQMI::ZSMITH | | Wed Aug 31 1994 17:29 | 4 |
| The number 6 was interpreted as no answer, it was not used to calculate means.
Number of responders to each question was number of people who respnded 1-5.
Regards, Zuzana Smith
|
3334.29 | You shouldn't be crunching these numbers anyway | TNPUBS::JONG | Steve | Wed Aug 31 1994 18:16 | 7 |
| You cannot number-crunch an opinion survey like this anyway; it's
meaningless. The best you can do is to identify areas of greatest
agreement or disagreement.
(If you doubt this, consider whether the survey would have had
different results if the choices had been A B C D E instead of
1 2 3 4 5...)
|
3334.30 | So why haven't we heard any results anyway? | SUBURB::POWELLM | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be! | Thu Sep 01 1994 07:40 | 1 |
|
|
3334.31 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | skewered shitake | Thu Sep 01 1994 11:34 | 3 |
| Probably because the results management got were not what they were
looking for. No one wants to communicate the fact that there is no
trust among the "t-people" about management and their decisions.
|
3334.32 | we got em | TINCUP::KOLBE | Wicked Wench of the Web | Thu Sep 01 1994 12:53 | 5 |
| We were given a review of the survey results in MCSDE. They tried
to play down the poor ratings on management but it was pretty
obvious from the numbers where the ICs thought the problem existed.
Maybe a lot of mangers just couldn't bring themselves to face it.
liesl
|
3334.33 | I was part of that fiasco! | MPGS::CWHITE | Parrot_Trooper | Thu Sep 01 1994 13:00 | 13 |
| And NO ONE would believe the idiocy that transpired for months
after the survey!!!!!!!! WHAT A CROCK!
Woods meetings to portray a feeling that the situation needs to be
solved.....so let's get the people that think stuff is wrong to
be instrumental in fixing the problems......(with the exception of
getting RID of the people causing the moral/lack of trust...ie:most of
the management).
I believe that the way the solved the problem is to TFSO the
ones that complained the most vocal. (me for one.....;^)
p/t
|
3334.34 | Top/bottom ten on survey for semiconductors | LADYM::TEASDALE | | Fri Sep 02 1994 17:33 | 164 |
| +---------------------------+ TM
| | | | | | | |
| d | i | g | i | t | a | l | I n t e r o f f i c e M e m o
| | | | | | | |
+---------------------------+
To: SCO Employees Date: 18 July 1994
From: Ed Caldwell
Dept: Semiconductor Operations
Ext: 225-5036
L/MS: HLO2-2/M12
Node: SHARE::CALDWELL
Subject: Renew94 Employee Survey Results
We have recently received the first set of results for SCO from the Renew94
Employee Survey. These results are reported for SCO as a whole. A second
report is due from Gallup by the beginning of August detailing survey
results at the group level within SCO. A total of 1065 people, or
32%, responded within SCO. I would like to thank all of you who
participated. With this note, I would like to share some data from the
survey and outline the next steps in this process.
The survey contained nearly 100 questions. Attached to this note are
the results of the ten highest and ten lowest scoring questions for
all of SCO. Concurrent with this memo, a complete copy of the survey
results is being provided to each SCO Staff member. They will provide
a means for anyone interested in the detailed report to see it.
A copy will also be available in the HLO library.
The results for SCO are very similar to those from the rest of Engineering
and for Digital as a whole. On the positive side, these results show a
very strong commitment to customers through teamwork and a goal oriented
organization. The results also are very candid about the areas of concerns
that many of you have.
As you recall, the Renew94 survey came on the heels of similar survey
sensing activities throughout SCO. Several groups had already conducted
surveys aimed at the same objectives of the Renew94 survey -- identify areas
of employee concerns and develop and implement action plans to address them.
The results from Renew94 provide additional data to those original
surveys and action plans. For those groups, the Renew94 results will be
integrated into the ongoing action planning process initiated by the
earlier sensing. For those other groups which had not previously initiated
a survey/sensing process, they will be using the results of Renew94 in
developing their action plans. The specific use of the Renew94 results
and next steps for your group will be communicated by your group manager.
In addition, the SCO staff will be reviewing the survey results to assess
what actions we as a staff should be taking in response to this survey.
We plan to do this during August after the full reporting from Gallup is
in. I will communicate the results of that review soon thereafter.
Following are a listing of the ten highest scoring and ten lowest
scoring responses to Renew94, for SCO and Digital worldwide. Results
are reported as a percentage of total responses by the following
five categories:
SD = Strongly Disagree
D = Disagree
U = Undecided
A = Agree
SA = Strongly Agree
To simplify the results and make them easier to read, the two categories
Strongly Disagree and Disagree have been aggregated and reported below
as Disagree. Agree and Strongly Agree are aggragated and reported below
as Agree.
The questions are numbered as they appeard in the VTX survey.
TEN HIGHEST SCORING QUESTIONS
Disagree Undecided Agree
----------------------------
59. When I make a commitment to my customer,
I keep it.
SCO 2% 3% 95%
Digital Worldwide 1% 3% 96%
22. In the last week, I have told a co-worker
to let me know if I could help him or her.
SCO 5% 2% 93%
Digital Worldwide 6% 5% 89%
8. During the last five working days, I
completed a task or assignment.
SCO 7% 3% 90%
Digital Worldwide 6% 4% 90%
69. I believe my efforts directly and positively
impact the success of my work unit.
SCO 2% 7% 91%
Digital Worldwide 3% 7% 90%
39. My co-workers treat me in a positive and
accepting manner.
SCO 4% 8% 88%
Digital Worldwide 5% 8% 87%
51. I plan to be working for Digital one
year from now.
SCO 6% 20% 74%
Digital Worlwide 7% 24% 69%
60. In the last week, I have praised someone
within Digital for doing a good job.
SCO 9% 8% 83%
Digital Worldwide 9% 8% 83%
13. I have the right amount of independence
from my immediate manager to do my job.
SCO 10% 5% 85%
Digital Worldwide 9% 7% 84%
54. I understand how my work contributes to the
company's profitability.
SCO 9% 7% 84%
Digital Worldwide 7% 9% 84%
26. I am very loyal to Digital.
SCO 10% 16% 74%
Digital Worldwide 7% 14% 79%
TEN LOWEST SCORING QUESTIONS
Disagree Undecided Agree
----------------------------
58. The job I am now in uses my talents to
their fullest.
SCO 46% 20% 34%
Digital Worldwide 43% 18% 39%
15. Senior management sticks to a decision
long enough to see if it will work.
SCO 35% 38% 27%
Digital Worldwide 57% 28% 15%
3. Recognition at Digital is based on performance.
SCO 44% 21% 35%
Digital Worldwide 45% 20% 35%
70. I could clearly explain, to others, the mission
of Digital.
SCO 44% 29% 27%
Digital Worldwide 37% 28% 35%
10. Senior management's behaviors are consistent
with Digital's stated core values.
SCO 41% 37% 22%
Digital Worldwide 45% 35% 20%
40. Policies and decisions made by senior mangt.
are always consistent with our mission.
SCO 40% 41% 19%
Digital Worldwide 50% 36% 14%
34. Digital management does all it can to make
Digital a better place for us to work.
SCO 47% 28% 25%
Digital Worldwide 55% 26% 19%
57. Promotions in Digital are based on performance.
SCO 47% 26% 27%
Digital Worldwide 49% 26% 25%
5. Processes and procedures at Digital allow me
to meet my customers' needs in the most efficient
manner.
SCO 53% 22% 25%
Digital Worldwide 66% 16% 18%
65. Senior management has a clear sense of
direction for our company.
SCO 44% 38% 18%
Digital Worldwide 50% 33% 17%
45. I feel the cooperation among territories,
areas, countries, functions and corporate is
excellent.
SCO 44% 42% 14%
Digital Worldwide 56% 28% 16%
|
3334.35 | | CSC32::D_RODRIGUEZ | Midnight Falcon ... | Sat Sep 03 1994 01:09 | 20 |
| > You cannot number-crunch an opinion survey like this anyway; it's
> meaningless. The best you can do is to identify areas of greatest
> agreement or disagreement.
>
> (If you doubt this, consider whether the survey would have had
> different results if the choices had been A B C D E instead of
> 1 2 3 4 5...)
This is true. If I remember correctly, it's called nominal data, which
are tallied responses to categories (like A B C D E). A person (technically,
from a statistician's standpoint) cannot average these types of responses...
... but that doesn't stop it from happening within Digital. Our customer
surveys here at the CSC were (maybe still are) based on nominal data being
averaged.
.34 is correct in breaking up the catagories into percentages (all those
tallied for SD and D considered as D, SA and A considered as A, and U.
Thus, inferences can be made from the data and statistically proven, within
a certain confidence interval, to be true or not-true representations of
the population).
|
3334.36 | | CSC32::D_RODRIGUEZ | Midnight Falcon ... | Sat Sep 03 1994 10:35 | 4 |
| >Thus, inferences can be made from the data and statistically proven, within
>a certain confidence interval, to be true or not-true representations of
^^^^^^^^
... should be 'level'
|
3334.37 | nominal-ordinal-interval-ratio | SMURF::WALTERS | | Tue Sep 06 1994 11:42 | 11 |
|
Nominal scales identify categories that are mutually exclusive,
they serve only to "name" the categories. A scale measuring a
continuum of agreement/disagreement (in which categories are not
mutually exclusive) could not usefully employ a nominal scale.
Even if you changed figures for letters, you could still draw
inferences from the cumulative frequency of each letter.
C.
|
3334.38 | Yes, but that's about it | TNPUBS::JONG | Steve Jong, IDC/Networks Publications | Tue Sep 06 1994 11:47 | 4 |
| Yes, that's true. However, there are sharp limitations.
For example, if the survey average was 3.0 (neither agree nor
disagree), and next year Digital conducted the survey again and got a
4.0 (agree), that does not mean results improved 20%.
|
3334.39 | Employee Forum DVN on 21-Sep-94 | AYOV18::AYRDAM::DAGLEISHP | DM, an enabler for successful OO... | Fri Sep 09 1994 12:42 | 55 |
| From today's Livewire...
The Q1 Employee Forum will be broadcast over the Digital
Video Network on Wednesday, Sept. 21. The importance of beginning
to look ahead will be the focus of the program.
Digital President and CEO Robert B. Palmer will discuss the
major short-term and longer-term issues facing the company and then
answer employee questions. The program will originate from Digital
Sweden headquarters in Stockholm.
In Europe and the U.S., the telecast will begin at 3 p.m.;
in the United Kingdom and Ireland, at 4 p.m. In Finland and Israel,
the Q1 Employee Forum will begin at 5 p.m.
For a complete listing of DVN sites, check item #8 on LIVE
WIRE's main menu page.
FOR DIGITAL INTERNAL USE ONLY
|
3334.40 | tardy server, I guess | WEORG::SCHUTZMAN | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri Sep 09 1994 14:15 | 4 |
| I guess my livewire server is just late getting the update . . . it
wasn't there when I left for lunch . . .
--bonnie
|
3334.41 | | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Fri Sep 09 1994 15:33 | 3 |
| I applaud BP for having the broadcast originate outside of New England.
Bob
|
3334.42 | I don't believe they think about us. | DRAC::DELGADO | Jorge Delgado @ZQO | Thu Sep 22 1994 04:46 | 10 |
|
What do I FEEL about it??
Franco used to use soccer to distract people from the country problems.
He just kept on ruling the country the way he liked...
Just sad.
Jordi.
|