T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3096.1 | painfully real | CVG::THOMPSON | An AlphaGeneration Noter | Mon May 23 1994 11:22 | 5 |
| My group is to be hit at 10% as is a sister group. I know all three
of the people "at risk." I know people in other groups who have been
told as well.
Alfred
|
3096.2 | | BOXORN::HAYS | I think we are toast. Remember the jam? | Mon May 23 1994 11:49 | 2 |
|
My sister-in-law's group went from 18 to 10 last week.
|
3096.3 | got me | RAGMOP::T_PARMENTER | Nip the ClipperChip in the bud | Mon May 23 1994 11:54 | 2 |
| Believe it.
|
3096.4 | | STAR::ABBASI | chess is cool ! | Mon May 23 1994 12:05 | 14 |
| i thought we had a note in this file where people post names of other
DECeeees and loved ones who have been TFSO'ed or at least announce
things like, today this many has been hit from our group and things like
that.
should we continute this process? every one who is hit or know
of some one being hit or think they will be hit, enter a note about it.
may be the moderators can find that note and point to us?
do you think this is a good idea?
\bye
\nasser
|
3096.5 | Win to retire | NYEM1::CRANE | | Mon May 23 1994 12:27 | 1 |
| Win Hindle announces his retirement on LIVEWIRE.
|
3096.6 | "From the Rumour Mill" | BWICHD::SILLIKER | Crocodile sandwich-make it snappy | Mon May 23 1994 12:36 | 10 |
| I hear some fantastic percentages, something in the order of 40%-50% of
IM&T, Finance gonna donate more blood, USLS (my parent organization)
cutting, I *hear* something like 15%, there's more, but I can't
remember... I stress that all of this is stuff I've heard from folks,
and is most likely quite accurate, but I'm just a foot soldier,
certainly not in a position of "official knowledge" possession. I live
surround by IM&T types, and they've all been in meetings, and have come
back, firing up Resum� Wizard...
FWIW
|
3096.7 | | AKOCOA::BBARRY | Laudabamusne Rex | Mon May 23 1994 13:38 | 9 |
| I think that part of the reason that widespread details are not
divulged has something to do with the awkward position management finds
itself in. They wish to make the quarter/year as profitable as
possible. How do you manage that when you need all the help you can get
to accomplish the most, while, at the same time, reduce the headcount?
Also, keeping people focused on the work would be more difficult if
everybody knew, blow by blow, exactly who was getting tapped and where.
/Bob
|
3096.8 | We are! ! ! ! | POBOX::SCHWARTZINGE | It's gonna get better | Mon May 23 1994 13:39 | 4 |
| our entire group has been hit.......18 days left and counting.
J
|
3096.9 | group name? | TPSYS::LAING | Soft-Core Cuddler * TAY1-2/H9 * 227-4472 | Mon May 23 1994 13:49 | 2 |
| What *is* (was) your group (function or name?)
|
3096.10 | | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | around and around it goes | Mon May 23 1994 13:57 | 6 |
|
So people are more productive when they don't know what's going on?
Mike
|
3096.11 | | CVG::THOMPSON | An AlphaGeneration Noter | Mon May 23 1994 14:03 | 10 |
| This is the way it works Mike. You get a whole bunch of people in
a room and tell them that some of them are going to be laid off.
But don't tell them who or how many. This way everyone will think
they're the ones staying and happily work real hard until they are
told they're the one. I suppose that must be the theory because
that's the way they're doing it around here.
'course now they've told some people so that spoils it.
Alfred
|
3096.12 | Productive, doing what... | AKOCOA::BBARRY | Laudabamusne Rex | Mon May 23 1994 14:04 | 6 |
| Well, some may choose to be productive on resume's and not their job.
I, for one, would like to know what's what, but it would be difficult
to stick to the program knowing that my whole group was dust in 3
weeks, for instance...
/Bob
|
3096.13 | Productivity Not the Concern | CTHQ::DELUCO | Premature Grandparent | Mon May 23 1994 14:05 | 16 |
|
Productivity isn't the goal. The goal is to cut in a productive way.
The sooner Digital is done with this restructuring, the sooner the
remaining Digital will become more productive. I don't think there's
much that the SLT can do to make this a pleasant experience...nor a
productive one. There are small things you can do to lower the anxiety
rate...like bury yourself in your work, and/or resign yourself to "what
will be will be".
Our organization is (I believe) giving us as much information as they
have...even if they don't have information, they've been telling us
that, and when they get the details, they tell us (ie, we're going to
cut X% by Y date). I think that's about as much as we can ask for
right now.
Jim
|
3096.14 | | DELNI::DISMUKE | | Mon May 23 1994 14:13 | 8 |
| Since jackie didn't come back to answer...
Search Surname: SCHWARTZINGER Search Given Name: JACKIE, JACKIE ANN
DTN: 474-2659 Intrnl Mail Addr: ACI1 Location: ACI
Org Unit: US DIGITAL SERVICES-MCS
|
3096.15 | Reach out and touch someone | DYPSS1::COGHILL | Steve Coghill, Luke 14:28 | Mon May 23 1994 14:37 | 3 |
| We just heard that due to expense restrictions (relating to travel)
our HR rep will be notifying TFSO'ed employees by telephone because
she cannot travel to the offices to notify them in person.
|
3096.16 | i love corporate amerika! | ODIXIE::RHARRIS | NRA lifer, heart and soul! | Mon May 23 1994 15:19 | 6 |
| MCS is being hit. I am in Base, and we are going to get impacted. I
sure would hate to be an employee after all this MAJOR reduction takes
place. You think it's tough now, just wait until July. We are losing
business, losing headcount, and budgets are going up.
|
3096.19 | Here I Am... | POBOX::SCHWARTZINGE | It's gonna get better | Mon May 23 1994 17:07 | 7 |
| Sorry about that....it is MVCS - they are closing the Call Management
Center and moving it to Atlanta and CXO
I couldn't get in here before this to answer...we are swamped with
work!
J
|
3096.20 | cube for rent | ODIXIE::RHARRIS | NRA lifer, heart and soul! | Mon May 23 1994 17:08 | 8 |
| If they are moving it to Atlanta, that tells me that there is going to
be some blood flowing out here. Due to a consolidation effort we have
experienced, we are on the virge of full capacity. So, if more people
are coming in, someones got to go. Watch out the next two weeks,
that's what I hear.
Bob
|
3096.21 | Waiting for the axe | DV780::DEGIDIO | Greetings from the Atomic City | Tue May 24 1994 11:28 | 6 |
| We were told at a meeting last week that our district will be hit
by four people. I just read a memo from my manager that this number
will be increased for a total of 12 people. How can I get myself, or
my team mates to get motivated?
|
3096.22 | | ICS::DONNELLAN | | Tue May 24 1994 12:10 | 1 |
| Personnel is slated to lose 40%!
|
3096.23 | good chunk of IDC | HUMOR::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Tue May 24 1994 14:30 | 4 |
| 90-100 people, out of around 800, in Information Design & Consulting (my and
Tom Parmenter's organization) are being Officially Notified today.
-- Nina
|
3096.24 | No package? | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Tue May 24 1994 16:23 | 14 |
| The following reply has been contributed by a member of our community
who wishes to remain anonymous. If you wish to contact the author by
mail, please send your message to ROWLET::AINSLEY, specifying the
conference name and note number. Your message will be forwarded with
your name attached unless you request otherwise.
Bob - Co-moderator DIGITAL
Is there a package with these layoffs? Heard a rumor *no* package was
being given....
\Troubled in Texas
|
3096.25 | | YIELD::HARRIS | | Tue May 24 1994 16:25 | 6 |
| > Is there a package with these layoffs? Heard a rumor *no* package was
> being given....
>
> \Troubled in Texas
Same package as last quarter.
|
3096.26 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue May 24 1994 16:28 | 1 |
| Supposedly the no-package layoffs start next quarter.
|
3096.27 | "Yup, pkg still in place" | BWICHD::SILLIKER | Crocodile sandwich-make it snappy | Tue May 24 1994 16:30 | 9 |
| There is a package, it has not changed... yet. I believe it's still
the 9 weeks plus one week for each full year's service... and whatever
else goes along with it...
There is RUMOUR that there will be no severance packages beyond what
the Feds mandate after the end of the fiscal year, but I stress that
that's just hearsay...
Hope that helps...
|
3096.28 | | 2HOT::SHANAHAN | The DEATH SPIRAL continues.... | Tue May 24 1994 16:37 | 2 |
|
the current package is 4 weeks plus 1 week for each year served....
|
3096.29 | the first wave has hit us | RHETT::WRIGHT | | Tue May 24 1994 16:46 | 23 |
| Customer/Internal Support has been hit. Our Ultrix/OSF1 Kernel support
group lost four of 28. All three customer support centers combined
are to lose about 100 people (out of 950 or so). This is the
*first* hit, not full approved by legal, but some of our managers
(thankfully mine) will let you know in the privacy of her office
whether or not you are on "the list".
All groups and all folks names are thrown in the bin to be sifted by
PA ratings and seniority, etc. Regardless of skills.
We've been told the package is one week pay per year of service with
a minimum of four weeks.
not much $,
not good,
not happy.
BTW, some managers will not tell their folks how many or who in
particular is on the list. So we're awash in rumor and sour moods
are rampant.
sue
|
3096.30 | Might be we don't need any layoffs in Q4 ... | EEMELI::SCHILDT | | Wed May 25 1994 02:35 | 8 |
|
In Digital Consulting Finland we have seen people reacting to the Q3
layoffs by starting to leave at own initiative. From a group of 90
people we have had almost 10 people leaving the company after that -
and most of those people are the top performers amongst us, of course.
Pirkko
|
3096.31 | "Will the last one out..." | BWICHD::SILLIKER | Crocodile sandwich-make it snappy | Wed May 25 1994 10:54 | 11 |
| My boss this morning grimly informed me that about 25% of the company
is expected to be made redundant in the next coupla weeks.
Furthermore, the thinking, so I'm told, is that, them's who don't like
things, the stress, the workloads, can terminate, period, no more
touchy-feely caring about people as individuals... we can be replaced
with people who don't think that they're owed anything by the
corporation after years of loyal service, etc. That may be his
perspective, but I hear it corraborated, more or less, in other
quarters. Hold onto your horses, troops, gonna be a real nasty ride.
I wonder why I even stay?
|
3096.32 | | NACAD::SHERMAN | Steve NETCAD::Sherman DTN 226-6992, LKG2-A/R05 pole AA2 | Wed May 25 1994 11:20 | 14 |
| FWIW, that is definitely NOT the attitude had where I'm at. Stress,
heavy workloads and so forth. We've got that. Not valued or not
important to the success of the enterprise? Heck no! Our awareness of
being needed is greatly heightened. We're running a very tight ship
and there isn't anybody that I know of that could leave without being
missed and affecting our deliverables. I have noticed changes in
attitudes about folks leaving. Used to be we felt concern for them.
But, with the tight ship we're in now, it's changed to concern for us!
As a result, I look at the folks around me as allies, all working
together to try to perform well, save all our jobs and be successful.
We're talking about highly technical folks with marketable skills.
Some of us have been (politely) beating off the headhunters ...
Steve
|
3096.33 | "Do we work for the same company?" | BWICHD::SILLIKER | Crocodile sandwich-make it snappy | Wed May 25 1994 12:08 | 18 |
| Steve:
I'm glad that there are still some pockets of decency within this once
great company, where the human factor is treated with respect and
dignity, but the sad reality is that the grim message I relayed is one
I am hearing from too many places to idly dismiss. I, too, am in a
small and profitable group wherein each contribution is critical...
but that may mean precious little to folks above who don't know the
detail, and don't care, it's slash-and-burn by numbers...
I wonder why mgmt. doesn't get it, that morale translates directly to
the bottom line, to future success, as does lack of morale translate
directly to the continuation of this death spiral we're caught in, and
any pilots out there are familiar with that analogy...
Sign me:
Stunned in Marlboro
|
3096.34 | the "ratio" | CSC32::K_BOUCHARD | | Wed May 25 1994 12:49 | 13 |
| DEC has a ratio of high to average performers like all other high-tech
companies (I don't know what the ideal ratio is,maybe something like 10
to 1) I suspect that after all the "re-org" is done,the ratio will be
about the same as when we were at 129,000 employees. I suspect that
overall,the layoffs are in that ratio which with my figure of 10:1
means that 10 average performers go for every one top performer. I said
"overall",there will definitely be some groups where it seems as though
*all* the "1's" are being laid off. DEC can't afford to keep all the
top performers. I'll bet that companies that try that soon go bankrupt.
The idea is to get the job done at the lowest cost. Isn't that what
keeps shareholders happy?
Ken
|
3096.35 | the trend seems to be the same..... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Tazmanian Person | Wed May 25 1994 13:08 | 5 |
| I would hope that the ratio of managers to worker types will be
corrected, or at least improved. In our last re-org, we actually got
an additional layer of management! Go figure......
steve
|
3096.36 | | VMSNET::M_MACIOLEK | Four54 Camaro/Only way to fly | Wed May 25 1994 13:25 | 14 |
| So they dump people, in a business sense this would work if the
systems and support personnel are operating efficiently. I gather
they are not.
(Un)fortunantly efficient systems require less human intervention.
If we dump people while failing to streamline operations we will not
suceed.
I've always tried to work smarter, not harder. A co-worker I once
worked with (straight out of college) thought he'd be viewed favorably
because he always sat at his desk all day. Meanwhile, I had the
computers doing the "busy work" for me.
MadMike
|
3096.37 | | NASZKO::MACDONALD | | Wed May 25 1994 13:28 | 10 |
|
Right, the current package is 4 weeks of continuous pay plus one week
for every year with the company with 4 as the minimum so everyone
leaves with at least 8 weeks. Also paid is any unused vacation plus
the personal holiday. I got the tap this week and leave Friday. The
TFSO option says it is approved through the first week of June.
fwiw,
Steve
|
3096.38 | I don't think the economics follow. | WRAFLC::GILLEY | Whatsoever a man soweth, that also shall he reap. | Wed May 25 1994 13:33 | 7 |
| Ken,
I have to disagree completely about letting go of the highest
performers. Give me two high performers *any* day, and they'll outwork
10 average types.
Charlie - sign me a high performer :-)
|
3096.39 | What's up in Europe | CAPNET::WENTWORTH | | Wed May 25 1994 14:55 | 4 |
| Aside from the avoided layoffs in France has the rest of
Europe seen the 6000+ layoffs announced not too long ago?
Curious.
|
3096.40 | "Are thanks appropriate?" | BWICHD::SILLIKER | Crocodile sandwich-make it snappy | Wed May 25 1994 15:37 | 3 |
| .37... Grim thanks for the correct information, what it took to be
able to share it with us "survivors", eh? The best to you...
Godspeed...
|
3096.41 | Please post official TFSO package details. | VULCN1::BROOKS | | Wed May 25 1994 22:41 | 6 |
| Could someone please post the "official" TFSO package details that were
found on LIVEWIRE a couple months ago.
Thanks
Dick
|
3096.42 | | CCAD23::TAN | FY94-Prepare for Saucer Separation | Wed May 25 1994 22:49 | 10 |
| re previous note, whose number I forget before I'm so stressed out I don't
know what day it is:
Layoffs don't equate to "streamlining". Certainly not from where I'm sitting.
All it's meant is that those of us who have yet to feel the shoulder tap, are
expected to pick up the slack. That is, after you recover from the shock and
disbelief.
sign me... stunned.
|
3096.43 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Ora, the Old Rural Amateur | Thu May 26 1994 05:20 | 4 |
| re .39: About 850 in Germany.
I'm not even sure what our headcount is nowadays... 850 probably
amounts to over 20%.
|
3096.44 | Yes, Europe is getting it. | OSLLAV::SVEIN | Svein Mulelid, CS Product Management, NWO | Thu May 26 1994 05:36 | 11 |
| In Norway 25% will have to go. It started on March 25th
when 30-40 people out of 250 had to go. Within July 1st
we are supposed to be down to 185, so a few more have to
leave before that. When this round is over we will be
down more than 50% compared to the top population.
On the first TFSO here in Norway people got up to 18 months
pay, pluss help to get new jobb. This time you get help to
find a new jobb, but no extra pay.
Svein
|
3096.45 | This bit of Europe's getting it | WELSWS::HILLN | It's OK, it'll be dark by nightfall | Thu May 26 1994 05:47 | 2 |
| UK is 85 people below its population target for the end of Q3, with
more to go during Q4.
|
3096.46 | Same work, fewer people | WRKSYS::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Sat May 28 1994 11:36 | 21 |
| The word went out a while back that SEG (Silicon Engineering Group, the
folks who design the chips, for you TLA-impaired folks :-) would cut by
6%. A friend was tapped and told me that while they admit that they
have to cut projects, deciding which would take longer than they have.
So instead, they are simply tapping the folks who are between projects
-- like my friend. This implies to me that probably the cuts are
probably not hitting managers. But when do they ever?
My own group is not going to be cut -- instead, they told us they'll
be cutting some of our support groups, so that we'll have to pick up
some of that work. Everywhere I look, the peanut butter is being
spread thinner.
As painful and frustrating as it is to cut whole groups and whole
projects, it seems to me that there's no alternative anymore. I
only hope the decisions on which groups/projects to cut are based
on a coherent and sensible plan for what businesses Digital wants
to remain in when we come out of this.
Larry
|
3096.47 | 11-11.5% of IDC were hit last Tuesday. | DEMON::PILGRM::BAHN | Infinite Diversity & Combinations | Sat May 28 1994 16:46 | 14 |
|
>>> 90-100 people, out of around 800, in Information Design & Consulting (my
>>> and Tom Parmenter's organization) are being Officially Notified today.
>>>
>>> -- Nina
As a system manager for IDC, I'm one of those who has the inenviable duty
of being an "account assassin." Since many IDC users have accounts on
multiple clusters, my colleagues and I have been confirming names all
week. A week ago, the predicted number was 92. As of yesterday, we've
received confirmation on 88. 11% to 11.5% of IDC "bought the farm."
Terry
|
3096.49 | what I think I heard | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 223-8576, MSO2-2/A2, IM&T) | Wed Jun 01 1994 12:34 | 34 |
| re Note 3096.48 by NOTAPC::PEACOCK:
> Palmer and others had been saying, to the best of my understanding at
> least, that further cuts/layoffs would be based on some analysis of
> the business units. That these cuts would affect (only/mostly) those
> business groups that were no longer "desirable".
...
> Instead I am hearing that nearly all groups are being hit, and that
> the numbers are ranging anywhere from 10% to 45 or 50%. It seems to
> this observer that the cuts are being spread across nearly every
> business unit, regardless of the viability of that unit. There are a
> couple of exceptions - I hear that the PC group actually has some
> small number of open reqs, but basically everybody got slashed.
Palmer committed a downsizing schedule to the BOD a long time
ago (a year?). Digital made essentially zero net progress
towards meeting this schedule over the past few quarters.
The BOD gave Palmer an ultimatum to get back on the
downsizing schedule by the end of the fiscal year (this
month). This requirement appears to be independent of and
higher priority than the restructuring analysis -- in any
event, the restructuring analysis is not complete and thus
its results are not being taken into account in the current
layoffs.
The current layoffs are mostly dumb cut-to-the-numbers
reductions.
Still to come is a restructuring of Digital businesses --
that will surely be accompanied by yet more layoffs as future
needs are finally determined.
Bob
|
3096.50 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jun 01 1994 12:48 | 7 |
| We were told yesterday that there is no more TFSO - no more package.
Anyone laid off from today on will just get their normal severance pay
(2 or 4 weeks, depending on wage class, I think.)
At least we won't have to keep explaining what TFSO stands for.
Steve
|
3096.51 | Thanks For Shoving Off | OKFINE::KENAH | Every old sock meets an old shoe... | Wed Jun 01 1994 12:52 | 0 |
3096.52 | re: .49, probably | BOOKS::HAMILTON | Change sucks. | Wed Jun 01 1994 12:56 | 23 |
|
re: .49
I pretty much concur with your analysis. I think there are a
number of things going on.
1. Cut people to get back on the downsizing schedule (i.e.,
continue to work the revenue to headcount ratio).
2. Prepare to sell/spinoff some things (would those
units/products be more valuable with less people?)
3. Continue the analysis of what we can sell/spinoff.
4. Loop to 1.
I also think that we got some unpleasant news about the valuations
of some of the businesses; I think that information might be
fed into the decision making apparatus with respect to down-
sizing. I also think that there was probably some feedback
from interested buyers that said cut more.
Of course, all of this is simply demented speculation on my
part. I'm "out of the loop" to quote an erstwhile politician.
Glenn
|
3096.53 | WHAT?? | DELNI::HARTWELL | | Wed Jun 01 1994 13:06 | 8 |
|
Where did you hear that from? I'm very interested since the reason
I volunteered to leave was the package.
such that it is...
|
3096.54 | Where did you hear that? | INDEV1::SMITH | I need two of everything... | Wed Jun 01 1994 13:10 | 4 |
| re: couple back... Can't be true. Our group has been told that
all involved will be notified next week... just can't believe
that the package has ended...
|
3096.55 | | MSDOA::SCRIVEN | | Wed Jun 01 1994 16:21 | 7 |
| re: Package ended.....
Reliable source, MCS Manager here who has been personally involved with
many people's departure, states that the current package is good
through the end of the fiscal year (FWIW)....
Toodles.....JP
|
3096.56 | Volunteers ??????? | DASPHB::PBAXTER | | Wed Jun 01 1994 16:44 | 1 |
| Remember ... you CAN't Officially Volunteer for Severence ?????
|
3096.57 | layoffs guided by a numberic goal...... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Indecision; the key to flexibility | Wed Jun 01 1994 16:50 | 6 |
| The layoffs here in DCO seem to be widespread across all organizations
with some folks being hit last week, this week, and rumored to be hit
in the next few weeks. It appears from my chair to be a blindfolded
grim reaper swinging his blade....keep yer head down!
steve
|
3096.58 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jun 01 1994 16:53 | 11 |
| Re: .53
I heard it from my cost center manager yesterday. It's possible she was
misinformed, though she's been quite reliable about such things in the
past. She said that the deadline was the reason for not taking longer to
come up with the list of people to be tapped.
It would not astonish me, though, to learn that different managers were being
given different stories.
Steve
|
3096.59 | Rumor time! | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Wed Jun 01 1994 16:54 | 19 |
| Just heard a few good rumors and thought I'd put them in this
thread since it's already depressing:
1. Salary freeze effective immediately, including any recent paperwork
which had not yet been processed (like any May and June increases which
people have not yet received).
2. Mandatory plant closings - Planned for both the weeks of July 4th
and Christmas week (either without pay or using your vacation time).
However, this has been temporarily postponed until the implications are
better understood.
3. A pool of roughly $7-10M exists for executive bonuses with no plans
to cut this or executive salaries, despite 1 & 2 above. Sure seems like
this would help the Q4 bottom line to give up this money, but what do I
know.
Good stuff, huh? Pretty detailed for a rumor, huh? Remember you
heard it here first!
|
3096.60 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jun 01 1994 17:31 | 11 |
| re .58:
I asked our CC mgr about this, and she said that the word from Harbert at the
beginning of this TFSO was that the package would end on May 31. She didn't
rule out the possibility that this had changed since she spoke to him about it.
I got mail from someone who had a group meeting today with several CC mgrs,
a group mgr and a personnel rep. They repeatedly denied that the package
was gone.
I suspect the package is here until the end of the quarter.
|
3096.61 | ??? | POWDML::MCDONOUGH | | Wed Jun 01 1994 17:55 | 9 |
| Re .59
What effect would this have on Wage Class 4 folks, who get paid on an
annual salary basis....not by the hour??
As far as a salary freeze, some of us have felt that it's been
'frozen' for a looooooong time already..
|
3096.62 | | DELNI::DISMUKE | | Wed Jun 01 1994 18:02 | 5 |
| as with last christmas...a WC4 person would submit a timecard that
would say "without pay"...
-sjd
|
3096.63 | hoping that one is FALSE! | 3D::RICHARDSON | | Wed Jun 01 1994 19:19 | 5 |
| Boy, I hope that one about mandatory vacation in a month is not true!
I don't have the vacation time, and I can't afford on such short notice
to survive a "payless payday"! Ulp!
/Charlotte
|
3096.64 | doubtful | SWAM1::MEUSE_DA | | Wed Jun 01 1994 19:27 | 6 |
|
If we close a plant or plants for any length of time, we might as well
get out of this business. Our customers are already mad as hell about
our late deliveries and other related mfg problems.
|
3096.65 | | MAASUP::MUDGETT | We need Dinosaur Power NOW! | Wed Jun 01 1994 19:33 | 11 |
| I know this might be a foolish pondering, but.... If our problem is
that we can't produce enough of the stuff that the customers want why
the heck would we be closing down the factories? I guess the lead
times aren't long enough...
Also I wouldn't sweat anything new. I was gabbing with a person today
that had said we need to have some (my word) inovation. We've been
downsizing things without coming up with newer or different ways of
doing things.
Fred
|
3096.66 | | ALFAXP::MITCHAM | -Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta) | Thu Jun 02 1994 07:52 | 7 |
| >We were told yesterday that there is no more TFSO - no more package.
>Anyone laid off from today on will just get their normal severance pay
>(2 or 4 weeks, depending on wage class, I think.)
I won't believe it 'til I read it in the paper.
-Andy (spoken only half in jest)
|
3096.67 | Correction to .50 | DELNI::HARTWELL | | Thu Jun 02 1994 10:09 | 12 |
|
What I was refering in in .53 was the note from .50 saying that as
of June 1 there is not package, just 2-4 weeks pay and that's it.
I thought I'd put a note in here to let you all know that the
cc manager who told his group this was feeding them mis-information
I called personnel and they double-checked and confirmed that the
package of 4 weeks plus 1 week for every year of service is
still in effect till the end of June.
Paulette
|
3096.68 | ?? | POWDML::MCDONOUGH | | Thu Jun 02 1994 10:09 | 21 |
| re .62
Interesting........but a bit puzzling... I don't recall that being
the case...
Fer talking purposes: Employee XX is on an ANNUAL SALARY of
$52,000.00... Digital decides to 'close the shop' for a week.. Employee
XX will now be either:
(a)FORCED to use his/her vacation????
(b)If he/she refuses, salary will be reduced to
$51,000.00???? Sounds like a pay-cut, huh??
I COULD understand this scenario if the Corp. had established a
POLICY of annual plant shutdown for vacation as some do, but this is
typically a well-known and widely published situation that ALL
employees know and understand prior to hiring. However, I don't really
see why it should have an impact on a salaried individual... Must be
another new "bennie" that we're gonna get..
|
3096.69 | | RULE62::kh | Parity error is a bit funny | Thu Jun 02 1994 10:14 | 7 |
| Re -.1
I don't have my last salary letter nearby, but I believe that we're paid a
weekly salary (which most of us translate to annual figure).
~/karl
|
3096.70 | | POWDML::MCDONOUGH | | Thu Jun 02 1994 10:42 | 13 |
| Re .69
I DO have my last few salary increase notifications here, and every
one of them give a weekly and ANNUAL SALARY figure... Also, I cannot
ever recall any Digital person who has ever had a need to ask what my
current salary is requesting it as a weekly....they ALWAYS ask what my
ANNUAL salary is..
In fact, I just went WAAAY back and found my OFFER LETTER from
Personnel which I received when I became an employee eons ago, and it
specifically states an "ANNUAL SALARY OF $XX,XXX.XX"............
|
3096.71 | Some operations cannot be shut down | NECSC::LEVY | A song that's born to soar the sky | Thu Jun 02 1994 11:44 | 5 |
| It will be interesting if they actually do plant closings. Some operations
(such as MCS) certainly cannot shut down for a week, unless we get the
customers to agree to not have any problems. :-)
dave
|
3096.72 | production facility....... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Indecision; the key to flexibility | Thu Jun 02 1994 12:09 | 14 |
| RE: -1
I think the word 'plant' in this case would mean a manufacturing
facility. Scheduled holiday shutdowns are very common in many
production industries. The plant can do much needed maintenance, the
factory staffs can plan knowing that all the employees will be taking
their vacations at the same time, and with careful planning, God
willing and the creek don't rise, they can still make their ship
schedules.......
Customer service is another story.............you can't cover a week of
support with soem extra finished goods inventory.
|
3096.73 | I wonder what plants | AZTECH::LASTOVICA | straight but not narrow minded | Thu Jun 02 1994 12:24 | 3 |
| I thought that in many cases (disks for example and I presume AXP
CPUs) that we were way behind in orders as it is. closing 'those'
plants would seem a poor choice.
|
3096.74 | :-( | AZTECH::LASTOVICA | straight but not narrow minded | Thu Jun 02 1994 12:25 | 6 |
| re: .70
> I DO have my last few salary increase notifications here, and every
better save those. sounds like they'll be real collector's items
shortly.
|
3096.75 | as good as the rumor it travel on.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Indecision; the key to flexibility | Thu Jun 02 1994 12:32 | 9 |
| re: -1
you're right......in my mfg experience it has been hard to justify
scheduled plant shutdowns when we were behind schedule...and many times
the shutdowns didn't happen. The plan was always to get the yields up,
shortages down, and get back on schedule. What we're probably hearing
is the 'plan'......
steve
|
3096.76 | | WWDST1::MGILBERT | Education Reform starts at home.... | Thu Jun 02 1994 13:39 | 13 |
| Additionally, even when did have plant shutdowns the
lines often continued to operate. We just ran with a
lighter crew and left the overhead/paper work go until
those folks returned. If we had an emergency need
to deal with overhead we had folks on callin who
got paid for the hours they had to show up.
At this point plant shutdowns, unless it includes
significant numbers of non-manufacturing functions,
wouldn't save a whole lot of money. One may be able
though to justify shutting down, for example, IM&T
development work for a couple of weeks.
|
3096.77 | Am I dreaming here? | TNPUBS::JONG | Steve | Thu Jun 02 1994 13:45 | 1 |
| Digital did this last Christmas. Don't you remember?
|
3096.78 | From livewire - Official freeze notice | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Thu Jun 02 1994 14:41 | 59 |
| )0 [;1mWorldwide News [m[13C LIVE WIRE
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
[;1mDigital announces immediate wage and salary ... [m Date: 02-Jun-1994
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
[62CPage 1 of 1
[7m Digital announces immediate wage and salary freeze [m
Digital management has decided to implement an immediate freeze
in base wages and salaries as part of the effort to reduce costs and
return the company to profitability, according to Richard M. Farrahar,
vice president, Human Resources. Performance-based incentive plans
currently in place are not affected.
"Digital is at a critical stage of our turnaround. We are
examining every aspect of our business with a determination to focus
on long-term success and hold costs in check to assure operational
flexibility," Farrahar said.
He explained that management had examined payroll, one of
Digital's largest fixed costs, and after careful consideration,
concluded a freeze was necessary. The freeze applies to payroll
worldwide, unless prohibited by law or other binding legal obligations.
In countries where the freeze is prohibited, managers are required to
submit the same level of cost reduction by other means.
In outlining provisions of the freeze to senior managers,
Farrahar said, "It is important for employees to understand that this
is part of our overall effort to reduce costs and restore profitability.
We -- each and every one of us -- must continue to do the difficult
things necessary to get Digital back to profitability as quickly as
possible. Our shareholders expect it, our customers want it and I am
confident that our employees will understand the necessity."
Consistent with Digital's "pay for performance" philosophy,
however, performance-based incentive plans will continue where they are
currently in place. These include sales incentives, organizational and
country success sharing programs, annual performance-based incentive
programs and the stock option program.
In addition, funding has been increased for the FY94 Top Performer
and FY94 Employee Recognition programs "to provide more financial reward
opportunities for high-performing employees at all levels."
Continuation or termination of the freeze will be determined by
Digital's future financial performance, Farrahar concluded.
FOR DIGITAL INTERNAL USE ONLY
|
3096.79 | !!! | POWDML::MCDONOUGH | | Thu Jun 02 1994 14:54 | 5 |
| Re .74
Right!! They already qualify as "antiques" due to age...
|
3096.80 | How can we say things are better now? | ASABET::SILVERBERG | Mark Silverberg MLO1-3/H20 | Thu Jun 02 1994 15:14 | 8 |
| And we have people walking around saying things are better then they
appear??????? We're out telling customers, etc. that Q3 was an
abnormal event and we're back on track???? Based on what I've seen,
and heard to be announced soon, we're acting like it's closer to the
end than we think.
Mark
|
3096.81 | | POWDML::MCDONOUGH | | Thu Jun 02 1994 17:02 | 9 |
|
Re .77
Not really. The Christmas thingie was strictly a VOLUNTARY item, with
a clear message that it WAS voluntary... In fact, I hadda work so some
of the 'chosen' could take the week off. Nobody was forced to lose pay.
If they elected to take unpaid leave, they were allowed to do so..
|
3096.82 | re .80 Is it that Bad Marc ? | ENQUE::TAMER | | Thu Jun 02 1994 18:08 | 10 |
| re .80
Mark,
Can you elaborate on what you're talking about ?
Or is it the wage freeze that pissed you off ;)
|
3096.83 | Precedent set... | GRANPA::BLARSON | | Fri Jun 03 1994 01:53 | 6 |
| re: 68
I had my previous employer close down the plant for a week because of
financial problems (Pennsylvania). It was legal then (late 70's)...
Doubt it would happen here though (FWIW)
|
3096.84 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Fri Jun 03 1994 03:39 | 21 |
| The "wake week" system started in Lancashire factories several
hundred years ago. The factories were so small that the loss of even
one person from the production line was a problem, and with
just-in-time supplying between carders, dyers, weavers,... it was
inconvenient for one factory to shut down without all the others doing
so. On the other hand, the employers recognised a need for *some*
holiday during the year, so the wake week of a town was the week on
which every factory was closed.
More recently I have visited a factory with 10,000 employees that
is highly automated. They close for 2 weeks in the summer and 9900
employees go on holiday while the remaining ones take their only chance
in the year to do software upgrades, LAN restructuring,... For the rest
of the year the factory is running 3 shifts, and the computer people
daren't even unplug a cable except on their own support systems. It is
a very busy 2 weeks for 1% of the employees.
It does work well in a manufacturing environment. It might work
well in other environments such as personnel or software engineering
where you might be able to have savings by shutting off heating, light,
air conditioning to a wing of a building for a week.
|
3096.85 | customer messages | ASABET::SILVERBERG | Mark Silverberg MLO1-3/H20 | Fri Jun 03 1994 07:37 | 19 |
| re .82
I've been in customer meetings recently where VPs told customers that
the Q3 surprise was really not as bad as it looks. We had more than
enough unshipped business on the dcok waiting for final components
to make up for the shortfall, our supply chain problems are solved,
and we will see that revenue made up in Q4. Also, stated was that
since we are experiencing greatly increased demand for hardware
products, we expect that tend to continue and we will back back on
track revenue-wise soon, and that although we will watch our costs
closely, there is no need for major drastic actions in the expense
areas...especially in the areas of service and support.
I view the curent and forecasted actions as drastic, and I don't like
it when our senior managers lead customers on like that. Maybe I'm
just to worried about how customers will react 8-)
Mark
|
3096.86 | | ICS::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Fri Jun 03 1994 08:16 | 3 |
| yeah...
and we landed on the moon in 1865, too.
|
3096.87 | Doubts | POCUS::RICCIARDI | Be a graceful Parvenu... | Fri Jun 03 1994 10:42 | 1 |
| Do we really have 1b$ in cash?
|
3096.88 | | ARCANA::CONNELLY | foggy, rather groggy | Fri Jun 03 1994 10:47 | 7 |
| re: .87
> Do we really have 1b$ in cash?
yup...of course some of the individual bills have pictures of a seal balancing
a ball on its nose...
- paul
|
3096.94 | Two New Rumors | AIMHI::DANIELS | | Fri Jun 03 1994 16:32 | 12 |
| Rumor: I've heard from two sources in the last two days that the cut
that is now being experienced is only for laying off 7K. They are
saying that a much bigger cut, beginning in August for 20K to go (with
no package) is going to happen. For one of these sources, today was
their last day, and their manager told them this 20K was going to be
happening. This source was more from the engineering side of Digital.
Has anyone else heard that one? and What do you think of it?
The other rumor I heard today for the first time, is that there is
going to be some sort of voluntary severance package coming around. I
heard this rumor over past years a lot, so I wondered if anyone heard
this one too.
|
3096.95 | | AKOCOA::BBARRY | Laudabamusne Rex | Fri Jun 03 1994 16:34 | 5 |
| Heard the rumor ref: 20K next Qtr, didn't hear anything new
ref: voluntary pkg- Doubt it strongly - why pay? If they keep
doin' it to us, like this past week, enough will leave on their own.
/Bob
|
3096.96 | (perhaps part may be in divested business?) | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 223-8576, MSO2-2/A2, IM&T) | Fri Jun 03 1994 16:46 | 10 |
| re Note 3096.94 by AIMHI::DANIELS:
> Rumor: I've heard from two sources in the last two days that the cut
> that is now being experienced is only for laying off 7K. They are
> saying that a much bigger cut, beginning in August for 20K to go (with
> no package) is going to happen.
The "living" will envy the "dead".
Bob
|
3096.97 | How long will it take to notice? | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Fri Jun 03 1994 18:39 | 4 |
| Since the number of engineers left in this company, hardware and
software combined, is less than 15k, some will have to come from
somewhere else. It will be an interesting company if every single
engineer gets the boot!
|
3096.98 | hard to know where to take 20k from | AZTECH::LASTOVICA | straight but not narrow minded | Mon Jun 06 1994 13:26 | 3 |
| it would be interesting to see the demographics of the company broken
down by number of players in the various groups and then the number of
players in 'overhead' vs. 'non-overhead'.
|
3096.99 | | KONING::KONING | Paul Koning, B-16504 | Mon Jun 06 1994 15:10 | 12 |
| Re .73:
> I thought that in many cases (disks for example and I presume AXP
> CPUs) that we were way behind in orders as it is. closing 'those'
> plants would seem a poor choice.
I'd say it would make as little sense as an across-the-board headcount cut
without regard to which divisions contribute to making money.
:-(
paul
|
3096.100 | Less what we have or more something new? | IDEFIX::65296::siren | | Tue Jun 07 1994 04:51 | 6 |
| Why not read the article about Compaq in yesterday's VNS in VTX?
Then think again our headcount, our internal IT services, the usage models
of our (largest private in the world) network, our working models etc.
--Ritva
|
3096.101 | 60+ % hit in sales support | BLOHRD::CAIRNS | | Tue Jun 07 1994 19:38 | 9 |
| Sales support was hit in April. All the CBU sales support people were
rolled into one group by geography and placed under sales. Our headcount
on Jan. 15 was 36 people coded sales support. The new model called for 14
district people and 1 region person. Some were given sales slots and some
moved to consulting, but most were TFSO'd. With the bad Q3 results,
another 3 are to be let go this week including me, so the group will be
down to 12. There is talk of major cuts in sales at the end of the month.
I don't think there will be sales support in a year!
|
3096.102 | >Hold onto your hats folks< | JULIET::MAPPES_DO | | Tue Jun 07 1994 20:39 | 5 |
| They are not waiting! They laid off the only Unix person in our area
and one of the two technical writers.
Hold on to your hats! Here we go again!
|
3096.103 | | DRDAN::KALIKOW | World-Wide Web: Postmodem Culture | Tue Jun 07 1994 20:42 | 4 |
| Hmmm... JULIET's in San Francisco... Last UNIX person... Well THAT
figures, there isn't any market for UNIX over there... Must be LOTS of
call for OpenVMS expertise. Yep that must be it!!!
|
3096.104 | | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Wed Jun 08 1994 07:22 | 1 |
| Geez...will Digital continue???
|
3096.105 | "Hear EDU got clobbered" | BWICHD::SILLIKER | Crocodile sandwich-make it snappy | Wed Jun 08 1994 14:06 | 13 |
| Just heard that PKO3 (Education) got hit big time, but full extent not
known. Don't know whether customer training, or internal training, or
a combo of both, but the suspicion is that all of internal training may
have been hit seeing as almost noone had funding anymore for internal
training.
Can anyone out there confirm or clarify this?
And, just a coupla years ago many groups were "kicked out" of PKO3 to
make room for this lovely upscale training center, and quickly it
started "dying"... the Digital Store closed... my group was there,
and was moved (for other reasons) to MRO3... it just have cost the
company a bundle to refurbish PK3, and heave us all out of there...
|
3096.106 | | ICS::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Wed Jun 08 1994 15:08 | 15 |
| MCS training in PKO3 was hit BIG TIME. All of the instructors are
gone, except for 3 or 4 who will no longer be doing any instructing.
All of the managers are gone.
Some DLS (customer training) suffering too... some management, some
staff. No instructors from DLS (at PKO) were hit, yet. I understand
two other sites lost one each...
I've been participiting in another string in this conference on this
topic... MCS training is going back to the CAI MODEL.
I have no idea what other site activity there is/was for the current
round of TFSO activity.
tony
|
3096.107 | the Great PKO Shuffle | PHAROS::ELLIOTT | | Wed Jun 08 1994 16:29 | 42 |
|
Re: .105 "cost us a bundle"
I am normally read-only but I just couldn't resist replying to this
note, as one of the people who have been caught in the PK shuffle for
3 years now. We (IDC) used to be part of US Education and Training
and chartered to develop training. A majority of us sat in Parker
Street and developed/supported/piloted the courses for Bedford. When
they moved from Bedford to Parker Street, they kicked us to Chelmsford.
(a small group had been going back and forth between Parker Street and
Littleton anyway.) Even though we were directly connected to the training
facility, we were leaving. Go figure.
So, in spite of how dumb it seemed, we move to Chelmsford. Within a
few months we are informed that we will be moving yet again because
our lease is running out in Chelmsford, so they moved us BACK
to Parker Street, within a year. Some of us even wound up in the exact
same physical location as when we left or close to it. (so, why did we
move to Chelmsford for 11 months?)
Well, .105 is correct...the training facility at PKO was never what it
was at Bedford (how much did we pay to refurbish?) Anyhow, we were all
back there for 2 years. Then we were told that displaced engineering
groups from the Mill were going to be moving to PKO. Which was good
for us, because we work closely with those groups. BUT, we were told
we had to leave. Several people made a point about how much this
whole thing cost. But, we were asked to go to MRO1. (Which we were
more than happy to do and we landed here in April, but some of us are
so tied to engineering that we need offices in Maynard, so those of us
who will be going BACK to PKO, are currently with offices in both MRO
and MLO and will be back in PKO soon).
Now, that we've been reorged as of a few weeks ago, it turns out that now
the entire organization is part of the same engineering group that is
going to Parker Street. So, do we now go back to Parker Street? (the last
question was pure sarcastic speculation on my part, but really now...)
How MUCH does all this cost???? Is anyone paying attention?
-Susan
|
3096.108 | | ICS::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Wed Jun 08 1994 17:31 | 34 |
| Well, the cost of the re-do at PKO3 was approximately 9 Millon Dollars.
We became a training HUB. That is, what WAS Customer Training and what
WAS Internal Training became the Eastern Area Training HUB. There were
a few other HUBs set up at about the same time. This was in the last
half of 1992.
In the last half of 1993, the HUB was split in two parts. DLS (Digital
Learning Services) resumed what had been Customer Training. MCS picked
up what used to be Internal. But the two organizations were never to
be the same as when at Bedford.
The previous noter was right in her statement that PKO never became
what Bedford was... it was smaller, and it had NO proximity to hotel/motel
(used for the customers of BOTH organizations). But, the actual
training facility was excellent! A BIG step forward from what was used
at Bedford.
But, development of the HUB model failed (IMHO) because the plans were
never fully implemented, management shuffled and the rest is history.
Rumors now are that DLS will move away from PKO... into some privately
owned facility (a Hotel is likely) somewhere near or on Rt. 128, easily
accessible. Where? God only knows. But, it looks certain that the
displaced engineering folks from the mill will be here by year's end.
Many folks move around a lot. We don't always understand the why's and
begrudge doing it. I've personally moved three times since Dec. 1992.
Once to PKO3 from Bedford, and twice within PKO (from one side of the
building to the other, and then back again... to the EXACT spot I left
from).
It cut's costs.
tony
|
3096.109 | and tonites megabucks numbers are ... | AIMHI::OTOOLE | soprano's do it HIGHER | Wed Jun 08 1994 17:39 | 19 |
|
the cost of the move from bedford to PKO and the cost of referb of pko
we were told ran $12M or so.
state of the art classrooms that made area colleges envious.
was the reaction from tours conducted involving area colleges.
main problem with having training in PKO was, no place to stay
nearby, all customers from out of town stayed in hotels in marlboro
and area's north.
a good 30 plus minute commute, customers could not understand why
we didnt have the training facility in marlboro, right near the hotels.
( Wow what a concept )
mike
former instructor /last january
|
3096.110 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Here's yer bucket, start bailing!! | Wed Jun 08 1994 17:53 | 7 |
| >>state of the art classrooms that made area colleges envious.
>>was the reaction from tours conducted involving area colleges.
Well, now they'll be able to rent the classrooms to area colleges.
|
3096.111 | | CSOADM::ROTH | What, me worry? | Wed Jun 08 1994 18:40 | 4 |
| I prefered training when it was in PKO2... never did like BUO that
much...
Lee
|
3096.112 | TSFO them for a change.. | TRLIAN::GORDON | | Wed Jun 08 1994 22:09 | 7 |
| re: 107(and others)
maybe the "they" who had you moving all around with no apparent reason
should be the ones TSFO'd as they are costing the company big bucks
and aren't bringing in any money with all these usless shuffles..
IMO
|
3096.113 | | ICS::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Thu Jun 09 1994 10:13 | 62 |
| The cost of refurbishing PKO was the $9million I referred to in my
.last. Mike's referral to $12 M. includes the cost of the move TO PKO
from BUO.
In May, 1992, when the move was first announced at a general staff meeting
held in the cafeteria at BUO, I asked Bob Good (the then manager) about
the lack of "facilities" in the Maynard area... and how would this be
received by our "customers".
His reply (and I paraphrase, since it is from my not-so-perfect memory)
was that his staff had conducted a formal "survey" of our customers
(and I interpreted, as I think he meant, that the word customer refers
to ALL who are attending classes... not just CUSTOMERS) and that that
survey included questions about how important it was for the student's
living quarters to be "close at hand" to the training facility. The
responses, he said, indicated that concern for living quarters
proximity to the facility was "way down" on the list (I recall he
mentioned in 9th or 14th place... or something like that) and was NOT
to viewed as a problem. Besides, he said, the various hotels had
agreed to provide shuttle service to PKO!
The matter was dropped.
Those of you who have been to the "new" training facility must
certainly agree that it is indeed a beautifully designed and
implemented training area: 54 classrooms, all with raised platforms
for the instructor, all with sound-proofing, all with over-head
projectors for PowerPoint display, or TV... all equipped with a VCR,
all wired for sound... all wired for video, high-speed data, voice, and
ethernet... A full "open" lab for students, a "private" instructor's
lab, for production/development/support, and a "proprietary" lab, where
we could (and often did) stage new products, hold demos, etc.
This place is a truly wonderful place to teach in. I've never enjoyed
teaching anywhere (and my teaching career, while broken, goes back to
1964) more than here.
Now the word is out that ALL these classrooms are to be dismantled.
And soon what training is to be done will be done elsewhere.
Engineering is moving in, and I understand they are going to dismantle
the open lab and enlarge it. The "proprietary" lab is long since gone.
The "instructor" lab is still there... haven't heard much about what's
going on in it. I understand all the class rooms are to be torn down..
more office space is needed.
On the first floor of PKO, the desks are already stacked up in one
room, the cubicle "dividers" are all dismantled, and the
destruction/rebuilding of PKO3 is well underway.
Those people who remain are constantly shuffling around as
"reorganizations" take over their jobs, and as "consolidations" take
place... To save costs, all DLS instructors were moved back to the same
space they were last year...
I could go on... but, you know how it is. It's probably the same where
you work, maybe even worse.
God help us all.
tony
|
3096.114 | Utter disbelief! | OKFINE::KENAH | Every old sock meets an old shoe... | Thu Jun 09 1994 11:26 | 6 |
| They're going to dismantle them?
Why don't they sell the building to Boston University, MIT, or
another local college?
andrew
|
3096.115 | it's mind-boggling | WEORG::SCHUTZMAN | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Thu Jun 09 1994 11:44 | 7 |
| I second the disbelief. Geez. State of the art facility going
through the crusher, presumably because of poor planning on somebody's
part.
Geez.
--bonnie
|
3096.116 | | ARCANA::CONNELLY | foggy, rather groggy | Thu Jun 09 1994 12:21 | 5 |
|
PKO is infinitely better than BUO...not just in terms of classrooms and labs,
but more importantly in terms of traffic/commuting. BUO was ATROCIOUS on that
score!
- paul
|
3096.117 | it was a miserable commute to BUO | 3D::RICHARDSON | | Thu Jun 09 1994 13:40 | 7 |
| Yup - Bedford was a terrible place to try to get it during normal
working hours. It was only somewhat better if you knew how to nagivate
the backroads shortcut. It probably took people staying in nearby
motels at least as long to get to BUO as it takes people to get from
hotels in MRO to PKO.
/Charlotte
|
3096.118 | The Ministry of Silly Walks | PHAROS::ELLIOTT | | Thu Jun 09 1994 17:11 | 22 |
|
I did a customer training at MRO4 and the customers stayed in various
places in and around Marlboro. They loved the proximity of the hotels
and the facility. These same customers complained about both BUO and
PKO.
However, I think it's absolutely appalling that much money was
spent on a training center that is now going away. I can't get a
pencil to write with around here, but we can just ambiguously decide to
stop using places that cost us several million dollars to build. Talk
about penny wise and pound foolish. When I've raised this to others I
am told I don't understand corporate finance. So EXPLAIN THIS TO ME.
If there is logic in the scheme of things, I'd like to know what it
could be.
From down here, these decisions appear to be silly.
(jeez I'm getting touchy lately)
-Susan
|
3096.119 | Why am I surprised? | MUDPIE::MASON | The law of KARMA hasn't been repealed | Thu Jun 09 1994 17:49 | 13 |
| As someone who worked on the first floor of PKO3 through all the months
they spent ripping up the second floor -- all I can say is that I'm
stunned they're taking it apart.
I worked in Office Applications in those days (related to Ed Services
through dotted line matrixed mis-management), and helped with tours of
the building when it was finished.
All that money down the tubes -- no wonder we're in so much trouble!
Sheesh!
****
|
3096.120 | no wonder we're losing $$$$$$$$$$'s | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Fri Jun 10 1994 07:36 | 4 |
| don't worry!! It will all be built again in the near future...hahaha..
more $$$$$$$to waste.
stig
|
3096.121 | AK01 + 2 being redone for the PC business | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Fri Jun 10 1994 10:01 | 18 |
| The following topic has been contributed by a member of our community
who wishes to remain anonymous. The author has requested NO MAIL replies.
Please reply here.
Bob - Co-moderator DIGITAL
==============================================================================
If people are upset about PKO3, they're not going to be very
happy when they find out that it is costing us $2 to 3 million
to renovate AKO1 + 2 before the PC business will move in.
Desks are wood and/or wood laminates with chairs with wood
arm rests, new w/w carpets etc.... nothing but the best.
This is unconscionable at a time when we are having massive
layoffs and a wage freeze.
When will we ever learn?
|
3096.122 | | AKOCOA::BBARRY | Laudabamusne Rex | Fri Jun 10 1994 10:06 | 3 |
| Well, at least it's down from the original $4M... :-(
|
3096.123 | a vicious cycle idin it??? | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Fri Jun 10 1994 10:45 | 7 |
| > when will we learn?
this is why we have a wage freeze so we can spend the money for our
raises on things that aren't as important. Then the nexted week we'll
knock that business down too...
stig
|
3096.124 | | CSOADM::ROTH | What, me worry? | Fri Jun 10 1994 11:00 | 4 |
|
And the company wonders why there is a morale problem...
Lee
|
3096.125 | do they wonder? I wonder. | CX3PST::CSC32::R_MCBRIDE | This LAN is made for you and me... | Fri Jun 10 1994 11:05 | 6 |
| Actually, Lee, I haven't seen any indication that the company cares
about morale.
Bob
|
3096.126 | We don't need promotions either | XCUSME::HATCH | On the cutting edge of obsolescence | Fri Jun 10 1994 13:56 | 4 |
| If they cared about moral they wouldn't top a salary freeze with a job
code freeze...
Gail
|
3096.127 | | GUCCI::RWARRENFELTZ | Follow the Money! | Fri Jun 10 1994 13:56 | 5 |
| .126 Gail:
I think you meant moralE.
Ron
|
3096.128 | | XCUSME::HATCH | On the cutting edge of obsolescence | Fri Jun 10 1994 13:59 | 2 |
| re .126 Your right, my lack of a promotion has not affected my
morals...at this time. Gail
|
3096.129 | AKO1 is a construction zone.... | JUMP4::JOY | Perception is reality | Fri Jun 10 1994 14:22 | 10 |
| re: .121
Not to mention the NEW demo centers which were completed less than a
year ago are gone, plus all the walls, ceilings, etc are being torn
out/down & replaced. My office is right in the destruction
path....we're moving to OGO next week....
Debbie
(the LAST AP/A (nee GIA) group to move out)
|
3096.130 | TAXES me thinks.... | PCOJCT::CRANE | | Fri Jun 10 1994 15:40 | 5 |
| I`m sure some accountant out there could clear this up. If I remember
my finance classes all these things are tax deductable (building new
training ctrs ectra) whereas your wages and the like are not deductable
to the company...thats why I was a bit surprised when they did away
with most of the education policy.
|
3096.131 | ? | RLTIME::COOK | | Fri Jun 10 1994 16:30 | 10 |
|
> If they cared about moral they wouldn't top a salary freeze with a job
> code freeze...
Have I missed something? Have promotions been frozen as well?
al
|
3096.132 | | PMRV70::SHERK | I belong! I got circles overme i's | Fri Jun 10 1994 16:46 | 5 |
|
Yup.
Ken
|
3096.133 | | PHAROS::ELLIOTT | | Fri Jun 10 1994 17:27 | 5 |
|
I thought the PC business moved out of Acton to Stow last year.
Now they're moving back?
|
3096.134 | more money for Mayflower | MSBCS::BROWN_L | | Fri Jun 10 1994 17:50 | 2 |
| Yup, the PC group is moving back to Acton.
|
3096.135 | | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Mon Jun 13 1994 08:01 | 13 |
| when will it ever end...
|
3096.136 | The Personnel Mgr | ULYSSE::BUXTON_M | Im pink therefore Im spam | Mon Jun 13 1994 12:12 | 8 |
|
>When will it ever end...
When the only person who is left is the Worldwide Personnel
manager. This person would then switch off the lights and fire
themselves,
:-) Mark.
|
3096.137 | You asked... | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Mon Jun 13 1994 12:13 | 5 |
| Re: .135
> when will it ever end...
My guess is about 6-12 months.
|
3096.138 | worst wurst i ever ate | POBOX::CORSON | YOU CALL THAT A SLAPSHOT....? | Mon Jun 13 1994 18:38 | 2 |
|
Never - we think we're the federal government.
|
3096.139 | job code freeze now lifted | WRKSYS::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Jul 19 1994 13:24 | 9 |
| The job code freeze has now been lifted. I was told by a manager that
the reason for it was that many of the layoffs were being done by
job code, and that in the last there was a lot of shifting of people
out of the affected job codes. Should one admire a manager who
protects his/her people by playing games like this, or should one
vilify such a manager for playing games instead of reducing head count?
Beats me.
Larry
|
3096.140 | Good-old-boy Network strikes again... | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Tue Jul 19 1994 14:14 | 29 |
| The following reply has been contributed by a member of our community
who wishes to remain anonymous. If you wish to contact the author by
mail, please send your message to ROWLET::AINSLEY, specifying the
conference name and note number. Your message will be forwarded with
your name attached unless you request otherwise.
Bob - Co-moderator DIGITAL
================================================================================
This very tactic was implemented in my group 2 months ago. Our senior
manager changed the job titles of our 4 supervisors to Principal
Engineer.
I asked why, and it was clear that it was to protect their jobs.
I asked if that implies our group is management top-heavy, the answer
was no.
I asked how the supervisors would be performance-evaluated, I was told
that they would be evaluated as a supervisor, not an engineer.
I asked if this was an ethical thing to do. I was not answered.
I was furious that our group, that I previously respected, would pull
such a stunt. I got the sense from the manager that our group
*deserves* to be exempt from any management layoffs. Total bunk.
|
3096.141 | latest on layoffs | NCMAIL::RECUPAROR | | Tue Dec 06 1994 16:25 | 3 |
| Any new rumors on layoffs? Heard there might be significant cuts in
sales, with not package.
|
3096.142 | Same as Q1 | 57661::JOY | Perception is reality | Thu Dec 08 1994 12:39 | 5 |
| My husband got the tap this week, in DC. Same package as was announced
for Q1.
Debbie
|
3096.143 | | STRATA::JOERILEY | Legalize Freedom | Fri Dec 09 1994 01:45 | 5 |
| RE: -1
You call what they gave in Q1 a package? I call it an insult.
Joe
|
3096.144 | | GENRAL::INDERMUEHLE | Stonehenge Alignment Service | Fri Dec 09 1994 09:12 | 3 |
| I call it "A lot better than namy of other companies in this
world would give you".
|
3096.145 | whats the package now? | REGENT::NIKOLOFF | STOP Global Whining | Wed Jun 07 1995 18:44 | 9 |
|
Could someone tell me what the CURRENT Serverence is???
I can not seem to find it anywhere
thank you
|
3096.146 | | RUSURE::MELVIN | Ten Zero, Eleven Zero Zero by Zero 2 | Wed Jun 07 1995 21:11 | 7 |
| > Could someone tell me what the CURRENT Serverence is???
>
> I can not seem to find it anywhere
Perhaps that answers your question :-).
-Joe
|
3096.147 | | DPDMAI::EYSTER | Livin' on refried dreams... | Thu Jun 08 1995 10:09 | 1 |
| In the states, I believe I saw it now officially two weeks.
|
3096.148 | | IMTDEV::BRUNO | | Thu Jun 08 1995 16:07 | 42 |
| [I have seen no official update on this, and local HR says it is
current.]
BENEFIT SUMMARY
(In addition to the 4 Weeks of Continuous Pay)
1. ADDITIONAL The total TFSO amount will be paid via weekly
TFSO WEEKLY payments. The total amount is equivalent to the
PAYMENTS applicable number of weeks times your weekly gross
base/regular wages for normally scheduled hours of
work less deductions required by law. The applicable
number of weeks is determined in accordance with the
following schedule:
YEARS OF CONTINUOUS # OF WEEKS
REGULAR COMPANY SERVICE
Less than 6 years 4 weeks
of service
6 or more years of 6 weeks
service but less
than 15
15 or more years of 8 weeks
service
2. INSURANCE A continuation of current medical, dental, basic
optional GUL and personal accident life insurance
coverages for the period of the Additional TFSO
Weekly Payments.
3. OUTPLACEMENT Employee may use the support services of Drake, Beam
and Morin (DBM) for a period of six (6) months
after the Friday of Notification Week.
4. PPC PPC (Personal Performance Consultants) is available
for a period of six (6) months beginning immediately
upon notification.
|
3096.149 | Hope that is current | REGENT::NIKOLOFF | STOP Global Whining | Thu Jun 08 1995 17:13 | 11 |
|
Thank you very much....
That is also the last one I received, but have heard
4 weeks, 2 weeks....etc.
again, thank you
Mikki
|