T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3078.1 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed May 18 1994 14:39 | 4 |
| I'd venture to say that they'll be disappointed but will understand that
it's necessary given DEC's losses. It's being billed as a suspension.
If and when we become profitable, they'll be upset if we don't resume
the program.
|
3078.2 | We probably couldn't have afforded anythig to match, anyway | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed May 18 1994 14:49 | 8 |
| Now the real question is whether or not this fall there will be the annual
all-out effort on the part of DIGITAL management to solicit us for
participation in the United Way campaign.
One would hope they'd have the good sense not to be so tacky, but then this
is the new DIGITAL . . .
-Jack
|
3078.3 | | CSC32::C_BENNETT | | Wed May 18 1994 15:02 | 16 |
| First of all, I believe its important to understand that Digital and
its employees have had a long history of supporting worth wild community
projects with matching funds. Digital should be commended for this.
I would imagine that once we pull thru these times this issue will be
reviewed although the fact of the matter is that when times get tuff
these voluntary items are subject to scrutiny. In my opinion the
past goodwill of the company plus the challenges we face to keep this
company afloat outweigh any temporary image issues. I back the Senior
Leadership Team decision.
|
3078.4 | We can't afford to put on a U.W. campaign | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Wed May 18 1994 15:29 | 16 |
| >Now the real question is whether or not this fall there will be the annual
>all-out effort on the part of DIGITAL management to solicit us for
>participation in the United Way campaign.
>One would hope they'd have the good sense not to be so tacky, but then this
>is the new DIGITAL . . .
I agree. The U.W. campaign represents a huge investment of man-hours from
the people putting it on and from the people who read the material and attend
the video showings and meetings. It also represents a significant investment of
paper printing and handling. If Digital can't afford to match employee donations
to U.W., they can't afford to spend this huge sum money on the campaign, even
though most of this expenditure is "hidden".
Also note that, as has been discussed in other topics, the U.W. campaign re-
presents a double standard: Digital can solicit for THIS cause on company time
and with company resources, but nobody can solicit for any other cause.
|
3078.5 | For the birds | CTHQ::DELUCO | Premature Grandparent | Wed May 18 1994 15:29 | 4 |
| Hey, once they cut my holiday turkey I figured *anything* could
happen...(tongue slightly in cheek).
Jim
|
3078.6 | | SUBSYS::NEUMYER | If Bubba can dance, I can too | Wed May 18 1994 16:19 | 11 |
| The UW campaign should be handled very simply. Issue the pledge cards
with the paychecks and anyone wanting to donate will return the pledge
card. All the meetings and other hoopla are unnecessary.
ed
PS. The cancellation of matching funds was also timed so as not to
affect the AIDs walk.
|
3078.7 | | CNTROL::DGAUTHIER | | Wed May 18 1994 16:49 | 5 |
| "You strain for a gnat yet swallow a camel." -JC
Sales/Revenue is the problem, not saving nickles and dimes associated
with a gift matching program.
|
3078.8 | They probably had fun choosing them. | MIMS::GULICK_L | When the impossible is eliminated... | Wed May 18 1994 16:59 | 10 |
|
re: <<< Note 3078.3 by CSC32::C_BENNETT >>>
> First of all, I believe its important to understand that Digital and
> its employees have had a long history of supporting worth wild community
----------
> projects with matching funds. Digital should be commended for this.
:-) :-) Which community was that?
|