T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3072.1 | too much redundancy | CARAFE::GOLDSTEIN | Global Village Idiot | Mon May 16 1994 00:34 | 26 |
| Dan,
There is no "comms admin". You should know that, being in IM&T. There
are many of them. There's a comms czar for the Central States and
Southern region, and one for the northeast and one for the west, in the
US. Then there are other countries. There's also a group (which I am
more closely affiliated with, I think, though you never know) which is
"Corporate" and owns some backbone links.
In terms of redundancy, well, the regional guys hate Corporate so they
put in costly "fractional T1" channels even though Corporate owns and
provides bandwidth multiplexed from T1s; unit bandwidth on a T1 is
roughly a third the price of fractional, but that's external dollars,
and OMS Finance charges back more for the share of a T1 than for a
fractional, so we have TONS of redundancy. Not in service, just
sitting there. THis is a problem that OMS was supposed to fix up, but
has not done, its VP (who's also CIO) preferring, perhaps (I
speculate), to devote more attention to making sure he (part of DC) and
not MCS or other groups own various worldwide groups....
DECnet and IP both follow ONE route at a time between any two sites.
Redundancy is only there for standby, not load-sharing. In Europe, the
backup links have been replaced by ISDN dial-up, which gives the speed
when needed on a per-time-unit basis. We could do that (with Switched
56 where ISDN not available) in the US too; maybe that's going on in
the "territories".
|
3072.2 | Just kidding.... | NPSS::BRANAM | Steve, Network Product Support | Mon May 16 1994 13:51 | 13 |
| DECnet Phase VI will implement a new wireless network layer called floppy
routing, using the latest in high speed floppy-switching technology.
Floppy-switching is primarily a local area technology, dependent on the
latency between user's forefinger and floppy eject button. Wide area floppy
routing uses existing third party terrestrial and airborne common carriers:
USPS, FEDEX, UPS, etc. Floppy-switching currently uses 1.44MB frame sizes,
providing much higher data carrying capacity than such small-frame
technologies as ATM and frame relay. The elimination of all physical
transmission media and intereconnect devices will provide a tremendous
cost-savings to all network users. It is predicted that Digital customers
will rapidly migrate to this new communications architecture. Digital is
already rapidly embracing this technology within its corporate
infrastructure.
|
3072.3 | | ELWOOD::LANE | | Mon May 16 1994 20:30 | 3 |
| re: .-1
AKA SneakerNet (tm)?
|
3072.4 | Don't forget security... | HLDE01::VUURBOOM_R | Roelof Vuurboom @ APD, DTN 829 4066 | Tue May 17 1994 03:02 | 10 |
| re: .-2
In fact, the technology is much further than this. Security
issues are being tackled using a patented highly original
floppy frame fingerprintering (fff) techinque.
Using fff and a specially designed fff proof ink, users can
indivdually fingerprint each floppy frame for a level of
security and user friendliness that far outstrips dated ATM
techniques.
|
3072.5 | The cutting is noticeable for telephone usage already..... | TPSYS::WEST | | Tue May 17 1994 09:44 | 25 |
|
See Note 2804.* for previous information on this issue.
Already I get serious re-order (fast busy, 120 beep/minute)
when I make calls from TAY to the Mill and MKO.... for the
uninformed, this is an indicator of busy trunks or equipment
between buildings...
I dont call them very often, but have a hard time when I do try..
I may have to call two and three more times to get thru...
"I don't think I can feel my toes and fingers anymore, and my
legs are feelings cold......"
"Daisy.... da..isy..... give meeeeeeeee youuuuuuurrrrr
answwwwweeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrr
t
r
u
e.
|
3072.6 | not a planned cutback, just bad planning | CARAFE::GOLDSTEIN | Global Village Idiot | Tue May 17 1994 15:02 | 17 |
| re:.5
I am also in TAY and I know who's in charge so I checked it out.
It's not intentional cutbacks. Back when TAY2 was built, we had just
put in Northern Telecom SL-100 telephones in the GMA; AT&T had little
presence left. We had a contract with NT that set prices for SL-100
parts, upgrades, etc., and it was assumed that new sites in the area
would just add on to the SL-100s (which were sized for growth) with
remote line modules. But TAY's phones were put up for bid. AT&T was
discontinuing an old product (System 85) and had closeout pricing.
They underbid NT. Foolishly, Digital bought it. Now, it's totally out
of capacity. Adding a single additional channel of trunk capacity would
require a costly capital upgrade. We're more likely to throw it out
and put something else in (from closed-site inventory).
On the other hand, with the empty desks soon to show up, we'll probably
not run out of calling capacity so often.
|