T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3017.1 | @@@@@ Ouch! That hurt! @@@@@ | TRACTR::MOODY | | Thu Apr 21 1994 15:02 | 3 |
| It hurt in '88 but it hurts much more in '94.
What are we doing wrong? We've got [had] the best salespeople,service-
people,products and partners. And yet....
|
3017.2 | Pointer please. | GVAADG::PERINO | I assumed it was implicit | Fri Apr 22 1994 07:47 | 8 |
| Since we are at History can somebody give me a pointer to a
fiction written by George VANTREEK (sp?) telling the life and
dead (or rise and decay) of a company which looked very much like
ours. Since Marketing lost its history I do not know were to
go and find it.
Thanks
Jo�l
|
3017.3 | Close enough. | GRANPA::DMITCHELL | | Fri Apr 22 1994 11:35 | 3 |
| How does it go(?).......Those who FAIL to learn from failures in the
past are DOOMED to repeat them.( For Digital
it is over and over and over again.)
|
3017.4 | more tidbits & some suggestions | DNEAST::BEICHMAN_JOH | | Fri Apr 22 1994 12:46 | 111 |
|
Re: .3
Those who do not study historyt are doomed to repeat it...
Spengler???? German philosopher???
Come on guys, somebody out there has a degree in philosophy!
I re-read the whole report yesterday. We included some direct customer
and Digital manager quotations without attribution to give a flavor of
some of the interviews.
Statements made by Digital Managers about their customers during
interviews.
==========================================================
He's a volatile sleezeball.
He's completely inflexible.
He's a hothead.
There's more payback to fixing problems than avoiding them.
Statements made by customers about Digital during confidential interviews
=========================================================================
(I'm not going to list them all, just some of the most interesting
ones)
"Why do I have to do DEC's job for them"
"You are sincere but inept."
"Something is wrong: this is not the Digital I've been doing business
with all these years."
"I have to have two full time people jus to manage your administrative
paperwork."
and my two personal favorites
"The only explanation I can think of for how this sale went is that the
salesman had an undiagnosed brain tumor."
"Digital explains what they won't do, not what they will do."
As my base note stated DIGITAL knew these things a long time ago. Many
of us have worked and our working hard to improve them. But it is such
a struggle against the organization and the processes -- which ARE the
RESPONSIBILITY of MANAGEMENT -- to improve how we treat our customers
that I know if the team was recreated and went out to new customers, we
would still hear similar things.
So where do we go from here?
1) Empowerment of individuals at all levels of the company to do the
right thing.
2) Training of individuals to understand what is the right thing for
both the customer and Digital (see the dinosaur string for an example)
3) A major reduction in the different types of things we sell.
4) Understanding of who we are and what we sell.
1) Empowerment
Those people who work with customers must be able to control the level
of service required. Those people who support those who work with
customers must understand that their job exists solely because of that
customer. Doing the right thing must again be a way of life for Digital
employees. (See Anker's string on renewal)
2) Training in Business Sense
Empowerment works only in context. If every sales rep or first line
manager is driven only by customer satisfacton events then our
customers' failures to plan will constitute emergencies on our parts and
we will gyrate wildly, inefficiently, and unprofitably. ICs & first
line managers must be trained to understand when and how to respond.
3) Reduce the number of things we sell.
The hackneyed phrase here is "return to your core competencies".
Hackneyed but true. We must focus and rebuild credibitility. I was
having a discussion the other day about how big Digital will wind up
being in terms of population. One said 60,000 and another countered
with 40,000. I said it will go to 40,000 IF we don't get to 60,000
fast enough. We must be the proper size to design, build, sell and
deliver profitably what only we can provide the marketplace.
4) Understand who and what we are.
Confusion is rampant within Digital. Guess what: our customers can see
it. Selling anything other than hardware and a small handfull of
software products is a crap shoot -- who knows whether a given software
product will be funded past next quarter? Who knows what delivery
organization will provide what kinds of services?
This point is really a corollary of the previous point. Simplify what
we are so that we can understand it and the marketplace can understand
it. (Certainly a theme in this notesfile has been we lack a vision;
this is another version of that discussion.)
There are other things to say, but's getting late and I'll let others
finish this off
regards,
johnb
|
3017.5 | New element?...sounds familiar. | GLDOA::ROGERS | hard on the wind again | Fri Apr 22 1994 14:48 | 40 |
| copied from an E-mail to me from a compatriot in Switzerland. Neat....
NEW ELEMENT DISCOVERED
The heaviest element known to science was recently discovered by
university physicists. The element, tentatively named
"ADMINISTRATIUM," has no proton or electrons and thus has an atomic
weight of 0. However, it does have one neutron, 70 vice neutrons, and
161 assistant vice neutrons. This gives it an atomic mass of 232.
These 232 particles are held together in a nucleus by a force that
involves the continuous exchange of meson-like particles called morons.
Since it has no electron, Administratium is inert. However, it can be
detected chemically, as it impedes every reaction it comes in contact
with. According to researchers, a minute amount of Administratium,
added to one reaction, caused it to take four days to complete.
Without the Administratium, the reaction ordinarily occurred in less
than one second.
Administratium has a normal half-life of approximately three years, at
which time it does not actually decay, but instead undergoes a
reorganization in which assistant neutrons, vice neutrons and assistant
vice neutrons exchange places. Studies seem to show the atomic number
actually increasing after each reorganization.
Research indicates that Administratium occurs naturally in the
atmosphere. It tends to concentrate in certain locations such as
government agencies, large corporations and universities. It can
usually be found in the newest, best-appointed and best-maintained
buildings.
Scientists warn that Administratium is known to be toxic, and recommend
plenty of fluids and bed rest after even low levels of exposure.
Attempts are being made to determine how administratium can be
controlled to prevent irreversable damage, but results to-date are not
promising.
|
3017.6 | .3/.4=Santayana | POCUS::HUSTON | | Fri Apr 22 1994 14:53 | 1 |
|
|
3017.7 | | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | neck, red as Alabama clay | Fri Apr 22 1994 15:21 | 8 |
|
RE: .5 Seen this ad nauseum. Also the one about Digital order
takers....er I mean sales reps.
Mike (who's been in administration for 8 years and is quite tired of
the abuse)
|
3017.8 | Be Careful...you might need us one day | MSDOA::SCRIVEN | | Fri Apr 22 1994 16:47 | 8 |
| Mike.... I'm with you....
I no longer tolerate the abuse.... I walk away... just like those
order takers do when I tell them we can't book a $1M order with a PO
for $500K.... (and they wonder why 8^})
Toodles....JP
|